From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Wed Apr 26 00:52:44 2000
Received: from exconnect.levels.unisa.edu.au (exconnect.levels.unisa.edu.au [130.220.36.204])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA08521
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 00:52:42 -0400
Received: by exconnect.levels.unisa.edu.au with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
	id <J20HKXZJ>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 14:22:33 +0930
Message-ID: <5DA42F8A3C18D111979400AA00DD609D021E9411@exstaff3.levels.unisa.edu.au>
From: Andrea Gerson <Andrea.Gerson@unisa.edu.au>
To: "'chemistry@ccl.net'" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Examples for simple lecture on all types of molecular modelling
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 14:22:30 +0930
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
Content-Type: text/plain


Dear All,

I have been asked to do a simple one hour lecture in which I should cover the
basics of molecular modelling. By the basics I do not mean the theory just
which types of theory (atomistic potential, semi-empirical, ab initio etc...)
are useful for what kind of applications. Because the people I will be talking
to are not modellers it would be nice to have some colourful examples and
simulations (dynamics) to liven up the lecture a bit. If anybody has this kind
of thing on hand (anything from solid state band structures to protein
conformation to dynmaic simulations) it would be most appreciated it if you
could e-mail it to me or point me in the direction of a web site.

Thanks very much

Andrea

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Wed Apr 26 11:14:55 2000
Received: from maile.surrey.ac.uk (maile.surrey.ac.uk [131.227.102.10])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA11869
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 11:14:54 -0400
Received: from lt-ces1mb (actually host ip192.cpe.surrey.ac.uk)
          by maile.surrey.ac.uk with SMTP Local (PP);
          Wed, 26 Apr 2000 16:13:43 +0100
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20000426161542.008114a0@pop.surrey.ac.uk>
X-Sender: ces1mb@pop.surrey.ac.uk
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 16:15:42 +0100
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: Dr Mark J Biggs <M.Biggs@surrey.ac.uk>
Subject: QM study of heterogeneous reactions
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi All!

I have a question relating to QM study of reactions relevent to heterogeneous
catalysis.  I have never done such simulations before, but have a number of
papers which report such work.

One of the papers (Schneider et al., J. Phys. Chem. B, V101, p4353, 1997)
I have seeks to determine the mechanism for NO decomposition over Cu-ZSM5.

This paper indicates that the --Cu .. O-N configuration (i.e. oxygen down)
is the lowest energy configuration.  From this start point, a mechanism is
then determined.

However, they also say that the --Cu .. N-O configuration is only slightly
more energetic than the O-down configuration.

My question is:

Why should we pick any one particular starting configuration?


Let me outline my motivation for this question so that I do not get the
obvious answer (i.e. minimum energy configuration as revealed by QM sim
on model used)!

The models used in QM are normally small cluster models which cannot take
into account the steric effects imposed by cages or other fluid molecules.
It is possible that the solid structure and other fluid molecules may make
it difficult to acheive an O-down configuration as simulated above.

Even if the cluster is adequate, there is likely to be various angles of
approach and orientations of the molecule relative to the Cu site at
typical reaction temperatures, and the molecule may not ever have time to
"get itself" into the O-down position before a second NO arrives and a
reaction possibly occurs.

The reaction configuration may, therefore, never be able to start from the
initial configuration assumed on the basis of minimum energy as determined
by the cluster model, and may never follow the path of minimum PE.

Whilst I have used the above paper as an example, it appears as if this
approach is used in all papers I have (even so-called "dynamic QM" using
DFT MD).

Answers can be sent to m.biggs@surrey.ac.uk

Many thanks in advance.

Mark Biggs


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Wed Apr 26 11:44:29 2000
Received: from angelos.phc.chalmers.se (angelos.phc.chalmers.se [129.16.97.41])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA12024
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 11:44:28 -0400
Received: from fkrs2.phc.chalmers.se (fkrs2.phc.chalmers.se [129.16.97.48])
	by angelos.phc.chalmers.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA21216;
	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 17:44:12 +0200
Received: (from svedung@localhost)
	by fkrs2.phc.chalmers.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA10657;
	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 17:44:09 +0200
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 17:44:07 +0200 (MDT)
From: Harald Svedung <svedung@phc.chalmers.se>
To: elewars <elewars@trentu.ca>
cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:van der Waals SURFACES/ELECTRON DEN
In-Reply-To: <39061DAA.E9D88A8D@trentu.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.91.1000426172447.12519A-100000@fkrs2.phc.chalmers.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hi,

I would just like to make a small comment on the side:

The van der Waals size applies to a very simple picture of a molecular 
system. It is quite useful in many cases but (and this is my perhaps 
misdirected warning) when it comes to scattering processes, e.g. 
collisional energy transfer, the shape of the repulsive wall is of 
course important.

How to go from electron density to the correct repulsive potential is 
discussed in e.g.:

C. Nyeland, J. P. Toennies, Chem. Phys. 188 (1994) 205.  

There is also work in progress in this field.

yours
:-)         The spring has finally come here in Goeteborg!
Harald



On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, elewars wrote:

> 2000 April 25
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I once read somewhere that an isosurface that encloses 97% of the total
> electron density of a molecule corresponds best to the experimental van
> der Waals surface.
> 
> (1) Has anyone a reference to this, or to any percentage of the electron
> density?
> (2) Is it correct to say that the usual way to measure the "van der
> Waals size" of a molecule is by X-ray diffraction (the molecules in a
> crystal being considered to be in contact)?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> E. Lewars
> ======> 
> 

Harald Svedung (Ph.Lic.)                phone:          +46-31-7722816
Department of Chemistry                 fax:            +46-31-167194
Physical Chemistry                      home phone:     +46-31-240897, +46-709223206	
Goeteborg University                    home e-mail:    harald.svedung@svedung.pp.se
SE-412 96 Goeteborg, Sweden             www.che.chalmers.se/~svedung/	


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Apr 25 18:29:46 2000
Received: from hotmail.com (law-f112.hotmail.com [209.185.131.175])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA06848
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 18:29:46 -0400
Received: (qmail 18348 invoked by uid 0); 25 Apr 2000 22:27:44 -0000
Message-ID: <20000425222744.18347.qmail@hotmail.com>
Received: from 205.247.153.213 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP;
	Tue, 25 Apr 2000 15:27:44 PDT
X-Originating-IP: [205.247.153.213]
From: "govindan subramanian" <vaishnavi66@hotmail.com>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: non-linear regressions
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 15:27:44 PDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed

Dear CCL'ers
I am interested in knowing about any freeware/shareware for performing 
non-linear regressions in UNIX/Windows platform.  My immediate interest is 
to perform sigmoidal fitting.  Any possible indicators are welcome.  Will 
summarize if there is sufficient interest.  Thanks.

-subramanian.g

________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Apr 25 19:30:35 2000
Received: from lrz.uni-muenchen.de (root@lsanca1-ar99-078-042.biz.dsl.gtei.net [4.3.78.42])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA07178
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 19:30:34 -0400
Received: (from eugene.leitl@localhost)
	by lrz.uni-muenchen.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA11505;
	Tue, 25 Apr 2000 16:29:33 -0700
From: Eugene Leitl <eugene.leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14598.10841.937841.764382@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 16:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: [BioPython] biocorba progress
X-Mailer: VM 6.71 under 21.1 (patch 4) "Arches" XEmacs Lucid

From: Ewan Birney <birney@ebi.ac.uk>
Sender: biopython-admin@biopython.org
To: biopython@biopython.org, biojava-l@biojava.org, bioxml-dev@bioxml.org
Subject: [BioPython] biocorba progress
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 20:59:26 +0100 (BST)


[excuse the cross post]

Just popping over from bioperl. Just to say that bioperl biocorba
server implementation is ticking along nicely. For the biojava and
biopython project I'd encourage you to look at developing clients to
these objects - this way you can bootstrap off the 'maturity' (aka -
cruft) of bioperl, giving you access to sequence flat files and 
sequence databases automatically without going nuts over the quirks
of sequence formats.

read:

http://www.uni-bielefeld.de/mailinglists/BCD/vsns-bcd-perl/0004/0027.html


I cc'd bioxml in so they didn't feel sidelined - xml and corba are pretty
orthogonal technologies, and both have their place. bioxml will play
naturally with biocorba once it gets into bioperl. In other words, writing
bioxml parsers in bioperl and then letting this functionality be exported
via biocorba will give a way of getting XML parsing to all 3 projects
at the same time. This will happen without anyone in bioxml needing to
understand the biocorba stuff... (whey hey!)


Thanks for listening to this transmission...

ewan

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ewan Birney. Mobile: +44 (0)7970 151230, Work: +44 1223 494420
<birney@ebi.ac.uk>. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
BioPython mailing list  -  BioPython@biopython.org
http://biopython.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Tue Apr 25 23:43:03 2000
Received: from hotmail.com (oe13.law3.hotmail.com [209.185.240.117])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id XAA08287
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 23:43:02 -0400
Received: (qmail 89731 invoked by uid 65534); 26 Apr 2000 03:40:57 -0000
Message-ID: <20000426034057.89730.qmail@hotmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: [161.142.78.83]
From: "Yeoh Hak Koon" <yeohakoon@hotmail.com>
To: "CCL" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: HOMO-LUMO vs. lambda max
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 11:35:54 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200

Dear Colleagues,

Something not addressed in all past postings :

What are the reservations or objections of equating the HOMO-LUMO energy gap
to the maximum wavelength peak (lambda max) in a UV-Vis spectra?

Are these the reasons?
(a) the HOMO-LUMO transition might be forbidden, hence does not show up in
the spectra
(b) the lambda max has vibrational contributions, so it is usually more
energetic than the 0-0 transition predicted.

For (a), is there a way to predict whether the transition is forbidden or
not?  (I am using a commercial software PC Spartan Pro).

For (b), since at room temperature, the vibrational energy is relatively
small, I could still say the approximation is acceptable, right?

My apologies if these insult your intelligence; I am not trained as a
chemist, but a chemical engineer.  Thank you very much.

Best regards,
H. K. Yeoh
26 April 2000


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Wed Apr 26 11:58:17 2000
Received: from mailhost.msi.com (fire.msi.com [146.202.0.242])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA12124
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 11:58:16 -0400
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mailhost.msi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id IAA26190 for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 08:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jnauss-pc.msi.com(146.202.26.50) by mailhost via smap (V2.0)
	id xma026182; Wed, 26 Apr 00 08:55:48 -0700
Message-Id: <4.3.0.20000426083022.00b0f610@146.202.6.217>
X-Sender: jnauss@146.202.6.217
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 08:31:16 -0400
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: Jeff Nauss <jnauss@msi.com>
Subject: MSI Workshops in York, UK


Molecular Simulations Inc. will be holding a pair of workshops 19-23 June
2000 at the University of York, York, UK.  These workshops are relevant to
any of our customers who are novices to the Cerius2 interface and who are
interested in combinatorial chemistry applications.

From 19-20 June, the <<Introduction to Cerius2 Workshop>> will be
conducted.  This is the introductory workshop to acquaint new users to the
Cerius2 user interface.  Basic operations with the interface will be the
main focus of the workshop but commonly used modules will also be
discussed.  Attendees should possess knowledge of basic UNIX commands and a
basic understanding of molecular modeling. No prior experience with Cerius2
is required.

The second workshop will be held from 21-23 June.  This three-day workshop,
<<QSAR and Combinatorial Chemistry Workshop>>, will cover basic aspects of
quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) and combinatorial
library design, from initial library specification through library analysis
techniques. The Cerius2 interface will be used throughout the workshop.

Fees for the two-day <<Introduction to Cerius2 Workshop>> are GBP 630
commercial, GBP 315 government, and GBP 250 academic.  Fees for the
three-day <<QSAR and Combinatorial Chemistry Workshop>> are GBP 945
commercial, GBP 475 government, and GBP 375 academic.  Register for both
classes and receive a 25% discount on the total amount.

Further detailed information about this and other MSI training workshops,
as well as on-line course registration, can be found at MSI's website
( http://www.msi.com/about/events/training ).  Please do not hesitate to
contact me should you have any questions.

Thank you very much.

                                   Jeffrey L. Nauss
                                   MSI Training Programs

                                   011- 58-799-5555


--
Jeffrey L. Nauss, PhD           Phone: (858) 799-5555
Customer Training Programs      Fax: (858) 458-0136
Molecular Simulations Inc.      E-mail: jnauss@msi.com
9685 Scranton Road              http://www.msi.com/about/events/training
San Diego, CA 92121-3752


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Wed Apr 26 14:29:20 2000
Received: from yogi.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de (yogi.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de [134.99.152.44])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA13306
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 14:29:19 -0400
Received: (from jochen@localhost)
	by yogi.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA03684;
	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 20:29:42 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Message-ID: <14599.13717.169934.242262@yogi.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 20:29:41 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jochen Kuepper <Jochen@pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de>
To: govindan subramanian <vaishnavi66@hotmail.com>
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: CCL:non-linear regressions
In-Reply-To: <20000425222744.18347.qmail@hotmail.com>
References: <20000425222744.18347.qmail@hotmail.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 9) "Canyonlands" XEmacs Lucid
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id OAA13307

>>>>> "govindan" == govindan subramanian <vaishnavi66@hotmail.com> writes:

    > Dear CCL'ers I am interested in knowing about any
    > freeware/shareware for performing non-linear regressions in
    > UNIX/Windows platform.  My immediate interest is to perform
    > sigmoidal fitting.  Any possible indicators are welcome.  Will
    > summarize if there is sufficient interest.  Thanks.

www.netlib.org

Jochen
-- 
Heinrich-Heine-Universität
Institut für Physikalische Chemie I
Jochen Küpper
Universitätsstr. 1, Geb. 26.43 Raum 02.29
40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
phone ++49-211-8113681, fax ++49-211-8115195
http://www.Jochen-Kuepper.de


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Wed Apr 26 14:42:25 2000
Received: from mailbox.syr.edu (root@mailbox.syr.edu [128.230.18.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA13460
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 26 Apr 2000 14:42:25 -0400
Received: from syr.edu (curie.syr.edu [128.230.187.116])
	by mailbox.syr.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA28833;
	Wed, 26 Apr 2000 14:42:20 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: desingh@mailbox.syr.edu
Message-ID: <390739B5.4EB99ADA@syr.edu>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 14:47:17 -0400
From: Deepak Singh <desingh@syr.edu>
Organization: Birge Group, Dept. Of Chemistry, Syracuse Univ.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX64 6.5 IP30)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yeoh Hak Koon <yeohakoon@hotmail.com>
CC: CCL <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:HOMO-LUMO vs. lambda max
References: <20000426034057.89730.qmail@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

A simple HOMO-LUMO approach to calculating lambda max is fundamentally incorrect.
Spectroscopic properties require a good knowledge of the excited state surface,
which ground state geometry optimization methods, like  HF, will not give you.
For an excitation to be visible, (i) it must be allowed, (ii) it should not have
an oscillator strength close to 0.  To calculate abosrption maxima one has to
apply some method which includes electron correlation and can be applied to
excited states

The easiest way to calculate absorption maxima is to use a CI method like ZINDO.
Of course, ZINDO fails in cases like polyenes which have low lying forbidden
states, but it is a start.


Deepak.

Yeoh Hak Koon wrote:

> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Something not addressed in all past postings :
>
> What are the reservations or objections of equating the HOMO-LUMO energy gap
> to the maximum wavelength peak (lambda max) in a UV-Vis spectra?
>
> Are these the reasons?
> (a) the HOMO-LUMO transition might be forbidden, hence does not show up in
> the spectra
> (b) the lambda max has vibrational contributions, so it is usually more
> energetic than the 0-0 transition predicted.
>
> For (a), is there a way to predict whether the transition is forbidden or
> not?  (I am using a commercial software PC Spartan Pro).
>
> For (b), since at room temperature, the vibrational energy is relatively
> small, I could still say the approximation is acceptable, right?
>
> My apologies if these insult your intelligence; I am not trained as a
> chemist, but a chemical engineer.  Thank you very much.
>
> Best regards,
> H. K. Yeoh
> 26 April 2000
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody    |   CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net

--
**********************************************************************
Deepak Singh                        Tel : (315)443 1739 (w)
Graduate Student                          (315)472 9659 (h)
Dept. of Chemistry                  Fax : (315)443 4070
Syracuse University               email : desingh@syr.edu
1-014 CST, Syracuse                 URL : http://web.syr.edu/~desingh
NY 13244

"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." --- Salvor Hardin
**********************************************************************




