From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Apr 25 10:42:42 2000
Received: from NPD1.NPD.UFPE.BR (npd1.npd.ufpe.br [150.161.6.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA04344
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 10:42:06 -0400
Received: from Alfredo ([150.161.5.112]) by npd.ufpe.br (PMDF V5.1-4 #20469)
 with SMTP id <01JONGSEV1WG0001VH@npd.ufpe.br> for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net; Tue,
 25 Apr 2000 11:38:12 GMT-3
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 11:33:52 -0300
From: Alfredo Mayall Simas <ams@npd.ufpe.br>
Subject: RES: Semi empirical parameterisation for Transition elements
In-reply-to: <10004191632.ZM17941@wavefun.com>
To: yu@wavefun.com
Cc: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Message-id: <NDBBKFACEKIKMDIDBDGCKEDBCBAA.ams@npd.ufpe.br>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3

Dear Yu,

Please consider using our Sparkle model which is a simple and very cost
effective way of determining the geometries of metal complexes.
Our model was introduced in 1994 ("Sparkle model for the quantum chemical
AM1 calculation of europium complexes", Chem. Phys. Lett., 227(3) 349-353,
1994) for the purpose of obtaining geometries of lanthanide complexes. At
the time we observed it could also be used to determine the geometries of d
element complexes as well. Since then it has been used for determining not
only geometries, but also electronic spectra, for the design of luminescent
complexes, etc.
Cundari and Saunders have also extended it to other elements.
More recently, Puchta and Hommes showed that it could be used for gallium,
iron
and lead complexes as well [J. Mol. Model. 6(2) 126-132, 2000].
The title of their paper is suggestive:
"Exploring {2}-metallacryptands and {2}-metallacryptates with quantum
chemical methods - When (not only) computer chemists' dreams come true"

We are also in the proces of creating a site explaining how to use our
sparkle model. Although it is still in construction it may be of some help.

http://sites.netscape.net/SparkleMetals

Sincerely,
Alfredo Mayall Simas
DQF/CCEN
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Recife, PE, Brazil





-----Mensagem original-----
De: Computational Chemistry List [mailto:chemistry-request@ccl.net]Em
nome de yu@wavefun.com
Enviada em: Quarta-feira, 19 de Abril de 2000 20:32
Para: scott.l.owens@bnfl.com
Cc: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Assunto: CCL:Semi empirical parameterisation for Transition elements


On Apr 19,  2:45pm, scott.l.owens@bnfl.com wrote:
> Subject: CCL:Semi empirical parameterisation for Transition elements
> Hi there all,
>
> I am interested in modelling some transition metal complexes using
> MOPAC2000, however the parameter set for these elements is pretty meagre.
> Are there any resources for these semi-empirical parameters as there are
> for the basis sets (as in the PNL database). If not is there anyone who
has
> parameters who would be willing to let them "go public".
> Will summarise any responses for the list.
>
> Scott Owens
> slo1@bnfl.com

We, Wavefunction, do have semiempirical parameters covering almost all
transition metels, and anybody can download them from our ftp side
(ftp.wavefun.com). But I don't know whether our parameters match the methods
used in MOPAC2000. If it doesn't, our SPARTAN series would be a natural
choice.

Jianguo Yu


--
+-----------------------+------------------+-------------------------+
|Jianguo Yu, Ph.D.      |  ______________  | E-Mail: yu@wavefun.com  |
|Computational Chemist  |  \  _________ /  | Phone:  (949)955-2120   |
|Wavefunction Inc.      |   \ \\\\\\\\/    | Fax:    (949)955-2118   |
|18401 Von Karman       |    \ \\\\\/      | "The doctrines observe  |
|Suite 370              |     \ \\/        |  nature"                |
|Irvine, CA 92612       |      \/          |   Lao-tzu (604-531 B.C.)|
+----------------------http://www.wavefun.com------------------------+

-= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody    |   CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To
Admins
MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net






From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Apr 25 11:54:08 2000
Received: from ccl.net (atlantis.ccl.net [192.148.249.4])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA04703
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 11:53:55 -0400
Received: from email.nist.gov (email.nist.gov [129.6.2.7])
	by ccl.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/OSC 2.0) with ESMTP id LAA00937
	for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 11:49:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from feldmann.nist.gov (feldmann.nist.gov [129.6.178.78])
	by email.nist.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA06198;
	Tue, 25 Apr 2000 11:48:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (chem@localhost)
	by feldmann.nist.gov (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA05317;
	Tue, 25 Apr 2000 11:30:30 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 11:30:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steve Heller <chem@feldmann.nist.gov>
To: lists <ACSMEDI@LISTS.WAYNE.EDU>, amber@cgl.ucsf.edu,
        APPLSPEC@listserv.uga.edu, cache@pacificu.edu,
        CHEMCHAT@UAFSYSB.UARK.EDU, CHEME-L@ULKYVM.LOUISVILLE.EDU,
        CHEMED-L@atlantis.uwf.edu, CHEMIG@LIST.NIH.GOV,
        CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net, CHMINF-L@LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU,
        ICS-L@UMDD.UMD.EDU, isisforum-l@mdli.com, ISOGEOCHEM@LIST.UVM.EDU,
        listproc@msi.com, listserver@ic.ac.uk, mailbase@mailbase.ac.uk,
        MOL-DIVERSITY@LISTSERV.ARIZONA.EDU,
        molecular-dynamics-news@mailbase.ac.uk, NATODATA@CC1.KULEUVEN.AC.BE,
        pdb-l@rcsb.org, PHILCHEM@VM.SC.EDU, PLASMACHEM-L@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU,
        POLYMER@TECHUNIX.TECHNION.AC.IL, SAFETY@LIST.UVM.EDU,
        spectroscopy-group@mailbase.ac.uk, ToxList@esc.syrres.com,
        ucair-lib@twu.edu
Subject: ChemInt2000 - Poster Submission
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.1000425112734.5298E-100000@feldmann.nist.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


This is just a short note to remind eveyone that the web Abstract
Submission deadline for papers to be considered for ChemInt2000 oral
presentations is June 1, 2000. The web submission form is operational for
the Chemistry and the Internet (ChemInt2000) meeting being held in at
Georgetown University in Washington DC on September 23-26, 2000.

The draft program of invited speakers, workshops, markup langauge
tutorial, and panel sessions is available on the meeting web site:

http://www.chemint.org

You are urged to look at the program and to consider submitting a
poster paper to the meeting.  Some 8-10 of poster papers will be selected
for oral presentation at the meeting.

The main lecturers for the meeting will be:

Rene DePlanque, FIZ - Berlin
Jim Myers, Pacific Northwest Labs
Glen Hopkinson, Synopsys Scientific Systems
Wolf-Dietrich Ihlenfeldt, University of Erlangen-Nurenberg
Jim Ostell, NIH/NLM/NCBI
Engelbert Zass, ETH
Henry Rzepa, Imperial College, London
Peter Murray-Rust, Nottingham University


Technical Sponsors are:

ACS CINF Division
ACS COMP Division
The Chemical Structure Association (CSA)
Georgetown University - Department of Chemistry
Special Libraries Association (SLA) Chemistry Division
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)


Steve Heller



Steve Heller, Guest Researcher
NIST/SRD, Mail Stop: 820/113
820 Diamond Avenue, Room 101
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-2310 USA
E-mail:  chem@feldmann.nist.gov


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Apr 25 13:38:06 2000
Received: from dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br (dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br [150.164.65.10])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA05382
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 13:38:03 -0400
Received: from localhost (rkrocha@localhost)
	by dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA50171
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 14:33:08 -0300
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 14:33:07 -0300 (BSC)
From: ramon kleber da rocha <rkrocha@dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br>
Reply-To: ramon kleber da rocha <rkrocha@dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br>
To: Computational Chemistry Mailing List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: looking for a code
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.96.1000424200130.75417A-100000@dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


	Hi CCLers,
	I am looking for a program able to perform free energy
calculations based on Perturbation Method or Thermodynamic Integration or
simular one. Our goal is to simulate the interaction between small organic
molecules and DNA with water molecules explicity, because of it that
program must support some requirements: 
 
1) it should run within several processors (SP2 machines)
2) it should support amber force field 
3) it should support particle mesh ewald summation (or derivated) on
nonbond contribution in that kind of simulation.
	Does anybody knows any code that can do that? I'll be thankfull
for any suggestions. I will summarize the replies.
	Thank you in advance.

________________________________________________________________________________
Ramon Kleber da Rocha, MSc.                                VOICE +55-31-499-5765
e-mail rkrocha@dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br                         FAX   +55-31-499-5700

Laboratorio de QSAR e Modelagem Molecular 
Nucleo de Estudos em Quimica Medicinal - NEQUIM - http://www.qui.ufmg.br/~nequim
Departamento de Quimica - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais -  (DQ/ICEx/UFMG)
---
The World is my Fatherland, Science is my Religion. Christiaan Huygens 1629-1695
________________________________________________________________________________



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Apr 25 13:42:05 2000
Received: from quim.iq.usp.br (quim.iq.usp.br [143.107.46.101])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA05436
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 13:41:57 -0400
Received: (from sjardino@localhost)
	by quim.iq.usp.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA17731;
	Tue, 25 Apr 2000 14:22:19 -0300 (EST)
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 14:22:18 -0300 (EST)
From: Sergio Augusto Jardino Filho <sjardino@iq.usp.br>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Error in Gaussian`98
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1000425141816.17605A-100000@quim>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by server.ccl.net id NAA05440

Hi,

Does anyone can help me with a error message from
CBS-4M of Gaussian98?
The message is the following:

Initial guess read from the checkpoint file:
 sp1.chk4
 Guess basis functions will be translated to current atomic coordinates.
 Logic error in ReDoC1: IndI= 284 but NBasI= 297.
 Error termination via Lnk1e in /usr/local/g98/l401.exe.

I will be grateful with any help or advice.
Thanks in advance.

Sergio A. Jardino F¼
Instituto de Quimica
Universidade de Sao Paulo
Brazil


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Apr 25 17:19:45 2000
Received: from ncisun1-nf0.ncifcrf.gov (fcs280s.NCIFCRF.GOV [129.43.1.11])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA06528
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 17:19:44 -0400
Received: from fcindy5.NCIFCRF.GOV (fcindy5.NCIFCRF.GOV [129.43.50.12])
	by ncisun1-nf0.ncifcrf.gov (8.10.0/8.10.0) with SMTP id e3PLJhu12062
	for <@fcs280s.NCIFCRF.GOV:chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 17:19:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fcindy5.NCIFCRF.GOV (950413.SGI.8.6.12/911001.SGI)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id RAA01827; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 17:17:15 -0400
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 17:17:15 -0400
From: catfee@fcindy5.NCIFCRF.GOV (CATFEE)
Message-Id: <200004252117.RAA01827@fcindy5.NCIFCRF.GOV>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: CATFEE: Drug Design Challenge
Reply-To: catfee@fcindy5.NCIFCRF.GOV


                           *** CATFEE ***

       CALL FOR TARGETS AND START OF THE PREDICTION SEASON

  Critical Assessment of Techniques for Free Energy Evaluation
            Asilomar, California, December 7-9, 2000
                http://uqbar.ncifcrf.gov/~catfee/

CATFEE is a challenge  and meeting designed to assess and discuss
the techniques employed in computer assisted drug  design efforts.
Organized  along the lines of previous  challenges (CASP), CATFEE
will provide the opportunity to  modelers and experimentalists to
test new algorithms  and evaluate established techniques used for
the prediction of binding free energies.

We are  building a  database of  previously  unpublished  binding
affinities. If you have data you wish to make available to CATFEE
you   may   use   the   auto- deposition   form    available   at
http://uqbar.ncifcrf.gov/~catfee/ or contact us for details.

Pre-registration is open at http://uqbar.ncifcrf.gov/~catfee/


Raul E.Cachau     (NCI-SAIC)
Krzysztof Fidelis (LLNL)
Adrian E.Roitberg (NIST-Geo Centers)

Critical Assessment of Techniques for Free Energy Evaluation,
CATFEE, Asilomar, California, USA; December 2000

e-Mail: catfee@uqbar.ncifcrf.gov;
e-Fax/e-Voice: USA-(323)-9965699
WWW: http://uqbar.ncifcrf.gov/~catfee/

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Apr 25 18:31:33 2000
Received: from ivory.trentu.ca (trentu.ca [192.75.12.103])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA06888
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 18:31:32 -0400
Received: from trentu.ca ([204.225.13.50]) by trentu.ca (PMDF V5.2-32 #29543)
 with ESMTP id <01JONV7QRADK009FPP@trentu.ca> for chemistry@ccl.net; Tue,
 25 Apr 2000 18:31:25 EDT
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 18:35:22 -0400
From: elewars <elewars@trentu.ca>
Subject: van der Waals SURFACES/ELECTRON DEN
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <39061DAA.E9D88A8D@trentu.ca>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Accept-Language: en

2000 April 25

Hello,

I once read somewhere that an isosurface that encloses 97% of the total
electron density of a molecule corresponds best to the experimental van
der Waals surface.

(1) Has anyone a reference to this, or to any percentage of the electron
density?
(2) Is it correct to say that the usual way to measure the "van der
Waals size" of a molecule is by X-ray diffraction (the molecules in a
crystal being considered to be in contact)?

Thanks.

E. Lewars
======


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Apr 25 20:03:11 2000
Received: from mail.rpi.edu (root@mail.rpi.edu [128.113.100.7])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA07315
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 20:03:11 -0400
Received: from brenemanP2.chem.rpi.edu (rts16p13.xyp.rpi.edu [128.113.30.142])
	by mail.rpi.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA09716;
	Tue, 25 Apr 2000 20:03:04 -0400
Message-ID: <3906323D.52CD@rpi.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 20:03:09 -0400
From: "Prof. Curt M. Breneman" <brenec@rpi.edu>
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04 (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: elewars <elewars@trentu.ca>
CC: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:van der Waals SURFACES/ELECTRON DEN
References: <39061DAA.E9D88A8D@trentu.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

elewars wrote:
> 
> 2000 April 25
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I once read somewhere that an isosurface that encloses 97% of the total
> electron density of a molecule corresponds best to the experimental van
> der Waals surface.
> 
> (1) Has anyone a reference to this, or to any percentage of the electron
> density?
> (2) Is it correct to say that the usual way to measure the "van der
> Waals size" of a molecule is by X-ray diffraction (the molecules in a
> crystal being considered to be in contact)?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> E. Lewars
> ======
> 
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody    |   CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net

There is one convention that says that for condensed phases, the Van der
Waals surface is approximated by a 0.002 e/au3 isosurface, while the gas
phase VdW surface is represented by the 0.001 e/au3 isosurface.

Curt Breneman
RPI Chemistry

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Apr 25 21:40:52 2000
Received: from mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA (mattacf@mcmail.CIS.McMaster.CA [130.113.64.66])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA07792
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 21:40:52 -0400
Received: from localhost (mattacf@localhost)
        by mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA  with ESMTP id VAA27671;
        Tue, 25 Apr 2000 21:40:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 21:40:42 -0400 (EDT)
From: "C.F. Matta" <mattacf@mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA>
To: elewars <elewars@trentu.ca>
cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:van der Waals SURFACES/ELECTRON DEN
In-Reply-To: <39061DAA.E9D88A8D@trentu.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0004252037001.16577-100000@mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear Dr. Lewars

In Prof. R.F.W.Bader's group, we integrate the properties densities of an
atom in a molecule over the atomic basin. The basin is the region of space
enclosed by the intersection of Inter-Atomic Surfaces (IAS) and and
envelope of the density choosen at some value. I will explain HOW AND WHY
we choose this value, with the hope of answering your question.

The IASs are not arbitrary. They must satisfy a quantum condition that
arises from the application of Swinger's principle of stationary action to
a subsystem (e.g. an atom in a molecule). An IAS is the unique surface
separating 2 atoms in a molecule so that the flux in the gradient vectror
field of the density vanishes.

If one integrates atomic properties up to the 0.001 a.u. isodensity 
envelope, these atomic values sum-up to the corresponding molecular (total
system) values with reasonable accuracy. 

For example, summing atomic energies of medium-sized molecules
such as the 20 naturally occuring amino acids recovers the SCF energy to
within 1 kcal/mol (typically 0.5 kcal/mol). The sum of the atomic populations
(or the corresponding atomic charges) is typically 0.001 e for a neutral
molecule (or within 0.001 e of the molecular charge). The sum of the atomic 
volumes (molecular vol.) of the 20 amino acids integrated up to 0.001
a.u. envelope corrrelates highly with the experimental partial molar
volumes (r^2=0.971).

These results are not surprising given that the 0.001 a.u. envelope 
encloses over 98% of the electronic charge of H atoms in hydrocarbons, and
over 99% of the electronic charge of atoms Carbon to Neon.

The 0.001 a.u. isodensity envelope has been shown to yield values of
molecular diameters of several gases in good agreement with the
equilibrium diameters of these molecules determined experimentally
(e.g. by viscosoity measurements fitted to a 6-12 potential).

The 0.002 a.u. may be a more realistic measure of the molecular size in
crystal, however.


   CONCLUSION
   ==========

The 00.1-00.2 a.u. isodensity envelopes are good approximation to the
experimentally determined van der Walls sizes of molecules.


   REFERENCES
   ==========

[1]	Bader RFW. Atoms in molecules: A quantum theory. Oxford,
	U.K.: Oxford University Press, (1990). pages 182,183,199,202.
	And references therein.
	(Radii of isolated ground-state atoms and ions is given in page
	432, for both the 0.001 and 0.002 envelopes). 


[2]	Matta CF, Bader RFW. Atoms-in-molecules study of the
	genetically-encoded amino acids. I. Effect of conformation on 
	geometric,atomic, and bond properties. Proteins: Structure, 
	Function and Genetics, (2000) [In Press].
 
.......................................................................
 Cherif F. Matta		  	tel. (905) 525-9140 ext. 22502
 Chemistry Department                   fax  (905) 522-2509
 McMaster University                      
 Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA L8S 4M1.

 Member of the Board of Governors of the University
.......................................................................

On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, elewars wrote:

> 2000 April 25
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I once read somewhere that an isosurface that encloses 97% of the total
> electron density of a molecule corresponds best to the experimental van
> der Waals surface.
> 
> (1) Has anyone a reference to this, or to any percentage of the electron
> density?
> (2) Is it correct to say that the usual way to measure the "van der
> Waals size" of a molecule is by X-ray diffraction (the molecules in a
> crystal being considered to be in contact)?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> E. Lewars
> ======
> 
> 
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody    |   CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


