Re: Difficult optimization in MOPAC



 I thank everyone who sent me suggestions on how to optimize the geometry
 of C6H5-COO radical using RHF techniques.   The best suggestion was given
 by Dr John McKelvey.  His solution to the problem is given in the following
 ARC file from MOPAC 93.  The GNORM was reduced to below the pre-specified
 limit of 0.01, which is definitive proof of the validity of the optimization.
 About 5-7 days had been spent on attempting the optimization, without any
 success.
 Within a day of posting the problem, I had received the correct answer.  This
 demonstrates the usefulness of the Net, and the skill of its users.
 Jimmy Stewart
                      SUMMARY OF   PM3   CALCULATION
                                                             MOPAC  93.00
   C7  H5  O2
                                                        Thu Jan 27 09:28:47 1994
     GNORM=0.01 GRADIENTS  PRECISE  PM3 SHIFT=50 EF C.I.=(3,2)
  C6H5-COO(.)
      GEOMETRY OPTIMISED USING EIGENVECTOR FOLLOWING (EF).
      SCF FIELD WAS ACHIEVED
           HEAT OF FORMATION       =       -10.726466 KCAL =    -44.87954 KJ
           ELECTRONIC ENERGY       =     -6178.829220 EV      STATE: DOUBLET B2
           CORE-CORE REPULSION     =      4687.367953 EV
           GRADIENT NORM           =         0.009496
           DIPOLE                  =         4.39069 DEBYE    SYMMETRY:       C2v
           NO. OF FILLED LEVELS    =        22
           AND NO. OF OPEN LEVELS  =         1
           CONFIGURATION INTERACTION WAS USED
           IONIZATION POTENTIAL    =        10.354278 EV
           HOMO (SOMO) LUMO (EV)   =       -10.439 ( -7.018) -0.921
           MOLECULAR WEIGHT        =       121.115
           SCF CALCULATIONS        =        17
           COMPUTATION TIME = 12 MINUTES AND  10.633 SECONDS
           FINAL GEOMETRY OBTAINED                                    CHARGE
     GNORM=0.01 GRADIENTS  PRECISE  PM3 SHIFT=50 EF C.I.=(3,2)
  C6H5-COO(.)
   C    0.00000000  0    0.0000000  0    0.0000000  0    0    0    0     -0.0563
   C    2.78147112  1    0.0000000  0    0.0000000  0    1    0    0     -0.1536
   C    1.39164098  1   60.0624509  1    0.0000000  0    1    2    0     -0.1172
   C    1.39164180  1   60.0622252  1  179.9992100  1    1    2    3     -0.1172
   C    1.39738087  1   60.0816056  1   -0.0001412  1    2    1    3     -0.0343
   C    1.39737820  1   60.0816087  1 -179.9989763  1    2    1    3     -0.0343
   H    1.09548486  1  179.9966649  1 -103.5372856  1    1    2    3      0.1071
   H    1.09537441  1  120.0286616  1 -179.9985171  1    3    1    2      0.1124
   H    1.09537460  1  120.0285221  1  179.9985854  1    4    1    2      0.1124
   H    1.09678871  1  120.1471184  1  179.9997238  1    5    2    1      0.1195
   H    1.09678839  1  120.1472596  1 -179.9983554  1    6    2    1      0.1195
   C    1.47024274  1  179.9997536  1    3.4455962  1    2    1    3      0.4514
   O    1.26492843  1  130.2209371  1 -179.9902413  1   12    2    5     -0.2548
   O    1.26492930  1  130.2194911  1    0.0089828  1   12    2    5     -0.2548
 From billg%scg. at.at  at.at ccl.net  Thu Jan 27 22:45:00 1994
 Received: from mail.barrnet.net  for billg%scg. at.at  at.at ccl.net
 	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id WAA08525; Thu, 27 Jan 1994 22:41:48 -0500
 Received: from fujitsu1.fai.com by mail.barrnet.net (5.67/1.37)
 	id AA18612; Thu, 27 Jan 94 19:41:34 -0800
 Received: from scg.scg.fai.com by fujitsu.fai.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
 	id AA10706; Thu, 27 Jan 94 19:41:13 PST
 Received: by scg.scg.fai.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
 	id AA05161; Thu, 27 Jan 94 19:41:51 PST
 Date: Thu, 27 Jan 94 19:41:51 PST
 From: billg at.at scg.fai.com (Marketing)
 Message-Id: <9401280341.AA05161 at.at scg.scg.fai.com>
 To: admiraal at.at bio.vu.nl
 Subject: Perturbational MO References
 Cc: chemistry at.at ccl.net
 >I need information on using perturbuation theory (? I don't
 >know if this is the correct name)
 >for modelling interactions between organic molecules.
 >Thanks, Alex
 Here are three references on the subject of perturbational
 molecular orbital (PMO) theory.
 1) Dewar, M. J. S., "The Molecular Orbital Theory of
    Organic Chemistry"; McGraw--Hill: New York, 1969.
 2) Fukui, K. Acc. Chem. Res., 1971, vol. 4, p. 57.
 3) Fleming, I. Frontier Orbitals and Organic Chemical
    Reactions"; Wiley-Interscience: London.
 I believe there is also a good reference by L. Salem
 which I cannot recall.
 PMO theory had its halcyon days about 20 years ago
 before computational chemistry codes and platforms were
 widely available. Today variational semiempirical (e.g., MNDO
 PM3, etc.) codes are often used instead since they can
 locate transition states (at least in principle) and
 even entire reaction pathways. Yet, for sheer insight into
 many types of concerted reactions, PMO theory offers a lot of
 bang for the buck!
 *********************************************************************
 * William A. Glauser, Ph.D.     |    Internet:  billg at.at scg.fai.com   *
 * Computational Chemist         |    Voice:     (610) 436-8125      *
 * SuperComputer Group           |    FAX:       (610) 430-1526      *
 * Fujitsu America, Inc.         |-----------------------------------*
 * 1564 McDaniel Drive           |                                   *
 * West Chester, PA 19380        |                                   *
 *********************************************************************