From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sat May 27 13:27:26 2000
Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net (tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA20103
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sat, 27 May 2000 13:27:25 -0400
Received: from josiah ([209.138.214.74])
	by tisch.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA10449;
	Sat, 27 May 2000 13:27:07 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <000601bfc801$3c6c0d60$4ad68ad1@josiah.daylight.com>
From: "Andrew Dalke" <dalke@acm.org>
To: "Keith Refson" <Keith.Refson@earth.ox.ac.uk>,
        "CCL, Computational Chemistry List" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:PDB format with 100000 atoms
Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 11:30:19 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0

Keith Refson <Keith.Refson@earth.ox.ac.uk> asked CCL:
>According to the Brookhaven PDB format website it seems that only a 5
>digit field is allowed for the atom sequence number, so there is no
>way of generating a correct PDB file containing 100000 atoms or more.
>
>Has anyone else come up against this limit and found any workaround?


XPLOR uses a base-36 digit for the first field (that is,
99998
99999
A0000
A0001
  ...
Z9999
).  This takes you up to 36,000 atoms.

This isn't legal, according to the PDB format.  There are some
submitted structures with over 100,000 atoms.  In that case, the PDB
splits the submission into two parts.  For example and 1BGL and 1BGM
are parts of the same structure - 66344 and 66310
  http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/cgi/explore.cgi?pdbId=1BGL
  http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/cgi/explore.cgi?pdbId=1BGM

I personally believe software reading a PDB file should ignore the
atom index fields.  The ones from the PDB always have numbers starting
>from 1 and never have gaps.  I've never seen files elsewhere which
encoded information in those numbers.  (There can be different numbering
schemes as when creating the full structure from a monomer, but that
scheme exists only long enough to renumber it in the proper form.)

For output, I've usually extended XPLOR's notation, and let the first
character of the serial number go to 'A' after '9'.  I then continue
the ASCII sequence after 'Z', so '[', '\', ']', ... .  That gives up
to 2 million atoms, though after that it loops back to 0 and starts
generating '\000' (C's end-of-string character) and '\n' (newline)
which would affect parsing.  Something will have to be done when
we start manipulating 2 million atom structures but the most I've done
to date is a million atoms, for a software stress test.

                    Andrew
                    dalke@acm.org




From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sun May 28 01:35:02 2000
Received: from ccl.net (atlantis.ccl.net [192.148.249.4])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA22727
	for <CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net>; Sun, 28 May 2000 01:35:02 -0400
Received: from arlen.ccl.net (arlen.ccl.net [192.148.249.10])
	by ccl.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/OSC 2.0) with ESMTP id BAA23998;
	Sun, 28 May 2000 01:34:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 01:34:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jan Labanowski <jkl@ccl.net>
To: quanta@chem.unipune.ernet.in
cc: Jan Labanowski <jkl@ccl.net>, CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:Address Please !!!
In-Reply-To: <200005271946.BAA00913@chem.unipune.ernet.in>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0005280116170.29320-100000@arlen.ccl.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear CCL,

This is just to remind CCL subscribers that posting address inquires
is discouraged at CCL. Please consult the rules of CCL available at:
   http://www.ccl.net/aboutccl


>From what I know, Prof. Friedrich Cramer may be retired at this moment
(he is like 77 years old), though he was quite active last year.
He was a director of the Max-Planck Institute for Experimental Medicine
in Goettingen, and has many honorary professorships and memberships all
around he world.
See e.g.:
   http://www.uni-kassel.de/fb19/fsr/ring/cramer.html

For his whereabouts check:
http://www.mpiem.gwdg.de/index.html
Prof. Dr. Friedrich Cramer 
 Adresse:
Hermann-Rein-Str. 3
37075 Goetingen 
 Telefon: 0551-3899-115
 Telefax: 0551-3899-284
 E-Mail: cramer@.em.mpg.de



On Sun, 28 May 2000 quanta@chem.unipune.ernet.in wrote:

> May 28, 2000
> 
> Can anyone please tell me the address of Dr. friedrich Cramer, one of the 
> contributor of the following book.
> 
> The Lock-and-Key Principle, Vol. 1,
> The State of the Art--100 Years On
> Edited by: Jean-Paul Behr (Univ. Louis Pasteur de Strasbourg, Illkirch, France)
>  
> 
> And the article is: 
> Emil Fischer's Lock-and-Key Hypothesis After 100 Years_Towards a Supracellular Chemistry (F. Cramer).
>  
> Thanks in advance.
> ANANT

Jan K. Labanowski            |    phone: 614-292-9279,  FAX: 614-292-7168
Ohio Supercomputer Center    |    Internet: jkl@ccl.net 
1224 Kinnear Rd,             |    http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html
Columbus, OH 43212-1163      |    http://www.ccl.net/



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sun May 28 14:39:37 2000
Received: from mailbox.syr.edu (root@mailbox.syr.edu [128.230.18.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA26652
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 28 May 2000 14:39:36 -0400
Received: from syr.edu (curie.syr.edu [128.230.187.116])
	by mailbox.syr.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA02288
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 28 May 2000 14:39:36 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: desingh@mailbox.syr.edu
Message-ID: <39316915.3CEC931@syr.edu>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 14:44:37 -0400
From: Deepak Singh <desingh@syr.edu>
Organization: Birge Group, Dept. Of Chemistry, Syracuse Univ.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX64 6.5 IP30)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: qmmm simulations
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello

I have a question related to QMMM methods ?  Everytime I do a study on a
protein,I use a separate RTF for a qmmm job and a separate one for a
pure MM job.  If I use the qmmm topology (with a link atom defined for a
particular residue) how will it affect a pure MM simulation, i.e. one in
which I do not define a QM region but use a topology with an extra link
atom?  It has mass so it should be part of a lot of energy terms.  It
has no charge so it should not create any trouble there.

I am just curious about whether people have tried that and if they see
any results that might be "interesting".


Deepak

