From:	"Giju Thomas Kalathingal" <gkalathi!at!vub.ac.be>
Date:	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 14:14:02 +0100
Subject:	Summary: Calculations without Born-Oppenheimer approximation "2nd Call"

From:	VITORGE Pierre 094605 <vitorge!at!azurite.cea.fr>
Date:	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 09:49:34 +0100
Subject:	RE: when to take a logarithm of biological activity in QSAR studi

From:	"Jens Spanget-Larsen" <spanget.-at-.virgil.ruc.dk>
Date:	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:19:21 +0100
Subject:	CCL:Summary: Calculations without Born-Oppenheimer approximation "2nd Call"

From:	Stephen Bowlus <chezbowlus!at!goldrush.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:15:39 -0800
Subject:	CCL: when to take a logarithm of biological activity in QSAR studies?

From:	"Yevgeniy Podolyan" <podolyan!at!ccmsi.us>
Date:	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:50:27 -0600
Subject:	special issue of the Structural Chemistry

From:	Rick Venable <rvenable.-at-.pollux.cber.nih.gov>
Date:	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:14:50 -0500
Subject:	Re: CCL:CCL

From:	"Mathias, Paul" <Paul.Mathias.-at-.aspentech.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:20:39 -0500
Subject:	RE: when to take a logarithm of biological activity in QSAR studi

From:	Osman F Guner <osman.-at-.accelrys.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 13:23:40 -0800
Subject:	Fw: QSAR - Hansch Award of the QSAR and Modelling Society