From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Tue Apr 8 22:12:39 2003 Received: from mail.kaist.ac.kr ([143.248.4.44]) by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h392CcX06118 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 22:12:39 -0400 Received: from ilsun (ilsun.kaist.ac.kr [143.248.37.227]) by mail.kaist.ac.kr (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h392AgV13753; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:10:46 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <001501c2fe3d$5db9e800$e325f88f@ilsun> From: "Kwanyong Seo" To: Cc: "CCL" References: <1049792532.3e9290144577d@webmail.portugalmail.pt> Subject: Re: CCL:Methods and basis sets to study hydrogen bonding Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:11:39 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by server.ccl.net id h392CdX06119 I think it is very large system. Perhaps, you should use density functional method-for example, B3LYP or B3PW91- and small basis set. And, you can also try using 'AllHBond' option. However, I think that the most important thing is computer system resources. If you can super computer or parallel computing environment, you may be able to try using Moller-Plesset correlation methods and 6-31G* or 6-311G** basis set. Best regards, Kwanyong Seo. ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2003 6:02 PM Subject: CCL:Methods and basis sets to study hydrogen bonding > Dear All > > I'm trying to perform some electonic calculation in supramolecular systems, and > I´m interested in study intermolecular hydrogen bonds between two molecules. > Can anyone advice me for the best methods (and basis sets) to study hydrogen > bonding? Note that my system is composed of 100 atoms. > > Thanks > > Best regards > > __________________________________________________________ > O email preferido dos portugueses agora com > 100Mb de espaço e acesso gratuito à Internet > http://www.portugalmail.com/gold/ > > > -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =- > CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins > Ftp: ftp.ccl.net | WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/ | Jan: jkl@ccl.net > > > > > > > > > > From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 9 01:57:51 2003 Received: from mail.shcnc.ac.cn ([202.127.16.28]) by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h395vnX08611; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 01:57:50 -0400 Received: from pc29 ([202.127.19.210]) by mail.shcnc.ac.cn (8.12.1/8.12.1) with SMTP id h39M0Auu028779; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 15:00:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200304092200.h39M0Auu028779@mail.shcnc.ac.cn> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:58:42 +0800 From: Jinzhi Tan Reply-To: jztan@mail.shcnc.ac.cn To: "CHEMISTRY@ccl.net" CC: "CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net" Subject: about CHARMM Organization: SIMM-DDDC X-mailer: FoxMail 4.0 beta 2 [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by server.ccl.net id h395vpX08612 Dear Sir: I want to the difference between the HARVARD CHARMM and ACCELRYS CHARMM. Which one is the normally used? Thank you very much! Jinzhi Tan jztan@mail.shcnc.ac.cn tanjinzhi@hotmail.com From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 9 13:47:16 2003 Received: from dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br ([150.164.65.10]) by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h39HlCb07903 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:47:13 -0400 Received: from dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h39Hf8bF038334 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 14:41:08 -0300 Received: from localhost (noronha@localhost) by dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id h39Hf79t025460 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 14:41:07 -0300 Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 14:41:06 -0300 (BSC) From: antonio luiz oliveira de noronha X-X-Sender: noronha@dedalus To: chemistry@ccl.net Subject: ODD Electron number in a ECP calculation using GAMESS-US Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Hi I'm trying a calculation using a pseudopotential that has a odd number of electrons in the core. And I'm using GAMESS. As far as I can see the GAMESS don't accept that given the wrong multiplicity for calculation. Example Using a f function for europium an f 7 element. My pseudopotential include all 7 f unpaired electron. The valence shell has a closed shell. For the calculation, as I set the unpaired electron inside the core and the valence has a closed shell, I expect the multiplicity as been singlet. However, the program seems to read the total number of electron before assigning the pseudopotential, what causes the calculation to stop due to the wrong multiplicity. Is there anyone has any idea about how may I fix this? ______________________________________________________________________ | | |Antonio Luiz Oliveira de Noronha - noronha@dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br | |EEPEMM - Eletronic Spectra and Electromagnetic Properties of Molecules| |Theoretical Physical Chemistry | |Chemistry Departament - DQ | |UFMG - Federal University of Minas Gerais - Brazil | |Av. Antonio Carlos, 6627 - Campus Pampulha | |CEP 31270-901 - Belo Horizonte - MG - Brazil | |VOICE +55 31 499 5757 - FAX +55 31 499 5700 | |______________________________________________________________________| From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 9 11:55:08 2003 Received: from srvus010.unitedcatalysts.com ([208.23.162.8]) by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with SMTP id h39Ft6b02170 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:55:08 -0400 Received: by lvlxch02.unitedcatalysts.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:53:29 -0400 Message-ID: <5CF08BBFE6DE97478C1E76E654CAF9089C262C@lvlxch02.unitedcatalysts.com> From: "Shobe, Dave" To: "'CCL'" Subject: TDDFT--summary Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 11:53:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPartTM-000-214366c5-94eb-4fc6-b3ca-962dc36d46cb" This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------=_NextPartTM-000-214366c5-94eb-4fc6-b3ca-962dc36d46cb Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2FEB0.29B6A4D0" ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2FEB0.29B6A4D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Thanks to all who responded* to my questions on TDDFT. I give a summary of their responses below. --Dave *Tim Robinson, T. Daniel Crawford, Ulrike Salzner, Marcin Makowski, 'elewars', Stefan Grimme, Geoff Hutchinson. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ :: Time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) has become popular for determining electronic :: excitation energies (approx. = lambda max in UV-visible spectroscopy) and excited state properties. :: I know very little about this other than the name, but I would like to learn. So here are my questions. :: 1. First, can one do TDDFT calculations using G98W? There is a TD command listed in the manual. :: I suppose that your route card would be something like this: :: :: # TD B3LYP 6-31G** (?) This is the correct syntax, according to the responses. You can also specify NSTATES like you can with CIS. :: 2. I normally use the hybrid functional B3LYP for ground state calculations, as it seems to be one of :: the better functionals for that purpose. But would a different functional be recommended for TDDFT :: calculations? Most people said B3LYP was fine, although one response said that other functionals perform somewhat better. One responder mentioned "asymptotically corrected functionals" which are unfortunately not included in Gaussian 98 (maybe G03 will have them?). Bibliography: 1. Hirata, Lee and Head-Gordon JCP 111 8904 (1999) 2. Bauernschmitt and Ahlrichs, CPL 256, 454 (1996) 3. K. B. Wiberg, R.E. Stratman, and M. J. Frisch, Chem Phys Lett, 1998, 297, 60 4. Head-Gordon et al. J Phys. Chem. A (2001) 105, p. 451. :: 3. How good are the results compared to the CIS method? TDDFT does not systematically overestimate transition energies the way CIS does. Also, it can describe types of excited states that CIS cannot describe well. If anything, the tendency is for TDDFT to underestimate transition energies, especially for long conjugated pi systems. ZINDO was mentioned as a third alternative for organic systems. [It would be nice if ZINDO worked best with the conjugated pi systems that TDDFT has trouble with, but no one has said this so far.] Bibliography: 5. C. Diedrich S. Grimme, Systematic investigation of Modern Quantum Chemical Methods to Predict Electronic Circular Dichroism Spectra, J. Phys. Chem. A, 107, (2003), 2524-2539. 6. S. Grimme, M. Parac, Substantial errors from Time-dependent density functional theory for the calculation of excited states of large pi-systems, ChemPhysChem., 4, (2003), 292-295. 7. J. Fabian et. al., THEOCHEM, 2002, 594, 41-53 :: 4. What caveats and common beginners' mistakes are there with TDDFT? I was advised to include diffuse functions in the basis set, and to set NSTATES high enough to ensure the states of interest were all there. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2FEB0.29B6A4D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable TDDFT--summary

Thanks to all who responded* to my questions on = TDDFT.  I give a summary of their responses below.

--Dave

*Tim Robinson, T. Daniel Crawford, Ulrike Salzner, = Marcin Makowski, 'elewars', Stefan Grimme, Geoff Hutchinson.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

:: Time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) = has become popular for determining electronic
:: excitation energies (approx. =3D lambda max in = UV-visible spectroscopy) and excited state properties. 
:: I know very little about this other than the = name, but I would like to learn.  So here are my questions.

:: 1. First, can one do TDDFT calculations using = G98W?  There is a TD command listed in the manual. 
:: I suppose that your route card would be something = like this:
::
:: # TD B3LYP 6-31G**  (?)

This is the correct syntax, according to the = responses.  You can also specify NSTATES like you can with = CIS.

:: 2. I normally use the hybrid functional B3LYP for = ground state calculations, as it seems to be one of
:: the better functionals for that purpose.  = But would a different functional be recommended for TDDFT
:: calculations?

Most people said B3LYP was fine, although one = response said that other functionals perform somewhat better.  One = responder mentioned "asymptotically corrected functionals" which are = unfortunately not included in Gaussian 98 (maybe G03 will have = them?).

Bibliography:
1. Hirata, Lee and Head-Gordon JCP 111 8904 = (1999)
2. Bauernschmitt and Ahlrichs, CPL 256, 454 = (1996)
3. K. B. Wiberg, R.E. Stratman, and M. J. Frisch, = Chem Phys Lett, 1998, 297, 60
4. Head-Gordon et al. J Phys. Chem. A (2001) 105, p. = 451.

:: 3. How good are the results compared to the CIS = method?

TDDFT does not systematically overestimate transition = energies the way CIS does.   Also, it can describe types of = excited states that CIS cannot describe well.  If anything, the = tendency is for TDDFT to underestimate transition energies, especially = for long conjugated pi systems.  ZINDO was mentioned as a third = alternative for organic systems.  [It would be nice if ZINDO = worked best with the conjugated pi systems that TDDFT has trouble with, = but no one has said this so far.]

Bibliography:
5. C. Diedrich S. Grimme, Systematic investigation = of Modern Quantum Chemical
Methods to Predict Electronic Circular Dichroism = Spectra, J. Phys. Chem. A,
107, (2003), 2524-2539.
6. S. Grimme, M. Parac, Substantial errors from = Time-dependent density
functional theory for the calculation of excited = states of large pi-systems,
ChemPhysChem., 4, (2003), 292-295.
7. J. Fabian et. al., THEOCHEM, 2002, 594, = 41-53

:: 4. What caveats and common beginners' mistakes are = there with TDDFT?

I was advised to include diffuse functions in the = basis set, and to set NSTATES high enough to ensure the states of = interest were all there. 


------_=_NextPart_001_01C2FEB0.29B6A4D0-- ------=_NextPartTM-000-214366c5-94eb-4fc6-b3ca-962dc36d46cb-- From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 9 10:45:07 2003 Received: from xsmtp.ethz.ch ([129.132.97.6]) by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h39Eiab32198 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:45:07 -0400 Received: from xfe2.d.ethz.ch ([192.168.36.11]) by xsmtp.ethz.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:44:36 +0200 Received: from tech.chem.ethz.ch ([129.132.224.193]) by xfe2.d.ethz.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Wed, 9 Apr 2003 16:44:36 +0200 Message-ID: <3E9432C4.3080003@tech.chem.ethz.ch> Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 16:48:36 +0200 From: angelo vargas Organization: ETHZ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net Subject: Molden command line zmatrix editor Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Apr 2003 14:44:36.0045 (UTC) FILETIME=[8A707FD0:01C2FEA6] Hallo does anybody know a list of command line instructions for the Molden Z-Matrix editor? For example with ctrl-u I delete a field (bond lenght or angle) but for example how do you add an atom to the Z-Matrix from keyboard? Using the mouse is extremely tiresome and these things are not written in the Molden tutorial Thanks in advance Angelo -- _______________________________________________________________________ Angelo Vargas Institute for Chemical and Bio Engineering Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETHZ) ETH Hönggerberg, Telefon: 0041/1/633 42 32, Room HCl E 129 Zürich - Switzerland Fax: 0041/1/632 11 63 E-mail: vargas@tech.chem.ethz.ch http://mercury.ethz.ch/members/vargas/ ________________________________________________________________________ From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 9 07:17:09 2003 Received: from exasp.biogeo.uw.edu.pl ([212.87.8.1]) by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h39BH8X27128 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 07:17:09 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by exasp.biogeo.uw.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF6E15E7F; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:17:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by exasp.biogeo.uw.edu.pl (Postfix, from userid 526) id D072815E39; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:17:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:17:12 +0200 From: Grzegorz Bakalarski To: Alain Borel Cc: chemistry@ccl.net Subject: Re: CCL:g03 on athlon in parallel Message-ID: <20030409111712.GB12096@exasp.biogeo.uw.edu.pl> References: <20030408153049.GA7819@exasp.biogeo.uw.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020300 On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 11:16:02AM -0600, Alain Borel wrote: > > On 08-Apr-2003 Grzegorz Bakalarski wrote: > > Should I compile in another way? Are there any setting in Linux > > I should activate ??? > > The 1st thing to check is whether you're running an SMP-enabled kernel. What's > the output of: > cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 6 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) MP 2000+ stepping : 2 cpu MHz : 1666.825 cache size : 256 KB Physical processor ID : 0 Number of siblings : 1 fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow bogomips : 3307.27 processor : 1 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 6 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) MP stepping : 2 cpu MHz : 1666.825 cache size : 256 KB Physical processor ID : 0 Number of siblings : 1 fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow bogomips : 3332.58 > > Does it report both processors? If not, you need to install an SMP kernel in > order to take full advantage of your hardware. > As you can see both processors are enabled ... Grzegorz From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net Wed Apr 9 08:07:37 2003 Received: from mx1.ustc.edu.cn ([218.22.21.1]) by server.ccl.net (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id h39C7aX27850 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 08:07:36 -0400 Received: from dxl ([202.38.82.79]) by mx1.ustc.edu.cn (8.8.7/8.8.6) with ESMTP id TAA27441 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:56:50 +0800 Message-Id: <200304091156.TAA27441@mx1.ustc.edu.cn> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:58:44 +0800 From: ¶¡Ñ¸À× Reply-To: dxl@mail.ustc.edu.cn To: CCls Subject: question: EA of O2 Organization: Öйú¿Æ´óÑ¡¼ü»¯Ñ§ÊµÑéÊÒ X-mailer: FoxMail 4.0 beta 2 [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====000_Dragon010623651610_=====" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=====000_Dragon010623651610_===== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 RGVhciBDQ2xzo7oNCg0KoaGhoUkgd2FudCB0byB1c2UgZzk4IG9yIGRtb2wzIHRvIGNhbGN1bGF0 ZSB0aGUgRUEgb2YgTzIgLCBidXQgaSBmb3VuZCBpdCBpcyANCglzbyBkaWZmaWN1bHQuIFRoZSBl eHBlcmltZW50YWwgZGF0YSBpcyBhcm91bmQgMC40NWVWIC4gV2hlbiB1c2UgZzk4LCBJIGhhZA0K CXRvIHVzZSB0aGUgNi0zMTErK0cqKiB0byBnZXQgdGhlIHJlc3VsdCBhbmQgbWFueSBvdGhlciBi YXNpc2VzIGFyZSBiYWQgZm9yIA0KCXRoZSBjYWxjdWxhdGlvbnMgLiBBcyBmb3IgZG1vbDMsIEkg Y2FuJ3QgZ2V0IHRoZSByZXN1bHQgYXQgYWxsLg0KCQ0KCUhhdmUgeW91IGZvdW5kIHRoZSBwcm9i bGVtIGJlZm9yZT8gDQoJDQoJSSB3YW50IHRvIGtub3cgOg0KCTEuSW4gZzk4LCB3aGF0IGJhc2lz ZXMgYXJlIHN1aXQgZm9yIHRoZSBjYWxjdWxhdGlvbiBvZiBPMiBhbmQgdGhlIGFuaW9uIG9mIE8y ID8NCgkyLkluIGRtb2wzICwgaG93IHRvIGNhbGN1bGF0ZSBPMiBhbmQgdGhlIGFuaW9uIG9mIE8y ID8NCg0KICAgIFRoYW5rIHlvdSBmb3IgeW91ciBoZWxwIaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhoaENCiAJCQkJ DQqhoaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhRGluZyBYdW5sZWkNCqGhoaGhoaGhoaGhoaGh oaGhoaGhoaGhoaGhoaEyMDAzLTA0LTA5DQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpEaW5nIFh1bmxlaSwgUGguRC4gQ2FuZGlkYXRlDQpPcGVuIExhYm9y YXRvcnkgb2YgQm9uZCBTZWxlY3RpdmUgQ2hlbWlzdHJ5DQpVbml2ZXJzaXR5IG9mIFNjaWVuY2Ug JiBUZWNobm9sb2d5IG9mIENoaW5hDQpIZWZlaSwgQW5odWkgMjMwMDI2LCBQLlIuQ2hpbmENClRl bC46IDAwODYtNTUxLTM2MDM0MTgNCkZheC46IDAwODYtNTUxLTM2MDI5NjkNCkUtbWFpbDogZHhs QG1haWwudXN0Yy5lZHUuY24NCkh0dHA6Ly93d3cuYnNjLnVzdGMuZWR1LmNuL35keGwNCg== --=====000_Dragon010623651610_===== Content-Type: image/gif; name="LittleBoy.GIF" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: FoxmailIcon; filename="LittleBoy.GIF" R0lGODlhIAAgANQAAGCXzwCAgGBnYP/IkPzJmpFjPBsNA2Q8HxQDACIGAk4HADYDAA0AAP///wAA ANPT05KSkm5ubmVlZUZGRiUlJRgYGBEREQ8PDwcHBwMDAwAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACH/C05F VFNDQVBFMi4wAwEAAAAh/sJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnJ0bHNvZnQuY29tL2FuaW1hZ2ljLwoKQ3JlYXRl ZCB3aXRoIEFuaW1hZ2ljIEdJRiBWIDEuMjJhCmJ5IFJpZ2h0IHRvIExlZnQgU29mdHdhcmUgSW5j LgoKVG8gc3VwcHJlc3MgdGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGluIHRoZSByZWdpc3RlcmVkIHZlcnNpb24KdW5j aGVjayAiT3B0aW9ucyB8IEFuaW1hZ2ljIGNvbW1lbnQgZnJhbWUiCgAh+QQJGQABACwAAAAAIAAg AAAF1mAgjmRpnmiqrqrjvjCLugNsO3LpDPz91rgcggf07XqyYa/nI9ZWytqy6HQGT1HrtEq8mhjc 45b7NImB5DTSrP6py6UoLfweLEwGpuBcJ95LYEANYm5vfyQOeQ4Ng12LfFyHIw5gi41AApdqkiIO CUxdjJppnAGBYYyQBQUERAoleW2QRAWuJFmOfbW1rySnfVy7A70jsV3ARAc8xCO/RXNkC8rDWGGz ZAgpzsgD2Srbfd4rCZ/ALjki5OXWXjKWoz2D6AEvooM2ojEtAADvqfz+BgE0EQIAIfkECRkAAQAs AAAAACAAIAAABc5gII5kaZ5oqq6q474wi7oDbDty6Qz8/da4HIIH9O16smGv5yPWVsrasuh0Bk9R 67RKvJoY3OOW+zSJgeQ00qz+qculKC38HixMhum5TryXwFKBVHV+JA55R2KJhGZgMFt7XIUjDglM XZhvkyKAYW5OBQUERAoleW2RRAWkJFldqVWrq6UknXxcsgO0I6eZtwMHPLsjtkVzZAvBulievwgp xb8DzyrRfNQrCZa3Ljki2tueXjIODeaR5eMrL+bnNu0xLQAA5e0NDvP18PkmIQAh+QQJGQABACwA AAAAIAAgAAAF02AgjmRpnmiqrqrjvjCLug9sO3LpPPz91rgchgf07XqyYa/nI9ZWytqy6HQGT1Hr tEq8mjLc45b7NImB5DTSrP6py6UoLfx+VEwWpuRcJ95LYEANYm5vfyQOeQ4Ng12LfFyHIw5gi41A EpdqkiIOF0xdjJppnAGBYYyQERFOFCV5bZBErDyuI1mOfaystiOnfVy7D70isF3ARBO1X1U2m8rD WGGyZBgpv8g81irYwNsrF5/ALjki4eLTXjKWoz2D5QEvooM2ojEtEBDsqfn7g/0mQgAAOw== --=====000_Dragon010623651610_=====--