From:	VSCHELDE%STEEVAST.RUG.AC.BE <-at-> OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 11:56 N
Subject:	solvation energy

From:	"DR. DOUGLAS A. SMITH, UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO" <DSMITH -x- at -x- uoft02.utoledo.edu>
Date:	03 Nov 1992 08:28:11 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:	Re: MPP vs. workstations?

From:	"DR. DOUGLAS A. SMITH, UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO" <DSMITH ^at^ uoft02.utoledo.edu>
Date:	03 Nov 1992 08:24:58 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:	Re: ECPs, transition metals, and parallel computing

From:	CUNDARIT%MEMSTVX1.BITNET()at()OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 08:19 CDT
Subject:	TMs, parallel computing and ECPs

From:	djh : at : ccl.net (David Heisterberg)
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 1992 09:17:59 -0500
Subject:	MPP vs. workstations?

From:	rs0thp %! at !% RohmHaas.Com (Dr. Tom Pierce)
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 1992 10:05:28 +22305823 (EST)
Subject:	Re: MPP vs. workstations?

From:	Pedro A.M. Vazquez <vazquez-0at0-iqm.unicamp.br>
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 15:08:06 GMT-3:00
Subject:	Re: MPP vs. workstations?

From:	theresa<;at;>si.fi.ameslab.gov (Theresa Windus)
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 12:18:59 CST
Subject:	parallel MOPAC

From:	jas' at 'medinah.atc.ucarb.com
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 1992 13:16:40 -0500
Subject:	Re: MPP vs. workstations?

From:	kpc20 $#at#$ cas.org (Kevin P. Cross Ext. 3192 Room 2209B)
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 14:33:23 EST
Subject:	Re(2): ECPs, transition metals, and parallel computing

From:	berkley-0at0-wubs.wustl.edu (Berkley Shands)
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 15:07:08 -0600
Subject:	MPP vs workstations

From:	jas -8 at 8- medinah.atc.ucarb.com
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 1992 17:00:55 -0500
Subject:	Re: ...parallel computing

From:	Andy Holder <AHOLDER(-(at)-)VAX1.UMKC.EDU>
Date:	03 Nov 1992 16:47:01 -0600 (CST)
Subject:	Conformational energies by Semiempirical methods.

From:	JWTESCH.,at,.DFWVM04.VNET.IBM.COM
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 17:32:15 CST
Subject:	Parallel Clusters

From:	mckelvey %-% at %-% Kodak.COM
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 92 22:21:48 -0500
Subject:	IBM/RS6000 compilers