From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Mon Mar  6 03:49:37 2000
Received: from tigris.klte.hu (tigris.klte.hu [193.6.138.33])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA25222
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 03:49:33 -0500
Received: from anti07 (193.6.133.59) by tigris.klte.hu (MX V5.1-A Vn6f) with
          SMTP for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 08:46:13 +0100
Message-ID: <004701bf873f$ffc12280$3b8506c1@chem.klte.hu>
From: "Tamas E. Gunda" <tamasgunda@tigris.klte.hu>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
References: <10756.000303@mnc.md>
Subject: Re: CCL:XRay -> Cartesian coordinates
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 08:45:52 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200

There are several utilities to convert fractional coordinates to Cartesian
ones.
The input needs beyond the coordinates the crystal cell data
alpha, beta, gamma, a, b,  and c.
You may want to use Mol2Mol or Babel for the conversion, both
supports a few standard formats and user-made free format. Several
true modeling softwares can also made the conversion.

Tamas Gunda

> | Dear chemistry,
> I found XRay data in journal in following format. How could I
> convert'em into cartesian coordinates?
>
> --- cut ---
> Atomic coordinates (x10^4)...
> Atom        X/a        Y/b        Z/c        Ueq
>  Ni       10000    2964(1)       3500      422(4)
> >...
and
>Hi All,

>I have also same question like Mike <mike@mnc.md>.

>How to convert X-ray coordiantes to conventional
>Cartesian coordinates or Internal coordiantes?

>Sincerely,

>Tapan Ghanty





Dr Tamas E. Gunda
Research Group for Antibiotics of the Hungarian Acad. Sci.
L. Kossuth University, POBox 36
H-4010 Debrecen, Hungary
tel.: (+36-52) 316666/2472
fax: (+36-52) 512914
e-mail: tamasgunda@tigris.klte.hu
home-page: www.klte.hu/~gundat/gunda.htm

----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Peleah <mike@mnc.md>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 5:09 PM
Subject: CCL:XRay -> Cartesian coordinates


> +======================---------------- --- -- -  -   -     -        .
> | Dear chemistry,
> :
> >.
>
> I found XRay data in journal in following format. How could I
> convert'em into cartesian coordinates?
>
> --- cut ---
> Atomic coordinates (x10^4)...
> Atom        X/a        Y/b        Z/c        Ueq
>  Ni       10000    2964(1)       3500      422(4)
> >...
> --- cut ---
>
> Best regards,
>  Mike                          mailto:mike@mnc.md
>                                                                      .
>                                                                      :
>                                                                      |
> >.        -     -   -  - -- --- ----------------======================+
>
>
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody    |   CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To
Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net
70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan:
jkl@ccl.net
>
>
>
>
>
>


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Mon Mar  6 10:32:56 2000
Received: from SEMOVM.SEMO.EDU (semovm.semo.edu [150.201.1.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA27806
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 10:32:55 -0500
Received: from tony [150.201.19.145] by SEMOVM.SEMO.EDU (IBM VM SMTP Level 310) via TCP with SMTP ; Mon, 06 Mar 2000 08:24:01 CST
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000306082739.007f4330@semovm.semo.edu>
X-Sender: ajduben@semovm.semo.edu
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 08:27:39 -0600
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: "Anthony J. Duben" <ajduben@semovm.semo.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:authorship
In-Reply-To: <20000305121655.92981.qmail@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 12:16 PM 3/5/00 GMT, C. Yang wrote:
>Yesterday, I happen to have a dinner with some biology people.
>Someone showed the first draft of her paper and I noticed for the
>first time that there was an astrix on two authors with a footnote
>saying equal contributors. Then there was an argument that mentioning
>equal contributors  is common in publishing papers. But I do not
>remember seeing as equal contributiors in computational chemistry
>papers. I tried to tell that it might be common in biology, but someone
>vehemently disagreed with me and arguing that it is common in science and
>nature as well, so it is common in all the areas. Is there someone to make
>comment on this. Thanks.
>Parthi
>
>PS: if two authors have equal contribution, will it be considered both
>as primary authors and can the second author who is also an equal
>contributor can write his name as first author of the paper in his CV.
>______________________________________________________
>
>
>


Sounds to me like the authors are working in fairly hostile environment
for tenure and promotion.  

Anthony J. Duben (ajduben@semovm.semo.edu)
********************************************************
Anthony J. Duben
Professor and Chairman
Computer Science Dept., MS 5950
Southeast Missouri State University
1 University Plaza
Cape Girardeau MO 63701-4799
phone:  573-651-2194
fax:         573-651-2791 
e-mail: ajduben@semovm.semo.edu
  or        c867buc@semovm.semo.edu

"Education is not the filling of a pail
  but the lighting of a fire."
		  -- William Butler Yeats
		


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Mon Mar  6 11:51:02 2000
Received: from ivory.trentu.ca (trentu.ca [192.75.12.103])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA28374
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 11:51:02 -0500
Received: from trentu.ca ([204.225.13.50]) by trentu.ca (PMDF V5.2-32 #29543)
 with ESMTP id <01JMPKDTZB44002HPZ@trentu.ca> for chemistry@ccl.net; Mon,
 6 Mar 2000 10:45:32 EST
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 10:49:18 -0500
From: elewars <elewars@trentu.ca>
Subject: SEMIEMPIRICAL REVIEWS--SOME ADDITIONS
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <38C3D37D.4400C0E2@trentu.ca>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Accept-Language: en

Mon 2000 March 6

Hello,  here are 4 additions to my summary of semiempirical reviews;
again, thanks very much.

QUESTION
If anyone knows of a *recent* (1995 or later) review of semiempirical>
In case u r interested,
methods, including or devoted to AM1 and PM3, I would  appreciate
receiving the reference.
(I looked in the CCL archives first; no luck).

Thanks very much
============
4 more answers:
#1

Qiang Cui <qiang@tammy.harvard.edu>
I'd recommend the following review:

>     Perspectives on semi-empirical molecular orbital theory, W. Thiel,
Adv. Chem.
> Phys. Vol, XCIII, 1996.

========
#2

> Although regarded by many as unqualified to offer a review of AM1
> and PM3, by reason of presumed bias, I nevertheless feel that some
> factual input on this topic would be useful.
>
> For a list of known faults, average errors in heats of formation,
> geometries, etc. in MNDO, AM1, and PM3, please look in
>
> http://www.schrodinger.com/Mopac/html/node656.html
>
> or
>
> http://home.att.net/~mopacmanual/node656.html
>
> My objective in writing AM1 and PM3 was to reduce the error in
> computed quantities, including hydrogen bonds.  This was partly
> successful in AM1 - the geometry of the water dimer was incorrect,
> and partly successful in PM3 - the shape of the PES was incorrect.
>
> Jimmy Stewart
>
>                       ( @ @ )
>
.-------------oOOo----(_)----oOOo-------------------------------------.
>   | James J. P. Stewart
|                                   |
>   | Stewart Computational Chemistry | E-mail:
jstewart@fujitsu.com     |
>   | 15210 Paddington Circle         | WWW:
http://home.att.net/~MrMOPAC |
>   | Colorado Springs CO 80921-2512
|                                   |
>   | USA               .ooo0         | Phone: USA +(719)
488-9416        |
>   |                   (   )   Oooo.
|                                   |
>   .--------------------\ (----(
)-------------------------------------.
>                         \_)    ) /
>                               (_/

=========
#3
David Gallagher <dgallagher@fujitsu.com>

In case anyone is interested, Jimmy Stewart, author of MOPAC, will be
talking about the evolution of semi-empirical codes and the latest
developments in MOPAC at the MOPAC User Group meeting at the ACS,
Saturday
25th March 1.30pm, Argent Hotel, 50 Third Street, San Francisco. Details

are available at http://www.schrodinger.com/Forms/mopac_ugm.html

David Gallagher
Fujitsu
===========
#4

AM <amasunov@shiva.hunter.cuny.edu>

Hi!
Saw your posting on CCL
Hope this hepls.

Artem

Here is a ref:


    Hydrogen bonds: a comparison of semiempirical and ab initio
treatments

    Dannenberg, J. J.
    THEOCHEM (1997), 401(3), 279-286

    H-bonding interactions calcd. using the AM1, PM3 and SAM1
semiempirical MO methods are compared with the best available ab initio
calcns. for
    several intermol. interactions of interest: AcOH dimers, H2O-C2H2,
H2O-HCN, HCHO-C2H2, HCHO-HCN, O3-C2H2, O3-HCN,
    (MeCO)2CH2, melamine-cyanuric acid, and MeNO2-NH3. Exptl. values are

also presented where available. The energetic comparisons are based
    upon enthalpies of interaction from the ab initio calcns. after
counterpoise and vibrational corrections are applied. Overall, AM1 seems

to do best,
    except for O-H.cntdot..cntdot..cntdot.O interactions, where none of
the 3 methods excel.
============







From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Mon Mar  6 14:11:05 2000
Received: from mserv3.dl.ac.uk (root@mserv3.dl.ac.uk [148.79.80.28])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA29061
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 14:11:04 -0500
Received: from mserv1.dl.ac.uk (root@mserv1.dl.ac.uk [148.79.160.65])
	by mserv3.dl.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3/[ref postmaster@dl.ac.uk]) with ESMTP id SAA15175
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 18:06:30 GMT
Received: from dl.ac.uk (tca8.dl.ac.uk [193.62.112.106]) by mserv1.dl.ac.uk with ESMTP id SAA16063
	(8.8.8/5.4[ref postmaster@dl.ac.uk] for dl.ac.uk from h.j.j.vandam@dl.ac.uk); Mon, 6 Mar 2000 18:05:35 GMT
Precedence: first-class
Sender: H.J.J.VanDam@dl.ac.uk
Message-ID: <38C3F08A.F16C3E7@dl.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 17:53:14 +0000
From: Huub van Dam <h.j.j.vandam@dl.ac.uk>
Organization: CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; OSF1 V4.0 alpha)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Summary Datamanagement Question
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear all,

Recently I asked the question below and I would like to summarize the
one answer I got with many thanks to Ferenc Csizmadia.

Best regards, Huub

Question:
=======

I have been asked to give a talk on scientific data management to bring
forward the requirements of the chemical community. So I would like to
invite any comments or references on topics like:

- Datastorage: What data do we need to store, how much of it and for how

long?
- Interoperability: Different data formats and programs and to make
everything (not) work together.
- Visualisation: What and how to visualise (and what does it show)?
- Analysis: Storing tons of data is one thing but how to extract
meaningful information from all that? What kind of analysis do we want
to do?
- Any other aspect that comes to mind.

Reply:
=====

Dear Huub,

We apply the following principles at ChemAxon:
- the data management system should work in every OS
- the all data should be stored in (one or more) SQL capable
relational database(s)
- the system should communicate with the database engine through
a standard interface.
- (if possible) the data should be displayed in HTML format, so
the queries could be handled from browsers.
These requirements can be satisfied using the Java programming
language. The standard interface to the databases can be JDBC.
HTML pages can be generated by JSP (Java Server Pages) scripts.
We created JChem, a Java development tool for creating custom
systems that handle chemical structures (http://www.jchem.com).
Similar solutions can also be applied to other types of
scientific data.





--

========================================================================

Huub van Dam                               E-mail: h.j.j.vandam@dl.ac.uk
CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory                  phone: +44-1925-603362
Daresbury, Warrington                         fax: +44-1925-603634
Cheshire, UK
WA4 4AD

========================================================================





From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Mon Mar  6 14:53:09 2000
Received: from hermes.iupui.edu (hermes.iupui.edu [134.68.220.31])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA29251
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 14:53:08 -0500
Received: from macgw.chem.iupui.edu (macgw.chem.iupui.edu [134.68.137.71])
	by hermes.iupui.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/1.2IUPUIPO) with SMTP id NAA18973
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 6 Mar 2000 13:47:48 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <n1259771190.71421@macgw.chem.iupui.edu>
Date: 6 Mar 2000 13:59:46 -0500
From: "Boyd" <boyd@chem.iupui.edu>
Subject: Gordon Conference announcement!
To: "OSC CCL" <chemistry@ccl.net>
X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP for Quarterdeck Mail; Version 4.1.0

Hi CCLers,

The Gordon Research Conference on Computational Chemistry will be held 
this year at Queen's College, Oxford, England,  2-7 July 2000.

Attendance is limited, and the conference is always oversubscribed.
Apply early.  Presentation of a contributed poster paper counts heavily 
toward acceptance.  Apply online at http://www.grc.uri.edu/

The Chair of this year's conference is Dr. Terry R. Stouch, Computer-Assisted 
Drug Design, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute
P.O. Box 5400, Princeton, NJ 08543-5400 USA
Email Stouch@bms.com   Tel: (609)818-5442   Fax: (609)252-6030 or
(609)818-3560

The Vice-Chair is Dr. Bernard R. Brooks, Bldg 12A, Room 2041, NIH, Bethesda, 
MD 20892-5626, USA
Tel. 301-496-0148  Office, 301-496-6889 Lab, Fax 301-496-2172
Email: brbrooks@helix.nih.gov

Topics:

Bioinformatics, Chemoinformatics, Computational Advances, Drug Design,
Force Fields, Free Energy Simulations, Hardware and Systems,
Mesoscale Modeling, Molecular Simulations, Quantum Chemistry,
Quantum Mechanics/Molecular Mechanics, Solvation, Structural Biology

Invited speakers and participants include:

John A. Pople, Nobel Laureate, Northwestern University
Walter Kohn, Nobel Laureate, University of California, Santa Barbara
Martin Karplus, Harvard University
Charles L. Brooks, The Scripps Research Institute
Peter A. Kollman, University of California, San Francisco
Peter Goodford, Oxford University, UK
James J. P. Stewart, author of MOPAC and MOZYME
Liem X. Dang, Pacific Northwest National Lab
Dominic J. Tildesley, Unilever Research, UK
Dennis J. Underwood, DuPont Pharmaceuticals
Martyn Guest, Daresbury Laboratory, UK
Michael K. Gilson, Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology
Ron Elber, Cornell University
Thomas Halgren, Schroedinger, Inc.
Ursula Rothlisberger, ETH Zentrum, Switzerland
Herman Berendsen, University of Groningen
Jeffrey Madura, Duquesne University
Jiali Gao, University of Minnesota
Julia Goodfellow, School of Crystallography, University of London
Martin Head-Gordon, University of California, Berkeley
Michael Levitt, Stanford University School of Medicine
Nohad Gresh, Faculte de Pharmacie de Paris
Wilfred F. van Gunsteren, ETH Zentrum, Switzerland

For further information, see
http://www.grc.uri.edu/programs/2000/compchem.htm

Thanks and see you in Oxford, Don

Donald B. Boyd, Ph.D.
Editor, Reviews in Computational Chemistry
	http://chem.iupui.edu/rcc/rcc.html
Editor, Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
	(publication of the ACS COMP division and MGMS)
	http://chem.iupui.edu/~boyd/jmgm.html
Department of Chemistry
Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis
E-mail boyd@chem.iupui.edu


