From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 24 05:41:57 2002
Received: from mserv.itpa.lt ([193.219.53.20])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3O9ftA21766
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 05:41:56 -0400
Received: from localhost (tamulis@localhost)
	by mserv.itpa.lt (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3O9fkw20087
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:41:50 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from tamulis@itpa.lt)
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:41:46 +0200 (EET)
From: Arvydas Tamulis <tamulis@itpa.lt>
To: <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: Atomic charges and potentials in ABINIT v3.3.2 (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0204241133200.19984-100000@mserv.itpa.lt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear Colleagues,

We are starting calculations using program ABINIT version 3.3.2

Do it is possible to calculate atomic charges in different excited states
using DFT-TD of ABINIT version 3.3.2 ?
As you know that in Gaussian 98 DFT-TD atomic charges in excited states are
calculating using one-particle electron densities and atomic charges in the
ground state are calculating using HF electron density. Therefore it is
difficult to compare these two in principle different values obtained by
G98. How are calculating atomic charges in excited and ground states
using ABINIT version 3.3.2 ?

I have two questions concerning DFT potentials in this ABINIT version
3.3.2 program:
1) Do ABINIT using GGA's functionals possess some density inhomogeneity as
it is in the case of PerdewWang91 ?
I am asking because we are interesting in charge transfer calculations in
excited non-symmetrical large supermolecules.
2) Do it is possible to use well known potentials B3LYP, B3PW91 in ABINIT
version 3.3.2 ?

Thanking your in advance.
With best regards, Arvydas Tamulis
*******************************************************************
                  Arvydas Tamulis

Doctor of Natural Sciences, senior research fellow

Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astronomy, Vilnius University,
Theoretical Molecular Electronics Research Group,
A. Gostauto 12, Vilnius 2600, Lithuania
e-mail: TAMULIS@ITPA.lt; WEBsite: http://www.itpa.lt/~tamulis/
fax: +(370-2)-225361  or  +(370-2)-224694
Phone: +(370-2)-620861
Home address: Didlaukio 27-40, Vilnius 2057, Lithuania
Mobile phone: +370-9919397
*******************************************************************

Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 09:21:45 +0100
From: Xavier Gonze <gonze@pcpm.ucl.ac.be>
To: abinit@pcpm.ucl.ac.be
Subject: (ABINIT) v3.3.2

Dear ABINITioners,

ABINIT version 3.3.2 is available ...
You will find it on the Web site, as usual.

The complete sources and tests are available, as well as the sequential
and MPI-parallel executable versions for
Compaq/DEC_EV56_Linux, Compaq/DEC_EV67_OSF, IBM 44P ,
CRAY T3E, and the sequential
version on PCLinux with the PGI compiler.

The list of modifications of v3.3.2 is written below,
and can be found also in the file ~ABINIT/changes.3.3.x .
In particular, with contrast to v3.3.1, ABINITv3.3.2 works .....

***************




From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 24 09:45:13 2002
Received: from mserv.itpa.lt ([193.219.53.20])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3ODjAA25360
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:45:11 -0400
Received: from localhost (tamulis@localhost)
	by mserv.itpa.lt (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3ODium22086;
	Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:44:56 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from tamulis@itpa.lt)
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:44:56 +0200 (EET)
From: Arvydas Tamulis <tamulis@itpa.lt>
To: <spanget@ruc.dk>
cc: <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:Atomic charges ...
In-Reply-To: <A476181798@virgil.ruc.dk>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0204241522290.19984-100000@mserv.itpa.lt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear Professor Spanget-Larsen,

Thank you for your comment on my mistake that arrive from my text
concerning HF-TD calculation analysis.
In any case, I wanted to say that in G98 DFT-TD the absolute values of
atomic charge change have not any physical meaning and can not be interpreted
as electron density amount transfer during excitation.

The main question of my former letter was: what it is the algorithm of
charge transfer in ABINIT DFT-TD ?

I have just received response from Professor Gonze, who is one of authors
of ABINIT:

No analysis of static charges is yet available in ABINIT. The reason
is simple: we use a plane-wave basis set, for which there is no
such concept as a Mulliken population analysis. We are now implementing
Hirshfeld analysis, then Bader analysis, but it will take some time.

Best regards, Arvydas Tamulis
**********************
 On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Jens Spanget-Larsen wrote:

> Arvydas Tamulis:
>
> > .. As you know that in
> > Gaussian 98 DFT-TD atomic charges in excited states are calculating
> > using one-particle electron densities and atomic charges in the
> > ground state are calculating using HF electron density.
>
> Dear Arvydas,
> just one comment: It is not true that the ground state atomic charges
> obtained by a G98 TD-DFT calculation are derived from a Hartree-Fock
> (HF) electron density. The printed ground state charges are the
> results of a Mulliken population analysis performed with the DFT
> Kohn-Sham molecular orbitals.
>
> Yours, Jens >--<
>
> NB! Please note new mail address: <spanget@ruc.dk>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> JENS SPANGET-LARSEN         Office:         +45 4674 2710
> Department of Chemistry     Fax:            +45 4674 3011
> Roskilde University (RUC)   Mobile:         +45 2320 6246
> P.O.Box 260                 E-Mail:        spanget@ruc.dk
> DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark   http://virgil.ruc.dk/~spanget
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 24 11:02:27 2002
Received: from smtp9.jaring.my ([61.6.32.59])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3OF2QA26965
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:02:26 -0400
Received: from vplaces.net (j125.crc20.jaring.my [61.6.157.139])
	by smtp9.jaring.my (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g3OF2Ed25696
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 23:02:15 +0800 (MYT)
Message-ID: <3CC6C9FC.484B2B39@vplaces.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 23:06:36 +0800
From: Rowyna <rowyna@vplaces.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en,pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CCL <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: change upon binding
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear CCLers,

I have a question regarding Autodock. I had a crystalised
protein-ligand complex, in which I took out the ligand and docked it
with Autodock. THe results have been consistent with the crystal
structure. But when I used a different ligand for docking, the results
are not quite as expected. I believe that the conformation of the
binding site has been shifted favourable to the original ligand and so
therefore, as autodock treats the protein rigid, the prediction of the
interactions with a different ligand is not a good. Has anybody been
through this sort of problem? I'd love to hear some opinions on it.
Actually, I'd like to find out how the binding of the another ligand
affects the conformation of the binding site, and I can't quite do it
with autodock. So, I am giving molecular dynamics a try. If there's
somebody who encountered something like this before, would be glad to
hear your input.

I've learned a lot from the mailing list so I thank all of you for your
help.

Rowyna K.





From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 24 06:45:29 2002
Received: from relay.unizar.es ([155.210.3.20])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3OAjSA22530
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 06:45:28 -0400
Received: from posta.unizar.es (root@posta.unizar.es [155.210.11.16])
	by relay.unizar.es (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g3OAjFp22841
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:45:15 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from QOTTFP4 ([155.210.90.178])
	by posta.unizar.es (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id g3OAgE829684
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:42:14 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <001201c1eb7d$1b13db10$b25ad29b@QOTTFP4>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs_Orduna?= <jorduna@posta.unizar.es>
To: "CCL" <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: Two photon absorption cross section units
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:45:09 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C1EB8D.DE551AC0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Virus-Scanned: TAMIZ + Sophos en unizar.es

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C1EB8D.DE551AC0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

dear CCLers,

I am becoming interested in Two Photon Absortion (TPA) processes and the =
use of quantum chemical calculations to predict TPA cross sections.

> From a three level aproach, the TPA cross section is expresed as:

 (mu(0,1))^2 (mu(1,2))^2/(delta E)^2

So it should have the dimensions of  "dipole moment^4/Energy^2"

but the TPA cross section is usually expresed in "cm^4 s/molecule" units =
which at least at first sight have a completely different dimension.

Could somebody clarify the relationship between these ways to express =
the TPA cross sections?

How can I convert calculated croos sections in atomic units to cm^4 =
s/molecule?


Thanks

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Jes=FAs Orduna
Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragon
Unidad de Nuevos Materiales Org=E1nicos
Facultad de Ciencias
CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza
E-50009 Zaragoza (Spain)
Phone/FAX: +34 976 761194
e-mail: jorduna@posta.unizar.es
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C1EB8D.DE551AC0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2713.1100" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>dear CCLers,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I am becoming interested in Two Photon =
Absortion=20
(TPA) processes and the use of quantum chemical calculations to predict =
TPA=20
cross sections.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>From a three level aproach, the TPA =
cross section=20
is expresed as:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>&nbsp;(mu(0,1))^2 (mu(1,2))^2/(delta=20
E)^2</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>So it should have the dimensions =
of&nbsp; "dipole=20
moment^4/Energy^2"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>but the TPA cross section is usually =
expresed in=20
"cm^4 s/molecule" units which at least at first sight have a completely=20
different dimension.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Could somebody clarify the relationship =
between=20
these ways to express the TPA cross sections?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>How can I convert calculated croos =
sections in=20
atomic units to cm^4 s/molecule?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial=20
size=3D2>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<BR>Jes=
=FAs Orduna<BR>Instituto=20
de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragon<BR>Unidad de Nuevos Materiales=20
Org=E1nicos<BR>Facultad de Ciencias<BR>CSIC-Universidad de =
Zaragoza<BR>E-50009=20
Zaragoza (Spain)<BR>Phone/FAX: +34 976 761194<BR>e-mail: <A=20
href=3D"mailto:jorduna@posta.unizar.es">jorduna@posta.unizar.es</A><BR>=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D</FONT></DIV></B=
ODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C1EB8D.DE551AC0--



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 24 11:06:05 2002
Received: from f04n01.cac.psu.edu ([128.118.141.31])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3OF65A27093
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:06:05 -0400
Received: from ra.chem.psu.edu (ra.chem.psu.edu [128.118.199.40])
	by f04n01.cac.psu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA36596
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:05:59 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
From: Rajarshi Guha <rajarshi@presidency.com>
Reply-To: rajarshi@presidency.com
To: <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: compiling Mopac 7.01-4
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 11:05:24 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <200204241105.30946.rajarshi@presidency.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,
  I'm trying to compile Mopac 7.01-4 on Linux (kernel 2.4.7-10) with g77 -I've 
tried both 2.96 and 3.0 and I get the same results:

matou1.f: In subroutine `matou1':
matou1.f:5: 
         PARAMETER (MAXDIM=MAX(MAXORB,3*NUMATM))
                           ^
Invalid declaration of or reference to symbol `max' at (^) [initially seen at 
(^)]

And a series of other errors. I'm sure somebody must have compiled it on Linux 
but I cant seem to find anything relevant to the problem in the archives. I 
also looked at the makefile and there does'nt seem to be any reference to f2c 
but all the docs say that I need f2c. I'm a little confused and ny pointers 
would be appreciated.

TIA,

- -- 
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
Rajarshi Guha                  | email: rajarshi@presidency.com
417 Davey Laboratory           | web  : http:// www.jijo.cjb.net
Dept. Of Chemistry             | ICQ  : 123242928
Pennsylvania State University  | AIM  : LoverOfPanda
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Fingerprint: DCCB 4D1A 5A8B 2F5A B5F6  1F9E CDC4 5574 9017 AF2A 
Public Key     : http://pgp.mit.edu/
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
Gravity brings me down.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8xsm6zcRVdJAXryoRAiogAJ9ddVzJq7ez4zJkAPHc5xJjPC3SDwCfYl8v
PSvfX6v+Z0zqJuTVVnqwNDY=
=DPDE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Apr 23 17:05:20 2002
Received: from f04n07.cac.psu.edu ([128.118.141.35])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3NL5KA13622
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:05:20 -0400
Received: from ra.chem.psu.edu (ra.chem.psu.edu [128.118.199.40])
	by f04n07.cac.psu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA392826
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:05:10 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
From: Rajarshi Guha <rajarshi@presidency.com>
Reply-To: rajarshi@presidency.com
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: physical properties for c60 
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:04:43 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <200204231704.43273.rajarshi@presidency.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,
  could somebody point me to papers or online sources regarding the physical 
properties C60 - I'm looking for specific heat capaciy and entropy.

TIA,

- -- 
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
Rajarshi Guha                  | email: rajarshi@presidency.com
417 Davey Laboratory           | web  : http:// www.jijo.cjb.net
Dept. Of Chemistry             | ICQ  : 123242928
Pennsylvania State University  | AIM  : LoverOfPanda
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
GPG Fingerprint: DCCB 4D1A 5A8B 2F5A B5F6  1F9E CDC4 5574 9017 AF2A 
Public Key     : http://pgp.mit.edu/
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
"355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI, but an incredible 
simulation!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8xcxrzcRVdJAXryoRAsiOAJ9C0H4EsAtCYVHYlxayGhScTBLL1wCffxvL
GmG7xxkQNxZaRtXshaa8A7g=
=B7ko
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 24 13:10:02 2002
Received: from thor.chem.sdu.dk ([130.225.142.15])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3OHA2A29343
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:10:02 -0400
Received: from localhost (tetz@localhost)
	by thor.chem.sdu.dk (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA66906;
	Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:12:08 +0200 (MDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:12:07 +0200
From: Per Tetzschner Olsen <tetz@thor.chem.sdu.dk>
To: Rajarshi Guha <rajarshi@presidency.com>
cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:physical properties for c60 
In-Reply-To: <200204231704.43273.rajarshi@presidency.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.05.10204241910510.5066743-100000@thor.chem.sdu.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Hi TIA

I am not sure if it is a help but try Professor Lawrence T. Scott.
He works with C60 at Boston College

Per

On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Rajarshi Guha wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi,
>   could somebody point me to papers or online sources regarding the physical 
> properties C60 - I'm looking for specific heat capaciy and entropy.
> 
> TIA,
> 
> - -- 
> - -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rajarshi Guha                  | email: rajarshi@presidency.com
> 417 Davey Laboratory           | web  : http:// www.jijo.cjb.net
> Dept. Of Chemistry             | ICQ  : 123242928
> Pennsylvania State University  | AIM  : LoverOfPanda
> - -------------------------------------------------------------------
> GPG Fingerprint: DCCB 4D1A 5A8B 2F5A B5F6  1F9E CDC4 5574 9017 AF2A 
> Public Key     : http://pgp.mit.edu/
> - -------------------------------------------------------------------
> "355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI, but an incredible 
> simulation!"
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
> 
> iD8DBQE8xcxrzcRVdJAXryoRAsiOAJ9C0H4EsAtCYVHYlxayGhScTBLL1wCffxvL
> GmG7xxkQNxZaRtXshaa8A7g=
> =B7ko
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> 
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 24 13:30:24 2002
Received: from gandalf.cber.nih.gov ([128.231.52.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3OHUOA29655
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:30:24 -0400
Received: from localhost (rvenable@localhost) by gandalf.cber.nih.gov (980427.SGI.8.8.8/980728.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA60688; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:23:15 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:23:14 -0400
From: Rick Venable <rvenable@gandalf.cber.nih.gov>
To: Rajarshi Guha <rajarshi@presidency.com>
cc: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:compiling Mopac 7.01-4
In-Reply-To: <200204241105.30946.rajarshi@presidency.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.21.0204241321180.69856-100000@gandalf.cber.nih.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Rajarshi Guha wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi,
>   I'm trying to compile Mopac 7.01-4 on Linux (kernel 2.4.7-10) with g77 -I've 
> tried both 2.96 and 3.0 and I get the same results:
> 
> matou1.f: In subroutine `matou1':
> matou1.f:5: 
>          PARAMETER (MAXDIM=MAX(MAXORB,3*NUMATM))
>                            ^
> Invalid declaration of or reference to symbol `max' at (^) [initially seen at 
> (^)]
> 
> And a series of other errors. I'm sure somebody must have compiled it on Linux 
> but I cant seem to find anything relevant to the problem in the archives. I 
> also looked at the makefile and there does'nt seem to be any reference to f2c 
> but all the docs say that I need f2c. I'm a little confused and ny pointers 
> would be appreciated.

For f2c, Fortran front-end is often a cover script named 'fort77'; look
for that in the Makefile.


=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
Rick Venable           29/500
FDA/CBER/OVRR Biophysics Lab
1401 Rockville Pike    HFM-419
Rockville, MD  20852-1448  U.S.A.
(301) 496-1905   Rick_Venable@nih.gov
ALT email:  rvenable@speakeasy.org
=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 24 13:48:37 2002
Received: from qtp.ufl.edu ([128.227.89.3])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3OHmbA29923
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:48:37 -0400
Received: from pc1 (pc1 [128.227.192.187])
	by qtp.ufl.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1/deumens) with SMTP id NAA00656;
	Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:48:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <0f4501c1ebb9$2f606c50$bbc0e380@qtp.ufl.edu>
From: "Stefan Fau" <fau@qtp.ufl.edu>
To: "Yubo Fan" <yubofan@mail.chem.tamu.edu>
Cc: "CCL - all" <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
References: <3CC625CD.68BBC46B@mail.chem.tamu.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:NLMO - Highest occupied NBOs are not at the beginning of the NBO list
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:55:08 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300

Hi Yubo,

it is a problem most often encountered with
transition metals: the program finds low
occupancy NBOs where it expects high
occupancy NBOs. Sometimes it helps to
reorganize the sequence of atoms in the
input: put the offending atom last in the
geometry specification. A convenient way
of doing that is to cut the LAST "standard
orientation" out of the optimization output
and convert it into xyz-coordinates. Shuffle
the lines and use it in the new input.

Stefan
______________________________________________________________________
Dr. Stefan Fau                    |      fau@qtp.ufl.edu
University of Florida             |     (352) 392-6714
Quantum Theory Project
2341 NPB #92, P.O.Box 117200
Gainesville, FL 32611-7200


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 24 14:04:14 2002
Received: from gate.ggr.co.uk ([193.128.25.10])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3OI4DA30122
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:04:13 -0400
Received: (uucp@localhost) by gate.ggr.co.uk; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:05:43 +0100 (BST)
Received: from uk-stv-mhub1.ggr.co.uk(147.184.212.132) by gb-stv-fw2.ggr.co.uk via smap (V5.5)
	id xma004139; Wed, 24 Apr 02 19:04:53 +0100
Received: from ukz590.ggr.co.uk (ukz590.ggr.co.uk [147.184.226.247]) by mailhub.ggr.co.uk; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:03:17 +0100 (BST)
Received: from ukz792.ggr.co.uk (unverified) by ukz590.ggr.co.uk
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with ESMTP id <B0017832551@ukz590.ggr.co.uk> for <chemistry@ccl.net>;
 Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:03:11 +0100
Received: by ukz792.ggr.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2654.89)
	id <HXZ628Q5>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:03:13 +0100
Message-Id: <E1B434B6A8D3D311A48D0000F845B1430529F409@ukz249.ggr.co.uk>
From: "Mclay, Iain" <iml67644@glaxowellcome.co.uk>
To: "'chemistry@ccl.net'" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: RE: UK QSAR and ChemoInformatics Discussion Group
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:03:08 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2654.89)
Content-Type: text/plain


> 	Please find details of the next UK QSAR and ChemoInformatics Group
> Meeting
> 
> 	UK QSAR and ChemoInformatics Group will be holding their next
> meeting at
> 
> 			Accelrys' new UK Centre, Cambridge, 
> 
> 				on the 11th June 2002
> 
> 	The programme will include a session on analysis of HTS data and a
> session
> 	of QSAR related topics. The main speakers will be:
> 
> 			John Topliss, (U. Michigan) 
> 
> 	 		Jon Mason (Pfizer UK), 
> 
> 	 		Rob Brown (Accelrys), 
> 
> 			Eric Jamois(Accelrys), 
> 
> 	 		Darren Flower (Jenner Institute) 
> 
> 	 		Dick Cramer (Tripos Inc)
> 	 
> 	***The closing date for registration is Friday 31st May.***
> 	 
> 	 If you would like to register for the meeting, or find out more,
> then
> 	 please go to the meeting website at
> 
> 		 http://www.accelrys.com/events/qsar/ 
> 	 
> 	 or  
> 	 
> 	visit the group web site at 
> 
> 		http://www.ukqsar.co.uk 
> 	or 
> 		http://www.iainm.demon.co.uk/
> 
> 
> 
> 

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 24 14:33:13 2002
Received: from kineo.bowdoin.edu ([139.140.14.35])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3OIXDA30630
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:33:13 -0400
Received: from dhcp-135-123.bowdoin.edu ([139.140.135.123]) by
          kineo.bowdoin.edu (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id
          GV34V700.I2Q; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:33:07 -0400 
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:33:07 -0400
Subject: Re: CCL:physical properties for c60 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481)
Cc: Rajarshi Guha <rajarshi@presidency.com>, chemistry@ccl.net
To: Per Tetzschner Olsen <tetz@thor.chem.sdu.dk>
From: "Ha-Yeon Cheong" <hcheong@bowdoin.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.05.10204241910510.5066743-100000@thor.chem.sdu.dk>
Message-Id: <B88A9BB1-57B1-11D6-96F4-0003936CCFAE@bowdoin.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481)

Dear TIA,

You should also try Professor Yves Rubin in UCLA. His e-mail is 
rubin@chem.ucla.edu. He works with C60 as well.

Yours,
Ha-Yeon Cheong
Bowdoin College

On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, at 01:12 PM, Per Tetzschner Olsen wrote:

>
> Hi TIA
>
> I am not sure if it is a help but try Professor Lawrence T. Scott.
> He works with C60 at Boston College
>
> Per
>
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Rajarshi Guha wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>   could somebody point me to papers or online sources regarding the 
>> physical
>> properties C60 - I'm looking for specific heat capaciy and entropy.
>>
>> TIA,
>>
>> - --
>> - -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Rajarshi Guha                  | email: rajarshi@presidency.com
>> 417 Davey Laboratory           | web  : http:// www.jijo.cjb.net
>> Dept. Of Chemistry             | ICQ  : 123242928
>> Pennsylvania State University  | AIM  : LoverOfPanda
>> - -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> GPG Fingerprint: DCCB 4D1A 5A8B 2F5A B5F6  1F9E CDC4 5574 9017 AF2A
>> Public Key     : http://pgp.mit.edu/
>> - -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> "355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI, but an incredible
>> simulation!"
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
>> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>>
>> iD8DBQE8xcxrzcRVdJAXryoRAsiOAJ9C0H4EsAtCYVHYlxayGhScTBLL1wCffxvL
>> GmG7xxkQNxZaRtXshaa8A7g=
>> =B7ko
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To 
> Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: 
> gopher.ccl.net 70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: 
> jkl@ccl.net
>
>
>
>
>


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 24 14:58:29 2002
Received: from argyle.richmond.edu ([141.166.188.18])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3OIwTA31224
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:58:29 -0400
Received: from sabrash.richmond.edu (lfa221037.richmond.edu [141.166.221.37])
	by argyle.richmond.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3OIsIV17128;
	Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:54:18 -0400
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020424145400.02efa330@facstaff.richmond.edu>
X-Sender: sabrash@facstaff.richmond.edu
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:56:25 -0400
To: "Ha-Yeon Cheong" <hcheong@bowdoin.edu>,
   Per Tetzschner Olsen <tetz@thor.chem.sdu.dk>
From: "Samuel A. Abrash" <sabrash@richmond.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:physical properties for c60 
Cc: Rajarshi Guha <rajarshi@presidency.com>, chemistry@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <B88A9BB1-57B1-11D6-96F4-0003936CCFAE@bowdoin.edu>
References: <Pine.SGI.4.05.10204241910510.5066743-100000@thor.chem.sdu.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

You should look at the NIST Webbook, http://webbook.nist.gov/
The heat capacity information is there.

Best regards,
Sam Abrash

At 02:33 PM 04/24/2002 -0400, Ha-Yeon Cheong wrote:
>Dear TIA,
>
>You should also try Professor Yves Rubin in UCLA. His e-mail is 
>rubin@chem.ucla.edu. He works with C60 as well.
>
>Yours,
>Ha-Yeon Cheong
>Bowdoin College
>
>On Wednesday, April 24, 2002, at 01:12 PM, Per Tetzschner Olsen wrote:
>
>>
>>Hi TIA
>>
>>I am not sure if it is a help but try Professor Lawrence T. Scott.
>>He works with C60 at Boston College
>>
>>Per
>>
>>On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Rajarshi Guha wrote:
>>
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>   could somebody point me to papers or online sources regarding the 
>>> physical
>>>properties C60 - I'm looking for specific heat capaciy and entropy.
>>>
>>>TIA,
>>>
>>>- --
>>>- -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>Rajarshi Guha                  | email: rajarshi@presidency.com
>>>417 Davey Laboratory           | web  : http:// www.jijo.cjb.net
>>>Dept. Of Chemistry             | ICQ  : 123242928
>>>Pennsylvania State University  | AIM  : LoverOfPanda
>>>- -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>GPG Fingerprint: DCCB 4D1A 5A8B 2F5A B5F6  1F9E CDC4 5574 9017 AF2A
>>>Public Key     : http://pgp.mit.edu/
>>>- -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>"355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI, but an incredible
>>>simulation!"
>>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
>>>Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>>>
>>>iD8DBQE8xcxrzcRVdJAXryoRAsiOAJ9C0H4EsAtCYVHYlxayGhScTBLL1wCffxvL
>>>GmG7xxkQNxZaRtXshaa8A7g=
>>>=B7ko
>>>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
>>CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
>>Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>-= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
>CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
>MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
>CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
>Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net
>
>
>

Samuel A. Abrash
Associate Professor
Department of Chemistry
University of Richmond
Richmond, VA 23173
Phone: (804) 289-8248
Fax: (804) 287-1897
E-mail: sabrash@richmond.edu
http://www.richmond.edu/~sabrash
"Research is to teaching as sin is to confession - if you don't participate 
in one you don't have anything to say at the other."


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 24 15:56:16 2002
Received: from mxout3.cac.washington.edu ([140.142.32.19])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3OJuGA32109
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 15:56:16 -0400
Received: from mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu (mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.17])
	by mxout3.cac.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with SMTP id g3OJuA8J013745
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:56:10 -0700
Received: FROM dante19.u.washington.edu BY mailscan-out2.cac.washington.edu ; Wed Apr 24 12:56:10 2002 -0700
Received: from localhost (jzheng73@localhost)
	by dante19.u.washington.edu (8.12.1+UW01.12/8.12.1+UW02.01) with ESMTP id g3OJu9lD075616
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:56:09 -0700
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 12:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: "J. Zheng" <jzheng73@u.washington.edu>
cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: ask for workshop of charmm or linux cluster.
In-Reply-To: <CEADF0D83077F7458B763904E47AA709066D12@exchange.neokimia.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.44.0204241248340.98282-100000@dante19.u.washington.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


hi, my question is a little bit out of subject of this forum. Now, I am
working on how to write a script by using CHARMM software package. It
really takes me lots of time to learn how to use it. I am wondering that
if there is any workshop for teaching how to use CHARMM. I think it would
be much better for me in order to save the time and learn more stuff from
CHARMM.

I am also looking for the workshop, "how to build a bewolf cluster".

if anybody has this information, please tell me. I will appreciate for
your informing.

thanks in advance.

jie





From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 24 14:52:33 2002
Received: from umbi3.umbi.umd.edu ([136.160.7.51])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g3OIqXA31156
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:52:33 -0400
Received: from umbi.umd.edu ([129.6.113.76]) by
          umbi3.umbi.umd.edu (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP
          id GV35SU00.3Z6 for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:53:18 -0400 
Message-ID: <3CC6FF48.E0C70024@umbi.umd.edu>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:54:00 -0400
From: "Michael K. Gilson" <gilson@umbi.umd.edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: cyclic urea data set at BindingDB
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------6C195188F33452E5D948EEE6"


--------------6C195188F33452E5D948EEE6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In response to several requests, we have made an sdf file of the cyclic urea data available on the front page of www.bindingdb.org. Look for the blue "sdf" link partway down the page. Let me know if you have any problems with it.

If you use these or other data from Binding DB, we ask that you cite Chen,X., Lin,Y., Liu,M. and Gilson,M.K. The Binding Database: Data Management and Interface Design. Bioinformatics 18:130-139,2002.

Please contact me if you have useful data collections -- preferably in electronic format -- that can be shared via BindingDB.

Happy modeling,
Mike Gilson

--------------6C195188F33452E5D948EEE6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
In response to several requests, we have made an sdf file of the cyclic
urea data available on the front page of www.bindingdb.org. Look for the
blue "<font color="#3333FF">sdf</font>" link partway down the page. Let
me know if you have any problems with it.
<p>If you use these or other data from Binding DB, we ask that you cite
<u>Chen,X., Lin,Y., Liu,M. and Gilson,M.K. The Binding Database: Data Management
and Interface Design. Bioinformatics 18:130-139,2002</u>.
<p>Please contact me if you have useful data collections -- preferably
in electronic format -- that can be shared via BindingDB.
<p>Happy modeling,
<br>Mike Gilson</html>

--------------6C195188F33452E5D948EEE6--



