From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Wed Nov  1 01:27:05 2000
Received: from dns2.seanet.com (dns2.seanet.com [199.181.164.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA28400
	for <chemistry@server.ccl.net>; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 01:27:05 -0500
Received: from biggeek (dialup-63.214.12.53.Seattle1.Level3.net [63.214.12.53])
	by dns2.seanet.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id WAA02960;
	Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:26:13 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <008d01c043cc$c350dda0$01808080@biggeek>
From: "Mark A. Thompson" <mthompson@seanet.com>
To: chemistry@server.ccl.net
Cc: <mthompson@seanet.com>
Subject: ArgusLab 2.0: beta2 released
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 22:27:00 -0800


ArgusLab 2.0 beta2 is available for download.

http://www.seanet.com/~mthompson/ArgusLab

Changes from beta1 include:
--------------------------------
1.  different install program: fixed a lot of complaints.
2.  800x600 pixel support for those who did not have the higher screen 
    resolutions.
3.  minor bug fixes.
4.  more fragments added to fragment library.


ArgusLab is a molecular modeling program for Microsoft Windows operating 
systems.

Overview of 2.0 features:
-----------------------------
1. Interactive 3D Molecule Builder with:
        Interactive 3D manipulator
        Fragment Library
        Beautify Geometry
        Automatically Add/Hide/Delete Hydrogens
        Cut & Paste
        Supports Multiple-Level Undo/Redo.
        Multiple Rendering Styles for Atoms and Bonds
        Geometry Monitors

2. Calculation Types
        Single-Point Energies
        Optimize Geometries
        Electronic Excitation Spectra
        Self Consistent Reaction Field (SCRF) Solvent Model for 
            Electronic Spectra

3. Molecular Mechanics
        Universal Force Field (UFF) for the entire periodic table

4. Quantum Mechanics
        Extended Huckel for entire periodic table
        MNDO, AM1, and PM3 semi-empirical Hamiltonians
        INDO1/s semi-empirical Hamiltonian
        Restricted and Unrestricted Hartree-Fock SCF

5. File Types: supports XYZ, PDB, and ArgusLab XML file formats.

6. HTML Help

7. No size limitations for molecules or calculations other than =
   available system resources

8. Multi-threaded architecture allows multiple molecules opened =
   simultaneously and running calculations

9. Runs on Windows 95/98, Windows NT 4.0, Windows 2000



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Wed Nov  1 08:23:28 2000
Received: from compchem.dfh.dk (compchem.dfh.dk [130.225.225.51])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA30966
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 08:23:26 -0500
Received: (from jeremy@localhost)
	by compchem.dfh.dk (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA47995
	for chemistry@ccl.net; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 14:21:16 +0100 (MET)
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 14:21:16 +0100
From: Jeremy Greenwood <jeremy@compchem.dfh.dk>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: Gaussian: recalculating thermochem
Message-ID: <20001101142116.B1279887@compchem.dfh.dk>
References: <20001026190754.A1254620@compchem.dfh.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <20001026190754.A1254620@compchem.dfh.dk>; from jeremy@compchem.dfh.dk on Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 07:07:54PM +0200


QUESTION

> Gaussian allows the rapid recalculation of thermochemical data   
> (e.g. with new scaling factor, temp., pressure) from the checkpoint
> file after a frequency job using freq=readfc                           
  
> However, if the checkpoint file is missing, it gets more tricky.                
> We would like to recalculate the thermochemistry without having
> to resort to re-running the frequency job.                   
  
> A checkpoint file can be created by a single point calculation.
> The force constants are listed in the archive, and can be read in
> using opt=fccards, or by editing the formatted checkpoint file by
> hand and unformatting, but this doesn't seem sufficient to
> convince Gaussian to perform freq=readfc.       
  
> One could use the information in the output file to recalculate
> the thermochemistry from first principles, but this is a little
> laborious. It would be nice to have an automated procedure.
  
> Does someone have a good way to do this?  

ANSWER using Gaussian, for the cost of a cheap frequency job and
a single point calculation:

1) Run a frequency job at HF/sto-3g using the geometry optimised
at the higher level
2) Format the checkpoint file using formchk
3) Replace the force constants in the checkpoint file with those
>from the archive of the output file. 
Handy extraction script from Per-Ola Norrby:
ftp://compchem.dfh.dk:/pub/QueueScripts/po_getForce
4) Unformat the new checkpoint file with unfchk
5) Run a single point calculation using the checkpoint file, 
specifying geom=check guess=read, and maybe scf=sleazy
6) Run a freq=(readisotopes,readfc) job to recalculate the thermochem

(Thanks to Joseph Ochterski, help@gaussian.com for help with this)

ALTERNATIVE at virtually no cost

Frank Jensen (frj@dou.dk) kindly supplied a short Fortan program to 
directly calculate ZPE, and vibrational contributions to H and S from 
a list of the frequencies, temperature and scale factor; from these
the desired quantities can be found.

Cheers,

Jeremy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremy Greenwood                                 jeremy.greenwood@i.am
Department of Medicinal Chemistry                      ph +45 35306117
Royal Danish School of Pharmacy                        fx +45 35306040
Universitetsparken 2, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 I am busy just now again on electro-magnetism, and think I have got  
 hold of a good thing, but can't say. It may be a weed instead of a   
fish that, after all my labor, I may at last pull up. -Michael Faraday
----------------------------------------------------------------------



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Wed Nov  1 12:47:03 2000
Received: from post2.inre.asu.edu (post2.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.73])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA32198
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 12:47:02 -0500
From: Benjamin.Moritz@asu.edu
Received: from conversion.post2.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.0-24 #47347)
 id <0G3C00H01WBAMZ@asu.edu> for chemistry@ccl.net; Wed,
 01 Nov 2000 10:23:34 -0700 (MST)
Received: from general2.asu.edu (general2.asu.edu [129.219.10.242])
 by asu.edu (PMDF V6.0-24 #47347) with ESMTP id <0G3C00GP7WBAHQ@asu.edu> for
 chemistry@ccl.net; Wed, 01 Nov 2000 10:23:34 -0700 (MST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by general2.asu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03628	for
 <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 01 Nov 2000 10:23:33 -0700 (MST)
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 10:23:33 -0700 (MST)
Subject: Transition Metals for G98
X-Sender: bmoritz@general2.asu.edu
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0011011021090.3384-100000@general2.asu.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

I was wondering if anyone has had trouble running transition metals in
G98.  I'm trying to run calculations with Hg but my error message keeps
stating that the basis set won't work because the atomic number is out of
range.  Is there any way to correct for this?  Thanks.

Benjamin J. Moritz
Chemical & Materials Engineering
Arizona State University
Mailto:bmoritz@asu.edu


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Wed Nov  1 12:46:24 2000
Received: from uucphost.mcs.net (Kitten2.mcs.com [192.160.127.90])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA32186
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 12:46:22 -0500
Received: from becky (P24-Chi-Dial-3.pool.mcs.net [205.253.224.152])
	by uucphost.mcs.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA89722;
	Wed, 1 Nov 2000 11:46:02 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from rone@mcs.net)
Message-ID: <001b01c044f4$adabf290$98e0fdcd@becky>
From: "Rebecca Rone" <rone@mcs.net>
To: "Zhenyu Lu" <zl2@duke.edu>, <chemistry@ccl.net>
References: <003901c0435e$a5a4c640$8da90398@chem.duke.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:molecular mechanic paramters for neutralized residues
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 11:44:33 -0600


Dear Zshenyu,

If you are using CHARMm from MSI the neutral residue should be
available. You need to check the documentation and rename the resudues
you want to neutralize in order to get the neutral form. By carefully
about modeling things this way. Make certain that your structure truly
supports the neutral form. If it is on the surface and you wish to avoid
the extra overhead of using explicit water molecules or counterions you
are probably OK, but if you wish to neutralize residues in the binding
site be certain it is justified. In either case if you see major
refolding of the protein you may have a problem. 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Zhenyu Lu 
  To: chemistry@ccl.net 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 11:18 AM
  Subject: CCL:molecular mechanic paramters for neutralized residues


  Dear CCL folks:
   
  I am trying QM/MM calculations on a enzyme.  We are interested
  in the electrostatic role of the enzyme enviroment. Instead of using
  counter ions, we just neutralized  most Lys, Arg, Glu, Asp redsidues
  to see what will happen. I am using Tinker program, and the
  paramter files (Amber, Charmm,etc) don't accomordate 
  these neutralized residues. 
  My quetion is :
  Where or is there some  way that I can obtain the parameters
  for the neutralized Lys, Arg, Glu, Asp residues?
   
  Help on how to simulate the true system, using  counter ions,
protonation
  state exploration,etc. is also appreciated.
   
  Thanks in advance!
  Best,
  Zhenyu Lu
  Duke University
   
    


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Wed Nov  1 14:16:37 2000
Received: from cheetah.it.wsu.edu (root@cheetah.it.wsu.edu [134.121.1.8])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA00015
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 14:16:37 -0500
Received: from ucis (ucis.chem.wsu.edu [134.121.41.180])
	by cheetah.it.wsu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA30714;
	Wed, 1 Nov 2000 11:16:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <001d01c04438$401b4440$b4297986@chem.wsu.edu>
From: "Phillip D. Matz" <matz@wsunix.wsu.edu>
To: <Benjamin.Moritz@asu.edu>, <chemistry@ccl.net>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0011011021090.3384-100000@general2.asu.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:Transition Metals for G98
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 11:16:34 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300

Hi Benjamin!

For Hg (and most transition metals) you will need to use a basis set
modified with an electrostatic core potential (ECP) which basically removes
the core electrons from the atom and replaces them with an empirical
potential.  G98 comes with the LANL2DZ basis and ECP built-in.  If you want
to use this basis then set your input like the following:

#P RHF/GEN Pseudo=read

comments...

charge multiplicity
molecular specifications

C N 0
6-31+G(d')
****
Hg 0
LANL2DZ
****

Hg 0
LANL2DZ

The important parts are the Gen and Pseudo=read - this tells gaussian to
look at the end of the input file for the basis set (which can be different
for each atom) and the ECP.  In the example above I used carbon and
nitrogen, you would put the element symbol for whatever atoms are in your
molecule there.  Let me know if this works for you!

Respectfully,
Phillip Matz
matz@wsunix.wsu.edu


----- Original Message -----
From: <Benjamin.Moritz@asu.edu>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 9:23 AM
Subject: CCL:Transition Metals for G98


> I was wondering if anyone has had trouble running transition metals in
> G98.  I'm trying to run calculations with Hg but my error message keeps
> stating that the basis set won't work because the atomic number is out of
> range.  Is there any way to correct for this?  Thanks.
>
> Benjamin J. Moritz
> Chemical & Materials Engineering
> Arizona State University
> Mailto:bmoritz@asu.edu
>
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody    |   CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To
Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net
70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan:
jkl@ccl.net
>
>
>
>
>


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Wed Nov  1 15:11:44 2000
Received: from lambda.inrs.uquebec.ca (lambda.inrs.uquebec.ca [207.162.3.13])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA00385
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 15:11:43 -0500
Received: from iaf.uquebec.ca ([198.168.44.64]) by lambda.inrs.uquebec.ca
          (Netscape Messaging Server 3.62)  with ESMTP id 380
          for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 15:07:31 -0500
Message-ID: <3A0079F1.52B3260B@iaf.uquebec.ca>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 15:15:46 -0500
From: "Jianhui Wu" <jianhui.wu@inrs-iaf.uquebec.ca>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: template, NMR or X-ray
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello, everyone,

I have a general question regarding homology modelling. I would like to
build a protein model for docking study. This protein have two close
homology proteins (A and B) with their structures solved: A from X-ray
and B from NMR.

I wonder which template I should use? or perhaps I should use two of
them at the same time? What kind of template will produce better protein
model if we try to judge the model by the docking result as well as the
biological experimental result. It seems that NMR structure will be more
in accord with what is going on in solution. Can we say that model built
by template from NMR will give a better result in docking study?  Let`s
assume the docking method and biological assay method are reasonable
here. Any help will be grateful appreciated.

Yours Sincerely,

Jianhui Wu
email:  JianHui_Wu@IAF.Uquebec.ca


