From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Sun Aug 26 02:37:20 2001
Received: from chem.ufl.edu ([128.227.16.141])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7Q6bKM00960
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 02:37:20 -0400
Received: from chem.ufl.edu (chem.ufl.edu [128.227.16.141])
	by chem.ufl.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1/map) with ESMTP id CAA21264
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 02:37:20 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 02:37:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Xiang(Simon) Wang" <simwang@chem.ufl.edu>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:Warning Message in Charmm: STRING TOO SMALL (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10108260221001.19962-100000@chem.ufl.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear CCLers:

Last October I asked the question about the warning message from the
CHARMM. Sorry that I forgot to summarize the answers at that time.
Recently I received several messages inquiring the answers. So I forward
Rick Venable's answer here. Thanks for his answer.

Regards,


Simon WANG


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2000 19:54:58 -0400
From: Rick Venable <rvenable@gandalf.cber.nih.gov>
To: "Xiang(Simon) Wang" <simwang@chem.ufl.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:Warning Message in Charmm: STRING TOO SMALL

On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Xiang(Simon) Wang wrote:
> I met the following warning message when reading thousands of TIP3
> molecules in Charmm:
> 
> ***** LEVEL -1 WARNING FROM <ENCODI> *****
> ***** STRING TOO SMALL
> 
> Please help me if you know how to avoid such warning. Thanks.

Because a 4-char string is used for the RESID (residue ID number) in
CHARMM, you can only have 9999 water molecules within a single
segment.  There's an easy fix-- just split your waters into more than
one segment, each with less than 10,000 molecules.

--
Rick Venable                  =====\     |=|    "Eschew Obfuscation"
FDA/CBER Biophysics Lab       |____/     |=|
Bethesda, MD  U.S.A.          |   \    / |=|  ( Not an official statement or
Rick_Venable@nih.gov          |    \  /  |=|    position of the FDA; for that,
rvenable@speakeasy.org              \/   |=|    see   http://www.fda.gov  )




From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Sun Aug 26 03:40:47 2001
Received: from eyou.com ([61.136.62.73])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f7Q7eGM03089
	for <CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 03:40:46 -0400
Received: (qmail 83012 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2001 15:40:05 +0800
Received: from unknown (HELO eyou.com) (172.16.2.1)
  by 172.16.1.1 with SMTP; 26 Aug 2001 15:40:05 +0800
Received: (qmail 46555 invoked by uid 65534); 26 Aug 2001 15:40:06 +0800
Date: 26 Aug 2001 15:40:06 +0800
Message-ID: <20010826154006.46554.qmail@eyou.com>
From: "王明韬" <wqsm@eyou.com>
To: CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net
Reply-To: "王明韬" <wqsm@eyou.com>
Subject: help!

Dear all:
Now, I want to study the interaction of some ligands with metalloprotein
containing metal. 
However, I donnot know how to get the AMBER force field parameters for metal
cobalt.
Can you kindly give me suggestion?

sincerely,
Wang Mingtao
08,26,01





--http://www.eyou.com
--稳定可靠的免费电子信箱  语音邮件  移动书签  日历服务  网络存储...亿邮未尽




From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Sun Aug 26 02:40:57 2001
Received: from epimetheus.hosting4u.net ([209.15.2.70])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f7Q6evM01096
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 02:40:57 -0400
Received: (qmail 15894 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2001 06:40:57 -0000
Received: from zeus.hosting4u.net (HELO proinformatix.com) (209.15.2.56)
  by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 26 Aug 2001 06:40:57 -0000
Received: from yersina ([202.138.18.39]) by proinformatix.com ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 01:40:52 -0500
Reply-To: <sergio@proinformatix.com>
From: "Sergio Manzetti" <sergio@proinformatix.com>
To: "Chemistry Discussion G" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: AUTODOCK
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 16:39:31 -0700
Message-ID: <JNEGLIJEJIBDHMKFNGBAGEJMCCAA.sergio@proinformatix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700

Hi everyone, I am trying to get a clear idea on how to define a volume in
space where the ligand is restricted before starting the docking simulation.
Which parameters control these features?

Cheers

Sergio

____________________________________________________________________________
___________________________

Sergio Manzetti
Research Scholar
Centre of Molecular Biotechnology/ Supercomputer Facility
Queensland University of Technology
2 George St.
BRISBANE
4000 QLD
AUSTRALIA
email: s.manzetti@student.qut.edu.au
Tlf: +61 7 3864 1434
www:  http://www.life.sci.qut.edu.au/html/research/cmgenetics.html
www2: http://www.its.qut.edu.au/hpc/



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Sun Aug 26 14:28:15 2001
Received: from elin.scali.no (IDENT:root@[62.70.89.10])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7QISEM03125
	for <CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 14:28:14 -0400
Received: from localhost (ole@localhost)
	by elin.scali.no (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7QISDK24943;
	Sun, 26 Aug 2001 20:28:13 +0200
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 20:28:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Ole W. Saastad" <ole@scali.no>
To: <CHEMISTRY@server.ccl.net>
cc: <gran@scali.no>
Subject: G98/linda compilation
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108262000400.24180-100000@elin.scali.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Hi,
I am trying to put together g98 and Linda. We have evaluation
copies of both softwares, but not the two as a unit.
I want to test the performance of our new ScaIP for this combination.
Many Scali clusters could take advantage of its SCI interconnect
through ScaIP.
ScaIP runs very well with Linda alone, we get latency slightly less
than the one for ethernet and a bandwidth more than three times
that of ethernet. It might be that Linda/g98 might benefit from
this higher bandwidth and somewhat lower latency. I have no information
about the average package size for g98/Linda.

How do you compile g98 for linda? I have more or less managed
to compile g98 by changing the lines in bldg98 where you specify
exe or linda.

if ($dolink) then
 $makename -f $locmake $makeflag exe
 $makename -f $locmake $makeflag linda
  endif

I had some problems with fork and wait. At present
I run with two empty routines for wait and fork. This is not
correct and a solution is needed.

After I have compiled I have files called both .exe and exel, the
latter beeing the Linda executables. How do I run g98 with these
Linda executables ?

Just running it a usual ( ./g98 <input file> ) does not start
Linda, it does however run scalar the normal way.

Some help on how to run Gaussian in combination with Linda would be very
helpful.


Best regards

Ole W. Saastad
Scali A/S.


