CCL Home Preclinical Pharmacokinetics Service
APREDICA -- Preclinical Service: ADME, Toxicity, Pharmacokinetics
Up Directory CCL July 05, 1993 [004]
Previous Message Month index Next day

From:  rovshan-: at :-atlas.chemistry.uakron.edu (Rovshan G. Sadygov)
Date:  Mon, 5 Jul 93 15:19:41 EDT
Subject:  Oscillator Strength





Dear netters,

I use Argus package to do CI calculations on Ohio Supercomputer.
Transition energies and dipole moments I got are in good agreement
with experiment. I have had hard time to understand results for os-
cillator strength. I thought that sum of oscillator strengths of all
excited states should be equal to 1. But for some states oscillator
strength length is greater than 1. Could anyone recommend me any cor-
responding reference? Thanx.
Rovshan.



From mail Mon Jul  5 19:54:40 1993
Date: 	Mon, 5 Jul 1993 16:31:15 -0400
From: hyper!hurst (Graham Hurst)
Message-Id: <9307052031.AA29310 -AatT- hyper.hyper.com>
To: Gustavo Mercier , chemistry -x- at -x-
ccl.net
Subject: Re:  HONDO and 5 canonical d orbitals

Gustavo Mercier  wrote:

> Does anybody know how to request that HONDO 7 use the
> 5 canonical d orbitals (i.e. dx2-y2 rather than dxx and dyy) instead
> of the default 6 cartesian d orbitals?

Although I am one of the authors of HONDO 7, it's been several years
since I've used it and I don't have the manual at hand.  I recall that
there was no "simple" option to throw away the xx+yy+zz component
and use the 5 canonical d orbitals.  The closest thing that I recall is
a tolerance for throwing away orbitals based on near-zero eigenvalues
of the AO-basis overlap matrix.  I believe that you can set the tolerance
and if you've got a "close" s basis function, you might be able to set
it to a value that only threw away the d xx+yy+zz.  You'd have to check
the output coefficients (Ci) to make sure there was no MO with equal Ci's
for dxx, dyy and dzz, since it might throw away the s instead!
Sorry that I can't recall or think of a better solution.

This test is designed to ensure that linear dependency problems don't arise
when using all 6 cartesian d functions.  My experience was that, with
the notatable exception of Gaussian, it was common to use all 6.
I think many ab initio programs did this since they'd calculated the
integrals anyway, and when they were written basis sets were so small
that the extra s function was not unwelcome.

> Also, I have had some difficult interpreting a line from a paper
> on effective core potentials for transition metals?
> The paper gives the exponents and coefficients for the gaussian
> orbitals that form the pseudoorbitals when used as a minimal basis set.
> It then goes on to state:
> 	"Contracted ""double zeta" [2s2p2d] basis sets can be obtained
> 	by leaving the outermost function uncontracted and by contracting
> 	the remaining inner functions into a single function
> 		ACCORDING TO THE RATIOS (Ci) IN TABLES X-XII"
> The tables are the listing of the exponents and coefficients, Ci's,
> for the minimal basis set.
> Simply, how do you go from the minimal basis set to a double zeta as
> described above? What does the phrase ACCORDING TO THE RATIOS..
> mean?
> Reference: P.J.Hay and W. R. Wadt
> 	   J.Chem.Phys. 82(1) 270-283, 1985
> 	  "Ab initio effective core potentials for molecular calculations.
>           Potentials for the transition metal atoms Sc to Hg"
> Any help would be welcomed

This is easier - just use the Ci's for the contraction coefficients.  I'm
pretty sure that HONDO will normalize them for you (and will print both the
normalized and unnormalized values in the basis set output).  Of course the
"split-out" basis function should have a contraction coefficient of one.

> Thanks
>
> gus
> mercie(-(at)-)cumc.cornell.edu

Hope this helps!

Graham
------------
Graham Hurst
Hypercube Inc, 7-419 Phillip St, Waterloo, Ont, Canada N2L 3X2 (519)725-4040
internet: hurst-: at :-hyper.com


Similar Messages
07/03/1993:  HONDO and 5 canonical d orbitals
07/04/1993:  HONDO and 5 canonical d orbitals
12/10/1995:  basis stes
03/04/1991:  Basis sets intro. Part 1/3
03/04/1991:  Basis sets intro. Part 2/3
09/25/1991:  Re: help for HOMO and LUMO precision
09/12/1996:  Summary: ECPs
08/15/1997:  Re: CCL:ADF: AE-Fit-functions (answer)
05/17/1999:  ab initio basis sets
12/07/1993:  Zinc Basis Sets - Summary (edited)


Raw Message Text