From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Sat Mar 4 21:24:51 2000 Received: from email.guomai.sh.cn (cflrozwkyk@e4000.guomai.sh.cn [202.96.206.72]) by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA17509 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2000 21:24:50 -0500 Received: from guomai.sh.cn ([202.101.13.191]) by email.guomai.sh.cn (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.07.30.00.05.p8) with ESMTP id <0FQX00ENPDAG6T@email.guomai.sh.cn> for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net; Sun, 5 Mar 2000 09:25:28 +0800 (CST) Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 09:17:24 +0800 From: Yubo Fan Subject: What is Power1, Power2 or Power3? To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net Message-id: <38C1B5A4.A3F2522C@guomai.sh.cn> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en Hi, We have a 16 nodes RS/6000 cluster. The cpus installed in it are Powerpc 604e. Does this kind of cpu belong to Power1, Power2 or Power3? And could someone tell me what is power1, Power2 or Power3 and the difference between them? Thanks in advance. Y. Fan -- ============================================================= Yubo Fan Email: yubofan@guomai.sh.cn Organic Synthesis Lab The Department of Chemistry Fudan University Phone: 8621-65648139 No. 220 Handan Road Fax: 8621-65641740 Shanghai, 200433 P. R. China ============================================================= From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Sun Mar 5 09:58:37 2000 Received: from anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.91]) by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA21322 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2000 09:58:36 -0500 Received: from chmqst.demon.co.uk ([158.152.83.101] helo=daisy) by anchor-post-33.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 12RbTT-0000Ox-0X; Sun, 5 Mar 2000 13:53:35 +0000 From: "David Livingstone" Organization: ChemQuest To: Daniel Severance Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2000 13:53:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: CCL:QSTR Reply-to: davel@chmqst.demon.co.uk CC: chemistry@server.ccl.net X-Confirm-Reading-To: davel@chmqst.demon.co.uk X-pmrqc: 1 Priority: normal In-reply-to: <15189A4705A8D31189B700805F85410B1D805E@sdnt1> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12a) Message-Id: Hi Daniel, > Hi, > Is there a standard data set that people use for generating models to > predict QSTR (Quantitative Structure Toxicity Relationships)? If so, where > does one get this data? The nearest thing you will find to a standard set (as far as I know) is any published set where the data is listed or the source acknowledged. There are various databases more or less publicly available but no recognised "standard" sets. > I'm also interested in information on QSPR (Property Relationships) and > datasets for that (Solubility, Permeability, etc.). Again, as far as I know, the same situation holds for QSPR sets. There are some QSAR datasets posted on the QSAR and Modelling Society website: http://www.pharma.ethz.ch/qsar/ I hope this helps. Dave. ------------------------------------------------------------------ D.J. Livingstone ChemQuest Delamere House, 1 Royal Crescent, Sandown. Isle of Wight UK PO36 8LZ Phone & Fax: +44 (0)1983 401793 e-mail davel@chmqst.demon.co.uk http://www.chmqst.demon.co.uk ------------------------------------------------------------------ From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Sun Mar 5 08:23:55 2000 Received: from hotmail.com (f68.law4.hotmail.com [216.33.149.68]) by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA20995 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2000 08:23:54 -0500 Received: (qmail 92982 invoked by uid 0); 5 Mar 2000 12:16:55 -0000 Message-ID: <20000305121655.92981.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 212.29.216.97 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Sun, 05 Mar 2000 04:16:55 PST X-Originating-IP: [212.29.216.97] From: "C. Yang" To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net Subject: authorship Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 12:16:55 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Yesterday, I happen to have a dinner with some biology people. Someone showed the first draft of her paper and I noticed for the first time that there was an astrix on two authors with a footnote saying equal contributors. Then there was an argument that mentioning equal contributors is common in publishing papers. But I do not remember seeing as equal contributiors in computational chemistry papers. I tried to tell that it might be common in biology, but someone vehemently disagreed with me and arguing that it is common in science and nature as well, so it is common in all the areas. Is there someone to make comment on this. Thanks. Parthi PS: if two authors have equal contribution, will it be considered both as primary authors and can the second author who is also an equal contributor can write his name as first author of the paper in his CV. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com