From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Jul 14 14:07:24 2000
Received: from genxy.com (mailhub.genxy.com [207.137.9.3])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA00772
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 14:07:23 -0400
Received: from genxy.com (genxy5-50.genxy.com [172.20.5.50])
	by genxy.com (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA03129
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <396F5600.19AC572D@genxy.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 11:03:44 -0700
From: Iraj Daizadeh <iraj.daizadeh@genxy.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: protein folding/sequence.
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="------------51254766772CE1360B5C38A4"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------51254766772CE1360B5C38A4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


I hear that if two sequences have homology (biological sequence
similarity)
greater than 20%, then their 3-d structures will be almost identical.

Is this true? If so, can someone point me to some seminal papers
discussing
this...

Thanks in advance. I will summarize if enough interest is shown.

Best Wishes, Iraj.

--------------51254766772CE1360B5C38A4
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
 name="iraj.daizadeh.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Iraj Daizadeh
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="iraj.daizadeh.vcf"

begin:vcard 
n:Daizadeh;Iraj
tel;fax:858-551-3001
tel;work:858-551-3030
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Genset Corporation;Statistical Genomics
version:2.1
email;internet:iraj.daizadeh@genxy.com
title:Patent Liaison
adr;quoted-printable:;;875 Prospect Street, Suite 206=0D=0A;La Jolla;CA;92037;
fn:Iraj Daizadeh
end:vcard

--------------51254766772CE1360B5C38A4--



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Jul 14 23:36:22 2000
Received: from smtp.mail.yahoo.com (smtp.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.68.32])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id XAA00653
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 23:36:21 -0400
Received: from s10062.pc.nus.edu.sg (HELO scip8239) (137.132.24.189)
  by smtp.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Jul 2000 03:31:38 -0000
X-Apparently-From: <lbbg123@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <000001bfee0d$30254e40$bd188489@nus.edu.sg>
From: "Li Zhenhua" <lbbg123@yahoo.com>
To: "G. Naga Srinivas" <naga@jamie.chem.unt.edu>, "CCL" <chemistry@ccl.net>
References: <396DE4C1.11C0E0B0@jamie.chem.unt.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:CO frequencies in Organometallics
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 10:07:08 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4029.2901
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4029.2901

Hi, A paper by Bytheway I and Wong MW is about the scaling factors of DFT
method for inorganic compounds. Hope it can help you.

The prediction of vibrational frequencies of inorganic molecules using
density functional theory
CHEM PHYS LETT 282: (3-4) 219-226 JAN 16 1998


----- Original Message -----
From: "G. Naga Srinivas" <naga@jamie.chem.unt.edu>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 11:48 PM
Subject: CCL:CO frequencies in Organometallics


> Hi
>     I am trying to compare the calculated CO vibrational frequencies
> with experimental
> frequencies in Organometallics.  But the scaling factors suggested for
> organic compounds
> in  J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16052  producing large errors.  Are there
> any special scaling
> factors for organometallic CO vibrational frequencies.  I will
> summarize.
>
> Thanks
> Srinivas
>
>
>
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody    |   CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To
Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net
70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan:
jkl@ccl.net
>
>
>
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Fri Jul 14 23:56:53 2000
Received: from cosmos.cosm.sc.edu (cosmos.cosm.sc.edu [129.252.40.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA00716
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 14 Jul 2000 23:56:53 -0400
Received: (from jorge@localhost)
	by cosmos.cosm.sc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA795394;
	Fri, 14 Jul 2000 23:51:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jorge Seminario <jorge@cosm.sc.edu>
Message-Id: <200007150351.XAA795394@cosmos.cosm.sc.edu>
Subject: Zerner Conference
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 23:51:51 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: jorge@mail.chem.sc.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Dear Colleagues,

The International Society of Quantum Biology and Pharmacology, is
organizing the Zerner Conference, in New Orleans, Louisiana, on August
17-19, 2000.
(http://www.chem.uno.edu/Politzer_files/ISQBP.htm)
Registration and abstract submission for poster presentations are still
open.  Articles will be published in the Proceedings (International
Journal of Quantum Chemistry) of The International Society of Quantum
Biology and Pharmacology.

Hotel Information
The conference will be held in the Queen and Crescent Hotel, located at
344 Camp Street. It is in a 100-year-old historic building within walking
distance of the French Quarter, the arts district and the casino. (For
more on-line information about New Orleans, visit http://www.nola.com.)
The rate for a double room will be $69 per night for August 16 and 17 and
$89 per night for August 18 and 19. A third and a fourth person can be
accommodated in a room for an additional$10 per person per night. A block
of rooms at these rates is being held until June 15, 2000. For room
reservations, contact the hotel at1-800-975-6652 or 1-504-587-9700; their
fax number is 1-504-587-9701. In order to receive the special rate,
conference attendees should mention the University of New Orleans
conference.
Conference Fees:
* ISQBP Members: $100 
* Nonmembers: $125 
* Students: $60 

Organizer
Dr. Peter Politzer, Department of Chemistry, University of New Orleans,
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70148, USA.

Conference Registration Form 
Name: ___________________________________________
Mailing Address: __________________________________
________________________________________________
E-mail: __________________________________________
Telephone: _______________________________________
Fax: ____________________________________________

(This information will be included in the conference program unless you
specify otherwise.)
ISQBP member _____
Nonmember _____
Student _____
Registration fee enclosed? _____ Yes _____ No
Please make check payable to the International Society of Quantum Biology
and Pharmacology;
it should preferably be drawn on a U.S. bank.
Do you wish to present a poster? _____ Yes _____ No
Tentative Title: _____________________________________
__________________________________________________
Do you plan to submit a contribution to the proceedings of the conference? 
_____Yes _____ No
(Manuscripts should be written in the usual IJQC format and submitted
on-site during the conference.)


Plenary Sessions and Speakers:
Enzyme Function:
* David Beratan (University of Pittsburgh) - 
* Tim Clark (University of Erlangen) - Hybrid QM/MM Simulations of Enzyme
Reaction Mechanisms. 
* Gilda Loew (Molecular Research Institute, Palo Alto) - Homology Modeling
and Substrate Binding Study of Human CYP450 Enzymes. 
* Kenneth Merz (Penn State University) - Combined QM/MM Methodologies and
Applications. 
Biochemical Nanocomputer Technologies:
* Robert Birge (University of Connecticut) - Protein-Based Volumetric
Memories and Associative Processors. 
* John Reif (Duke University) - Recent Advances and New Applications for
Biomolecular Computations. 
* Joel Schnur (Naval Research Laboratory) - Sub-Micron Lipid Tubules and
their Applications. 
Protein Structure:
* Harold Scheraga (Cornell University) - Prediction of Protein Structure
by Global Optimization of a Potential Function. 
* Eugene Shakhnovich (Harvard University) - Universally-Conserved
Positions in Protein Folds: Reading Evolutionary Information about Protein
Stability, Folding Kinetics and Function. 
* Jeffrey Skolnick (Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis) -
Prediction of Structure and Function on a Genomic Scale. 
* Devarajan Thirumalai (University of Maryland) - Stretching Proteins. 
Proton Pumps:
* Daniel Borgis (Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris) - Transport and
Spectroscopy of Protons in Aqueous Media. 
* Mark Tuckerman (New York University) - Identifying Quantum Effects in
Aqueous Proton Transport and in "Intermediate-Barrier" Intramolecular
Proton Transfer. 
* Arieh Warshel (University of Southern California) - Computer Simulations
of Proton Transfer Processes in Proteins. The Energetics of Proton
Translocation Processes. 
Membrane Proteins:
* Frank Blaney (SmithKline Beecham) - Modelling of Voltage-Gated Calcium
Channels and their Interactions with Small Peptide Neurotoxins. 
* Benoit Roux (Cornell Medical School) - Theoretical Studies of Ion
Permeation. 
* Peter Tieleman (Oxford University) - Molecular Dynamics Simulations of
Antimicrobial Peptides: From Membrane Binding to Transmembrane Channels. 
* Harel Weinstein (Mt. Sinai Medical School, New York) - Computer
Experiments Reveal Signaling Mechanisms in Membrane Proteins: From
Structural Motifs to Functional Microdomains. 
Modelling of Electrostatic Interactions: 
* Sergio Hassan (Mt. Sinai Medical School, New York) - Description of
Solvent Effects in Proteins: A New and General Continuum Approach for
Structure Calculations. 
* Ferran Sanz (IMIM/Universitat Pompeu Fabra) - Automatic Exploration of
Similarities between Distributions of Molecular Interaction Potentials. 
* Rebecca Wade (European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg) -
Electrostatic Interactions in Protein-Protein Association: Insights from
Brownian Dynamics Simulations and Protein Interaction Property Similarity
Analysis. 




From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sat Jul 15 07:55:42 2000
Received: from smtp.email.msn.com (cpimssmtpu08.email.msn.com [207.46.181.30])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA03437
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 07:55:41 -0400
Received: from oemcomputer - 199.35.91.98 by email.msn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Sat, 15 Jul 2000 04:48:29 -0700
Message-ID: <002d01bfee5a$b882a420$625b23c7@oemcomputer>
From: "NATHAN HARRIS" <NHARRIS1@email.msn.com>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
Cc: "Mao Xiang" <xmao@iris.sipp.ac.cn>
References: <396E739A.A5548C23@iris.sipp.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: CCL:deprotonation rate
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 07:46:37 -0500
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300

Dear Mao,

The heterolytic dissociation reactions you are interested in are all
impossible processes without the presence of a proton accepter (a base).

For example, the gas phase dissociation of water

H2O      ==>      H+     +      OH-

has an energy requirement of around 380 kcal/mol (this is the same as the
ionization enthalpy except zero-point energy is not included).  However, the
reverse process has no barrier at all.  Gas phase ionization doesn't happen
unless there is some proton acceptor, as in

H2O   +   B-     ==>    OH-      +    BH

In aqueous solution the story is different because the ions are then
solvated.

----- Original Message -----
From: Mao Xiang <xmao@iris.sipp.ac.cn>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2000 8:57 PM
Subject: CCL:deprotonation rate


> Hello everyone:
>     I want to know about the activation free energy of the following
> reaction:
>
> 1. H2O---> H+ + OH-
> 2. CH3CH2OH----> CH3CH2O- + H+
> 3. NH2CH2CH2OH---> +NH3CH2CH2O-
>
> I think I calculate them with Arrhenius equation, but I do not know
> where I can get the observed rate constants.
>
> Does anyone have some experients about my problem. Hope you can help me.
> Thanks.
>
>
> Regards,
> mao
>   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> |  Xiang Mao                                                     |
> |  Lab of Molecular Regulation for Microbial Secondary Metabolism |
> |  Shanghai institute of Plant Physiology, Academia Sinica        |
> |  300 Fenglin Road, Shanghai, China, 200032                      |
> |  Tel: +86-21-64042090-4791                                      |
> |  Fax: +86-21-64042385                                           |
>   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody    |   CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To
Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net
70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan:
jkl@ccl.net
>
>
>
>
>





From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sat Jul 15 13:56:21 2000
Received: from mauve.csi.cam.ac.uk (exim@mauve.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.38])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA04619
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 13:56:20 -0400
Received: from su4.phar.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.156.196])
	by mauve.csi.cam.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #1)
	id 13DW5T-0005Bu-00; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 18:50:51 +0100
Received: from pc1.phar.cam.ac.uk by su4.phar.cam.ac.uk (SMI-8.6/CS-SUB)
	id SAA29905; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 18:50:20 +0100
Received: from localhost by pc1.phar.cam.ac.uk; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 18:50:20 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 18:50:20 +0100 (BST)
From: James Smith <James.Smith@ddg.phar.cam.ac.uk>
X-Sender: js252@pc1.phar.cam.ac.uk
To: Iraj Daizadeh <iraj.daizadeh@genxy.com>
cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:protein folding/sequence.
In-Reply-To: <396F5600.19AC572D@genxy.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.95.1000715170717.15837C-100000@pc1.phar.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by server.ccl.net id NAA04620



Homology does not mean "amino acid  sequence similarity >20%" It is  
defined  in terms of functionality (cf. analogy). For a clear definition 
see Attwood, T. K. & Parry-Smith, D. J. (1999). Introduction to
bioinfomatics (Cell and Molecular biology Series), Addison
Wesley Longman Ltd., Harlow, England. 

Comparative modelling methods require more than  aligning protein 
sequences, constructing structural models against canonical quaternary,
tertiary and secondary structural element templates  or using  threading
methodologies and then minimisation. It is  increasingly  knowledge based,
requiring more information on protein domain  motions (normal mode
analysis), catalytic group analysis, protein-protein activation and
modification, expression and regulation.

For seminal papers perform  citation searches on the following
publications and look for reviews that have used or criticised: 

Chou & Fasman (1978).  Advances in Enzymology, 47,  45-148

 Godzik et al (1993). J Computer-aided molecular design, 7, 397-438

Jones et al (1992). Nature 358, 86-89

Luthy et al (1992). Nature 356, 83-85

Mosimann et al (1995).  Proteins 23, 301-317

Novotny et al (1988). Proteins 4, 19-30

good luck 

James Smith


> I hear that if two sequences have homology (biological sequence
> similarity)
> greater than 20%, then their 3-d structures will be almost identical.
> 
> Is this true? If so, can someone point me to some seminal papers
> discussing
> this...
> 
> Thanks in advance. I will summarize if enough interest is shown.
> 
> Best Wishes, Iraj.
> 

_________________________________________________________________________

 James Smith       The Drug Design Group         01123 331 987 (Office)
 St.John's College Department of Pharmacology    01223 331 740 (Fax) 
 Cambridge         University of Cambridge       07625 395 084 (Pager)
 CB2 1TP           CB2 1QJ                       js252@cam.ac.uk
 United Kingdom    United Kingdom        http://www.cus.cam.ac.uk/~js252
_________________________________________________________________________




From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sat Jul 15 23:03:13 2000
Received: from server.ccl.net (server.ccl.net [192.153.40.39])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA06993
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sat, 15 Jul 2000 23:03:13 -0400
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 23:03:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Computational Chemistry List <ccl@ccl.net>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Fatal Problem: The largest alpha MO coefficient is   0.17136284D+04
 (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10007152302570.6620-100000@server.ccl.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Computational Chemistry List                 http://www.ccl.net/chemistry
Administration  (chemistry-request@ccl.net)  ftp://ftp.ccl.net/
Ohio Supercomputer Center                    ccl@ccl.net
1224 Kinnear Rd
Columbus, Ohio 43212-1163

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-version: 1.0
Subject: Fatal Problem: The largest alpha MO coefficient is   0.17136284D+04
To: chemistry-request@ccl.net
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 12:22:25 -0400
From: Sompop Sanongraj <ssanongr@mtu.edu>

Hi
When I ran the MP2 single point calculation in g98 (A.7) e.g. #
rmp2/6-31g+(d,P) maxdisk=1500mb or # rmp2/6-31g++(d) maxdisk=1500mb. I got
the error message shown: 
**** Fatal Problem: The largest alpha MO coefficient is  0.17136284D+04
 Error termination via Lnk1e in /local/gauss/g98-a7/g98/l801.exe.  

Could anybody tell me how to deal with this problem?
Thanks
sompop
Sompop Sanongraj
208 Church Street
Hancock MI 49930.

TEL: (906) 482 9377



