From chemistry-request@ccl.net Fri Sep  5 03:38:36 2003
Received: from hawk.dcu.ie (mail.dcu.ie [136.206.1.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h857c4B8005215
	for <chemistry..at..ccl.net>; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 03:38:05 -0400
Received: from [136.206.1.18] by hawk.dcu.ie with HTTP; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 08:37:56 +0100
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 08:37:56 +0100
Message-ID: <3F335BC000013B9C..at..hawk.dcu.ie>
In-Reply-To:   <OFBEBD2912.B276DD62-ON85256D97.004E1D09-85256D97.004E2DAD..at..epamail.epa.gov>
From: "Noel O'Boyle" <noel.oboyle2..at..mail.dcu.ie>
Subject: RE: CCL:density matrix printout in g98
To: Fan.Huajun..at..epamail.epa.gov
Cc: chemistry..at..ccl.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=7.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by server.ccl.net id h857caB8005227

Hello Huajun,
You need to include "POP=FULL IOP(3/33=1)" in the route section, in order
to get a printout of the overlap matrix. Be warned: this will give a large
output file.

You may also be interested in:
http://www.cup.uni-muenchen.de/oc/zipse/lv18099/mull1.html
which explains some of the Mulliken analysis output data.

Noel


>-- Original Message --
>Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 10:13:55 -0400
>From: Fan.Huajun..at..epamail.epa.gov
>Subject: CCL:density matrix printout in g98
>To: chemistry..at..ccl.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi All
>
>I tried to extract the overlap matrix out of check point file and have
>no clue how to get it simple way. Here is what happened:
>
>I had two calculations. One is for a smaller molecular, the overlap
>matrix is printed after the eigenvalues and before the "total atomic
>charge". It also is put into a table of condense-to-atom format. here is
>the example:            Condensed to atoms (all electrons):  
>1          2          3          4          5          6
>1  C    5.218776    .307077   -.011311   -.013193   -.060074    .008774
>2  C     .307077   5.303976    .327129   -.107374   -.007505   -.000374
>3  C    -.011311    .327129   4.480786    .363461    .016396    .004622
>4  C    -.013193   -.107374    .363461   5.369341    .468097   -.062622
>5  C    -.060074   -.007505    .016396    .468097   4.742781    .365727
>6  C     .008774   -.000374    .004622   -.062622    .365727   5.181790
>
>
>However, for the larger molecular, it is not output by default (maybe it
>is too large the size). and if I use guess=read, only and pop=full to
>extract the information out, it gives the following format:      Full
>Mulliken population analysis:                            1
>2         3         4         5    1 1   N  1S          2.05972  
>2        2S         -0.02424   0.39472    3        2PX         0.00000
>0.00000   0.46976    4        2PY         0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
>0.60856    5        2PZ         0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
>0.52927    6        3S         -0.03594   0.33552   0.00000   0.00000
>0.00000    7        3PX         0.00000   0.00000   0.11921   0.00000
>0.00000    8        3PY         0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.23160
>0.00000    9        3PZ         0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
>0.18736
>10        4XX        -0.00119   0.00434   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
>11        4YY        -0.00074  -0.00647   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
>
>However it is not in condense-to-atom format as the above one.
>
>Does anyone know some ways to get the same format of density matrix but
>not full mulliken pop analysis?
>
>Many thanks.
>
>Huajun
>





From chemistry-request@ccl.net Fri Sep  5 12:30:46 2003
Received: from relay.unizar.es (piedra.unizar.es [155.210.11.65])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h85GUEB8027433
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 12:30:14 -0400
Received: from posta.unizar.es ([155.210.88.194])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by relay.unizar.es (8.12.6/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h85GRaVK027776
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 18:27:45 +0200
Message-ID: <3F58BA10.3BD3F562~at~posta.unizar.es>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 18:30:08 +0200
From: Luis Salvatella <lsalvate~at~posta.unizar.es>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.71 [en] (Win98; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry~at~ccl.net
Subject: Energy raising by means of a basis enlargement: the Answer
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: TAMIZ + Sophos en unizar.es
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=7.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_XM,X_ACCEPT_LANG,
	      X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

 I posted yesterday an e-mail on the energy raise of a system (at
B3LYP/6-31G*) including a ghost atom when a second atom was added. I
received some replies (thanks to the authors!).
 Thus, Xavier Assfeld pointed out that the Kohn-Sham equations are
variational towards a basis enlargement. Therefore, there was an error
in the calculated energy.
 In fact, I have found that the problem lies on the SCF Convergence
criterion used by Gaussian in single-point calculations. When a tighter
criterion is used (Conver=8) on the system having two ghost carbons, a
significantly lower energy is found (-303.996714442 Hartrees, i. e. a 2
Kcal/mol lowering).

 Evidently, a tight SCF Convergence criterion should be used by default
in B3LYP (and other) calculations.

 Regards,
                      Luis Salvatella



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Fri Sep  5 13:34:18 2003
Received: from bureau6.utcc.utoronto.ca (bureau6.utcc.utoronto.ca [128.100.132.16])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h85HXkB8029393
	for <CHEMISTRY!at!ccl.net>; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:33:46 -0400
Received: from mditdell.mdit.utoronto.ca ([128.100.251.12] HELO MditDell ident: IDENT-NOT-QUERIED [port 1186]) by bureau6.utcc.utoronto.ca with SMTP id <464167-29566>; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:33:35 -0400
From: "William Wei" <william.wei!at!utoronto.ca>
To: "CCLers" <CHEMISTRY!at!ccl.net>
Cc: "Roma Oakes" <r.e.oakes!at!btconnect.com>
Subject: Bond order in gaussian
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:34:25 -0500
Message-ID: <MDEIKEJBFAGCDMAAIPIBAELOCEAA.william.wei!at!utoronto.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2727.1300
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=7.0
	tests=MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Dear CCLers:

In Gaussian 98, what keyword can help to get the bond order? And little more
detail is appreciated. Thank you very much.

Regards,
William

-------------------------
William Wei
Molecular Design and Information Technology (MDIT) center
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto
19 Russell Street, Toronto, ON. M5S 2S2
Tel: 1-416-946-8469
Fax: 1-416-978-8511
Email: william.wei!at!utoronto.ca
       william!at!phm.utoronto.ca




