From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Jul 27 09:22:06 2001
Received: from mserv.itpa.lt ([193.219.53.20])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6RDM3524546
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 09:22:04 -0400
Received: from localhost (tamulis@localhost)
	by mserv.itpa.lt (8.11.4/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6RDLxP40794;
	Fri, 27 Jul 2001 15:22:01 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from tamulis@itpa.lt)
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 15:21:59 +0200 (EET)
From: Arvydas Tamulis <tamulis@itpa.lt>
To: <chemistry@ccl.net>
cc: Jelena Tamuliene <gicevic@itpa.lt>
Subject: to ccl (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0107271520000.40146-100000@mserv.itpa.lt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hi,
I would like to perform investigation of tetraphosphorus molecule that is
placed in field created point charge of 2. The coordinates of the above
charge are known. I would like to know how is necessary to arrange initial
file of such kind investigation for Gaussian 98 or DALTON, or NewChem, or
GAMESS programe packages.

Thank you in advance.
With respect,
Jelena Tamuliene





From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Jul 27 07:08:39 2001
Received: from web20207.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.226.62])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f6RB8d522830
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 07:08:39 -0400
Message-ID: <20010727110838.99307.qmail@web20207.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [202.238.80.30] by web20207.mail.yahoo.com; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 04:08:38 PDT
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 04:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: bjorn mayer <bjornmayer@yahoo.com>
Subject: Solid state reaction thermodynamics prediction?
To: chemistry@ccl.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

I want to know the free energy change of solid
state reactions like e.g.

CaCl2 (alpha) --> CaCl2 (beta) --> Ca + Cl2(g)

such that I can have the pressure composition
phase diagram.

I have a search in PRB, they are either caln
of melting or configuration in alloys.

Is it possible to do the above with ab initio or
empirical potential methods?

thank you very much
mayer

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Jul 27 10:27:27 2001
Received: from hawk.dcu.ie ([136.206.1.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6RERQ526034
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 10:27:26 -0400
Received: from gizmo (136.206.86.88) by hawk.dcu.ie (5.5.031)
        id 3B5FBC010000705F for chemistry@ccl.net; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 15:27:29 +0100
Message-ID: <3B5FBC010000705F@hawk.dcu.ie> (added by postmaster@dcu.ie)
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 15:34:05 +0100
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: Kevin Kincaid <kevin.kincaid2@mail.dcu.ie>
Subject: G98 or Jaguar on IBM S/390 with Linux
X-Mailer: Opera 5.02 build 855
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hello!

I'm just wondering has anyone successfully got G98 or Jaguar 3.5 running on an IBM S/390 with Linux installed.  We have access to such a machine, but 
seemingly both packages only support IBM RS6000 with AIX.  Any help would be appreciated!

Thanks in advance,

Kevin
___________________

Molecular Modelling Lab
Dublin City University
Dublin 9
Ireland

Tel: +353-1-7008193



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Jul 27 11:56:01 2001
Received: from ivory.trentu.ca ([192.75.12.103])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6RFu1527803
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:56:01 -0400
Received: from trentu.ca ([204.225.13.50]) by trentu.ca (PMDF V5.2-32 #37862)
 with ESMTP id <01K6FAV6VLHQ000LSD@trentu.ca> for chemistry@ccl.net; Fri,
 27 Jul 2001 11:55:37 EDT
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:01:44 -0400
From: elewars <elewars@trentu.ca>
Subject: REQUEST FOR CALCULATION
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <3B619068.1A042532@trentu.ca>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Accept-Language: en

2001 July 27, Friday

Hello,

If anyone has access to the ACES II program (or some other program with
a fast CC optimization algorithm), and can find the time, I would
appreciate it if  they could subject the input structure below to a
CCSD(T)/6-31G* optimization and email me the Cartesians of the optimized
structure. If the optimization takes too long, the Cartesians for an
_unfinished_  job may still be useful to me, to show where the geometry
is going. If someone does try this, I would also appreciate knowing what
machine was used and how long it took.

Thanks,

E. Lewars

------------------------------------------------
  CCSD(T)/6-31G* requested

 C2F2O, charge=0, multiplicity=1

    C1        0.656697    0.220442   -0.044289
    O2       -0.457469    0.362686    0.620775
    F3        1.476651   -0.761318   -0.036919
    C4        0.128983    1.428372   -0.389388
    F5       -1.593798   -0.660278   -0.225763
-----------------------------------------------------


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Jul 27 12:13:54 2001
Received: from if1.if.ufrgs.br ([143.54.2.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6RGDq528199
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:13:53 -0400
Received: from pclap3.if.ufrgs.br by if1.if.ufrgs.br (PMDF V4.3-10 #7035)
 id <01K6FCXQ0H4G000I8U@if1.if.ufrgs.br>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:54:55 -0003
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 12:54:21 -0300
From: =?UNKNOWN?Q?Cl=E1udio?= Perottoni <perott@if.ufrgs.br>
Subject: Raman intensities in Gamess-US
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Reply-to: perott@if.ufrgs.br
Message-id: <01072713000100.23015@pclap3.if.ufrgs.br>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29]
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit


	Dear CCLers,

	Could someone help me to setup an input file suitable to optimize the
geometry of a single molecule and to calculate its normal modes wavenumbers, 
IR and Raman intensities with Gamess-US (PC-GAMESS 6.0) ?

	Thanks in advance!

			Cláudio.

 -- 
******************************************************************
Cláudio A. Perottoni
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
Instituto de Física - Lab. de Altas Pressões e Materiais Avançados
Av. Bento Gonçalves, 9500
CAIXA POSTAL 15051
91501-970  PORTO ALEGRE - RS
BRASIL
PHONE:+55-51-3316-6500
FAX  :+55-51-3316-7286
http://www.if.ufrgs.br/~perott/index.html
******************************************************************


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Jul 27 11:49:52 2001
Received: from outbound.mail.uoguelph.ca ([131.104.96.18])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6RFnq527707
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:49:52 -0400
Received: from msnet.mathstat.uoguelph.ca (msnet.mathstat.uoguelph.ca [131.104.32.59])
	by outbound.mail.uoguelph.ca (8.9.3 (PHNE_21697)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA24102
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:49:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from MSNET/SpoolDir by msnet.mathstat.uoguelph.ca (Mercury 1.48);
    27 Jul 01 11:47:44 -0500
Received: from SpoolDir by MSNET (Mercury 1.48); 27 Jul 01 11:47:20 -0500
From: "Bill Smith" <wsmith@msnet.mathstat.uoguelph.ca>
Organization: Math & Stats, University of Guelph
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 11:47:19 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: CCL:Solid state reaction thermodynamics prediction?
Message-ID: <3B6154B9.7122.8459E6BF@localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <20010727110838.99307.qmail@web20207.mail.yahoo.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)

You might first try looking in some standard thermochemical 
databases - e.g. JANAF Tables, Barin's book - for some 
experimental data.  I just looked in JANAF and found data for 
CaCl2(cr), but lit lists only one crystal type.  Data for Ca(alpha) and 
Ca(beta) are available.

If you want to consider the reactions

CaCl2(s) -> Ca(alpha) + Cl2(g)
CaCl2(s) -> Ca(beta) + Cl2(g)

then all the data is available.


On 27 Jul 2001, at 4:08, bjorn mayer wrote:

> I want to know the free energy change of solid
> state reactions like e.g.
> 
> CaCl2 (alpha) --> CaCl2 (beta) --> Ca + Cl2(g)
> 
> such that I can have the pressure composition
> phase diagram.
> 
> I have a search in PRB, they are either caln
> of melting or configuration in alloys.
> 
> Is it possible to do the above with ab initio or
> empirical potential methods?
> 
> thank you very much
> mayer
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo!
> Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
> 
> 
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To
> Admins MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher:
> gopher.ccl.net 70 Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW:
> http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



Best Regards,

W. R. Smith, Professor
Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics and School of Engineering
Room 546 MacNaughton Building
University of Guelph
Stone Road and Gordon Streets
Guelph, Ontario, CANADA N1G 2W1
Tel: 519-824-4120, ext. 3038; FAX: 519-837-0221; 
http://www.mathstat.uoguelph.ca/faculty/smith/


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Jul 27 13:08:06 2001
Received: from ccl.net ([192.148.249.4])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6RH86529095
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 13:08:06 -0400
Received: from gap.cco.caltech.edu (gap.cco.caltech.edu [131.215.139.43])
	by ccl.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/OSC 2.0) with ESMTP id NAA05499
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 13:08:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from news@localhost)
	by gap.cco.caltech.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA27931;
	Fri, 27 Jul 2001 09:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
To: mlist-chemistry@nntp-server.caltech.edu
Path: news
From: "Richard P. Muller" <rpm@wag.caltech.edu>
Newsgroups: mlist.chemistry
Subject: LYP correlation functional
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 09:11:19 -0700
Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Lines: 4
Message-ID: <3B6192A7.E8656182@wag.caltech.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp-26-205.wag.caltech.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en

Does anyone know a reference to fortran subroutines for the LYP
functional? Thanks in advance.

Rick


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Jul 27 17:30:45 2001
Received: from dasher.wustl.edu ([128.252.68.48])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6RLUj502296
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 17:30:45 -0400
Received: from dasher.wustl.edu by dasher.wustl.edu (8.8.8/1.1.20.8/08Dec99-1053AM)
	id QAA0000495007; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 16:40:50 -0500 (CDT)
Sender: ponder@dasher.wustl.edu
Message-ID: <3B61DFE2.3B0F5AA9@dasher.wustl.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 16:40:50 -0500
From: Jay Ponder <ponder@dasher.wustl.edu>
Organization: Biochemistry, Washington University Medical School
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; OSF1 V5.0 alpha)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: TINKER 3.9 is Now Available
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Dear CCL,

A new release of the TINKER Molecular Modeling Package, version
3.9 dated June 2001, is available from the TINKER web site at
http://dasher.wustl.edu/tinker/ or via anonymous ftp download
> from dasher.wustl.edu in the /pub/tinker area.

TINKER is a modular, general package for molecular mechanics and
dynamics with some special facilities and parameter sets for
biopolymers. It supports several common force fields, including
AMBER, CHARMM, MM2, MM3, OPLS-AA, OPLS-UA, and our own TINKER
polarizable atomic multipole force field. The package contains
advanced algorithms for energy minimization, molecular dynamics,
distance geometry and global search including some methods that
are not readily available elsewhere.

TINKER version 3.9 contains the following new features and updates
> from version 3.8: (1) improved nucleic acid building from sequence
and automated conversion of nucleic acid PDB files to and from the
TINKER format, (2) a new rigid body dynamics facility, (3) ability
to handle infinite polymer lattices such as diamond and graphite,
(4) treatment of intramolecular polarization via the Thole method,
(5) a new utility program to compute molecular polarization, (6) an
improved RasMol-based viewer that accepts TINKER coordinate files,
allows atom selection, etc., (6) an optional Andersen stochastic
collision thermostat for MD, (7) where appropriate TINKER programs
such as ANALYZE, SUPERPOSE and SPACEFILL accept multiple coordinate
set "archive" files as input, (8) updated parameter sets for various
of the supported force fields.

TINKER is distributed with full source code, a User's Guide, and
several examples and test molecule files. Directions are supplied
for building the package on most commonly used CPU/OS combinations.
Prebuilt executables limited to a maximum of 10000 atoms are also
provided for Linux, Windows, and Macintosh (currently Mac OS 9,
OS X executables will be available shortly).

Please see the web site above for further information. Comments,
questions and suggestions for future improvements can be sent to
ponder@dasher.wustl.edu.

                             Jay Ponder

-- 
Jay W. Ponder                          Phone:  (314) 362-4195
Biochemistry, Box 8231                 Fax:    (314) 362-7183
Washington University Medical School
660 South Euclid Avenue                Email:  ponder@dasher.wustl.edu
St. Louis, Missouri 63110  USA         WWW:    http://dasher.wustl.edu/

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Jul 27 18:06:40 2001
Received: from unlserve.unl.edu ([129.93.1.130])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6RM6d502717
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 18:06:39 -0400
Received: from localhost (jmazlo@localhost)
	by unlserve.unl.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.2) with SMTP id RAA59730
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 17:06:38 -0500
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 17:06:38 -0500 (CDT)
From: Johanna Mazlo <jmazlo@unlserve.unl.edu>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:autodock -active site-summary
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.02.10107141047240.103592-100000@unlserve.unl.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.02.10107271703001.80608-100000@unlserve.unl.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear CCL group,

Thank you all for help regarding searching only the active site when
docking the ligand to the receptor in Autodock.  As I promised, below are
the responses.  

Johanna Mazlo
___________________________________________________________
You can do that by precisely tailoring the grid size as to
include only the region of interest. Start from a receptor-
ligand complex (ie the ligand bound to the active site).
mkgdf3 build a grid centered on the ligand (gridcenter keyword
on your gpf file) that will be explored by the ligand during the
search. if the grid fits the active site, your ligand will only
move within that site. you have to play with npts keyword in the
gpf file (number of gridpoint per direction, only even number!)
in order to size the grid exactly. a useful program to visualise
the extents of the grid is avs

regards,

fabrizio
____________________________________________________

I read your mail regarding autodock.  I'm using autodock as well for my
work. I'm using a crystal structure of my protein-ligand and I specify the
active site according to the where the ligand is docked. So whatever atoms
which is within maybe say 3 angstrom of my ligand, i take those atoms and
get the average as the center of my grid. I don't know about your receptor
or ligand but I hope this maybe will help.

Regards,
Rowyna

_____________________________________________________

Hi Johanna, can you just change the grid parameter file so that the 3D
cube only encompasses the active site? Then you will only be able to
search within this area.

Simon Cross
_____________________________________________________


Define the x,y,z coordinates of the center of your active site, then in
your glg file change the x,y,z coordinates of the grid center with your
data. In addition to this you can specify the dimensions of your grid box
based on the active site of the protein.

Istvan



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Jul 27 22:35:59 2001
Received: from phobos.email.Arizona.EDU (IDENT:root@[128.196.133.165])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6S2Zx505330
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 22:35:59 -0400
Received: from demetrio.u.arizona.edu (128.196.86.129) by phobos.email.Arizona.EDU (5.1.056)
        id 3B5F19E5000378BA for chemistry@ccl.net; Fri, 27 Jul 2001 19:35:57 -0700
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010727151346.025346b0@deimos.email.arizona.edu>
X-Sender: dasf@deimos.email.arizona.edu
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 19:34:47 -0700
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: Demetrio Antonio da Silva Filho <dasf@u.arizona.edu>
Subject: Gaussian vs Lorenzian.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="=====================_8183471==_.ALT"

--=====================_8183471==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Dear CCL'ers,

I am interested in doing some simulations of UPS/Absorption spectra in organic
systems and I have one question about the convolution procedure.

For the case of the absorption spectrum, for example, the theoretical 
calculations
gives us a table of oscilator strengths and frequencies and most of the 
articles
uses gaussians to convolute with the delta function spectral lines.

My question is: There exist any justificative to use Gaussians? Which one?

We can use Lorenzians instead of Gaussians?

Why people preffer Gaussians?

Thanks a lot for your help. I will sumarize.

Demetrio Filho

--=====================_8183471==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<html>
<font face="Lucida Sans Unicode" size=3>Dear CCL'ers,<br><br>
I am interested in doing some simulations of UPS/Absorption spectra in
organic<br>
systems and I have one question about the convolution 
procedure.<br><br>
For the case of the absorption spectrum, for example, the theoretical
calculations <br>
gives us a table of oscilator strengths and frequencies and most of the
articles<br>
uses gaussians to convolute with the delta function spectral
lines.<br><br>
My question is: There exist any justificative to use Gaussians? Which
one?<br><br>
We can use Lorenzians instead of Gaussians? <br><br>
Why people preffer Gaussians?<br><br>
Thanks a lot for your help. I will sumarize.<br><br>
Demetrio Filho<br>
</font></html>

--=====================_8183471==_.ALT--


