From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Oct 15 14:26:28 2003
Received: from smtp3.server.rpi.edu (smtp3.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.3])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9FIPudH007903
	for <chemistry|at|ccl.net>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:25:56 -0400
Received: from rpi.edu (rts17p11.xyp.rpi.edu [128.113.30.160])
	by smtp3.server.rpi.edu (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9FIPoF0017018;
	Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:25:50 -0400
Message-ID: <3F8D9147.FD2A532A|at|rpi.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:26:15 -0400
From: "Curt M. Breneman" <brenec|at|rpi.edu>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry|at|ccl.net, qsar_society|at|accelrys.com, Joan Luo <luoq|at|rpi.edu>,
   Wei Deng <dengw2|at|rpi.edu>, Minghu Song <songm|at|rpi.edu>,
   Sukumar <nagams|at|rpi.edu>, Dechuan Zhuang <zhuand|at|rpi.edu>,
   Bill Katt <kattw|at|rpi.edu>, Hongmei Zhang <zhm100|at|hotmail.com>,
   Rongrong Jiang <jiangr|at|rpi.edu>, Lingling Shen <shenl|at|rpi.edu>,
   Mer Selecky <selecm|at|rpi.edu>, Sarah Cho <chos3|at|rpi.edu>
Subject: CCG Excellence Award Application date Extended to October 24th!!!
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=7.0
	tests=PLING_PLING,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_XM,X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Dear Computational Chemistry graduate students and advisors:

Applications for CCG Excellence Awards are due October 17th, 2003
(EXTENDED to October 24th!) for the
Anaheim ACS National Meeting!

Application for these awards is a two-step process. First, an
application for the Award must be submitted to the Treasurer of the COMP

division for consideration. The application consists of an extended
(2-page) abstract of the poster or presentation along with a letter of
support from the research advisor, a two page CV, and a personal
statement. Secondly, an abstract of a poster or oral presentation in the

COMP program must be submitted through the ACS OASYS system for online
submissions prior to the deadline for the meeting at which the awards
will be presented (Anaheim, in this case).

Awardees are chosen on the basis of the quality and significance of the
research to be presented, as well as the strength of the supporting
letter and other materials. All graduate students are encouraged to
submit applications for the Awards. Students from the same research
group are encouraged to apply. Students from research groups that have
won awards at previous ACS meetings are also encouraged to submit
applications. Awards will be given only to those individuals making
presentations, and not co-authors.

For questions, contact:

Prof. Curt M. Breneman; Treasurer, ACS COMP Division; RPI Department of
Chemistry; 110 8th St.; Troy, NY 12180

To see photos and details of previous winners, see:
http://membership.acs.org/C/COMP/CCG/ccg.html#winners






From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Oct 15 13:00:05 2003
Received: from mailhost.unt.edu (mailhost.unt.edu [129.120.209.40])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9FGxXdH004919
	for <chemistry{at}ccl.net>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:59:33 -0400
Received: from iatro (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail1 (Postfix) with SMTP id 4172A603D9
	for <chemistry{at}ccl.net>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:59:32 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from eaglemail.unt.edu (imp2.private.acs.unt.edu [192.168.221.72])
	by mailhost.unt.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281AA603CD
	for <chemistry{at}ccl.net>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:59:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by eaglemail.unt.edu (Postfix, from userid 99)
	id 6D826474F8; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:59:30 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from 129.120.42.54 ( [129.120.42.54])
	as user gns0001 by eaglemail.unt.edu with HTTP;
	Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:59:30 -0500
Message-ID: <1066237170.3f8d7cf22e66c{at}eaglemail.unt.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 11:59:30 -0500
From: gnsriniv{at}unt.edu
To: chemistry{at}ccl.net
Subject: Error linking DL_POLY
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=7.0
	tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL,
	      USER_AGENT_IMP
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Dear All,
We are trying to compile dl_poly_2.14 version
using f90 on an SGI Indigo-2 (R10000, IRIX64 release 6.5).
The compilation seemed ok.  However, during the
linking of object files we received the following
error (given below). 

If any of you have seen an error of this type and have any
suggestions on how to rectify it, we would be most appreciative.

Thanks in advance.
Sincerely

Srinivas Gantasala
gns0001{at}unt.edu

ERROR BELOW

make LD="f90 -o" LDFLAGS="-lscs" \
        FC=f90 FFLAGS="-c -O2 -OPT:Olimit=0 -lscs" TIMER="" \
        CPFLAGS="-DSGICRAY -DSTRESS -DSERIAL -
D'POINTER=integer'" \
        EX=DLPOLY.X BINROOT=../execute 3pt
        f90 -o ../execute/DLPOLY.X angfrc.o bndfrc.o cfgscan.o corshl.o
        coul0.o
coul4.o  coul2.o coul3.o conscan.o dblstr.o dcell.o diffsn0.o  diffsn1.o
dlpoly.o duni.o error.o ewald1.o ewald3.o  exclude.o exclude_atom.o
fldscan.o exclude_link.o  exitcomms.o extnfld.o fbpfrc.o fcap.o forces.o
freeze.o gauss.o gdsum.o getrec.o gimax.o gisum.o gstate.o images.o
initcomms.o  intlist.o intstr.o invert.o invfrc.o jacobi.o lowcase.o
lrcmetal.o  lrcorrect.o machine.o merge.o merge1.o merge4.o multiple.o  
multiple_nsq.o npt_b1.o nst_b1.o parset.o npt_h1.o nst_h1.o nve_1.o 
nvt_b1.o nvt_e1.o nvt_h1.o parlst_nsq.o parlink.o parlst.o passcon.o 
passpmf.o pmf_1.o pmf_shake.o primlst.o quench.o rdf0.o rdf1.o 
rdshake_1.o result.o revive.o scdens.o shellsort.o shlfrc.o  shlmerge.o
shlqnch.o shmove.o simdef.o splice.o static.o strip.o  strucopt.o sysdef.o
sysgen.o systemp.o sysbook.o sysinit.o  tethfrc.o thbfrc.o timchk.o
traject.o vertest.o vscaleg.o  warning.o xscale.o zden0.o zden1.o denloc.o
dihfrc.o erfcgen.o ewald2.o ewald4.o forgen.o  fortab.o metgen.o srfrce.o
srfrceneu.o suttchen.o coul0neu.o coul2neu.o coul3neu.o excludeneu.o
forcesneu.o multipleneu.o neutlst.o parneulst.o prneulst.o  parlinkneu.o
rdf0neu.o nptq_b1.o nptq_b2.o nstq_b1.o nstq_b2.o nptq_h1.o nptq_h2.o 
nstq_h1.o nstq_h2.o nveq_1.o nveq_2.o nvtq_b1.o nvtq_b2.o  nvtq_h1.o
nvtq_h2.o passquat.o qshake.o       quatbook.o quatqnch.o crecv.o csend.o
gsync.o mynode.o nodedim.o numnodes.o  \
        -lscs  bspcoe.o bspgen.o cpy_rtc.o ele_prd.o ewald_spme.o 
        scl_csum.o
set_block.o spl_cexp.o spme_for.o dlpfft3.o hkgen.o hkewald1.o hkewald2.o
hkewald3.o hkewald4.o cerfr.o ld32: FATAL   9  : I/O error (-lscs): No
such file or directory *** Error code 2 (bu21) *** Error code 1 (bu21)


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Oct 15 14:09:17 2003
Received: from chem.udel.edu (chem.udel.edu [128.175.138.224])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9FI8kdH007348
	for <chemistry{at}ccl.net>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:08:46 -0400
Received: from zxwang ([128.175.138.22])
	by chem.udel.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA89160;
	Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:10:31 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: <zxwang{at}chem.udel.edu>
From: "Zhixiang Wang" <zxwang{at}chem.udel.edu>
To: <chemistry{at}ccl.net>
Cc: <gaussian.com!help%gaussian.com{at}gaussian.com>
Subject: GAUSSIAN need to clarify
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:07:34 -0400
Message-ID: <000701c39347$3653ab80$168aaf80@zxwang>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <QQphgq28125.200309221605{at}uucp0.ash.ops.us.uu.net>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=7.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Hi All
   I paln to study solvation free energies using gaussin. When I tried to
understand the output file and compare the output results with the manual, I
was totally confused, and found there are  discrepancies between manual and
the gaussin output file. I hope gaussian clarify this. Suggestions on how to
calculate the solvation free energies will greately appreciated. For
example, the solvatin free energy of methanol in water.

Sincerely

ZX
***********************
Details

In the current manual on web,

SCF Done:  E(RHF) =  -98.569083211     A.U. after    5 cycles
          Convg  =    0.4249D-05             -V/T =  2.0033
          S**2   =   0.0000
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Variational PCM results
=======================
<psi(f)|   H   |psi(f)>                 (a.u.) =     -98.568013
<psi(f)|H+V(f)/2|psi(f)>                (a.u.) =     -98.573228
Total free energy in solution:
 with all non electrostatic terms       (a.u.) =     -98.569083
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(Polarized solute)-Solvent               (kcal/mol) =      -3.27
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Cavitation energy                        (kcal/mol) =       5.34
Dispersion energy                        (kcal/mol) =      -3.08
Repulsion energy                         (kcal/mol) =       0.34
Total non electrostatic                  (kcal/mol) =       2.60
--------------------------------------------------------------------

 Note that the E(RHF) energy (-98.569083211) is equal to Total free energy
in solution
with all non electorstatic terms -98.569083.

While in my output file give (G03, B.04)

 SCF Done:  E(RB+HF-LYP) =  -115.736036910     A.U. after   10 cycles
             Convg  =    0.7861D-09             -V/T =  2.0067
             S**2   =   0.0000
 KE= 1.149665200488D+02 PE=-3.519462956324D+02 EE= 8.102355096224D+01
 --------------------------------------------------------------------
 Variational PCM results
 =======================
 <psi(f)|   H    |psi(f)>                     (a.u.) =    -115.727169
 <psi(f)|H+V(f)/2|psi(f)>                     (a.u.) =    -115.736037
 Total free energy in solution:
  with all non electrostatic terms            (a.u.) =    -115.728593
 --------------------------------------------------------------------
 (Polarized solute)-Solvent               (kcal/mol) =      -5.56
 --------------------------------------------------------------------
 Cavitation energy                        (kcal/mol) =       9.54
 Dispersion energy                        (kcal/mol) =      -5.23
 Repulsion energy                         (kcal/mol) =       0.36
 Total non electrostatic                  (kcal/mol) =       4.67
 --------------------------------------------------------------------

here E(RB+HF-LYP) (-115.736036910)= <psi(f)|H+V(f)/2|psi(f)>(-115.736037)

I also note that the manual printed out on Aug.11/03 tell me thia

SCF Done:  E(RHF) =  -100.02918740     A.U. after    5 cycles
          Convg  =    0.4249D-05             -V/T =  2.0033
          S**2   =   0.0000
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Variational PCM results
=======================
<psi(f)|   H   |psi(f)>                 (a.u.) =     -98.568013
<psi(f)|H+V(f)/2|psi(f)>                (a.u.) =     -98.573228
Total free energy in solution:
 with all non electrostatic terms       (a.u.) =     -98.569083
--------------------------------------------------------------------
(Polarized solute)-Solvent               (kcal/mol) =      -3.27
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Cavitation energy                        (kcal/mol) =       5.34
Dispersion energy                        (kcal/mol) =      -3.08
Repulsion energy                         (kcal/mol) =       0.34
Total non electrostatic                  (kcal/mol) =       2.60
--------------------------------------------------------------------

The E(RHF) energy (-100.02918740) is neither equal to
<psi(f)|H+V(f)/2|psi(f)> energy nor to Total free energy in solution: with
all non electrostatic terms.






From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Oct 15 12:50:54 2003
Received: from panda3.phys.unm.edu (panda3.phys.unm.edu [64.106.62.24])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9FGoNdH004457
	for <chemistry{at}ccl.net>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 12:50:23 -0400
Received: from sapphire.phys.unm.edu (sapphire.phys.unm.edu [64.106.62.238])
	by panda3.phys.unm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 809FE4A89B; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:51:12 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: susie{at}panda3.phys.unm.edu
Message-ID: <3F8D7A23.7DAC51E3{at}sapphire.phys.unm.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 10:47:31 -0600
From: "Susan R. Atlas" <susie{at}sapphire.phys.unm.edu>
Organization: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX64 6.5 IP28)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry{at}ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:PhD and Deep Questions
References: <MFEKIFDLINLMPCOPEBDGCEEACNAA.hultin{at}cc.umanitoba.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=7.0
	tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL,REFERENCES,
	      X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

I would just add to Phil Hultin's very nice post that in earlier times,
before the bifurcation of knowledge into so many specialized fragments,
the study of science was referred to as 'natural philosophy' and indeed,
this is how I like to think of it, myself.

By the way, there is a recent (1999), beautifully-written book by Prof.
E. O. Wilson, entitled Consilience, that addresses precisely this
question of "the unity of knowledge."

- Susan Atlas

> Three cheers for Yao-Ying Chien's nephew!  I have often said that if I
> could teach a class of students who had the knowledge and skills of
> 20-year olds combined with the intellectual drive of 3-year olds (I
> have a 3-year old) together we could do miracles.There are a variety
> of names for academic degrees depending on the country in question,
> and even the individual school.  Thus, Oxford gives a D. Phil. degree,
> for example, which is similar to the PhD given elsewhere.The important
> question is not what the degrees are called, but what they actually
> MEAN.  Yao-Ying's nephew had this bang on.  Just what does it mean to
> be a "Doctor of Philosophy"?  Unfortunately, for many science students
> this seems to be simply a certificate that they are really good at
> mixing the right chemicals, or tweaking the right knob on a machine,
> or writing code that actually runs.  All of these things are good
> skills to have, and very important for specific areas of science, but
> they are of much less importance than what is implied by the word
> "Philosophy".Being a "Doctor of Philosophy" should (IMHO) mean that
> one is driven by a true love of knowledge and understanding of the
> world (universe) around us to become ever more skilled in the quest
> for more knowledge and understanding.  It MAY also imply (and I think
> probably should also imply) that one is skilled in applying one's
> knowledge and understanding to improve the world around us, but since
> this involves a value judgement it is difficult to include in a
> definition.I think it is wonderful that most universities give the
> same Ph.D. degree to graduates in what we like to call "the Arts",
> "the Sciences", "Engineering", "the Social Sciences" etc etc.  All of
> these artificial distinctions are no more than convenient ways to
> categorize the world around us in terms of specific classes of
> questions that may be asked.  The true Philosopher recognizes the
> kinship of all branches of knowledge, and grants pre-eminence to no
> particular branch a priori.Because all of us have only a little time
> on this earth, we must by necessity specialize in order to achieve
> anything, but we should nonetheless strive (whether we hold the degree
> or not) to be true "Doctors of Philosophy" insofar as we are able.To
> Yao-Ying Chien: keep that nephew of yours asking these questions.
> Together, you and he are walking along the road to Philosophy.  One of
> the first steps on this road is to realize how little one actually
> knows, and your posting shows that you and he are facing this
> realization - and it showed me that I also could not answer his
> questions except by indirection.  Thank him for me, please.
>
> The gods did not reveal from the beginning
>
> All things to us; but in the course of time,
>
> Through seeking, men find that which is better.
>
> But as for certain truth, no man has known it.
>
> Nor will he know it.
>
> Xenophanes (6th Century B.C.)<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =
> "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
> Dr. Philip G. Hultin
> Associate Department Head and
> Associate Professor of Chemistry
> University of Manitoba
> Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3T 2N2
> (vox) 204-474-9814
> (fax) 204-474-7608
> mailto:hultin{at}cc.umanitoba.ca
> http://www.umanitoba.ca/chemistry/

--
 _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
 _/                                                                              _/
 _/   Susan R. Atlas                                                             _/
 _/   Research Associate Professor, Physics and Astronomy                        _/
 _/                                                                              _/
 _/   Department of Physics & Astronomy                                          _/
 _/   MSC07 4220                          phone: (505) 277-1509                  _/
 _/   1 University of New Mexico          email: susie{at}sapphire.phys.unm.edu     _/
 _/   Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001          http://www.phys.unm.edu/CompMaterials  _/
 _/                                                                              _/
 _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/





From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Oct 15 15:06:57 2003
Received: from alvin.unc.edu.ar (alvin.unc.edu.ar [170.210.248.4])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9FJ6NdH008807
	for <CHEMISTRY/at/ccl.net>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:06:24 -0400
Received: from mail.fcq.unc.edu.ar (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by alvin.unc.edu.ar (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9FJ6Kr21624
	for <CHEMISTRY/at/ccl.net>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 16:06:20 -0300
Received: from localhost (malisa@localhost)
	by mail.fcq.unc.edu.ar (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id h9FIwkR08857
	for <CHEMISTRY/at/ccl.net>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:58:46 -0300
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:58:46 -0300 (ART)
From: Malisa Chiappero <malisa/at/mail.fcq.unc.edu.ar>
To: <CHEMISTRY/at/ccl.net>
Subject: Summary:Using GEN (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0310151536500.7508-100000/at/mail.fcq.unc.edu.ar>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0
	tests=USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Hi
A) QUestion
Hi
I should need help about GEN use in gaussian.
I try to do some calculation using diferent basis set
for different atoms
Like this

#P rhf/GEN


geometry specification

C F Cl O 0
6-311+G*
****
I 0
SDD or LANL2DZ
****
Br 0
6-31+g(d)

but the calculations were aborted. It is possible that
another keyword or
specification we need take into account, or Are they
incompatible?

Thank you in advance.
Malisa
______________________________________________________________________


B)This is the answer with examples
_______________________________________
Dear Malisa,
    Your input still includes only the valence basis set information.
Here is my example input again, but with added comments:

#p hf/gen pseudo=read gfinput test

Cr(CO)6

   0   1
   Cr  0.00  0.00  0.00
   C   1.93  0.00  0.00
   C  -1.93  0.00  0.00
   C   0.00  1.93  0.00
   C   0.00 -1.93  0.00
   C   0.00  0.00  1.93
   C   0.00  0.00 -1.93
   O   3.07  0.00  0.00
   O  -3.07  0.00  0.00
   O   0.00  3.07  0.00
   O   0.00 -3.07  0.00
   O   0.00  0.00  3.07
   O   0.00  0.00 -3.07

Cr  0            <<<<< valence basis set on all Cr atoms
lanl2dz
   F    1 1.0
    0.1  1.0
****
C O 0         <<<<< valence basis set on all C and O atoms
6-311G(d,p)
****
              <<<<<<< blank line terminates valence basis set input
Cr 0     <<<<<<<< ECP on all Cr atoms
lanl2


So, the keyword you need is pseudo=read, and you need an extra couple
of lines of input after the valence basis set. For your case the extra
lines of input would be:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
6-311+G*
****
I 0
SDD (or LANL2DZ)
****

I 0
SDD (or lanl2)


Regards,
Jim Hess

-----------------------------------------------------------------
All the other comments are similar:

-I think Gaussian quitted because the ECP for I is
missing.
So you can edit your input file as the following.

#P rhf/GEN PSEUDO=Cards


geometry specification

C F Cl O 0
6-311+G*
****
I 0
SDD or LANL2DZ
****
Br 0
6-31+g(d)
****

I 0
SDD or LANL2DZ

Moreover, SDD is better for Br, too. And ECP can save
your
CPU time.
Good luck, Malisa.

Yubo



----------------------------------------------------------
Hi Malisa

I'm not entirely sure about this but if you want to use
an ECP (like
LANL2DZ) along with a general basis set you should use
the keyword 'GENECP'.
Also - don't forget about the invisible blank line after
the final line, so
(for example) here is some input that did work for me -

C N H 0
6-31G(d)
****
Ru 0
LANL2DZ
****

Ru 0
LANL2DZ



After the final 'Z' above you need to press enter twice
and then save before
submitting the job to G03. Hope this helps

Regards     Roma

---------------------------------------------------------
Hi Malisa

Please add ECP to your I. so the input should be

#P rhf/GEN psudo=read


geometry specification

C F Cl O 0
6-311+G*
****
I 0
SDD or LANL2DZ
****
Br 0
6-31+g(d)
****

I 0
LANL2DZ

That should fix your problem.

Best wishes.

Huajun
------------------------------------------------------------
two things may be related to your problem,
1) just below the basis set line of Br, **** is also
required
2) you had better define PP for the atoms you will use
   SDD or Lanl2dz basis sets.
hopefully it will work,

Yixuan
------------------------------------------------------------

As long as you avoid pseudopotential basis sets (SDD and
LANL2DZ), '#p rhf/gen' will work fine.  However, since
you want to use pseudopotentials, you need '#p rhf/gen
pseudo=read' plus additional input to specify the
pseudopotentials that go with the pseudopotential basis
sets.

--David Shobe
S|d-Chemie, Inc.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Hi,
        For one, I find that the keyword works better
when each atom type is
listed separately. So, C, F, and Cl would require their
basis
specifications listed one after the other. Also, you
should specify
the ECP separately at the end of the basis set
specifications,
terminated by a blank line. Hope this fixes your
problems.

Bala
Balakrishnan Viswanathan
Department of Chemistry
Dalhousie University
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Canada B3H 4J3
(902) 494-7021
bviswan/at/chem1.chem.dal.ca
------------------------------------------------------------


\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Another answer (My mistake to write the e-mail)
____________________________________________________________

You need to have a final **** at the end of your GEN
block.  You also
need to make sure that you are reading in the effective
core potential.
Look at the keyword pseudo for more information.

Joseph Han
Department of Chemical Engineering
Stanford University
650-723-0420
FAX:  650-725-7294
____________________________________________________________
Hi,

You should include four asterisks (****) after each basis
set (you did not
include them in the last one) and also a blank line after
the last four
asterisks at the end of the input file.

I hope this would help.

Juan F. Espinal
___________________________________________________________


Thank you very much to all
Best regards

MAlisa




From jkl@ccl.net Thu Oct 16 09:08:13 2003 -0400
Return-Path: <favia:at:farmchim.uniba.it>
Message-ID: <006501c393c9$24f93fd0$c6b3ccc1:at:farmacia.uniba.it>
From: "Angelo Favia" <favia:at:farmchim.uniba.it>
To: chemistry:at:ccl.net
Subject: Running Amber 7.0 on a linux cluster
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:37:34 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0

Dear CCl members,
         does anyone of you try to run Amber 7.0 on a linux cluster 
(openMosix patch)?
I'd like to parallelize it...
tanks in advance.

angelo favia



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Thu Oct 16 15:25:25 2003
Received: from cornell.edu (cornell.edu [132.236.56.6])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9GJOrdH004527
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:24:53 -0400
Received: from dopey (dopey.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.241.121])
	by cornell.edu (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA22613
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:24:54 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <000d01c3941b$2d1514d0$6400000a.-at-.ccmr.cornell.edu>
From: "Connie Chang" <cc236.-at-.cornell.edu>
To: <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>
Subject: CCL: Help with interpretation of Gaussian error message?
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 15:24:53 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C393F9.A5EDF100"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=7.0
	tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C393F9.A5EDF100
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi --

What does this Gaussian03 error message mean?

Fock matrices will be formed incrementally for  20 cycles.
 Integral accuracy reduced to 1.0D-05 until final iterations.
 Inconsistent input #3 in SPerMO.
 Error termination via Lnk1e in C:\g03w\l502.exe at Thu Oct 16 15:12:38 =
2003.
 Job cpu time:  0 days  0 hours  2 minutes 12.0 seconds.
 File lengths (MBytes):  RWF=3D    496 Int=3D      0 D2E=3D      0 =
Chk=3D      1 Scr=3D      1


I'm trying to do a force calculation on an already optimized geometry in =
the presence of a field...

thanks!

connie
------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C393F9.A5EDF100
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1264" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hi --</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>What does this Gaussian03 error message =

mean?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Fock matrices will be formed =
incrementally=20
for&nbsp; 20 cycles.<BR>&nbsp;Integral accuracy reduced to 1.0D-05 until =
final=20
iterations.<BR>&nbsp;Inconsistent input #3 in SPerMO.<BR>&nbsp;Error =
termination=20
via Lnk1e in C:\g03w\l502.exe at Thu Oct 16 15:12:38 2003.<BR>&nbsp;Job =
cpu=20
time:&nbsp; 0 days&nbsp; 0 hours&nbsp; 2 minutes 12.0 =
seconds.<BR>&nbsp;File=20
lengths (MBytes):&nbsp; RWF=3D&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 496=20
Int=3D&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0 =
D2E=3D&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0=20
Chk=3D&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1 =
Scr=3D&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
1</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I'm trying to do a force calculation on =
an already=20
optimized geometry in the presence of a field...</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>thanks!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>connie</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C393F9.A5EDF100--



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Thu Oct 16 04:36:58 2003
Received: from violet.noc.ucla.edu (violet.noc.ucla.edu [169.232.47.18])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9G8aQdH022154
	for <chemistry[at]ccl.net>; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 04:36:26 -0400
Received: from orchid.noc.ucla.edu (orchid.noc.ucla.edu [169.232.48.12])
	by violet.noc.ucla.edu (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9G8aQ8c029995
	for <chemistry[at]ccl.net>; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 01:36:26 -0700
Received: from dsievers (23.226.nwc.net [207.151.226.23])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by orchid.noc.ucla.edu (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9G8aOpD006666
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT)
	for <chemistry[at]ccl.net>; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 01:36:25 -0700
Message-ID: <000701c393c0$3096d0e0$7700a8c0[at]ucla.triangle.org>
From: "Doug Sievers" <dsievers[at]ucla.edu>
To: "CCL" <chemistry[at]ccl.net>
Subject: gOpenMol
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 01:33:31 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Probable-Spam: no
X-Spam-Hits: 0
X-Scanned-By: vscan.smtp.ucla.edu
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0
	tests=none
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

In the most recent release of gOpenMol (for windows) By default, when one
changes from global to local mode, the coordinates of the structure are reset.
The user manual says that this default can be changed so that the coordinates do
not change, which would be useful to set up several molecules for an MD run.
Does anyone know how to change the default behavior?

Thank you,

Douglas Sievers
Graduate Student Researcher
Materials Science & Engineering
3049 Engineering 1
(310) 794-6491
dsievers[at]ucla.edu



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Thu Oct 16 03:15:39 2003
Received: from ozone.cs.vu.nl (ozone.cs.vu.nl [130.37.24.158])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9G7F8dH020185
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 03:15:08 -0400
Received: from chem.vu.nl (far27.chem.vu.nl [130.37.148.106])
	by ozone.cs.vu.nl with esmtp
	(Smail #87) id m1AA2Lj-000NGxC; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:15 +0200
Message-ID: <3F8E462E.4060407~at~chem.vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:18:06 +0200
From: Anton Feenstra <feenstra~at~chem.vu.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4.1) Gecko/20031008
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry~at~ccl.net
Subject: CCL:PhD and Deep Questions
References: <MFEKIFDLINLMPCOPEBDGCEEACNAA.hultin~at~cc.umanitoba.ca> <3F8D7A23.7DAC51E3~at~sapphire.phys.unm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <3F8D7A23.7DAC51E3~at~sapphire.phys.unm.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=7.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,X_ACCEPT_LANG
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

Hi,

I'd just like to add that after reading these, shall I say philosophical,
exchanges on Philosophy, I find the other postings on the list awfully
mundane, like: "Error linking DL_POLY", or "Autodock output file format"...

Let's not forget that these extremely specialized bits of knowledge only
make sense in the larger context of our common quest for Knowledge!

-- 
Groetjes,

Anton
  _____________ _______________________________________________________
|             |                                                       |
|  _   _  ___,| K. Anton Feenstra                                     |
| / \ / \'| | | Dept. of Pharmacochem. - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam |
|(   |   )| | | De Boelelaan 1083 - 1081 HV Amsterdam - Netherlands   |
| \_/ \_/ | | | Tel: +31 20 44 47608 - Fax: +31 20 44 47610           |
|             | Feenstra~at~chem.vu.nl - www.chem.vu.nl/~feenstra/       |
|             | "If You See Me Getting High, Knock Me Down"           |
|             | (Red Hot Chili Peppers)                               |
|_____________|_______________________________________________________|



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Thu Oct 16 00:55:48 2003
Received: from chem.udel.edu (chem.udel.edu [128.175.138.224])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9G4t7dH017693
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:55:08 -0400
Received: from localhost (pradyu@localhost)
	by chem.udel.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA114383;
	Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:56:54 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 00:56:54 -0400
From: "Pradyumna S. Singh" <pradyu~at~chem.udel.edu>
To: "Susan R. Atlas" <susie~at~sapphire.phys.unm.edu>
cc: chemistry~at~ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:PhD and Deep Questions
In-Reply-To: <3F8D7A23.7DAC51E3~at~sapphire.phys.unm.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.10.10310160050240.115300-100000~at~chem.udel.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=7.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,USER_AGENT_PINE
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

> 
> By the way, there is a recent (1999), beautifully-written book by Prof.
> E. O. Wilson, entitled Consilience, that addresses precisely this
> question of "the unity of knowledge."

Ohh and btw, there is a fabulous critique of that book by the American
poet Wendell Berry in his book, "Life is a Miracle" ! Be sure to check it
out as well.

Pradyumna



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Thu Oct 16 20:38:53 2003
Received: from mail.cybermesa.com (mail.cybermesa.com [198.59.109.2])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9H0cMdH010019
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 20:38:22 -0400
Received: from dave (qwest96-dsl3.cybermesa.com [216.84.163.96])
	by mail.cybermesa.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h9H0ckA06859
	for <chemistry~at~ccl.net>; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:38:46 -0600 (MDT)
From: "David Miller" <dmiller~at~sageinformatics.com>
To: <chemistry~at~ccl.net>
Subject: CCL: ChemTK supports SMILES
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:40:29 -0500
Message-ID: <NHBBIFIIEKENOFPCJFHBGEAOCAAA.dmiller~at~sageinformatics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4 required=7.0
	tests=MSGID_GOOD_EXCHANGE
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

ChemTK version 2.7 is now available for download from:
http://www.sageinformatics.com

New features include:
- Support for SMILES files (*.smi) in all ChemTK features, including
  visualization, scaffold-based class generation, descriptor and model
  generation, substructure/property search, R tables and MCS.
- Display of individual SMILES strings entered into a custom dialog.
- Support for SMILES files in Batch menu operations such as filter,
  virtual screen, similarity screen, random selection and error check.
- Ability to enlarge molecule depictions in the Class/Molecule views.

Visit http://www.sageinformatics.com to download the ChemTK product sheet,
documentation, and release notes, and to learn more about the
inexpensive licensing terms.

Best regards,

David W. Miller, Ph.D.
Sage Informatics LLC
dmiller~at~sageinformatics.com


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Thu Oct 16 11:05:25 2003
Received: from soul.helsinki.fi (soul.helsinki.fi [128.214.3.1])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h9GF4rdH031624
	for <chemistry_at_ccl.net>; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:04:54 -0400
Received: from localhost (mpjohans@localhost)
	by soul.helsinki.fi (8.9.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA78294
	for <chemistry_at_ccl.net>; Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:04:52 +0300 (EEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: soul.helsinki.fi: mpjohans owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 18:04:52 +0300 (EEST)
From: Mikael Johansson <mpjohans_at_pcu.helsinki.fi>
X-X-Sender: mpjohans_at_soul.helsinki.fi
To: chemistry_at_ccl.net
Subject: Winter School in Theoretical Chemistry 2003
In-Reply-To: <006501c393c9$24f93fd0$c6b3ccc1_at_farmacia.uniba.it>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.58.0310161755440.77854_at_soul.helsinki.fi>
References: <006501c393c9$24f93fd0$c6b3ccc1_at_farmacia.uniba.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=7.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,USER_AGENT_PINE,X_AUTH_WARNING
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by server.ccl.net id h9GF5PdH031645


Hello All!

It's time for the annual Winter School in Theoretical Chemistry to
take place again in Helsinki, Finland. This years topic is:
"Quantum Chemistry Bordering Nanoscience and Nanotechnology"

The School will be held on December 8-11, 2003, at the Department of
Chemistry, University of Helsinki. This years speakers are:

Reinhart Ahlrichs
Roi Baer
Hannu Hdkkinen
Jouko Korppi-Tommola
Yi Luo
Bernadette Quinn
Florian Weigend

The School is free for university students and staff, but you are asked to
register by November 15, by e-mailing Dr. Juha Vaara at
jvaara_at_chem.helsinki.fi. For more details, please visit the home page of
the School: http://www.chem.helsinki.fi/Info/WinterSchool/ws2003.html

Have a nice day,
    Mikael Johansson
    University of Helsinki
    Department of Chemistry
    mikael.johansson_at_helsinki.fi
    http://www.helsinki.fi/~mpjohans/
    Phone: +358-9-191 50185
    FAX  : +358-9-191 50169



