From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sun Jul 16 04:50:57 2000
Received: from mailgate.dfh.dk (web-cache.dfh.dk [130.225.176.26])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA08673
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 04:50:51 -0400
Received: from f-lhk.dfh.dk (dhcp225-220.dfh.dk [130.225.225.220])
	by mailgate.dfh.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA12411;
	Sun, 16 Jul 2000 10:52:11 +0200
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20000716105029.0079ab10@compchem.dfh.dk>
X-Sender: anne@compchem.dfh.dk
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 10:50:29 +0200
To: anne@compchem1.dfh.dk
From: Anne <atj@dfh.dk>
Subject: CCL:protein folding/sequence.
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id EAA08674



Homology does not mean "amino acid  sequence similarity >20%" It is  
defined  in terms of functionality (cf. analogy). For a clear definition 
see Attwood, T. K. & Parry-Smith, D. J. (1999). Introduction to
bioinfomatics (Cell and Molecular biology Series), Addison
Wesley Longman Ltd., Harlow, England. 

Comparative modelling methods require more than  aligning protein 
sequences, constructing structural models against canonical quaternary,
tertiary and secondary structural element templates  or using  threading
methodologies and then minimisation. It is  increasingly  knowledge based,
requiring more information on protein domain  motions (normal mode
analysis), catalytic group analysis, protein-protein activation and
modification, expression and regulation.

For seminal papers perform  citation searches on the following
publications and look for reviews that have used or criticised: 

Chou & Fasman (1978).  Advances in Enzymology, 47,  45-148

 Godzik et al (1993). J Computer-aided molecular design, 7, 397-438

Jones et al (1992). Nature 358, 86-89

Luthy et al (1992). Nature 356, 83-85

Mosimann et al (1995).  Proteins 23, 301-317

Novotny et al (1988). Proteins 4, 19-30

good luck 

James Smith


> I hear that if two sequences have homology (biological sequence
> similarity)
> greater than 20%, then their 3-d structures will be almost identical.
> 
> Is this true? If so, can someone point me to some seminal papers
> discussing
> this...
> 
> Thanks in advance. I will summarize if enough interest is shown.
> 
> Best Wishes, Iraj.
> 

_________________________________________________________________________

 James Smith       The Drug Design Group         01123 331 987 (Office)
 St.John's College Department of Pharmacology    01223 331 740 (Fax) 
 Cambridge         University of Cambridge       07625 395 084 (Pager)
 CB2 1TP           CB2 1QJ                       js252@cam.ac.uk
 United Kingdom    United Kingdom        http://www.cus.cam.ac.uk/~js252
_________________________________________________________________________




-= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody    |   CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To
Admins
MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net










From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Sun Jul 16 12:23:59 2000
Received: from oc30.uni-paderborn.de (oc30.uni-paderborn.de [131.234.240.90])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA11121
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 12:23:58 -0400
Received: from localhost (cpilger@localhost)
	by oc30.uni-paderborn.de (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA08859
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 18:48:11 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 18:48:11 +0200
From: Christian Pilger <cpilger@oc30.uni-paderborn.de>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: AutoDock 3
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.3.95.1000715170717.15837C-100000@pc1.phar.cam.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.10.10007161841430.108847-100000@oc30.uni-paderborn.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear CCl'ers,

	lately I experienced a problem after I prepared input files for
AutoDock 3. The program terminates after it read the dpf-file with the
following message:

		autodock3: NOW IN COMMAND MODE.

I don't really understand this, because I prepared the input files in the
same manner as I have done it several times before.

Any help is appreciated.

Best regards,

Christian

-----------------------------------------------------------------

 Christian Pilger                      Uni-GH Paderborn
                                       FB 13 - Organische Chemie
                                       Warburger Str. 100
                                 
                                       D-33098 Paderborn/Germany
 Tel.: 05251-60279/-602183         
 Fax : 05251-603245         email: cpilger@oc30.uni-paderborn.de

-----------------------------------------------------------------


