From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jun  4 05:32:22 2003
Received: from patronimo.umh.ac.be (patronimo.umh.ac.be [193.190.193.113])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h549WLgC028961
	for <chemistry..at..ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 05:32:21 -0400
Received: from patronimo (patronimo [193.190.193.113])
	by patronimo.umh.ac.be (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h549VpBJ422386
	for <chemistry..at..ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:31:51 +0200
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:31:51 +0200 (DFT)
From: Victor Geskin <Victor..at..averell.umh.ac.be>
X-X-Sender: Victor@patronimo
To: chemistry..at..ccl.net
Subject: CCL: Orbitals: a practical approach of a theoretical chemist
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.44.0306040926020.226014-100000@patronimo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.1 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang)

Dear CCLers,

I was absent from office, only by now I have read all the discussion - a
very stimulating one, and I would like to dwell on several points that
have not received due attention, unless I overlooked something. A
practical approach of a theoretical chemist.

An almost trivial introduction.

Scientific papers contain words, not only tables with numbers and graphs.
And these words not only describe which number in a table is greater than
another one, but tend to explain why. That is, as natural scientists and
human beings we need images and qualitative models. We strive at
discussing our results, not just cutting-pasting the numbers provided by
our computers. If the computers were able to provide any number with
necessary precision at reasonable computational cost, it would be of great
importance for industry and the death of natural science; of theoretical
chemistry in particular, as far as chemical research is concerned.
Hopefully, this is not expected soon.

The words in theoretical chemistry papers are supposed to be not just
anything plausible we invent to make our numbers look less dull. (It could
be like that before QM.) We have got an underlying physical theory, which
is extremely well cast and of unquestionable applicability in our domain:
QM, of course. Our words are rooted in its formalism and can be used only
provided they do not contradict this formalism; the latter is taken for
granted.

Now closer to orbitals to illustrate this approach.

A simple-minded question (one of those I used to ask myself as a
high-school student, before getting acquainted with QM): are electrons
just immobile clouds shaped as orbitals or do electrons move within the
orbitals? Now I think that the correct answer is: no matter what electrons
are, they do move, that is their velocity is non-zero, because the
expectation value of the kinetic energy operator is non-zero.

Are orbitals something like flats in which electron pairs (or poor lonely
electrons) live? That could be an acceptable image for a Hartree product
wave function, but not for a Slater determinant: in the latter it is
blurred which electron is where. Therefore, MOs should not be viewed as
flats in a molecule-hostel.

It is widely accepted (in DFT, though not strictly proven, as far as I
know) that any electron density in our 3D space can be obtained from one
Slater determinant, squared (assuming all the numbers real), by
integrating over the coordinates af all the electrons but one. Since the
orbitals (the one-electron functions of which the determinant is built)
are orthogonal by construction, the total electron density is the sum of
orbitals squared (multiplied by the normalization factor, of course) - no
cross terms. Therefore, MOs are good for decomposing the total
electron density; I do not see a real problem in the fact that in this
sense they are defined up to a phase factor.

A corollary: the necessity of multideterminant CI wavefunctions is but an
illusion; having obtained a precise electron density, one can reconstruct
it from one determinant - built of Kohn-Sham, not Hartree-Fock orbitals. I
suppose, they do it in the group of Baerends.

However, these orbitals are not unique, even supposing that the detrminant
is unique: one more reason why they are not flats for electrons.

I would say that the electrons do not "live in" orbitals, but in many
cases they "leave from" them. I mean the following. For ionization, as
long as Koopmans works, it is reasonable to suppose that the electron
density decreases in the spatial region of a given orbital. For
excitation, when a CI or TD-DFT calculation shows which excited
determinants constitute the excited state, it means in the region of which
orbitals the electron density decreases and where it increases. In this
sense, ionization and excitation take place between (among) canonincal
orbitals.

I would like also to mention experimental spin-density determinations in
organic radicals performed some ten years ago in Grenoble, in the
laboratory of Jacques Schweitzer, by neutron scattering (neutron has spin
but no charge: most useful for spin density probing). If some MO based
calculations (I suppose these have been done) show that the total spin
density can be traced back to one MO predominantly - then we can even
admit that, in a sense, the unpaired electron even lives in a given
orbital.  This bearing in mind that we cannot say which electron is
unpaired: they are all antisymmetrized in a determinant.

In particular for Kohn-Sham orbitals, there was a tradition to justify
their meaning by Janak's theorem, stating that the partial derivative of
the total energy wrt a given orbital's occupation number is equal to the
eigenenergy of this orbital. A most confusing theorem based on an
assumption that an electron can be ionized in infinitesimal parts! (Not
the same as fractional occupation numbers of e.g. natural orbitals!) I
think, better to forget about this theorem (it must already be forgotten
since noone has mentioned it in this discussion).

In conclusion, I consciously avoided any direct reply to whether the
orbitals are real or not. I tried to exemplify that in many situations
they can be used in a quantum-mechanically well-defined sense and help us
building models that do not contradict QM.

If you are not yet too tired of this discussion, I would be most grateful
for any remarks and criticism.
 ___________________________________________________________________

      Dr Victor GESKIN         e-mail:   Victor..at..averell.umh.ac.be

      Service de Chimie                   http://morris.umh.ac.be
   des Materiaux Nouveaux
 Universite de Mons-Hainaut     phone:     +32-(0)65.37.38.67
      Place du Parc, 20           fax:     +32-(0)65.37.38.61
    B-7000 MONS, BELGIQUE         GSM:     +32-(0)486.779.799
 ___________________________________________________________________



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jun  4 03:52:58 2003
Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h547qvgC025397
	for <CHEMISTRY..at..ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 03:52:57 -0400
Received: from moka.ccr.jussieu.fr (moka.ccr.jussieu.fr [134.157.1.23])
          by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.12.9/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id h547qm5Q096951
          for <CHEMISTRY..at..ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:52:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ccr.jussieu.fr (verdi.div.jussieu.fr [134.157.75.160])
          by moka.ccr.jussieu.fr (8.10.0/jtpda-5.3.3) with ESMTP id h547qlE1839218
          for <CHEMISTRY..at..ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:52:47 +0200
Sender: seb..at..ccr.jussieu.fr
Message-ID: <3EDE234B.9320792A..at..ccr.jussieu.fr>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 09:50:20 -0700
From: Sebatien Laugaro <laugaro..at..ccr.jussieu.fr>
Organization: Pharmacochime Moleculaire
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP32)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CHEMISTRY..at..ccl.net
Subject: Gaussian problem
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr

Hy,
I work on Gaussian98 and I have a problem.
I have an error message : "increase integral accuracy, restarting
incremental FockFormation". I use B3LYP/6-31G* OPT SCF(MAXCYCLE=256).
Can you help me .
Thank you
Sebastien
laugaro..at..ccr.jussieu.fr



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jun  4 04:45:28 2003
Received: from smtp02.sohu.com ([61.135.132.105])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h548jQgC027407
	for <chemistry<<at>>ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 04:45:27 -0400
Received: from njuitccwx (jproxy.nju.edu.cn [202.119.32.27])
	by smtp02.sohu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5B46ABF5
	for <chemistry<<at>>ccl.net>; Wed,  4 Jun 2003 16:44:08 +0800 (CST)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 16:45:13 +0800
From: wxin <wxinmail<<at>>sohu.com>
To: "chemistry<<at>>ccl.net" <chemistry<<at>>ccl.net>
Subject: About the lanczos diagnolization in G98 
X-mailer: FoxMail 3.11 [cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20030604084408.3C5B46ABF5<<at>>smtp02.sohu.com>

Dear CCL-lister, 
Does anyone knows how to change the maximum number of lanczos iterations in Gaussian98 (the default is 64) when doing casscf calculation? 


Xin Wang
Dept Chem, Nanjing Univ 
P.R.China




From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jun  4 05:59:18 2003
Received: from hal.netbox.cz (hal.netbox.cz [212.96.166.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h549xIgC029768
	for <chemistry..at..ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 05:59:18 -0400
Received: from chemi.muni.cz (r10s01p08.home.nbox.cz [212.96.184.72])
	by hal.netbox.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1984171D44
	for <chemistry..at..ccl.net>; Wed,  4 Jun 2003 11:59:13 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3EDDC287.2070609..at..chemi.muni.cz>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 11:57:27 +0200
From: Lubos Vrbka <shnek..at..chemi.muni.cz>
Reply-To: shnek..at..chemi.muni.cz
Organization: NCBR
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030529
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry..at..ccl.net
Subject: chemical formula editors for windows
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

dear ccl'ers,

i've used chemdraw for some time but now i have to switch to something 
else, preferably a FREE software. i'm trying mdl isis draw 2.5 now (it's 
free for academic and home use), but it has serious problems exporting 
.eps and other file types that are essential for me. anyone has seen the 
same behaviour? do you have any advices concerning this?

or could you please suggest some other program for free that i could 
use? unix reccomendations are also welcome.

i tried to search the archives, but with no results... i'll summarize 
the postings at the end...

regards,
lubos

-- 
-
#################################################
Lubos Vrbka
National Centre for Biomolecular Research
Masaryk university, Brno, Czech Republic

shnek..at..chemi.muni.cz
http://www.chemi.muni.cz/~shnek
tel. +420 541 129 508
#################################################





From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jun  4 12:13:49 2003
Received: from dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br (dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br [150.164.65.10])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h54GDmLB001202
	for <chemistry=at=ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 12:13:49 -0400
Received: from dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h54G78eu053846;
	Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:07:08 -0300
Received: from localhost (amolive@localhost)
	by dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id h54G778g038432;
	Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:07:07 -0300
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 13:07:07 -0300 (BSC)
From: andre mauricio de oliveira <amolive=at=dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br>
X-X-Sender: amolive@dedalus
To: Lubos Vrbka <shnek=at=chemi.muni.cz>
cc: chemistry=at=ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:chemical formula editors for windows
In-Reply-To: <3EDDC287.2070609=at=chemi.muni.cz>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.40.0306041305590.41380-100000@dedalus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



I have used ChemSketch 5.0 (www.acdlabs.com)that has many functionalities.



On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Lubos Vrbka wrote:

> dear ccl'ers,
>
> i've used chemdraw for some time but now i have to switch to something
> else, preferably a FREE software. i'm trying mdl isis draw 2.5 now (it's
> free for academic and home use), but it has serious problems exporting
> >.eps and other file types that are essential for me. anyone has seen the
> same behaviour? do you have any advices concerning this?
>
> or could you please suggest some other program for free that i could
> use? unix reccomendations are also welcome.
>
> i tried to search the archives, but with no results... i'll summarize
> the postings at the end...
>
> regards,
> lubos
>
> --
> -
> #################################################
> Lubos Vrbka
> National Centre for Biomolecular Research
> Masaryk university, Brno, Czech Republic
>
> shnek=at=chemi.muni.cz
> http://www.chemi.muni.cz/~shnek
> tel. +420 541 129 508
> #################################################
>
>
>
>
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject: line
> and send your message to:  CHEMISTRY=at=ccl.net
>
> Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST=at=ccl.net
> HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net   | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs
>
> If your mail is bouncing from CCL.NET domain send it to the maintainer:
> Jan Labanowski,  jkl=at=ccl.net (read about it on CCL Home Page)
> -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>
>
>
>
>

Andre Mauricio de Oliveira

VOICE +55-031-374-1325
      +55-031-499-5765
FAX   +55-031-499-5700

Laboratorio de QSAR e Modelagem Molecular
Nucleo de Estudos em Quimica Medicinal (NEQUIM)
NEQUIM's Homepage: http://www.qui.ufmg.br/~nequim
Departamento de Quimica ICEx
Federal University of Minas Gerais
Av Antonio Carlos 6627 Pampulha ZIP CODE 31270-901
Belo Horizonte MG Brazil


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jun  4 09:26:15 2003
Received: from mail.ngdc.net (mail.ngdc.net [195.190.153.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h54DQF6B002025
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:26:15 -0400
Received: from [10.20.30.120] (unknown [62.242.210.146])
	by herodot (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 82C4B17A94; Wed,  4 Jun 2003 16:25:18 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 15:25:33 +0200 (CEST)
From: Kenneth Geisshirt <kenneth~at~geisshirt.dk>
Sender: kneth~at~hydrogen.ngdc.net
Reply-To: kenneth~at~geisshirt.dk
To: Lubos Vrbka <shnek~at~chemi.muni.cz>
Cc: "chemistry~at~ccl.net" <chemistry~at~ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:chemical formula editors for windows
In-Reply-To: <3EDDC287.2070609~at~chemi.muni.cz>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0306041523270.21307@hydrogen>
References: <3EDDC287.2070609~at~chemi.muni.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Lubos Vrbka wrote:

> or could you please suggest some other program for free that i could
> use? unix reccomendations are also welcome.

Take a look at xdrawchem: http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~gte067k/xdrawchem/
- there is also a Windows version.

Kneth

-- 
Kenneth Geisshirt, M.Sc., Ph.D.         http://kenneth.geisshirt.dk
Grxndals Parkvej 2A, 3. sal                    kenneth~at~geisshirt.dk
DK-2720 Vanlxse                                     +45 38 87 78 38


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jun  4 10:07:53 2003
Received: from mail1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE (mail1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE [134.95.100.208])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h54E7q6B003410
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:07:53 -0400
Received: from uni-koeln.de ([134.95.151.118])
	by mail1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE (8.12.9/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h54E7WjR018566;
	Wed, 4 Jun 2003 16:07:32 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <3EDDFD26.9050406~at~uni-koeln.de>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 16:07:34 +0200
From: Christoph Steinbeck <c.steinbeck~at~uni-koeln.de>
Reply-To: c.steinbeck~at~uni-koeln.de
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lubos Vrbka <shnek~at~chemi.muni.cz>
CC: chemistry~at~ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:chemical formula editors for windows
References: <3EDDC287.2070609~at~chemi.muni.cz>
In-Reply-To: <3EDDC287.2070609~at~chemi.muni.cz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Spam-Report: EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA

Completely free (as in "free software") is WinDrawChem, which is also 
available as a Linux version XDrawChem ( see 
http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~gte067k/windrawchem/ and links therein).

Don't know about the export features, though. But because it is open 
source you could add them yourself :-)

If you feel very adventurous, you could try our free structure editor 
JChemPaint (http://jchempaint.sf.net), but if your focus is nice output, 
that might not be an option (yet).

Cheers,

Chris

-- 
Dr. Christoph Steinbeck (e-mail: c.steinbeck~at~uni-koeln.de)
Groupleader Junior Research Group for Applied Bioinformatics
Cologne University BioInformatics Center (http://www.cubic.uni-koeln.de)
Z|lpicher Str. 47, 50674 Cologne
Tel: +49(0)221-470-7426   Fax: +49 (0) 221-470-5092

What is man but that lofty spirit - that sense of enterprise.
... Kirk, "I, Mudd," stardate 4513.3..


Lubos Vrbka wrote:
> dear ccl'ers,
> 
> i've used chemdraw for some time but now i have to switch to something 
> else, preferably a FREE software. i'm trying mdl isis draw 2.5 now (it's 
> free for academic and home use), but it has serious problems exporting
> 
>> .eps and other file types that are essential for me. anyone has seen the 
> 
> same behaviour? do you have any advices concerning this?
> 
> or could you please suggest some other program for free that i could 
> use? unix reccomendations are also welcome.
> 
> i tried to search the archives, but with no results... i'll summarize 
> the postings at the end...
> 
> regards,
> lubos
> 



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jun  4 10:01:16 2003
Received: from atom.ecn.purdue.edu (atom.ecn.purdue.edu [128.46.108.94])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h54E1G6B003170
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:01:16 -0400
Received: from ecn.purdue.edu (chme117bpc3.ecn.purdue.edu [128.46.108.125])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by atom.ecn.purdue.edu (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h54E0ofL022355
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:00:50 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3EDDFB92.4090008~at~ecn.purdue.edu>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 09:00:50 -0500
From: Aaron Deskins <ndeskins~at~ecn.purdue.edu>
Organization: Purdue University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry~at~ccl.net
Subject: Freezing atoms-modredundant
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned-ECN: by AMaVIS version 11 (perl 5.8) (http://amavis.org/)

Hello all,
   I have (hopefully) a relatively simple question. I'm trying some 
simple test calculations using Gaussian 98, but am running into a little 
problem freezing atom positions. Essentially I want to freeze a few 
atoms, and allow others to relax. Below is a test file. The problem I 
see is that the geometry optimization algorithm moves all atoms to the 
same location on first pass and subsequently causes the program to 
crash. I've tried different atoms and arrangements with no luck. Any 
suggestions?  Thank you


# opt(maxcycle=200,modredundant) hf/lanl2dz scf(diis,maxcycle=300)

Title Card Required

0  3
c 0.0000000000 0.0000000000 0.0000000000
c 2.7718585823 0.0000000000 0.0000000000
c 0.0000000000 2.7718585823 0.0000000000
c 2.7718585823 2.7718585823 0.0000000000

1 f
2 f
3 f



-- 
Aaron Deskins
Graduate Student
Chemical Engineering
Purdue University



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jun  4 09:48:39 2003
Received: from lgdx04.lg.ehu.es (lgdx04.lg.ehu.es [158.227.1.36])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h54Dmc6B002827
	for <CHEMISTRY~at~ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 09:48:38 -0400
Received: by lgdx04.lg.ehu.es id PAA0000000556; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 15:48:15 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <00eb01c32a9f$f55bb2e0$222fe39e~at~lc.ehu.es>
From: "Pablo Vitoria" <qibvigap~at~lg.ehu.es>
To: "Sebatien Laugaro" <laugaro~at~ccr.jussieu.fr>, "CCL" <CHEMISTRY~at~ccl.net>
References: <3EDE234B.9320792A~at~ccr.jussieu.fr>
Subject: Re: CCL:Gaussian problem
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 15:48:19 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

Hi Sebastien,

They are not error messages, it is the normal behavior of G98.

 When using direct SCF (which is the default), G98 calculates the integrals
to a low accuracy (to speed up the initial cycles) until the wavefunction is
converged to 10^-5, then it prints "Initial convergence to 1.0D-05 achieved.
Increase integral accuracy", and starts calculating with higher accuracy.
Thsi behaviour can be turned off with SCF=NoVarAcc.

Also by default, G98 uses the "Pulay's Direct Inversion in the Iterative
Subspace extrapolation method " (DIIS), which (usually) accelerates the
convergence of SCF. You will see a message "Restarting incremental Fock
formation" every 20 cycles of the SCF.

Best regards

Pablo
--------------------------------------------------------
Pablo Vitoria Garcia
Dpto. Qummica Inorganica, Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad del Pams Vasco (UPV/EHU)
Aptdo. 644
48080 Bilbao (Bizkaia)

Tfno. 94 6015992
Fax. 94 4648500
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sebatien Laugaro" <laugaro~at~ccr.jussieu.fr>
To: <CHEMISTRY~at~ccl.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:50 PM
Subject: CCL:Gaussian problem


| Hy,
| I work on Gaussian98 and I have a problem.
| I have an error message : "increase integral accuracy, restarting
| incremental FockFormation". I use B3LYP/6-31G* OPT SCF(MAXCYCLE=256).
| Can you help me .
| Thank you
| Sebastien
| laugaro~at~ccr.jussieu.fr
|
|
|
| -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
| To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject:
line
| and send your message to:  CHEMISTRY~at~ccl.net
|
| Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to:
CHEMISTRY-REQUEST~at~ccl.net
| HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net   | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs
|
| If your mail is bouncing from CCL.NET domain send it to the maintainer:
| Jan Labanowski,  jkl~at~ccl.net (read about it on CCL Home Page)
| -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|
|
|
|
|
|



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jun  4 10:10:28 2003
Received: from pump2.york.ac.uk (pump2.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.12])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h54EAR6B003484
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:10:27 -0400
Received: from thallium.york.ac.uk (thallium.york.ac.uk [144.32.52.130])
	by pump2.york.ac.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h54EA6gX010575
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 15:10:07 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
From: Grant Hill <jgh105~at~york.ac.uk>
To: chemistry~at~ccl.net
Subject: CCL:Extremely large basis sets
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 15:10:11 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <200306041510.11973.jgh105~at~york.ac.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id h54EAS6B003488

Hi all,

One of my current research interests requires a very large basis set, which 
would ideally support the elements of the first two periods (or at the very 
least hydrogen and oxygen).  The basis set would need to be larger than (for 
example) aug-cc-pV6Z, and in principle be as close to the basis set limit as 
possible.

Does anyone on the list know of any basis sets which may fulfil these 
requirements? Either a reference to a journal article, or a url for a website 
would be hugely appreciated.

Please note that I'll also consider larger slater basis sets.

Thanks in advance,

Grant Hill



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jun  4 11:23:04 2003
Received: from sccrmhc11.attbi.com (sccrmhc11.attbi.com [204.127.202.55])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h54FN46B005405
	for <chemistry|at|ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:23:04 -0400
Received: from C1353359A (12-207-205-144.client.attbi.com[12.207.205.144](untrusted sender))
          by attbi.com (sccrmhc11) with SMTP
          id <20030604152244011006qgh3e>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 15:22:44 +0000
Reply-To: <mark|at|planaria-software.com>
From: "Mark Thompson" <mark|at|planaria-software.com>
To: "Lubos Vrbka" <shnek|at|chemi.muni.cz>, <chemistry|at|ccl.net>
Subject: CCL: chemical formula editors for windows
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:18:20 -0700
Message-ID: <000301c32aac$88212180$0300a8c0|at|attbi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <3EDDC287.2070609|at|chemi.muni.cz>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Importance: Normal


Dear Lubos,

Try WinDrawChem (its free)
http://www.prism.gatech.edu/~gte067k/windrawchem/

Mark

=================================
Mark Thompson, Ph.D.
Planaria Software
PO Box 55207
Seattle, WA  98155
FAX: 206-440-3305

ArgusLab is available at:
http://www.arguslab.com
=================================










> -----Original Message-----
> From: Computational Chemistry List [mailto:chemistry-request|at|ccl.net]On
> Behalf Of Lubos Vrbka
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 2:57 AM
> To: chemistry|at|ccl.net
> Subject: CCL:chemical formula editors for windows
>
>
> dear ccl'ers,
>
> i've used chemdraw for some time but now i have to switch to something
> else, preferably a FREE software. i'm trying mdl isis draw 2.5 now (it's
> free for academic and home use), but it has serious problems exporting
> >.eps and other file types that are essential for me. anyone has seen the
> same behaviour? do you have any advices concerning this?
>
> or could you please suggest some other program for free that i could
> use? unix reccomendations are also welcome.
>
> i tried to search the archives, but with no results... i'll summarize
> the postings at the end...
>
> regards,
> lubos
>
> --
> -
> #################################################
> Lubos Vrbka
> National Centre for Biomolecular Research
> Masaryk university, Brno, Czech Republic
>
> shnek|at|chemi.muni.cz
> http://www.chemi.muni.cz/~shnek
> tel. +420 541 129 508
> #################################################
>
>
>
>
>
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your
> Subject: line
> and send your message to:  CHEMISTRY|at|ccl.net
>
> Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to:
> CHEMISTRY-REQUEST|at|ccl.net
> HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net   | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs
>
> If your mail is bouncing from CCL.NET domain send it to the maintainer:
> Jan Labanowski,  jkl|at|ccl.net (read about it on CCL Home Page)
> -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>
>
>
>
>
>



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jun  4 16:06:29 2003
Received: from atom.ecn.purdue.edu (atom.ecn.purdue.edu [128.46.108.94])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h54K6TLB006183
	for <chemistry_at_ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 16:06:29 -0400
Received: from ecn.purdue.edu (chme117bpc3.ecn.purdue.edu [128.46.108.125])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by atom.ecn.purdue.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h54K6Pme028768;
	Wed, 4 Jun 2003 15:06:26 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3EDE5141.6050400_at_ecn.purdue.edu>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 15:06:25 -0500
From: Aaron Deskins <ndeskins_at_ecn.purdue.edu>
Organization: Purdue University
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Aaron Deskins <ndeskins_at_ecn.purdue.edu>
CC: chemistry_at_ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:Freezing atoms-modredundant
References: <3EDDFB92.4090008_at_ecn.purdue.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned-ECN: by AMaVIS version 11 (perl 5.8) (http://amavis.org/)

Thanks for the replies. I think I found the problem. I needed the Nosymm 
  keyword for the optimization to work properly. Thanks again!

Aaron Deskins wrote:
> Hello all,
>   I have (hopefully) a relatively simple question. I'm trying some 
> simple test calculations using Gaussian 98, but am running into a little 
> problem freezing atom positions. Essentially I want to freeze a few 
> atoms, and allow others to relax. Below is a test file. The problem I 
> see is that the geometry optimization algorithm moves all atoms to the 
> same location on first pass and subsequently causes the program to 
> crash. I've tried different atoms and arrangements with no luck. Any 
> suggestions?  Thank you
> 
> 
> # opt(maxcycle=200,modredundant) hf/lanl2dz scf(diis,maxcycle=300)
> 
> Title Card Required
> 
> 0  3
> c 0.0000000000 0.0000000000 0.0000000000
> c 2.7718585823 0.0000000000 0.0000000000
> c 0.0000000000 2.7718585823 0.0000000000
> c 2.7718585823 2.7718585823 0.0000000000
> 
> 1 f
> 2 f
> 3 f
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Aaron Deskins
Graduate Student
Chemical Engineering
Purdue University


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jun  4 15:07:03 2003
Received: from mail.uvigo.es (mail.uvigo.es [193.146.32.91])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h54J72LB005363
	for <chemistry)at(ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 15:07:02 -0400
Received: from mail.uvigo.es (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.uvigo.es (8.12.9/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h54J6v8o006370
	for <chemistry)at(ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:06:57 +0200
Received: from correo.uvigo.es (correo.uvigo.es [193.146.32.68])
	by mail.uvigo.es (8.12.9/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h54J6vTA006365
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT)
	for <chemistry)at(ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:06:57 +0200
Received: from correo (correo [193.146.32.68])
	by correo.uvigo.es (8.12.9/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h54J6vIF030992;
	Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:06:57 +0200
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 21:06:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Carlos Silva Lopez <csilval)at(uvigo.es>
X-X-Sender:  <csilval@correo>
To: Lubos Vrbka <shnek)at(chemi.muni.cz>
cc: <chemistry)at(ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:chemical formula editors for windows
In-Reply-To: <3EDDC287.2070609)at(chemi.muni.cz>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0306042105270.2588-100000@correo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by server.ccl.net id h54J73LB005364

I would suggest the use of xdrawchem (for linux/unix) and/or windrawchem
(for windows). Both are completely compatible, so you can share your files
between the two plattforms.
Regards

_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-

   Carlos Silva Lspez
 Dept. Qummica Organica
  Universidade de Vigo
  Phone:0034 986812226
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_





From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jun  4 14:17:39 2003
Received: from kelly.bath.ac.uk (kelly.bath.ac.uk [138.38.32.20])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h54IHdLB004412
	for <chemistry)at(ccl.net>; Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:17:39 -0400
Received: from mary.bath.ac.uk ([138.38.32.14] ident=mmdf)
	by kelly.bath.ac.uk with smtp  id 19Ncp5-0004fE-3K; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 19:17:19 +0100
Received: from prpcn144  ( prpc-n144.bath.ac.uk [138.38.128.144] ) by bath.ac.uk
          id aa03238 ; 4 Jun 2003 19:17 +0100
From: James Robinson <prsjjr)at(bath.ac.uk>
To: Aaron Deskins <ndeskins)at(ecn.purdue.edu>, chemistry)at(ccl.net
Subject: RE: Freezing atoms-modredundant
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 19:17:34 +0100
Message-ID: <NGBBILMDCLJNCGKMLPEEAEHKCCAA.prsjjr)at(bath.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To: <3EDDFB92.4090008)at(ecn.purdue.edu>
X-Scanner:  *19Ncp5-0004fE-3K*d8QNaXq/1Yg*
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id h54IHdLB004413

You could use Molden to freeze atoms in the zmatrix. I have found writing a cartesian file with Mopac, then put zero for optimisation flags that you want to freeze. Then use Mopac to do a single point calculation, and include AIGOUT keyword and you get an equivalent zmatrix usable in Gaussian. Its not perfect but I have found it useful.

I wonder also if you need some zeros after immediately after the atom labels, should it be ?

C 0 0.000 0.000 0.000
C 0 0.000 1.500 0.000


James, Bath.

-----Original Message-----
From: Computational Chemistry List [mailto:chemistry-request)at(ccl.net]On
Behalf Of Aaron Deskins
Sent: 04 June 2003 15:01
To: chemistry)at(ccl.net
Subject: CCL:Freezing atoms-modredundant


Hello all,
   I have (hopefully) a relatively simple question. I'm trying some 
simple test calculations using Gaussian 98, but am running into a little 
problem freezing atom positions. Essentially I want to freeze a few 
atoms, and allow others to relax. Below is a test file. The problem I 
see is that the geometry optimization algorithm moves all atoms to the 
same location on first pass and subsequently causes the program to 
crash. I've tried different atoms and arrangements with no luck. Any 
suggestions?  Thank you


# opt(maxcycle=200,modredundant) hf/lanl2dz scf(diis,maxcycle=300)

Title Card Required

0  3
c 0.0000000000 0.0000000000 0.0000000000
c 2.7718585823 0.0000000000 0.0000000000
c 0.0000000000 2.7718585823 0.0000000000
c 2.7718585823 2.7718585823 0.0000000000

1 f
2 f
3 f



-- 
Aaron Deskins
Graduate Student
Chemical Engineering
Purdue University



-= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject: line
and send your message to:  CHEMISTRY)at(ccl.net

Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST)at(ccl.net 
HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net   | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs 

If your mail is bouncing from CCL.NET domain send it to the maintainer:
Jan Labanowski,  jkl)at(ccl.net (read about it on CCL Home Page)
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+









