From chemistry-request@ccl.net Sun Aug 31 12:31:29 2003
Received: from GWIA.HSC.WVU.EDU (gateway.hsc.wvu.edu [157.182.105.18])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h7VGVTvj001712
	for <chemistry..at..ccl.net>; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 12:31:29 -0400
Received: from HSC-DOM5-MTA by GWIA.HSC.WVU.EDU
	with Novell_GroupWise; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 12:31:36 -0400
Message-Id: <sf51eaa8.086..at..GWIA.HSC.WVU.EDU>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0.3
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 12:31:38 -0400
From: "Peter Gannett" <pgannett..at..hsc.wvu.edu>
To: <r.e.oakes..at..btconnect.com>, <chemistry..at..ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:can someone identify this molecule?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id h7VGVTvj001713

Roma:

Given the amount of worms, virii, etc attached to email these days, I'm not sure I'm inclinded to open the attachment.  Perhaps you could give the link to where it was downloaded from.

Pete

>>> "Roma Oakes" <r.e.oakes..at..btconnect.com> 08/30/03 22:41 PM >>>
Hi all

Some time ago I downloaded this picture to use in a talk - of course I
assumed that I would remember exactly what it was (and I did at the time).
Now I want to use it again but cannot remember its name.
I know I should have written it all down - I have already kicked myself!!

Please help

Roma



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Sun Aug 31 20:38:50 2003
Received: from lac.chem.nagoya-u.ac.jp (lac.chem.nagoya-u.ac.jp [133.6.84.199])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h810cnvj009261
	for <chemistry|at|ccl.net>; Sun, 31 Aug 2003 20:38:50 -0400
Received: from lac2.chem.nagoya-u.ac.jp (lac2.chem.nagoya-u.ac.jp [133.6.84.36])
	by lac.chem.nagoya-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9547BD9DC4
	for <chemistry|at|ccl.net>; Mon,  1 Sep 2003 09:38:48 +0900 (JST)
From: Hannes Loeffler <HLoeffler|at|lac.chem.nagoya-u.ac.jp>
Organization: University of Nagoya
To: chemistry|at|ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:error message from CHARMM: too many IM contacts?
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 09:40:25 +0900
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <200308200929.58597.HLoeffler|at|lac.chem.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <Pine.SGI.4.51.0308201544250.8953|at|pollux.cber.nih.gov>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.51.0308201544250.8953|at|pollux.cber.nih.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="shift_jis"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200309010940.25341.HLoeffler|at|lac.chem.nagoya-u.ac.jp>

On Thursday 21 August 2003 05:11, you wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, Hannes Loeffler wrote:
> > what does this error message mean and how can I avoid it?
> >
> >       ***** LEVEL -4 WARNING FROM <NBONDS> *****
> >       ***** GENERATING TOO MANY IM CONTACTS
>
> The message suggests that some of your nonbond and image choices, esp.
> cutoffs, may be requiring too much memory.  It's difficult to tell w/o
> seeing some more of the output.  Some things to try:
>
> [1] reduce CUTIM; it can be the same size as CUTNB (but not smaller)
>
> [2] use a CHARMM executable with a larger atom limit
>
> Another possibility is that the machine type you're using doesn't
> support dynamic expansion of the HEAP data structure; this has been a
> problem on some 64-bit architectures in the past.  I'm not sure of the
> current status of this problem.

Thank, you very much for your suggestions.  Unfortunately the problems still 
remains (CUTIM reduced, large, xxlarge).  The only "solution" I found was to 
set BOMLEV to -5, though I don't know it's implications.  I have no idea 
which output could be more helpful as the output of a failed run looks pretty 
much the same as in a successful run.

The computer system is Linux running on a Pentium IV.  The simulation system 
is just a single ion immersed in 499 TIP3P.

Many thanks for your help,
Hannes.

