From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 01:17:04 2001
Received: from mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca ([130.113.64.66])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1D6H3w17965
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 01:17:03 -0500
Received: from localhost (mattacf@localhost)
        by mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca  with ESMTP id BAA09055
        for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 01:14:48 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 01:14:48 -0500 (EST)
From: "C.F. Matta" <mattacf@mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Volume of a molecule contained within an isosurface
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0101072145350.4376-100000@mcmail.cis.McMaster.CA>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0102130105450.8171-100000@mcmail.cis.mcmaster.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Hi everyone,

I wonder is someone knows of a free program that calculates the volume
of a molecule contained within a particular density envelope (e.g. the
0.001 a.u. density envelope) from a GAUSSIAN94 wavefunction or cube ?

( The volume I want to calculate is the INTEGRATED volume within the
envelope of choice AND NOT the volume computed from intersecting spheres 
NOR the "solvent accessible volume").

Thank you very much, I will summarize the answers.

Cherif
 
___________________________________________________________________________

  Cherif F. Matta		    	  tel. (905) 525-9140 ext. 22502
  Chemistry Department                    fax  (905) 522-2509
  McMaster University                     
  Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA L8S 4M1.        
___________________________________________________________________________



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 01:27:06 2001
Received: from century.fen.bilkent.edu.tr (century.fen.bilkent.edu.tr [139.179.97.100])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1D6R4w18020
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 01:27:05 -0500
Received: from pinar (pinar [139.179.97.99])
	by century.fen.bilkent.edu.tr (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA25782;
	Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:26:22 +0200 (EET)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:32:47 +0200 (EET)
From: Ulrike Salzner <salzner@fen.Bilkent.EDU.TR>
X-Sender: salzner@pinar
To: Christos Garoufalis <garoufal@physics.upatras.gr>
cc: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:g98 oscillator strengths
In-Reply-To: <002201c094f8$fde7c8c0$0b9e8c96@milon.physics.upatras.gr>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10102130824150.394-100000@pinar>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

There is a brand new article by Hsu, Hirata, and Head-Gordon, J. Phys.
Chem. A, 2001, 105, 451-458 on TDDFT excitation energies and oscillator
strength of linear polyenes. There are also references and comparisons
with other methods and wit experiment.
Best wishes,
Ulrike Salzner
 

===================================================================

Dr. Ulrike Salzner
Associate Professor
Department of Chemistry		Tel.: (312) 290-2122
Bilkent University		Fax.: (312) 266-5097
06533 Bilkent, Ankara 		e-mail: salzner@fen.bilkent.edu.tr
Turkey

====================================================================

On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Christos Garoufalis wrote:

> Dear CCL'ers
> How reliable are the oscillator strengths derived by a TDDFT
> calculation with g98? Does anyone has any experience with it? And how can one force g98 to print them out
> with more decimal digits?
> 
> Thanks in advance
> _________________________
> C. S. Garoufalis,
> Department of Physics, 
> University of Patras, Greece
> _________________________
> 


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 03:17:37 2001
Received: from gate.syntem-sa.fr (gate.syntem-sa.fr [146.19.248.65])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1D8HZw18311
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 03:17:35 -0500
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by gate.syntem-sa.fr (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) id JAA80432; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:14:31 +0100 (MET)
Received: from syntem-sa.fr(10.0.0.2) by gate.syntem-sa.fr via smap (4.1)
	id xma180812; Tue, 13 Feb 01 09:14:14 +0100
Received: from victoria.syntem-sa.fr (victoria.syntem-sa.fr [10.0.0.44]) by laetitia.syntem-sa.fr (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id JAA57337; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:11:45 +0100 (MET)
Received: from syntem-sa.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by victoria.syntem-sa.fr (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id JAA11192; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:17:20 +0100 (MET)
Sender: dturner@syntem-sa.fr
Message-ID: <3A88ED90.89EC1676@syntem-sa.fr>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:17:20 +0100
From: David Turner <dturner@syntem-sa.fr>
Reply-To: dturner@syntem.com
Organization: Computational Drug Design, Syntem
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP32)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ivan <ivanhome@stonline.sk>
CC: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:Second negative frequency
References: <003401c09484$54ceb240$71df05d4@duron-k-7>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Your second value (36 cm-1) could easily be positive given the error 
associated with normal mode calculations (+/-50 cm-1 or so). Perhaps
you have only one imaginary frequency ...

David

Ivan wrote:
> 
> Dear CCL'ers
> 
> I am working with programme GAMESS and an present time I am facing some
> problems with TS.I am simulating H-transfer from NH3 bonded to the rest of
> molecule to another "free" NH3 forming "free"NH4.
> In TS there are two imaginary frequencies ( 1. - value about 975, that
> correspond to H-transfer and 2.- value about 36 )  and  can't get rid of
> this second little negative frequency. Firstly I tried to use keywords
> PURIFY in $STATPT and $FORCE groups to purify hessian matrix but with no
> results. Then I tried several approachs to find better TS, but all resulted
> to the same TS. And IRC calculations in both directions are correct, because
> according to IRC's this TS connects appropriate minimas on both side of the
> hill.Finally I wanted to to perform IRC folowing the second negative
> frequency, but GAMESS did not accept the specified frequency ( in $IRC
> group ).
> 
> I would very appreciate any help,advice or trick.
> 
> Stanislav Ivan
> student
> 
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net

-- 

________________________________________________________________

David Turner                                             Synt:em
Senior Modeling Scientist              Parc Scientifique G.Besse
Computational Drug Discovery                         30000 Nimes
email: dturner@syntem.com                                 France

Tel: 				       
Switchboard: +33 (0)4 66 04 86 66      Fax: +33 (0)4 66 04 86 67
Direct Line: +33 (0)4 66 04 22 85
________________________________________________________________

          Discover New Drugs, Discover Synt:em
                 http://www.syntem.com
________________________________________________________________

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 05:09:20 2001
Received: from info.cyf-kr.edu.pl (root@info.cyf-kr.edu.pl [149.156.4.11])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1DA9Fw18946
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 05:09:19 -0500
Received: from kinga.cyf-kr.edu.pl (IDENT:8304@kinga.cyf-kr.edu.pl [149.156.2.32])
	by info.cyf-kr.edu.pl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA24989
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:09:13 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from mynowak@localhost)
	by kinga.cyf-kr.edu.pl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA07604;
	Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:09:11 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:09:10 +0100 (MET)
From: Mateusz Nowak <mynowak@cyf-kr.edu.pl>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Pair list generation problem in GROMOS96
Message-ID: <Pine.GHP.4.31.0102131104310.326-100000@kinga.cyf-kr.edu.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear CCL

I'm trying to run a regular MD simulation in GROMOS96. My system is 107 aa
protein in a box of SPC water with 4 NA+ ions added. PBC are applied, and
the box sizes are ~ 4*5*6 nm. Bonds involving hydrogens are shaken. In an
output i'm getting following warnings:

 NONBML: WARNING, NOT ALL EXCLUDED NEIGHBOUR WERE SCANNED IN THE PAIR-LIST
 NONBML: WARNING, NOT ALL THIRD NEIGHBOUR WERE SCANNED IN THE PAIR-LIST

Kinetic and non-bonded potental energy terms are not being calculated
("nan" instead of a value) in an initial (t=0) step. In next steps pair
list contains 0 elements instead of ~300000, as it is in initial step.

According to manual this warning occures when cut-off for pair list
construction (RCUTP) is not reasonably large. In my case it has 1.0 nm
(acctually twin rang cut-off 1.0/1.6 is used). I tried to run the same
simulation with pair list construction cut-off 1.2 and 1.6 nm, but the
same warning occures.

Has anybody experienced similar problem? Any help will be appreciated.

Mateusz Nowak

Jagiellonian Univ.
Krakow
POLAND


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 05:44:14 2001
Received: from rzumail2.unizh.ch (rzumail2.unizh.ch [130.60.128.10])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1DAiEw19083
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 05:44:14 -0500
Received: from zisgi.unizh.ch (zisgi.unizh.ch [130.60.19.17])
	by rzumail2.unizh.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/08) with ESMTP id LAA18211;
	Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:44:12 +0100 (MET)
From: "Dr. Peter Burger" <chburger@aci.unizh.ch>
Received: [(chburger@localhost)
           by zisgi.unizh.ch (SGI-8.9.3/SMI-IRIX6.2/USAR_MAIL_V2) id LAA42365;
           Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:44:12 +0100 (MET)]
Message-Id: <200102131044.LAA42365@zisgi.unizh.ch>
Subject: Re: CCL:Second negative frequency
To: dturner@syntem-sa.fr (David Turner)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:44:12 +0100 (CET)
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <3A88ED90.89EC1676@syntem-sa.fr> from "David Turner" at Feb 13, 1 09:17:20 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Good point,

however, what are you going to do about it? I spent alot computer time
in reoptimizing using the calculated hessian / recalculating the second
derivatives (sometimes several times) and had the excact same question.
I analyzed these low frequencies and in my case quite often these were
just rotations of methyl groups etc. in the peripheral positions, while
the larger imaginary frequency was corresponding to the TS.  

Anyways, this made me wonder how this is handled
in publications. Are these sometimes small frequencies 
sometimes ignored? Will this be always mentioned
in the paper, would the referees accept additional imaginary
frequencies if they had been analyzed thoroughly?

 Sorry, for this question I do not want to
blame anyone - but being originally  not trained
as an theoretical chemist, I am just curious.  So far,
I was lucky to get rid of all additional negative frequencies, 
by reoptimization, but considering the usual error bars of these
frequencies as mentioned in the last post and the size of some of my
systems (DFT on 50-130 atoms with numerical second derivatives by finite
difference), I could be tempted to just mention in the paper that
that there is a residual small imaginary frequency, which I
cannot get rid of with reasonable computational effort, e.g. redo the
force calculation a third or forth time.

Any comments?

Peter

> Your second value (36 cm-1) could easily be positive given the error 
> associated with normal mode calculations (+/-50 cm-1 or so). Perhaps
> you have only one imaginary frequency ...


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 06:55:27 2001
Received: from mx1.ustc.edu.cn ([61.132.182.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1DBtMw20209
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 06:55:23 -0500
Received: from mail.ustc.edu.cn (mail.ustc.edu.cn [202.38.64.10])
	by mx1.ustc.edu.cn (8.8.7/8.8.6) with SMTP id UAA26876
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:37:46 -0800
Received: (qmail 1557 invoked by uid 1944); 13 Feb 2001 11:46:42 -0000
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 19:46:42 +0800 (CST)
From: Zhiyong Zhang <zzy@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
X-X-Sender:  <zzy@mail>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
cc: <amber@cgl.ucsf.edu>
Subject: One article
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.31L2A.0102102127010.15829-100000@mail>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hi, everyone:
        Now, I am eager to get one article:

Title:  "Free energy calculations on binding and catalysis by alpha-lytic
protease: the role of substrate size in the P1 pocket."

Authors: "Caldwell JW, Agard DA, and Kollman PA."

Journal: "PROTEINS: Structure, Function and Genetics"

Date: "1991; 10(2): 140-148

        Can anyone tell me a site to download this article? Or any other
suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you in advance.

Regards
Zhiyong

********************************************************
Zhiyong Zhang, Ph.D student of Professor Yunyu Shi,
Laboratory of Structural Biology,
School of Life Science,
University of Science and Technology of China (USTC),
Hefei, Anhui 230027,
P.R. China.
Tel: +86-551-3603754 or +86-551-3630875
Fax: +86-551-3603754
Email: zzy@mail.ustc.edu.cn
********************************************************


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 00:51:33 2001
Received: from iitkgp.iitkgp.ernet.in ([202.141.127.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1D5pUw17868
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 00:51:31 -0500
Received: from cts.iitkgp.ernet.in (cts.iitkgp.ernet.in [144.16.192.220])
	by iitkgp.iitkgp.ernet.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12527
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:19:43 -0500 (GMT)
Received: from localhost (rajarshi@localhost)
	by cts.iitkgp.ernet.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA08860
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:08:59 +0530
X-Authentication-Warning: cts.iitkgp.ernet.in: rajarshi owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:08:59 +0530 (IST)
From: Rajarshi Guha <rajarshi@presidency.com>
X-X-Sender:  <rajarshi@cts.iitkgp.ernet.in>
To: CompuChem List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: z matrix to cartesian
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.32.0102131108240.8831-100000@cts.iitkgp.ernet.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hi,
   does anybody know any command line utility that would convert a z
matrix to cartesian coords?


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rajarshi Guha                  | Circumstances rule men; men do not rule
Dept Of Chemistry,             | circumstances.
IIT Kharagpur.                 |
                               |                   -- Herodotus
email: rajarshi@presidency.com |
web  : www.psynet.net/jijog    |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 02:18:11 2001
Received: from mserv.itpa.lt (mserv.itpa.lt [193.219.53.20])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1D7Ghw18159
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 02:16:50 -0500
Received: from localhost (tamulis@localhost)
	by mserv.itpa.lt (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1D7Cvx29753;
	Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:13:12 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from tamulis@itpa.lt)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:12:56 +0200 (EET)
From: Arvydas Tamulis <tamulis@itpa.lt>
To: "Cust. Service Doug" <gaussian.com!csd@gaussian.com>
cc: <chemistry@ccl.net>, <help@gaussian.com>,
   Jelena Tamuliene <gicevic@itpa.lt>
Subject: Re: CCL:Paramagnetically shifted 1H NMR spectra
In-Reply-To: <QQkcce10741.200102122012@wodc7ug0.ffx.ops.us.uu.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102130847100.29506-100000@mserv.itpa.lt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear Dauoglas Fox and other Netters who responded me during last days
concerning calculations of paramagnetically shifted 1H NMR spectra
possessing up to 135 ppm values.

During last days I clearified that for large (100 ppm) paramagnetic
1H shifts are responsible not good basis sets (only few ppm) and not
electron correlations (only tens ppm) but including relativistic effects:
'electron spin-orbit', 'electron spin-spin', and 'electron spin - proton
spin', etc. couplings. I do not know what relativism it is included in DALTON
and DIRAC packages (maybe here can respond experts from these teams) but
for my opinion if it is included 'electron spin - proton spin' coupling
that should give these 100 ppm paramagnetic shifts in 1H NMR spectra.

Maybe in other programs people are doing such a inclusions of
'electron spin - proton spin couplings'?
I would be appreciate if somebody will allow me to perform trial calculations
of biliverdin CuOEB molecule 1H NMR spectrum using DALTON, DIRAC or other
program with implemented as much as possible relativistic effects.

Thanking your in advance for further discussions and advises.

Yours sincerely, Arvydas Tamulis
Enclosed please find X-Ray geometry of CuOEB molecule in Angstroms:
 Cu1                   0.        0.        0.
 O2                    0.2239   -2.96653  -1.55039
 N3                    1.38133  -1.33544  -0.35323
 N4                    1.38119   1.34207   0.36885
 C5                    1.22628  -2.58553  -0.97483
 C6                    2.51385  -3.33756  -0.86868
 C7                    3.37827  -2.55016  -0.22896
 C8                    2.67395  -1.28282   0.09472
 C9                    3.26426  -0.17877   0.65202
 C10                   2.68854   1.08761   0.70813
 C11                   3.38244   2.34651   0.96318
 C12                   2.50269   3.34699   0.72477
 C13                   1.25013   2.71593   0.35196
 C14                   0.0751    3.37078   0.
 C15                   2.68652  -4.68205  -1.49633
 C16                   3.05674  -4.56912  -2.96369
 C17                   4.84657  -2.77602   0.04178
 C18                   5.72923  -2.08939  -1.00856
 C19                   4.85471   2.43112   1.27447
 C20                   5.69449   2.34802   0.0041
 C21                   2.72592   4.83225   0.72854
 C22                   2.87181   5.41601  -0.67222
 H23                   4.13917  -0.29105   1.00274
 H24                   0.09707   4.35684   0.
 H25                   1.8737   -5.18468  -1.40342
 H26                   3.37402  -5.20107  -1.07412
 H27                   3.13618  -5.45897  -3.37019
 H28                   2.36288  -4.06322  -3.3895
 H29                   3.87718  -4.07992  -3.05734
 H30                   5.00432  -3.74715   0.00503
 H31                   5.07799  -2.46117   0.91361
 H32                   6.64112  -2.28581  -0.82449
 H33                   5.51113  -2.4159   -1.88189
 H34                   5.58593  -1.11668  -0.96462
 H35                   5.10459   1.68705   1.84642
 H36                   5.03303   3.27735   1.73233
 H37                   6.61722   2.41078   0.21711
 H38                   5.52484   1.4978   -0.44582
 H39                   5.45344   3.10135  -0.56135
 H40                   3.50226   5.01567   1.24612
 H41                   1.98737   5.25961   1.1645
 H42                   3.01354   6.38803  -0.58859
 H43                   3.62122   5.00544  -1.10604
 H44                   2.09038   5.25163  -1.1876
 N45                  -1.43943  -1.27259   0.35323
 N46                  -1.32005   1.40226  -0.36885
 C47                  -1.12793   2.76892  -0.35196
 C48                  -1.34022  -2.52835   0.97483
 C49                  -2.72843  -1.16245  -0.09472
 C50                  -2.63743   1.20627  -0.70813
 C51                  -2.35113   3.45514  -0.72477
 O52                  -0.3558   -2.95361   1.55039
 C54                  -2.66     -3.22228   0.86868
 C55                  -3.4885   -2.39716   0.22896
 C56                  -3.26899  -0.0332   -0.65201
 C57                  -3.27458   2.49484  -0.96318
 C58                  -2.50799   4.94886  -0.72854
 C59                  -2.89238  -4.55775   1.49633
 C60                  -4.9654   -2.5574   -0.04178
 H61                  -4.14802  -0.1064   -1.00274
 C62                  -4.74161   2.64493  -1.27447
 C63                  -2.62775   5.53854   0.67222
 H64                  -3.2754    5.16668  -1.24612
 H65                  -1.75115   5.34291  -1.1645
 C66                  -3.2572   -4.42844   2.96368
 H67                  -2.10276  -5.09608   1.40342
 H68                  -3.60232  -5.04563   1.07412
 C69                  -5.8166   -1.83214   1.00856
 H70                  -5.16625  -3.52054  -0.00503
 H71                  -5.18257  -2.23255  -0.91362
 C72                  -5.58426   2.59932  -0.0041
 H73                  -5.02439   1.91273  -1.84642
 H74                  -4.88207   3.49828  -1.73233
 H75                  -2.72604   6.51592   0.58859
 H76                  -3.3947    5.16177   1.10604
 H77                  -1.85441   5.33953   1.1876
 H78                  -3.37619  -5.31387   3.37019
 H79                  -2.5415   -3.95395   3.3895
 H80                  -4.05504  -3.90319   3.05734
 H81                  -6.73633  -1.98774   0.82449
 H82                  -5.61326  -2.16804   1.88189
 H83                  -5.63012  -0.86678   0.96462
 H84                  -6.50328   2.70312  -0.21711
 H85                  -5.45265   1.74239   0.44582
 H86                  -5.3099    3.34117   0.56135
***********************************************************
>

On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Cust. Service Doug wrote:

>
>    Dr. Tamulis,
>
>    I don't have ready access to this journal at my office.  Can
> you send the structure you used?  Have you verified that the
> environment around these protons is reasonably described by this
> input structure?
>
>    Generally the shifts in proton NMR calculations are good only to
> about 10% which makes them less appropriate for structural studies
> but the wide range you report from the experiment should be reproduced
> at least qualitatively.
>
> >
> > Dear Netters,
> >
> > We did not succeeded to calculate paramagnetically shifted 1H NMR spectrum
> > of biliverdin molecule CuOEB using Gaussian 98 (see experimental data in
> > J. Am. Chem.Soc., vol. 115, p. 12206 (1993)).
> >
> > We have optimized geometry of TeMeSilane molecule and obtained from NMR
> > calculation the Isotropic Shielding values for H atoms (in ppm):
> >
> >    H    Isotropic =    31.9027   Anisotropy =     9.6413
> >    XX=    29.4642   YX=     0.2951   ZX=    -0.7329
> >    XY=     0.4642   YY=    32.9871   ZY=    -5.1492
> >    XZ=    -0.8947   YZ=    -5.1015   ZZ=    33.2567
> >    Eigenvalues:    27.9348    29.4430    38.3302
> >
> > We have used Density Functional Theory B3PW91/6-311G**
> >
> > We have taken geometry of CuOEB from X-Ray experiment.
> > Our B3PW91\6-311G** calculated CuOEB NMR  Hm shielding values (ppm):
> >  23  H    Isotropic =    28.4781   Anisotropy =    10.0683
> >    XX=    24.0637   YX=    -1.2135   ZX=     -.8179
> >    XY=     -.0906   YY=    35.1141   ZY=    -2.2717
> >    XZ=     9.0739   YZ=     1.6948   ZZ=    26.2566
> >    Eigenvalues:    20.8808    29.3633    35.1904
> >
> >  60  H    Isotropic =    27.5216   Anisotropy =    12.3793
> >    XX=    22.4061   YX=     2.7621   ZX=    -1.0495
> >    XY=     -.3733   YY=    35.4454   ZY=     2.7019
> >    XZ=    10.0293   YZ=    -6.4196   ZZ=    24.7134
> >    Eigenvalues:    18.6646    28.1258    35.7745
> >
> >  and shielding Hm' value:
> > 24  H    Isotropic =    25.8868   Anisotropy =    16.3237
> >    XX=    36.5750   YX=     -.6396   ZX=     4.7813
> >    XY=     -.0379   YY=    23.9614   ZY=      .1694
> >    XZ=     -.9100   YZ=     2.3766   ZZ=    17.1241
> >    Eigenvalues:    16.7005    24.1907    36.7693
> >
> > It means that our calculated chemical shifts for Hm and Hm' are equal to
> > few ppm while CuOEB experimental NMR chemical shift values for Hm and Hm' in
> > J. Am. Chem.Soc., vol 115, p. 12206 are equal approximately to 135 ppm and
> > -100 ppm.
> >
> > Why so badly we have calculated paramagnetically shifted 1H NMR spectrum
> > for CuOEB molecule?
> > Maybe GAUSSIAN is not able to calculate paramagnetically shifted 1H NMR
> > spectra?
> > Which program is suitable for calculations of paramagnetically shifted 1H
> > NMR spectra?
> >
> > Thanking your in advance.
> > With best regards, Arvydas Tamulis & Jelena Tamuliene
> > *******************************************************
> >            Arvydas Tamulis
> >
> > Doctor of Natural Sciences, senior research fellow
> >
> > Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astronomy,
> > Theoretical Molecular Electronics Research Group,
> > A. Gostauto 12, Vilnius 2600, Lithuania
> > e-mail: TAMULIS@ITPA.lt; WEBsite: http://www.itpa.lt/~tamulis/
> > fax: +(370-2)-225361  or  +(370-2)-224694
> > Phone: +(370-2)-620861
> > Home address: Didlaukio 27-40, Vilnius 2057, Lithuania
> > Phone: +(370-2)-778743
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> > CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
> > MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> > CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
> > Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
>   Douglas J. Fox
>   Technical Support
>   Gaussian, Inc.
>   help@gaussian.com
>
>



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 04:41:23 2001
Received: from merlin2.unizar.es (root@merlin2.unizar.es [155.210.208.12])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1D9fMw18798
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 04:41:22 -0500
Received: from posta.unizar.es (root@merlin2.unizar.es [155.210.208.12])
	by merlin2.unizar.es (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1D9fFi29100
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 04:41:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from qo_ttf-p3 ([155.210.88.182])
	by posta.unizar.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id KAA08435
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:39:23 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <005601c095a1$1ed25cf0$b658d29b@qo_ttf-p3>
From: "Jesus Orduna" <jorduna@posta.unizar.es>
To: "CCL" <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: DFT Hyperpolarizabilities in G98:Summary.
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:41:20 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0053_01C095A9.80615D10"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0053_01C095A9.80615D10
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi all,

A few days ago I made a question on the calculation of =
hyperpolarizabilities using DFT in Gaussian 98.

According to the answers I have recieved DFT hyperpolarizabilities can =
be calculated as second numerical derivatives of the dipole moment using =
the keywords polar=3Denonly or as numerical derivatives of the =
polarizability using published methods. Here is the original question =
and the answers.

Thanks to everybody who responded

Original question:

Hi all,

I am interested in the calculation of DFT first hyperpolarizabilities =
(beta). To the best of my knowledge, G98 is not able to calculate =
analytical hyperpolarizabilities by dft methods (even though the manual =
is rather confussing concerning this point). The only way I have been =
able to calculate beta is using the keyword POLAR=3DEnOnly, that causes =
the calculation of beta as the second numerical derivative of the dipole =
moment with respect to the electric field. Since analytical =
polarizabilities (alfa) are available in G98 I wonder if there is a way =
to calculate beta as the first numerical derivative of alfa which should =
lead to a more rapid and precise calculation.

A second question concerns the calculation of second =
hyperpolarizabilities (gamma). Can they be calculated in G98 using =
either  HF or DFT methods.

Regards

Answers:

Dear Jesus:=20

how about using the ADF code?=20

See: http://www.scm.com/=20

and a couple of papers such as:=20

     S J A van Gisbergen, J G Snijders, and E J Baerends, Comput. Phys. =
Commun. 118, 119, (1999)=20
     S J A van Gisbergen, J G Snijders, and E J Baerends, J. Chem. Phys. =
109, 10644 (1998)=20
     S J A van Gisbergen, J G Snijders, and E J Baerends, Phys. Rev. =
Lett. 78, 3097 (1997)=20

Best regards, Georg=20

Here is one more reference:=20

Van Gisbergen SJA, Guerra CF, Baerends EJ=20
     Towards excitation energies and (hyper)polarizability calculations =
of large molecules. Application of parallelization=20
     and linear scaling techniques to time-dependent density functional =
response theory=20
     J COMPUT CHEM 21: (16) 1511-1523 DEC 2000=20

--Dr. Georg Schreckenbach          phone: +44-1925-603849
CLRC Daresbury Laboratory      FAX: +44-1925-603634
Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire, WA4 4AD, UK
h.g.schreckenbach@dl.ac.uk   http://www.geocities.com/gschreckenbach/

si colocas #P polar(numer,enonly)=20
te calcula alpha y beta como la derivada num=E9rica de la energ=EDa con =
respecto al camp=F2 aplicado.

Existe un m=E9todo llamado campo finito. El cual est=E1 muy bien =
explicado en el siguiente articulo: Kurtz, H; Stewart, J; Dieter, K. =
Journal of computational Chemistry, Vol. 11, No. 1,(1990), pp. 82-87.

si deseas algunos detalles me puedes escribir

Espero que sea de ayuda.

P.D. Disculpa que no te haya contestado en ingl=E9s, pero en vista de =
que eres de Espa=F1a creo que para m=ED es m=E1s sencillo explicarte en =
nuestro idioma :o)

--=20
N=E9stor Cubill=E1n
Laboratorio de Electr=F3nica Molecular
La Universidad del Zulia
Maracaibo-Venezuela

Hello Jesus,

We are used to run Gaussian to get these alpha, beta
and gamma values at different levels of approximation.
Maybe you would like to have a look at these papers:
JCP, 109, 10489 (1998),
JPC A 104, 4755 (2000),
CPL, 284, 24 (1998),
J. Molec. Struct. 528, 151 (2000).

Best regards,

Beno=EEt

Dr. Benoit CHAMPAGNE
CTA Lab
FUNDP
Rue de Bruxelles, 61
B-5000 Namur
BELGIUM
http://www.scf.fundp.ac.be/~bchampag/
Tel : 00 32 81 724554
Fax : 00 32 81 724567



Yes, you are right. What you should do, if possible, is just calculate =
the analytical alfa,
in several jobs, where you change the electric field in steps of =
1.0*10-4 a.u.
The minimum number of jobs would then be 7.


   A second question concerns the calculation of second =
hyperpolarizabilities (gamma). Can they be calculated in G98 using =
either  HF or DFT methods.


With HF, that should be no problem, but with DFT probably not, since you =
can not even calculate the first hyperpolarizability.


Recuerdos,


Marcel.
--=20
Marcel Swart


Theoretische Chemie (MSC) / Moleculaire Dynamica (GBB)
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Nijenborgh 4
9747 AG Groningen
The Netherlands
m.swart@chem.rug.nl
http://go.to/m.swart


Dear Jesus,

to calculate beta and gamma components you can see the expansion series
and the finite-field expressions as reported in:

J.Phys.Chem. 97, 1993, 1158; J. Chem. Phys. 103, 1995, 4157

Best regards

Andrea








------=_NextPart_000_0053_01C095A9.80615D10
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindows-1252" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Hi all,</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>A few days ago I made a question on the calculation of =

hyperpolarizabilities using DFT in Gaussian 98.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>According to the answers I have recieved DFT=20
hyperpolarizabilities can be calculated as second numerical derivatives =
of the=20
dipole moment using the keywords polar=3Denonly or as numerical =
derivatives of the=20
polarizability using published methods. Here is the original question =
and the=20
answers.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Thanks to everybody who responded</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Original question:</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Hi all,</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>I am interested in the calculation of DFT first=20
hyperpolarizabilities (beta). To the best of my knowledge, G98 is not =
able to=20
calculate analytical hyperpolarizabilities by dft methods (even though =
the=20
manual is rather confussing concerning this point). The only way I have =
been=20
able to calculate beta is using the keyword POLAR=3DEnOnly, that causes =
the=20
calculation of beta as the second numerical derivative of the dipole =
moment with=20
respect to the electric field. Since analytical polarizabilities (alfa) =
are=20
available in G98 I wonder if there is a way to calculate beta as the =
first=20
numerical derivative of alfa which should lead to a more rapid and =
precise=20
calculation.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>A second question concerns the calculation of second=20
hyperpolarizabilities (gamma). Can they be calculated in G98 using =
either&nbsp;=20
HF or DFT methods.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Regards</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Answers:</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Dear Jesus: </FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>how about using the ADF code? </FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>See: <A =
href=3D"http://www.scm.com/">http://www.scm.com/</A>=20
</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>and a couple of papers such as: </FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; S J A van Gisbergen, J G =
Snijders, and=20
E J Baerends, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 119, (1999)=20
<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; S J A van Gisbergen, J G Snijders, and E J=20
Baerends, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 10644 (1998) <BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
S J A=20
van Gisbergen, J G Snijders, and E J Baerends, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3097 =
(1997)=20
</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Best regards, Georg </FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Here is one more reference: </FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Van Gisbergen SJA, Guerra CF, Baerends EJ=20
<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Towards excitation energies and=20
(hyper)polarizability calculations of large molecules. Application of=20
parallelization <BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; and linear scaling =
techniques to=20
time-dependent density functional response theory =
<BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; J=20
COMPUT CHEM 21: (16) 1511-1523 DEC 2000 </FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>--Dr. Georg=20
Schreckenbach&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
phone:=20
+44-1925-603849CLRC Daresbury Laboratory&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
FAX:=20
+44-1925-603634Daresbury, Warrington, Cheshire, WA4 4AD, UK
h.g.schreckenbach@dl.ac.uk&nbsp;&nbsp; <A=20
href=3D"http://www.geocities.com/gschreckenbach/">http://www.geocities.co=
m/gschreckenbach/</A></FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>si colocas #P polar(numer,enonly) <BR>te calcula alpha =
y beta=20
como la derivada num=E9rica de la energ=EDa con respecto al camp=F2=20
aplicado.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Existe un m=E9todo llamado campo finito. El cual =
est=E1 muy bien=20
explicado en el siguiente articulo: Kurtz, H; Stewart, J; Dieter, K. =
Journal of=20
computational Chemistry, Vol. 11, No. 1,(1990), pp. 82-87.<BR><BR>si =
deseas=20
algunos detalles me puedes escribir<BR><BR>Espero que sea de =
ayuda.<BR><BR>P.D.=20
Disculpa que no te haya contestado en ingl=E9s, pero en vista de que =
eres de=20
Espa=F1a creo que para m=ED es m=E1s sencillo explicarte en nuestro =
idioma=20
:o)<BR><BR>-- <BR>N=E9stor Cubill=E1n<BR>Laboratorio de Electr=F3nica =
Molecular<BR>La=20
Universidad del Zulia<BR>Maracaibo-Venezuela</FONT></P>
<P><FONT size=3D2>Hello Jesus,<BR><BR>We are used to run Gaussian to get =
these=20
alpha, beta<BR>and gamma values at different levels of =
approximation.<BR>Maybe=20
you would like to have a look at these papers:<BR>JCP, 109, 10489 =
(1998),<BR>JPC=20
A 104, 4755 (2000),<BR>CPL, 284, 24 (1998),<BR>J. Molec. Struct. 528, =
151=20
(2000).<BR><BR>Best regards,<BR><BR>Beno=EEt<BR><BR>Dr. Benoit =
CHAMPAGNE<BR>CTA=20
Lab<BR>FUNDP<BR>Rue de Bruxelles, 61<BR>B-5000 Namur<BR>BELGIUM<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.scf.fundp.ac.be/~bchampag/">http://www.scf.fundp.ac.be=
/~bchampag/</A><BR>Tel=20
: 00 32 81 724554<BR>Fax : 00 32 81 724567<BR><BR></FONT></P>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Yes, you are right. What you should do, if possible, =
is just=20
calculate the analytical alfa,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>in several jobs, where you change the electric field =
in steps=20
of 1.0*10-4 a.u.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>The minimum number of jobs would then be =
7.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE type=3D"cite" cite>
  <DIV><FONT size=3D2>&nbsp;A second question concerns the calculation =
of second=20
  hyperpolarizabilities (gamma). Can they be calculated in G98 using=20
  either&nbsp; HF or DFT methods.</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV><BR>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>With HF, that should be no problem, but with DFT =
probably not,=20
since you can not even calculate the first =
hyperpolarizability.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Recuerdos,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Marcel.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>-- <BR>Marcel Swart</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Theoretische Chemie (MSC) / Moleculaire Dynamica=20
(GBB)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Rijksuniversiteit Groningen</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Nijenborgh 4</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>9747 AG Groningen</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>The Netherlands</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>m.swart@chem.rug.nl</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2><A=20
href=3D"http://go.to/m.swart">http://go.to/m.swart</A></FONT></DIV><BR>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Dear Jesus,<BR><BR>to calculate beta and gamma =
components you=20
can see the expansion series<BR>and the finite-field expressions as =
reported=20
in:<BR><BR>J.Phys.Chem. 97, 1993, 1158; J. Chem. Phys. 103, 1995,=20
4157<BR><BR>Best regards<BR><BR>Andrea<BR><BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><BR>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0053_01C095A9.80615D10--



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 04:52:10 2001
Received: from web9613.mail.yahoo.com (web9613.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.131.12])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f1D9qAw18855
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 04:52:10 -0500
Message-ID: <20010213095209.59533.qmail@web9613.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [161.142.10.11] by web9613.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 01:52:09 PST
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 01:52:09 -0800 (PST)
From: sohail qamar <sohailqamar@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: CCL:AMBER6*COMPILATION ON SUN*
To: Cory Pye <cpye@crux.stmarys.ca>
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10102111234031.16499-100000@ap>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


--- Cory Pye <cpye@crux.stmarys.ca> wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, sohail qamar wrote:
> 
> > I am getting errors with f77 compiler.I have
> installed
> > the licenses properly(as far as I know) but still
> its
> > giving me an output of missing licence file in
> > flexlm/licences/licences.dat If I put the
> appropriate
> > license files in path it still give me errors.
> > 
> > It also give an error of setting domain name to 1
> or
> > to use etc/resolve.configfile but I have none in
> my
> > sun.
> 
> 
> This might be called /etc/resolv.conf ?
> 
> It typically has a list like:
> 
> domain <domainname>
> nameserver <IPnameserver#1>
> nameserver <IPnameserver#2>
> 
> The <domainname>, and <IPnameserver#X> information
> you will need to get from 
> your network administrator.
> It sounds as though you might have a network
> misconfiguration.
> 
> The resolv.conf file, if used, basically tells the
> computer what network it 
> belongs to and what host to use as a nameserver
> (certain hosts on a network 
> give out information which matches a symbolic name
> to an assigned IP address 
> (of course real IP addresses must use numbers
> expressible in 8 bits, 
> 0<IP_field<255).
> 
> See examples
> satan.word98.hell.com            666.666.666.666
> god.latex.heaven.ca              3.3.3.3
> fibonacci.math.edu               2.3.5.8
> 
> The nameserver would be given a numeric IP address,
> because at this point, the computer doesn't know
> anything about names.
> 
> domain     heaven.ca.
> nameserver 3.3.2.1       ;
> stpeter.pearlygates.heaven.ca
> 
> What might be happening is that the licencing
> software needs to know the 
> hostname in order to generate some internal code,
> which it can't get.
> 
> > 
> > If any friend has compiled amber6 on sun.sparc
> please
> > give me some idea.
> > 
> > sohail.
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
> - only $35 
> > a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> > 
> > 
> > -= This is automatically added to each message by
> mailing script =-
> > CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  |
> CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
> > MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> > CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |   
> Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
> > Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW:
> http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>    *************    !  Dr. Cory C. Pye
>  *****************  !  Assistant Professor 
> ***   **    **  **  !  Theoretical and Computational
> Chemistry
> **   *  ****        !  Department of Chemistry,
> Saint Mary's University
> **      *  *        !  923 Robie Street, Halifax, NS
> B3H 3C3
> **      *  *        !  cpye@crux.stmarys.ca  
> http://apwww.stmarys.ca/cpye 
> ***     *  *    **  !  Ph: (902)-420-5654 
> FAX:(902)-496-8104 
>  *****************  !  
>    *************    !  Les Hartree-Focks (Apologies
> to Montreal Canadien Fans)
> 
> 
 Dr. cory,
I amm still getting errors after solving various.
especially there is no lib file in my system,  f77:
Cannot find /usr/lib/v8plusa/libm.il. i am getting the
following errors.can u giveany suggestion.

cd addles; make install
../Compile L0 -P lesmain.f
cat lesmain.f | /lib/cpp  -P   -DSPARC -DISTAR2 
-DMEM_ALLOC   > _lesmain_.f
/usr/lang/f77 -c -Nl50 -fast -O1 _lesmain_.f
f77: Warning: Optimizer level changed from 1 to 3 to
support dependence based tr
ansformations
f77: Warning: -xarch=v8plusa is not portable
_lesmain_.f:
 MAIN:
"_lesmain_.f", line 237: Warning: local variable
"tntheta" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 239: Warning: local variable
"tifcap" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 314: Warning: local variable
"inlist" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 320: Warning: local variable
"title" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 324: Warning: local variable "tx"
never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 324: Warning: local variable "ty"
never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 324: Warning: local variable "tz"
never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 326: Warning: local variable "tvx"
never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 326: Warning: local variable "tvy"
never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 326: Warning: local variable "tvz"
never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 337: Warning: local variable
"ncop" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 341: Warning: local variable
"revpoint" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 341: Warning: local variable
"poiatom" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 342: Warning: local variable
"tlesid" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 342: Warning: local variable
"tnlev" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 343: Warning: local variable
"tbfach" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 343: Warning: local variable
"tbfac" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 343: Warning: local variable
"tafach" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 343: Warning: local variable
"tafac" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 344: Warning: local variable
"ttfach" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 344: Warning: local variable
"ttfac" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 345: Warning: local variable
"nexcl" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 345: Warning: local variable
"tnexcl" never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 346: Warning: local variable "j1"
never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 346: Warning: local variable "i2"
never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 346: Warning: local variable "i3"
never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 346: Warning: local variable "k5"
never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 346: Warning: local variable "i4"
never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 369: Warning: local variable "i1"
never used
"_lesmain_.f", line 370: Warning: local variable
"chgbox" never used
f77: Cannot find /usr/lib/v8plusa/libm.il
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target
`lesmain.o'
Current working directory
/export/home/sohail/AMBER/amber6/src/addles
*** Error code 1
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `install'

*** Select Close or Exit from the window menu to close
this window ***










__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 08:12:04 2001
Received: from vytautas.vdu.lt (vytautas.vdu.lt [193.219.38.33])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1DDA8w20570
	for <chemistry@server.ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:11:34 -0500
Received: from vaidila.vdu.lt ([193.219.38.52] ident=root)
	by vytautas.vdu.lt with esmtp
	for chemistry@server.ccl.net
	id 14Sf9q-0002iB-00; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:06:14 +0200
Received: from vaidila.vdu.lt (vejas.vdu.lt [193.219.38.82])
	by vaidila.vdu.lt (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA11485
	for <chemistry@server.ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:06:44 +0200 (GMT)
Message-ID: <3A8896D7.77AC3A6B@vaidila.vdu.lt>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 03:07:20 +0100
From: "art'" <Arturas.Ziemys@vaidila.vdu.lt>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: chemistry@server.ccl.net
Subject: CCL: reference on polarizabilities vs. molecular reactivity/electronic 
 structure ?
References: <200008231930.PAA03790@comppub.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi, CCL'ers,

Is there any reference on relation between polarizabilities and molecular
reactivity or electronic structure ?

Have a nice day
Arturas Z.



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 09:06:44 2001
Received: from argyle.richmond.edu (argyle.richmond.edu [141.166.188.18])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1DE6iw21049
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:06:44 -0500
Received: from sabrash (lfa222012.richmond.edu [141.166.222.12])
	by argyle.richmond.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f1DE0TO15257;
	Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:00:29 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20010213085728.008af680@facstaff.richmond.edu>
X-Sender: sabrash@facstaff.richmond.edu
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:57:28 -0500
To: "Dr. Peter Burger" <chburger@aci.unizh.ch>, dturner@syntem-sa.fr
From: "Samuel A. Abrash" <sabrash@richmond.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:Second negative frequency
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <200102131044.LAA42365@zisgi.unizh.ch>
References: <3A88ED90.89EC1676@syntem-sa.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Of course there is the possibility that it is real.  I haven't looked at
the molecule under discussion but many molecules have internal rotation
degrees of freedom, or other degrees of freedom in which the potential
energy surface is very flat.  In those cases, it can be very difficult to
locate the minimum of the PES in that coordinate.  Another possibility is
that the symmetry that the calculation is being carried out in may be too
high to allow a true minimum to be reached.  Perhaps the symmetry needs to
be relaxed.

Best regards,
Sam Abrash


At 11:44 AM 02/13/2001 +0100, Dr. Peter Burger wrote:
>Good point,
>
>however, what are you going to do about it? I spent alot computer time
>in reoptimizing using the calculated hessian / recalculating the second
>derivatives (sometimes several times) and had the excact same question.
>I analyzed these low frequencies and in my case quite often these were
>just rotations of methyl groups etc. in the peripheral positions, while
>the larger imaginary frequency was corresponding to the TS.  
>
>Anyways, this made me wonder how this is handled
>in publications. Are these sometimes small frequencies 
>sometimes ignored? Will this be always mentioned
>in the paper, would the referees accept additional imaginary
>frequencies if they had been analyzed thoroughly?
>
> Sorry, for this question I do not want to
>blame anyone - but being originally  not trained
>as an theoretical chemist, I am just curious.  So far,
>I was lucky to get rid of all additional negative frequencies, 
>by reoptimization, but considering the usual error bars of these
>frequencies as mentioned in the last post and the size of some of my
>systems (DFT on 50-130 atoms with numerical second derivatives by finite
>difference), I could be tempted to just mention in the paper that
>that there is a residual small imaginary frequency, which I
>cannot get rid of with reasonable computational effort, e.g. redo the
>force calculation a third or forth time.
>
>Any comments?
>
>Peter
>
>> Your second value (36 cm-1) could easily be positive given the error 
>> associated with normal mode calculations (+/-50 cm-1 or so). Perhaps
>> you have only one imaginary frequency ...
>
>
>-= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
>CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
>MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
>CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
>Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net
>
>
>
>
>
Samuel A. Abrash
Associate Professor
Department of Chemistry 
University of Richmond
Richmond, VA 23173
Phone: (804) 289-8248
Fax: (804) 287-1897
E-mail: sabrash@richmond.edu
http://www.richmond.edu/~sabrash
"The time it takes to complete a scientific project is given by the
equation t = 2a + b, where a is the original estimate, 2 is a correction
factor, and b is a number large compared to 2a."

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 09:35:50 2001
Received: from relay.it.northwestern.edu (relay.acns.nwu.edu [129.105.16.56])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1DEZow21204
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:35:50 -0500
Received: (from mailnull@localhost)
	by relay.it.northwestern.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA11075;
	Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:35:49 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [129.105.9.174] (pine-4-009174.nuts.nwu.edu [129.105.9.174]) by relay.acns.nwu.edu via smap (V2.0)
	id xma010416; Tue, 13 Feb 01 08:35:38 -0600
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: hutchisn@mercury.chem.northwestern.edu
Message-Id: <p05010404b6aef6569b9c@[129.105.9.174]>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.32.0102131108240.8831-100000@cts.iitkgp.ernet.in>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.32.0102131108240.8831-100000@cts.iitkgp.ernet.in>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:35:29 -0600
To: Rajarshi Guha <rajarshi@presidency.com>
From: Geoff Hutchison <hutchisn@chem.nwu.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:z matrix to cartesian
Cc: CompuChem List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

At 11:08 AM +0530 2/13/01, Rajarshi Guha wrote:
>    does anybody know any command line utility that would convert a z
>matrix to cartesian coords?

Sure. There are various z-matrix formats and Cartesian formats 
handled by babel.

<http://www.eyesopen.com/babel.html>

-- 
--
-Geoff Hutchison	<hutchisn@chem.nwu.edu>
Ratner/Marks Groups
Northwestern Chemistry	http://www.chem.nwu.edu/

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 10:34:24 2001
Received: from interlock.herc.com (interlock.herc.com [199.221.7.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f1DFYMw21439
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:34:23 -0500
Received: from csdnsg1.herc.com ([147.116.14.51]) by interlock.herc.com with SMTP id KAA14308
  (InterLock SMTP Gateway  for <chemistry@ccl.net>);
  Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:34:07 -0500
Subject: polymer structures
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Cc: 
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.2b  December 16, 1999
Message-Id: <OF8246497F.F7902997-ON862569F2.0054AB14@herc.com>
From: Goutam.Das@betzdearborn.com
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:32:35 -0600
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Mimetrack: Serialize by Router on CSDNSG1/Servers/Herc(Release 5.0.1b|September 30, 1999) at
 02/13/2001 10:21:06 AM
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Dear CCL'ers

Could anyone of you send me pointers on calculated structures of EVA
copolymers, polyalkyl acrylates/methacrylates,  Ethylyne, vinyl acetate,
isobutylene terpolymers.  Do they exist at all in litera ture?  I did find
some studies on poly alkyl acrylates but that is all.  What is the best way
(level of theory, etc) to calculate the structure of a "unit cell" of e.g.
Polyoctadecyl acrylate?

Thanks in anticipation


Goutam Das
Staff Scientist
BetzDearborn Division of Hercules
The Woodlands, TX 77380
281.367.6201 ext 425


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 11:22:57 2001
Received: from schrodinger.com (root@thermidore.schrodinger.com [192.156.98.99])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1DGMuw22099
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:22:56 -0500
Received: from erica.schrodinger.com (erica.schrodinger.com [192.156.98.3])
	by schrodinger.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA00745;
	Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:22:54 -0800
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:22:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Schrodinger Technical Support <help@schrodinger.com>
Reply-To: Schrodinger Technical Support <help@schrodinger.com>
To: Jamal Uddin <uddin%chem.wisc.edu+jaguar@schrodinger.com>
cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: diasort: Not enough e- to doubly occupy core | 010209o
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010212131708.8000A-100000@chem.wisc.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.95.1010212153910.23045T-100000@erica.schrodinger.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hi Jamal,

When Jaguar uses the special initial guess routines for a transition metal-
containing molecule, it typically tries to obtain closed-shell
configurations for the ligands.  In your scandium complex, scandium's 3
valence electrons are used to make closed-shells for the three ligands, but
then the required +1 charge for the molecule can't be reconciled with the
number of electrons in the ECP.  You can guide the TM initial guess by
using an &atomic section that specifies where the unpaired electron
and formal charge should go, but in this case it's probably easiest to
just use the default initial guess algorithm, iguess=10.

Note that the 'iacc=1' and 'iacscf=1' settings in your input file apply
only to the pseudospectral method, which you have turned off with 'nops=1'. 
You can actually do this optimization with the following &gen section:

&gen
gdftmed=-13
gdftfine=-13
gdftgrad=-13
iacc=1
idft=22111
iguess=10
igeopt=1
molchg=1
multip=2
basis=LACV3P**++
&

On the other hand, if you are trying to obtain the ultimate accuracy in
this calculation, replace 'iacc=1' with 'nops=1'.

Sincerely,

Dale Braden

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Schrodinger Technical Support | http://www.schrodinger.com
help@schrodinger.com | 503-299-1150 | 503-299-4532 (fax)
Schrodinger, Inc. | 1500 SW First Ave. Suite 1180, Portland OR 97201
----------------------------------------------------------------------

On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Jamal Uddin wrote:

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: CCL:Not enough e- to doubly occupy core
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:50:25 -0600 (EST)
From: Jamal Uddin <uddin@chem.wisc.edu>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net

Hello,

 
In optimizations of cationic transition metal complexes using JAGUAR I
get the following error message: 

 start of program hfig
 initial wavefunction generated automatically from atomic
wavefunctions
 
 ERROR: fatal error -- debug information follows
      diasort: Not enough e- to doubly occupy core

For transition metal, there is an effective core potential which I
used
for the calculation of neutral molecules too but there were no error
message. I would appreciate any suggestion or help. Thanks,


Jamal Uddin




From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 10:45:16 2001
Received: from hope.edu (webmail.hope.edu [198.110.98.17])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1DFjGw21658
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:45:16 -0500
Received: from  [198.110.101.2] (polik@hope.edu); Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:45:30 -0500
X-WM-Posted-At: hope.edu; Tue, 13 Feb 01 10:45:30 -0500
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20010213103855.01b653f0@webmail.hope.edu>
X-Sender: polik@webmail.hope.edu
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:43:40 -0500
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: "William F. Polik" <polik@hope.edu>
Subject: WebMO: WWW-based interface to Gaussian, GAMESS, MOPAC
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

WebMO version 2.1 has been officially released and is available for FREE 
download at
     http://www.webmo.net

WebMO is a web-based interface to popular computational chemistry programs 
including Gaussian, MOPAC, and GAMESS.  WebMO permits users to build 3-D 
molecular structures, submit multiple jobs, monitor job progress, and view 
text and graphical results all from within a standard web-browser.  WebMO 
has a very fast learning curve for novices, yet offers total control over 
every job for experts.  A tour of screenshots and a working demo are 
available at the WebMO website.

WebMO features include:
   * Entirely web-based (no software or plug-ins to install on clients)
   * True 3-D molecular editor for building input structures
   * Built-in support for Gaussian 94/98, GAMESS, MOPAC 6/7
   * Automatic parsing of output files for calculated properties
   * Vibrational mode and partial charge visualization
   * IR and NMR spectra visualization
   * Job queuing, monitoring, and control
   * Web-based administration of user accounts, time limits, job control, etc.

For a detailed list of features, system requirements, screenshots, a 
working demo, download information, installation and upgrade instructions, 
and general support information, visit the WebMO homepage at
      http://www.webmo.net

In addition, the WebMO website has support material of general interest to 
the computational chemistry community, including
   * Detailed Gaussian, GAMESS, and MOPAC installation instructions
   * East-to-follow Red Hat Linux installation instructions
   * Computational chemistry course lecture notes and exercises
which are available at
      http://www.webmo.net/support
      http://www.webmo.net/curriculum

Enjoy!

The WebMO Team




From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 10:43:32 2001
Received: from kanga.INS.cwru.edu (root@kanga.INS.CWRU.Edu [129.22.8.32])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1DFhWw21612
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:43:32 -0500
Received: from raman6 (chem51439.CHEM.CWRU.Edu [129.22.129.103]) by kanga.INS.cwru.edu with SMTP (8.8.8+cwru/CWRU-3.6)
	id KAA08646; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:43:32 -0500 (EST) (from hxt19@po.cwru.edu for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>)
Message-ID: <007e01c095d4$d193bea0$67811681@cwru.edu>
Reply-To: "Hui-Hsu (Gavin) Tsai" <hxt10@po.cwru.edu>
From: "Hui-Hsu (Gavin) Tsai" <hxt19@po.cwru.edu>
To: <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: different electronic states
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:51:22 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_007B_01C095AA.E7340960"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_007B_01C095AA.E7340960
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear all,

       I have a question about setting up calaulations at different =
electronic states in G98.

    The first example is how to remove one electron from different =
orbitals (e.g. HOMO, HOMO-1....) to calculate=20
different ionization potential energy at different final electronic =
states
In G98, I use "alter" command to switch two orbitals (say HOMO and =
HOMO-1) and let G98 to remove one electron from=20
the "switched HOMO" orbital. Unfortunely, G98 always removes the =
"original" HOMO orbital.

   The another example is about the different spin state of =
Fe(II)/Fe(III) (or say transition metal).=20
As you know, iron compunds always have mixed spin sate. The question is =
how to setup different spin sate in G98?
     =20
     Could anyone show me how to perform this kind of calculations?
Any comment or suggestion is welcomed and appreciated.

Gavin

------=_NextPart_000_007B_01C095AA.E7340960
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" =
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Dear all,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I =
have a=20
question about setting up calaulations at different electronic states in =

G98.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;The first =
example is how to=20
remove one electron from different orbitals (e.g. HOMO, HOMO-1....) to =
calculate=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>different ionization potential =
energy&nbsp;at=20
different final electronic states</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>In G98, I use "alter" command to switch =
two=20
orbitals (say HOMO and HOMO-1) and let G98 to remove one electron from=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>the "switched HOMO</FONT><FONT =
face=3DArial size=3D2>"=20
orbital. Unfortunely, G98 always removes the "original" HOMO=20
orbital.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp; The another example is =
about the=20
different spin state of Fe(II)/Fe(III) (or say transition metal). =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>As you know, iron compunds always have =
mixed spin=20
sate. The question is how to setup different spin sate in =
G98?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Could =
anyone show me=20
how to perform this kind of calculations?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Any comment or suggestion is welcomed =
and=20
appreciated.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Gavin</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_007B_01C095AA.E7340960--



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 12:10:54 2001
Received: from rzumail2.unizh.ch (rzumail2.unizh.ch [130.60.128.10])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1DHArw22516
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:10:53 -0500
Received: from zisgi.unizh.ch (zisgi.unizh.ch [130.60.19.17])
	by rzumail2.unizh.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3/08) with ESMTP id SAA20794;
	Tue, 13 Feb 2001 18:10:51 +0100 (MET)
From: "Dr. Peter Burger" <chburger@aci.unizh.ch>
Received: [(chburger@localhost)
           by zisgi.unizh.ch (SGI-8.9.3/SMI-IRIX6.2/USAR_MAIL_V2) id SAA23036;
           Tue, 13 Feb 2001 18:10:51 +0100 (MET)]
Message-Id: <200102131710.SAA23036@zisgi.unizh.ch>
Subject: Re: CCL:Second negative frequency
To: azhary@ksu.edu.sa (Adel Abbas Ali Elazhary Sci. College)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 18:10:51 +0100 (CET)
Cc: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.1010213175156.17508A-100000@sun1> from "Adel Abbas Ali Elazhary    Sci. College" at Feb 13, 1 05:55:46 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear Adel,

> I think your problem is with the numerical derivatives. I think using the
> analytical would solve you problem. You do not you try small basis set

nice try, but in the (yet) absence of this capability in the program
I use, i.e. Turbomole I am left with that problem.

> with analytical or if you can the smallest of your molecules with
> analytical. There are so many paprameters also to vary with the numerical.
> Why do not try to vary these (I really do not think it will help but you
> may try). Why do not you try tighter geometry optimization. I think that

well, sure I do all that kind stuff, tighten SCF-convergence etc., change 
the stepsize of the finite differences but you see, you do not know 
the answer in advance after 6n SCF steps and gradients. In my case I may
have the answer just after 2-10 days etc. depending on the size of the system
 (50-130 atoms 500-1500 bfs) and numbers of CPU I use (though it
runs perfectly parallel, calculations are done on 8-20 CPUs).  Checking
for / fighting the numerical noise is not
just gratifying considering error bars of at least +-20 cm-1 - so should
I stop and relax with a second small imaginary frequency of -20 to -30
cm-1?

Peter

P.S. Also I forget to point out that a number of people seem to be just
     happy and get away with the updated approximate hessian they get
     during the optimization process - is that any better? I do not
     think so.
    


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 13:08:39 2001
Received: from mumbai3.mtnl.net.in (mumbai3.mtnl.net.in [203.94.227.53])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1DI8Yw23188
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:08:35 -0500
Received: from bol.net.in by mumbai3.mtnl.net.in (8.9.1/1.1.20.3/27Mar00-0611PM)
	id XAA0000001743; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 23:36:58 +0530 (IST)
Message-ID: <3A0F887E.77F6E895@bol.net.in>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:51:50 +0530
From: Prashant Desai <pradesai@bol.net.in>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Info on Principle Compmonent Analysis
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I am looking for a nice review article on Principle Component Analysis
as applicable to QSAR studies. It should be written for beginners.
Name: Prashant Desai
e-maol: pradesa@bol.net.in


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 13:11:22 2001
Received: from mumbai3.mtnl.net.in (mumbai3.mtnl.net.in [203.94.227.53])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1DIBJw23239
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:11:20 -0500
Received: from bol.net.in by mumbai3.mtnl.net.in (8.9.1/1.1.20.3/27Mar00-0611PM)
	id XAA0000017110; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 23:39:44 +0530 (IST)
Message-ID: <3A0F8924.A27C0B13@bol.net.in>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 11:54:36 +0530
From: Prashant Desai <pradesai@bol.net.in>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Review on Principle Component Analysis
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I am looking for a review article alongwith examples on Principle
Component Analysis as applied to QSAR. It should be written for
beginners.
Name: Prashant desai
e-mail: pradesai@bol.net.in


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 13:20:55 2001
Received: from hotmail.com (f14.pav0.hotmail.com [64.4.33.85])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1DIKtw23416
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:20:55 -0500
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:18:54 -0800
Received: from 64.109.129.78 by pv0fd.pav0.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;	Tue, 13 Feb 2001 18:18:54 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [64.109.129.78]
From: "Orest Macina" <omacina@msn.com>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: MO Viewer
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:18:54 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F14yyqdtOanzIZsZska00008ad2@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Feb 2001 18:18:54.0898 (UTC) FILETIME=[6CA40120:01C095E9]

Hello CCL,

Does anyone know of a free Molecular Orbital
viewer that can read in a MOPAC output file
and display HOMO and LUMO?

             Orest
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 14:56:06 2001
Received: from Mailer.Uni-Marburg.DE (Mailer.Uni-Marburg.DE [137.248.1.76])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1DJu6w24317
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 14:56:06 -0500
Received: from mailer.uni-marburg.de ([192.168.161.185])
	by Mailer.Uni-Marburg.DE (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f1DJu7j23908
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:56:07 +0100
Sender: boehm@mailer.uni-marburg.de
Message-ID: <3A899156.E5503DD@mailer.uni-marburg.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:56:07 +0100
From: Markus Boehm <Markus.Boehm@mailer.uni-marburg.de>
Organization: University of Marburg
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP32)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: CCL:Info on Principle Compmonent Analysis
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> I am looking for a nice review article on Principle Component Analysis
> as applicable to QSAR studies. It should be written for beginners.
> Name: Prashant Desai
> e-maol: pradesa@bol.net.in

Have a look at a very nice tutorial:
PCA, in:
Chemometrics and Intelligent Lab. Systems 2 (1987) 37-52

Greetings,
Markus



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 15:58:36 2001
Received: from toto.research.aa.wl.com ([162.48.100.19])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1DKwZw25764
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:58:35 -0500
Received: by toto.research.aa.wl.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <17BVWSJK>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:56:36 -0500
Message-ID: <6944FBE0F687D411823D00508B6095FA26B365@aaunderdog.research.aa.wl.com>
From: "Whitehead, Christopher" <Christopher.Whitehead@pfizer.com>
To: "'Prashant Desai'" <pradesai@bol.net.in>, chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: RE: Review on Principle Component Analysis
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:46:20 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

Desai,

The following reference is not an exact match to your query, but it should
help:  

Geladi, P. and B. R. Kowalski (1986). "Partial Least-Squares Regression: A
Tutorial." Analytica Chimica Acta 185: 1-17.

Contained in this article, is a brief description of MLR, PCA, PCR, and PLS.


Christopher Whitehead

-----Original Message-----
From: Prashant Desai [mailto:pradesai@bol.net.in]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2000 1:25 AM
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: CCL:Review on Principle Component Analysis


I am looking for a review article alongwith examples on Principle
Component Analysis as applied to QSAR. It should be written for
beginners.
Name: Prashant desai
e-mail: pradesai@bol.net.in


-= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net





From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 22:42:32 2001
Received: from iitkgp.iitkgp.ernet.in ([202.141.127.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1E3gTw27642
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 22:42:30 -0500
Received: from cts.iitkgp.ernet.in (cts.iitkgp.ernet.in [144.16.192.220])
	by iitkgp.iitkgp.ernet.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA13295
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:10:45 -0500 (GMT)
Received: from localhost (rajarshi@localhost)
	by cts.iitkgp.ernet.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA03145
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 08:58:57 +0530
X-Authentication-Warning: cts.iitkgp.ernet.in: rajarshi owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 08:58:57 +0530 (IST)
From: Rajarshi Guha <rajarshi@presidency.com>
X-X-Sender:  <rajarshi@cts.iitkgp.ernet.in>
To: CompuChem List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: GAMESS?
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.32.0102140858170.3143-100000@cts.iitkgp.ernet.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hi,
  does anybody know an alternative site for GAMESS-US.
The site at http://www.msg.ameslab.gov/GAMESS/ seems to be down.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rajarshi Guha                       | Growing old is mandatory,
Dept. of Chemistry		    | growing wise is optional
IIT Kharagpur.                      |
		                    |
email: rajarshi@presidency.com      |
       rajarshi@cts.iitkgp.ernet.in |
web  : www.psynet.net/jijog         |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Feb 13 23:52:04 2001
Received: from lorica.ucc.usyd.edu.au (lorica.ucc.usyd.edu.au [129.78.64.15])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1E4q2w28300
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 23:52:03 -0500
Received: from alf.chem.usyd.edu.au (alf.chem.usyd.edu.au [129.78.76.34])
	by lorica.ucc.usyd.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA17094
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:51:38 +1100 (EST)
Received: by alf.chem.usyd.edu.au (5.65v4.0/1.1.19.2/16Dec99-0159PM)
	id AA10667; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:52:01 +1100
Received: from equus.chem.usyd.edu.au(129.78.77.235) by alf.chem.usyd.edu.au via smap (V2.1)
	id xma005890; Wed, 14 Feb 01 15:51:53 +1100
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20010214144647.00899550@mailhost>
X-Sender: bacskay@mailhost
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:46:47 +1100
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: George Bacskay <bacskay@alf.chem.usyd.edu.au>
Subject: Xenon computers
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Dear all,

We at Sydney are considering buying Xenon 700 computers for quantum
chemistry (mostly G98) as well as Monte Carlo type applications. We'd be
interested to hear from anyone who has such a machine or tested one (single
or dual processor Xenon with 1M or 2M cache and varying RAM sizes) and
could tell us about its performance. We would particularly like to know how
such machines compare with pentium III and/or IV machines.
Any information on this will be greatly appreciated.

Best regards,

George Bacskay

School of Chemistry
University of Sydney
NSW 2006
Australia

email: bacskay@chem.usyd.edu.au


*****************************************************
Dr George Bacskay             
School of Chemistry           
University of Sydney  
NSW 2006                                       
Australia

tel  : 61-2- 9351 3777
fax  : 61-2- 9351 3329
email : bacskay@chem.usyd.edu.au
web   : http://www.chem.usyd.edu.au/staffgbb.htm

*****************************************************


