From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Jul  6 15:53:03 2001
Received: from phobos.email.Arizona.EDU (IDENT:root@[128.196.133.165])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f66Jr2518956
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:53:03 -0400
Received: from demetrio.u.arizona.edu (128.196.86.129) by phobos.email.Arizona.EDU (5.1.056)
        id 3B1F829C001EC0F9 for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 12:53:01 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010706124722.024390a0@deimos.email.arizona.edu>
X-Sender: dasf@deimos.email.arizona.edu
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 12:52:21 -0700
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
From: Demetrio Antonio da Silva Filho <dasf@u.arizona.edu>
Subject: BSSE on Dimers
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Dear CCL'ers,

I am doing some MP2/6-311G(2d,2p) canculation on
anthracene dimers (using Gaussian'98) and I want to
know how I can eliminate the BSSE (basis set
superposition error) using the counterpoise method
for that system of two equal molecules.

I wonder if someone can point me to articles or
a scheme in order to do that using Gaussian'98.

Thanks in advance,

Demetrio Filho


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Thu Jul  5 21:26:55 2001
Received: from web10106.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.130.56])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f661Qt520648
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 21:26:55 -0400
Message-ID: <20010706012651.44748.qmail@web10106.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [161.142.10.11] by web10106.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 05 Jul 2001 18:26:51 PDT
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 18:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: ng ling <ling_100@yahoo.com>
Subject: Free Energy Pertubation (Amber)
To: chemistry@ccl.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Dear friends :

I'm using Free Energy Pertubation (FEP) method
(Amber)in my master project in Penang. Can anyboy send
me references about FEP method (Amber)?




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Thu Jul  5 16:57:53 2001
Received: from web13205.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.174.190])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f65Kvr517431
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 16:57:53 -0400
Message-ID: <20010705205752.48785.qmail@web13205.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [129.105.55.29] by web13205.mail.yahoo.com; Thu, 05 Jul 2001 13:57:52 PDT
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 13:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: mike smith <mike_smith07@yahoo.com>
Subject: short summary of my post on June 29 << CCL:Short-term certificate on drug design or bioinformatics
To: ccl <chemistry@ccl.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-1804289383-994366672=:48740"

--0-1804289383-994366672=:48740
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Dear listers,

As the requests of more than 3 people on the topic, 
I am attaching the summary. Hope this may be a little
helpful for them, and those who may want to know it
but did not ask for.

Many thanks to all of those who replied to my message.

Best wishes to all of you.

--Mike

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
--0-1804289383-994366672=:48740
Content-Type: text/html; name="ccl.html"
Content-Description: ccl.html
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="ccl.html"

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<head>
   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
   <meta name="Author" content="Guosheng Wu">
   <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.7 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) [Netscape]">
</head>
<body>
(1)
<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I had a similar background--grad degree in theoretical
chemistry,
<br>but I didn't have any trouble finding a post-doc in bio-simulation
(3 years
<br>ago)&nbsp; I know of at least 2 other people who also found a post-doc
in a
<br>bio-simulation group with a very theoretical grad school experience.&nbsp;
Have you tried
<br>applying for a NRC Postdoctoral Research Associate position?&nbsp;
They fund
<br>positions at a lot of the national labs (NIST/Naval/etc) and seem to
be a good route
<br>for making the transition.&nbsp; I think you need to keep trying for
a post-doc
<br>position.
<p>good luck,
<br>---------------------------------------------------
<p>(2)
<br>Workshop attendees,
<p>Here is a webpage with links to Prof. Vaisman's PPT
<br>lectures, the main workshop page, the in-class exer-
<br>cises, and solutions to the exercises:
<p>http://www.ib3.gmu.edu/taylor/PROTWORKSHOPSUM01/workshop.html
<p>-----------------------------------------------------
<p>(3)
<br>I'm no expert on this, but here's one man's opinion.
<p>First, lean on your Ph.D. advisor for help.&nbsp; He/She has a
<br>responsibility to help you build a rewarding career.&nbsp; If you are
not
<br>a recent graduate, then you might ask for some help from supervisors
<br>at your subsequent jobs.
<p>It also sounds like you have pretty specific ideas about the kind of
<br>job you want.&nbsp; This suggests: (1) Talk to experienced people in
that
<br>industry.&nbsp; Ask them directly what kind of training, which postdoc
<br>advisers (if any), etc., are the best for obtaining the job you
<br>want.&nbsp; (2) If you can't get that job, be flexible and start with
<br>something else.&nbsp; You may find that you like if very much, but
if your
<br>goals are unaffected you at least have a richer career/resume to help
<br>you.
<p>Also keep in mind that obtaining (and holding) a job takes more than
<br>technical skills.&nbsp; There are many "soft skills" required, and
which
<br>are difficult to learn.&nbsp; They can be evaluated in an interview,
in
<br>letters of reference, etc.
<p>Industrial jobs usually require great flexibility, since projects
<br>(and job descriptions) may change every quarter.&nbsp; If you've been
in
<br>one area a long time, flexibility may be an important concern to
<br>potential employers.
<p>It's unrealistic to expect to master any of those research areas in
a
<br>couple of months.&nbsp; A Ph.D. alone takes 5-6 years.&nbsp; The fastest
I've
<br>heard of was less than four years, but that was an unusually good
<br>student (now a HHMI at a top-tier research university).&nbsp; However,
you
<br>can train yourself to some extent by attending meetings (for
<br>technical content but especially to build your interpersonal network)
<br>and by studying (textbooks, journals, software).
<p>My last comment--be sure that your resume and cover letter are
<br>linguistically polished, as appropriate when seeking a professional
<br>position.&nbsp; I realize it's "just" an e-mail message, but you have
<br>several grammatical errors (below).
<p>Good luck to you!&nbsp; I hope my comments are helpful; use the useful
and
<br>discard the rest.
<p>Sincerely,
<br>........
<br>----------------------------------------------
<p>(4)
<br>Where did you get your degree?&nbsp; What, if anything, did your university
<br>have for a placement office?&nbsp; Do they offer resume critiquing?
&amp; if so, did
<br>you participate?&nbsp; To what professional organizations do you belong?&nbsp;
[ACS?]
<br>ACS has a LOT of job stuff for members - placement at meetings, though
you
<br>have to scrape up the funds to get there.&nbsp; If you're unemployed,
tell them &amp;
<br>they waive the registration - members, of course.&nbsp; Do you follow
C&amp;E News'
<br>employment sections, Science, Nature, &amp; respond to ads there?
<p>What is your relationship with your degree preceptor?&nbsp; What does
he
<br>usually do to help his students find jobs?&nbsp; [Writing letters of
recommendation
<br>only is not really enough, but too many of them think along those lines].
<br>If that's usually all he does, ask him to what groups he thinks you
should
<br>be applying for post-docs.&nbsp; Post-docs are often passed to friends
&amp;
<br>acquaintances, then an ad is written so specifically only the person
<br>already in mind will fit the criteria.
<p>Next:&nbsp; please don't take this personally, but if the grammar of
your
<br>posting [below] is the way you normally write, you need to pay a lot
more
<br>attention to it.&nbsp; There are numerous errors.&nbsp; Paradoxically,
scientists have by
<br>default become the custodians of written English- the literary types
<br>are all into anything goes, but most scientists still think poor grammar
&amp;
<br>spelling are hallmarks of sloppy thinking.
<br>Your grammar is such that, in fact, were it not for your All-American
<br>user ID, I'd think English is not your first language.&nbsp; So much
so, that I
<br>suspect many who might otherwise have replied think you may be someone
<br>not using their real name as their user id.&nbsp; A lot of people tend
to think
<br>replying to someone who won't tell you who they really are is a waste
<br>of time.
<p>SO, if your posting is your normal grammar, you need to take some
<br>courses. Since you obviously also need a job, you need to get someone
to correct
<br>any letters you intend to mail before you send them out.&nbsp; If you
have a
<br>learning disability that prevents you from using standard grammar,
forget what I
<br>said about more courses, but DO have someone check your outgoing letters.
<br>By all means use a computer grammar checker, but still have a person
it
<br>afterward. I am not impressed by computer grammar checkers.&nbsp; The
one with MS Word
<br>gets upset at many proper constructions &amp; overlooks egregious errors
such as
<br>incorrectly typing form instead of from.
<p>Hope this is somewhat helpful.&nbsp; I'm going away until after the
4th, so
<br>if I don't reply, that's why.
<p>-----------
<br>(5)
<br>I think whether you do some research work in your known area during
a short-term?
<br>if it is not suitable for publication, may you directly see
<br>employer with your manuscript to prove you eligible to work in this
area?
<p>with a best wish,
<p>------------
<br>&nbsp;
<br>&nbsp;
<br>&nbsp;
</body>
</html>

--0-1804289383-994366672=:48740--


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Jul  6 12:08:44 2001
Received: from ucidoor.unitedcatalysts.com ([208.23.162.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f66G8h516452
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 12:08:43 -0400
Received: by ucidoor.unitedcatalysts.com; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id MAA18770; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 12:08:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 10.1.0.50 by ucismtp02.unitedcatalysts.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 06 Jul 2001 12:09:38 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Received: from lvlxch01.unitedcatalysts.com ([10.16.100.88])
 by lvlmail.unitedcatalysts.com (PMDF V6.0-24 #41777)
 with ESMTP id <0GG2002287AX5Y@lvlmail.unitedcatalysts.com> for
 chemistry@ccl.net; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 12:04:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by lvlxch01.unitedcatalysts.com with Internet Mail Service
 (5.5.2650.21)	id <L0H6YWCC>; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 12:09:00 -0400
Content-return: allowed
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 12:08:59 -0400
From: "Shobe, Dave" <dshobe@sud-chemieinc.com>
Subject: aromaticity w/o orbitals
To: "'CCL'" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Message-id: 
 <157A51F55AAAD3119CD70008C7B1629DDAB043@lvlxch01.unitedcatalysts.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id f66G8i516453

Another question in the philosophical debate about orbitals.

The explanation of aromaticity and the 4n+2 rule that I was taught was very
dependent on the idea of orbitals.  In fact, it was usually presented in
terms of the Huckel orbitals derived from the molecular graph of the pi
system.  My question is, is it possible to explain the Huckel 4n+2 rule
without appealing to orbitals? How does one do it?

--David Shobe
Süd-Chemie Inc.
phone (502) 634-7409
fax     (502) 634-7724
email  dshobe@sud-chemieinc.com

Don't bother flaming me: I'm behind a firewall.



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Thu Jul  5 16:53:24 2001
Received: from hotmail.com ([216.33.240.134])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f65KrO517233
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 16:53:24 -0400
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Thu, 5 Jul 2001 13:52:55 -0700
Received: from 149.169.26.114 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;	Thu, 05 Jul 2001 20:52:55 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [149.169.26.114]
From: "Jayalakshmi Rajaraman" <jayatr@hotmail.com>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Help in Gaussian
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 20:52:55 -0000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
Message-ID: <F259mEaJswFCHOzyfyz000141cd@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jul 2001 20:52:55.0549 (UTC) FILETIME=[7727F2D0:01C10594]

<html><DIV>Hello!!</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I am a new user of Gaussian 98 and am trying to run some geometry optimization and frequency calculations of adsorbed species on copper.. I am having some problems in using the commands of gaussian98 and a friend of mine referred me to you.. I would appreciate if you could help me out with my problem..</DIV>
<DIV>Here is the description of the problem:</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I was originally using the command, </DIV>
<DIV># UHF/3-21G* opt(maxcycle=70) freq=noraman scf=maxcycle=300 gfprint pop=full</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>to run my geo. optimization and freq calculations.. There were some non-convergence and I was suggested that i should use command stable=opt in the SCF calculations to alleviate this problem. I do not know how to incorporate the above command into my existing commands.. I tried a couple of things like removing scf=maxcycle= and replacing it with stable=opt but I got Illegal Iparse error in my calculations.. Could someone please let me know how stable=opt keyword could be used?</DIV>
<DIV>I would very much appreciate your help..</DIV>
<DIV>Thanks!</DIV>
<DIV>Jaya</DIV><br clear=all><hr>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at <a href="http://www.hotmail.com">http://www.hotmail.com</a>.<br></p></html>


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Jul  6 23:07:42 2001
Received: from sirius.chem.vt.edu (IDENT:root@[128.173.181.42])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6737g524790
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 23:07:42 -0400
Received: from localhost (crawdad@localhost)
	by sirius.chem.vt.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6737f210064;
	Fri, 6 Jul 2001 23:07:41 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: sirius.chem.vt.edu: crawdad owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 23:07:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: "T. Daniel Crawford" <crawdad@vt.edu>
X-Sender:  <crawdad@sirius.chem.vt.edu>
To: "Shobe, Dave" <dshobe@sud-chemieinc.com>
cc: "'CCL'" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:aromaticity w/o orbitals
In-Reply-To: <157A51F55AAAD3119CD70008C7B1629DDAB043@lvlxch01.unitedcatalysts.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107062304490.9889-100000@sirius.chem.vt.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Shobe, Dave wrote:

> Another question in the philosophical debate about orbitals.
>
> The explanation of aromaticity and the 4n+2 rule that I was taught was very
> dependent on the idea of orbitals.  In fact, it was usually presented in
> terms of the Huckel orbitals derived from the molecular graph of the pi
> system.  My question is, is it possible to explain the Huckel 4n+2 rule
> without appealing to orbitals? How does one do it?
>
> --David Shobe
>

The recent issue of Chemical Reviews dedicated entirely to the topic of
aromaticity may be useful to you.  See issue five of the current volume.
Prof. Paul Schleyer, whose recent work in alternative definitions of
aromaticity based on magnetic susceptibilities is well known, is the
guest editor.

-Daniel

-- 
T. Daniel Crawford                           Department of Chemistry
crawdad@vt.edu                                    Virginia Tech
www.chem.vt.edu/chem-dept/crawford    Voice: 540-231-7760  FAX: 540-231-3255
                            --------------------
 PGP Public Key at: http://www.chem.vt.edu/chem-dept/crawford/publickey.txt


