From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Sat Nov 16 20:53:04 2002
Received: from viper.abbott.com ([130.36.44.77])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id gAH1r4u29151
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 20:53:04 -0500
Received: from abtmr1.abbott.com (abtmr1.abbott.com [10.254.245.1])
	by viper.abbott.com (Switch-2.1.4/Switch-2.1.0) with ESMTP id gAH1s8M05642
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 19:54:08 -0600 (CST)
Received: from abtapn561.northamerica.intra.abbott.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by abtmr1.abbott.com (Switch-2.0.6/Switch-2.0.6) with ESMTP id gAH1r4j13690
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sat, 16 Nov 2002 19:53:04 -0600 (CST)
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Cc: james.metz@abbott.com
Subject: CCL: Differences between soaking versus co-crystallization for protein-ligand
 complexes
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.5  September 22, 2000
Message-ID: <OFA852A833.E2B1DB73-ON86256C74.00097933@northamerica.intra.abbott.com>
From: james.metz@abbott.com
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2002 19:52:17 -0600
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ABTAPN561/ESVR/ABBOTT(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at
 11/16/2002 07:49:01 PM,
	Serialize complete at 11/16/2002 07:49:01 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 000A597486256C74_="

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 000A597486256C74_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

CCL,

        Is anyone aware of any publications which describe differences 
between soaking versus co-crystallization
for protein-ligand structures?  For example, are there reports of 
significant differences in the ligand conformation?  Has
anyone analyzed possible differences in energetics of the bound ligand in 
a structure obtained from soaking versus co-
crystallization?  What are the differences in protein conformation in 
addition to space group and packing?

        Regards,
        Jim Metz

 

James T. Metz, Ph.D.
Research Investigator Chemist

GPRD R46Y AP10-2
Abbott Laboratories
100 Abbott Park Road
Abbott Park, IL  60064-6100
U.S.A.

Office (847) 936 - 0441
FAX    (847) 935 - 0548

james.metz@abbott.com

--=_alternative 000A597486256C74_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"


<br><font size=2 face="Arial">CCL,</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Is anyone aware of any publications which describe differences between soaking versus co-crystallization</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">for protein-ligand structures? &nbsp;For example, are there reports of significant differences in the ligand conformation? &nbsp;Has</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">anyone analyzed possible differences in energetics of the bound ligand in a structure obtained from soaking versus co-</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">crystallization? &nbsp;What are the differences in protein conformation in addition to space group and packing?</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Regards,</font>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Jim Metz</font>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Arial">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <br>
<br>
James T. Metz, Ph.D.<br>
Research Investigator Chemist<br>
<br>
GPRD R46Y AP10-2<br>
Abbott Laboratories<br>
100 Abbott Park Road<br>
Abbott Park, IL &nbsp;60064-6100<br>
U.S.A.<br>
<br>
Office (847) 936 - 0441<br>
FAX &nbsp; &nbsp;(847) 935 - 0548<br>
<br>
james.metz@abbott.com<br>
</font>
--=_alternative 000A597486256C74_=--


From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Fri Nov 15 15:35:55 2002
Received: from exchange.neokimia.com ([132.210.158.207])
	by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id gAFKZsD17113
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:35:55 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Need your help
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C28CE6.6893EF8C"
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 15:34:34 -0500
Message-ID: <CEADF0D83077F7458B763904E47AA70918A28A@mail-l.neokimia.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Need your help
Thread-Index: AcKM0VRWaYMpVL24Sn+FnkMa04YQ4AAFDTQQ
From: "Axel Mathieu" <Axel.Mathieu@neokimia.com>
To: "Pong" <jaturong.pratuangdejkul@lrb.ap-hop-paris.fr>, <chemistry@ccl.net>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C28CE6.6893EF8C
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

What software did you use to generate your conformers? The reason I ask =
this is because in software such as Sybyl and MOE, there are specific =
functions in the database viewers to measure these descriptors (Insight =
should work like these programs also - I never performed conformational =
searches in Inshgt!!). Needless to say, although I have never tried it, =
if you import your conformations into a database for these programs, you =
should theoretically be able to measure these descriptors quite easily =
(so long as the atom numbering is the same for all your molecules in the =
database - this is more important than the actual molecule in each =
entry!). Working in Sybyl and MOE, they both worked when the =
conformational search was performed in each its own program (they =
obviously all have the same atom names, numbering and typing). But I =
understand you dilemme, I've had the same problem to compare =
conformational databases of variations of the same molecule (such as =
semi-peptidic molecules where only the side chain is chained). If you do =
find something that works no matter the source and/or the atom numbering =
(which happens to be the problem), could you please send me the =
reference?=20

Axel Mathieu, Ph.D.

-----Original Message-----
From: Pong [mailto:jaturong.pratuangdejkul@lrb.ap-hop-paris.fr]=20
Sent: 15 novembre, 2002 17:53
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: CCL:Need your help


Dear memeber of CCL,

I'm Mr PONG. I would like to have your advice about the program to =
calculate the geometry of chemical structure. I mean, to measure the =
distance, aggle and dihedral angle. Yes, there are many  programs which =
is very easy to do that, I know. But I need the program to measure all =
compounds at the same time. This was due to I have thousands conformers =
generation by systematic search. All have the same atom type and number, =
just only different in conformers. Sure! they must be difference in term =
of geometry (distance, angle, and torsional angle). Is there any =
program?  that I can specify the atom that I want to measure, for =
example A-B, A-B-C and A-B-C-D for distance, angle, and torsional angle, =
respectively. And use this atom point to be calculate for all conformers =
in the same time, not need to select one conformer and calculate for =
each one. It's not possible to do if i have many thoudsands conformers. =
So, if you have any program capable to to that, could you please  to =
inform me too. I would like to thank for all your kindness to consider =
my problem. Thank you .

Pong



-=3D This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =3D- =
CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody  | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To =
Admins
Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: =
jkl@ccl.net






------_=_NextPart_001_01C28CE6.6893EF8C
Content-Type: text/x-vcard;
	name="Axel P. Mathieu.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Description: Axel P. Mathieu.vcf
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="Axel P. Mathieu.vcf"
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------_=_NextPart_001_01C28CE6.6893EF8C--


