From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Mon Oct 14 13:33:11 2002
Received: from ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.105])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with SMTP id g9EHXAf32323
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:33:10 -0400
Received: (qmail 1486 invoked by uid 1001); 14 Oct 2002 17:33:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20021014173300.1485.qmail@linuxmail.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404)
Received: from [129.69.166.31] by ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com with http for
    bimo7@linuxmail.org; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:33:00 +0200
From: "Bimo Ario Tejo" <bimo7@linuxmail.org>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Cc: jkl@ccl.net
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:33:00 +0200
Subject: CCL: rapid heating during MD
X-Originating-Ip: 129.69.166.31
X-Originating-Server: ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com

Dear CCLers,

I'd like to know exactly what is the effect of too rapid heating phase on molecular dynamics. I got enery potential (Ep) curve is increased sharply during heating phase (60 ps), but during production phase of 1 ns the energy looks very-very stable. The energy curve looks very nice, except during heating phase.

Do I have to bother about heating phase if I took the last 100 ps as average structure which is very stable and equilibrated? Is it very important to get very smooth Ep curve during heating phase? FYI, even the energy increased too fast during heating phase, my simulation was not crashed.

Regards,
Bimo
-- 
Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org 


Powered by Outblaze


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Mon Oct 14 14:04:12 2002
Received: from hotmail.com ([216.33.241.20])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g9EI4Bf00387
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:04:11 -0400
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Mon, 14 Oct 2002 11:04:12 -0700
Received: from 128.8.176.196 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
	Mon, 14 Oct 2002 18:04:11 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [128.8.176.196]
From: "Melanie Moses" <melaniejmoses@hotmail.com>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: dodecahedron
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:04:11 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F20ago6oG6AblDi7pMY000182c4@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Oct 2002 18:04:12.0062 (UTC) FILETIME=[1995EBE0:01C273AC]

Dear Colleagues,
I am an inorganic graduate student trying to figure out a computational 
problem and was wondering if any of you may be able to give me some insight. 
I am trying to generate coordinates for a dodecahedron with Ih point 
symmetry that I can put into CAChe 4.1. I think I should start with a center 
atom and generate the 20 atoms around it; however, I am uncertain how to do 
this or what type of program would be needed. Any suggestions or insight 
would be appreciated.
Thank you,
 >
 >  Melanie Moses (melaniejmoses@hotmail.com)
 >  Graduate Student of Bryan Eichhorn's
 >  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry
 >  University of Maryland, College Park










_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Mon Oct 14 14:15:15 2002
Received: from gatekeeper.itqb.unl.pt ([193.136.177.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with SMTP id g9EIFEf00700
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 14:15:15 -0400
Received: (qmail 5493 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2002 18:15:14 -0000
Received: from mistral.itqb.unl.pt (herrmann@193.136.176.14)
  by gatekeeper.itqb.unl.pt with SMTP; 14 Oct 2002 18:15:14 -0000
Received: from localhost (herrmann@localhost)
	by mistral.itqb.unl.pt (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA24818
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:15:13 +0100
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 19:15:13 +0100 (WEST)
From: Rudolf Herrmann <herrmann@itqb.unl.pt>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: G98: VOCl3 problem: convergence criterion not met
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10210141904190.14957-100000@mistral.itqb.unl.pt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hello,
I recently tried to calculate the NMR chemical shifts of VOCl3
with Gaussian 98:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
#B3LYP/6-31G* SP NMR

VOCl3

0 1
cl
cl   1 clcl2
cl   2 clcl3      1 clclcl3
 o   3 ocl4       2 oclcl4       1 dih4
 v   3 vcl5       2 vclcl5       1 dih5

clcl2       3.506363
clcl3       3.506243
clclcl3      59.999
ocl4        2.938735
oclcl4       53.376
dih4        -64.586
vcl5        2.118170
vclcl5       34.144
dih5        -31.640
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The result (even with several variations in the input) is always an
error termination when trying the "incremental Fock formation"
(convergence criterion not met). The structure was optimized with
GAMESS. 
Any suggestion what I could do is wellcome - thank you!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   108 basis functions      288 primitive gaussians
    41 alpha electrons       41 beta electrons
       nuclear repulsion energy       561.9817715949 Hartrees.
 One-electron integrals computed using PRISM.
 NBasis=   108 RedAO= T  NBF=   108
 NBsUse=   108 1.00D-04 NBFU=   108
 Projected Huckel Guess.
 Requested convergence on RMS density matrix=1.00D-08 within  64 cycles.
 Requested convergence on MAX density matrix=1.00D-06.
 Virtual orbitals will be shifted by   0.200 hartree.
 Restarting incremental Fock formation.
 Restarting incremental Fock formation.
 Restarting incremental Fock formation.
 >>>>>>>>>> Convergence criterion not met.
 SCF Done:  E(RB+HF-LYP) =  -2359.59549049     A.U. after   65 cycles
             Convg  =    0.5851D-03             -V/T =  1.9657
             S**2   =   0.0000
 Convergence failure -- run terminated.
 Error termination via Lnk1e in /usr/local/g98_a7/l502.exe.
 Job cpu time:  0 days  0 hours 16 minutes 33.0 seconds.
 File lengths (MBytes):  RWF=   14 Int=    0 D2E=    0 Chk=    1 Scr=    1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
Dr. Rudolf Herrmann
Instituto de Tecnologia Quimica e Biologica (ITQB)
Av. da Republica, EAN,  Apt. 127
P-2781-901 Oeiras
e-mail: herrmann@itqb.unl.pt



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Oct 15 03:21:12 2002
Received: from luc.ac.be ([193.190.2.30])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g9F7LBf26356
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 03:21:11 -0400
Received: from sbg-ts (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by luc.ac.be (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA29033;
	Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:19:43 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:19:43 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <200210150719.JAA29033@luc.ac.be>
X-Sender: lucp1381@mail.luc.ac.be
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.1.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: "Bimo Ario Tejo" <bimo7@linuxmail.org>, chemistry@ccl.net
From: sergiusz kwasniewski <sergiusz.kwasniewski@luc.ac.be>
Subject: Re: CCL:rapid heating during MD
Cc: jkl@ccl.net

Hi,

to my knowledge, the heating phase in MD calcs is needed to equilibrate the
energy (or temperature) of the system to the given temperature. The
equilibration time
should not be taken too small, but this depends on the system you're
considering.

If you're interested in how a system behaves at a specific temperature, you
should
not take this equilibration time into consideration.

Hope this helps !
Serge


___________________________________________________

	Sergiusz Kwasniewski
	LUC SBG/TS
	Universitaire Campus Gebouw D
	3590 Diepenbeek
	BELGIUM

	tel(direct): 032 (0)11/268315
	fax	   : 032 (0)11/268301
	email      : sergiusz.kwasniewski@luc.ac.be
	http://www.luc.ac.be/TheoChem
___________________________________________________


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Oct 15 14:07:42 2002
Received: from mr1.cc.ic.ac.uk ([155.198.5.111])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g9FI7ff09236
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:07:41 -0400
Received: from sunfs1-gw.ps.ic.ac.uk ([155.198.164.2] helo=sunfs1.ps.ic.ac.uk)
	by mr1.cc.ic.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 181W6W-0001El-01
	for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:07:40 +0100
Received: from pskaram ([155.198.165.105])
	by sunfs1.ps.ic.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 3.31 #1)
	id 181W6R-0005oM-00
	for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:07:35 +0100
From: "Panagiotis G. Karamertzanis" <p.karamertzanis@ic.ac.uk>
To: <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: Gamess question
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 19:07:03 +0100
Message-ID: <PEENJAOFKDEJGFPLLJFPOENMCCAA.p.karamertzanis@ic.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Scanner: exiscan *181W6R-0005oM-00*RmT0RbB6LgA* http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/

Dear all,

I started using GAMESS recently. I am computing electrostatic potential to
do later on fitting with distributed charges.

The problem is that I do not know the units of the output of the GAMESS run.
The manual does not help with this.

Thanks,

Panagiotis Karamertzanis
CPSE Imperial College



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Oct 15 04:56:50 2002
Received: from hotmail.com ([64.4.32.227])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g9F8uof28733
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 04:56:50 -0400
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Tue, 15 Oct 2002 01:56:50 -0700
Received: from 211.161.196.196 by pv0fd.pav0.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
	Tue, 15 Oct 2002 08:56:50 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [211.161.196.196]
From: =?gb2312?B?1qMgw/fUwg==?= <my_zheng@msn.com>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Some problems about DOCK4.0
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 16:56:50 +0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312; format=flowed
Message-ID: <F43mPf7bAlFIvLsypdO0001f9a3@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Oct 2002 08:56:50.0280 (UTC) FILETIME=[CCC56E80:01C27428]



Hi !all CLL users

I am a beginner in the field of drug design and encountered 

some problems on using DOCK4.O:

1)How to set parameters for "critical_points",or how to define 

a critical point in the receptor sphere?should I edit the *.sph file?

and how?(This question was presented by Xavier Fradera on 18.sep.2002,

but still no one reply.)

2)If the result vary remarkably when I modify the value of "random_seed",

does it mean that model is not reliable?

3)There are references listed on the manual may be of help,but some early 

documents are hard for me to access.Is anyone here who have these documents 
? 

Could you send an electonic copy to me?Thanks a lot in advance.

Any suggestions or resources ,ect.would be very helpful and highly 
appreciated.

ps : Hi,Xavier Fradera,have you had your problem solved?If so please give 

me a hand.Thank you!

 

Best regards!

                                                    yours sincerely

                                                      Zheng



_________________________________________________________________
与联机的朋友进行交流，请使用 MSN Messenger: 
http://messenger.microsoft.com/cn



