From jkl@ccl.net Tue Jan 13 07:21:19 2004 -0500
Return-Path: <sa.cosco^at^virgilio.it>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:20:32 +0100
Message-ID: <4002B18800001981^at^ims1b.cp.tin.it>
From: sa.cosco^at^virgilio.it
Subject: MD after Autodock     
To: chemistry^at^ccl.net

Dear CCL
I performed a partial flexible docking analysis of some ligands, using Autodock,
on a receptor modelled by means of homology building .The complexes obtained
were geometrically optimized and energetically minimized. Is it really necessary
to perform a MD simulation after the docking and the minimization? Any suggestion
will be appreciated
Best regards
Sandro

From chemistry-request@ccl.net Mon Jan 12 21:39:31 2004
Received: from adenine.cgl.ucsf.edu (socrates.cgl.ucsf.edu [169.230.27.3])
	by servernd.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0D2dUld030638
	for <chemistry-.at.-ccl.net>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:39:30 -0500
Received: from localhost (socrates.cgl.ucsf.edu [169.230.27.3])
	by adenine.cgl.ucsf.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/GSC1.16) with ESMTP id i0D2e5hH793955
	for <chemistry-.at.-ccl.net>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:40:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:40:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Pradipta Bandyopadhyay <pradipta-.at.-cgl.ucsf.edu>
To: chemistry-.at.-ccl.net
Subject: heat capacity of supercooled water!!
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.53.0401121837300.793741-.at.-adenine.cgl.ucsf.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net


Hi,

 I am looking for estimation of heat capacity at constant volume (Cv) of
supercooled water from simulation. I got references only at constant
pressure. Any pointer would be appreciated. Also, any pointer to the
experimental Cv for supercooled water will be very helpful to me.

thanks.

       Pradipta



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jan 13 12:28:16 2004
Received: from mailserv.unb.ca (mailserv.unb.ca [131.202.3.23])
	by servernd.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0DHSAld008634
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:28:14 -0500
Received: from smeagol.unb.ca (smeagol.unb.ca [131.202.3.52])
	by mailserv.unb.ca (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0DHRuDa014407;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:28:06 -0400
Received: from smeagol.unb.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by smeagol.unb.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0DHRehT020564;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:27:40 -0400
Received: (from apache@localhost)
	by smeagol.unb.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0DHRdpg020561;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:27:39 -0400
Received: from athlon2.chem.unb.ca (athlon2.chem.unb.ca [131.202.171.176]) 
	by webmail.unb.ca (IMP) with HTTP 
	for <s808o@127.0.0.1>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:27:39 -0400
Message-ID: <1074014859.40042a8b99d35.-at-.webmail.unb.ca>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:27:39 -0400
From: Joey Harriman <s808o.-at-.unb.ca>
To: sa.cosco.-at-.virgilio.it
Cc: chemistry.-at-.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:MD after Autodock     
References: <4002B18800001981.-at-.ims1b.cp.tin.it>
In-Reply-To: <4002B18800001981.-at-.ims1b.cp.tin.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2
X-Originating-IP: 131.202.171.176
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-UNB-VirusScanner: Found to be clean
X-UNB-SpamDetails: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-2.4,
	required 5, IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,
	SPAM_PHRASE_03_05, USER_AGENT, USER_AGENT_IMP)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net

Hi Sandro,

I'm not really sure what you are trying to do....Did you perform the geometry
optimization and minimization to both the ligand and the receptor?  In addition, do you
mean that you optimized (via ab initio) then minimized (using MM)?  If you are trying
to find the best docking pose of a ligand to a given receptor here is what I would do:
1. Optimize the active site of the receptor (if you don't have a crystal structure) and
the ligand  i.e. ab initio geometry optimization.  If you do this at the HF/6-31G*
level then you can generate a RESP charge set which is excellent for docking.
2.  Do the docking in Autodock.
3.  Rescore the poses.  The scoring function in Autodock is not necessarily the best. 
It was trained on a limited number of molecules and used OPLS charges.  You can however
rescore the poses using a MM program that will allow you to calculate VdW,
electrostatic, potential energy (of ligand), etc...and use this to rank the poses.

As far as a MD simulation.....you could do one if you wanted to observe the interaction
between the ligand and the receptor.  This might be useful to determine if the ligand
is equilibrated (i.e. prefers one geometry) in the active site and the rate at which it
goes into and out of the active site.  Hope this helps.

Cheers,
Joey

----------------------------------
Joey Harriman
MSc Computational Chemistry
University of New Brunswick
Room 228
Toole Hall
s808o.-at-.unb.ca
476-6543
----------------------------------

Quoting sa.cosco.-at-.virgilio.it:

> Dear CCL
> I performed a partial flexible docking analysis of some ligands, using Autodock,
> on a receptor modelled by means of homology building .The complexes obtained
> were geometrically optimized and energetically minimized. Is it really necessary
> to perform a MD simulation after the docking and the minimization? Any suggestion
> will be appreciated
> Best regards
> Sandro
> 
> -= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-
> To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject: line
> and send your message to:  CHEMISTRY.-at-.ccl.net
> 
> Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST.-at-.ccl.net 
> HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net   | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs 
> 
> If your mail is bouncing from CCL.NET domain send it to the maintainer:
> Jan Labanowski,  jlabanow.-at-.nd.edu (read about it on CCL Home Page)
> -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jan 13 08:04:46 2004
Received: from avmx.iitkgp.ernet.in ([203.197.98.4])
	by servernd.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0DD4gld025725
	for <chemistry[at]ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:04:44 -0500
Received: from avmx.iitkgp.ernet.in (avmx [203.197.98.4])
	by avmx.iitkgp.ernet.in (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i0DDbNgF001516
	for <chemistry[at]ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:07:23 +0530
Received: from iitkgp.iitkgp.ernet.in (iitkgp.iitkgp.ernet.in [203.197.98.10])
	by avmx.iitkgp.ernet.in (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i0DDbNbb001511
	for <chemistry[at]ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:07:23 +0530
Received: from cts.iitkgp.ernet.in (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by iitkgp.iitkgp.ernet.in (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA23829
	for <chemistry[at]ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:25:40 -0500 (GMT)
X-Authentication-Warning: iitkgp.iitkgp.ernet.in: iscan owned process doing -bs
Received: from localhost (utpal@localhost)
	by cts.iitkgp.ernet.in (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0DCb2523914
	for <chemistry[at]ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:07:11 +0530
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:07:02 +0530 (IST)
From: utpal sarkar <utpal[at]cts.iitkgp.ernet.in>
To: chemistry[at]ccl.net
Subject: Stochastic Resonance
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401131801240.23756-100000[at]cts.iitkgp.ernet.in>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net

Dear CCL Users,
               I am trying to calculate Signal to noise ratio for a 
stochastic system (with white noise). I can't understand how to calculate 
the noise power and signal power? Is there any free fortran/C progam 
available for this? Any kind of help is greatly acknowledged.
Thanking you.
With regards

Utpal Sarkar 
Indian Institute Of Technology
Kharagpur-721302
INDIA



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jan 13 14:28:49 2004
Received: from hubble.deepsea.com (ip67-89-181-114.z181-89-67.customer.algx.net [67.89.181.114])
	by servernd.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0DJSbld013582
	for <chemistry-.at.-ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:28:44 -0500
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
Subject: RE: Stochastic Resonance
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:29:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CC8129480AE2A042821AB16027DC0EE8879BED-.at.-hubble.deepsea.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Stochastic Resonance
Thread-Index: AcPaCIJMowLdwiqZQE27GsXdHULoEwAAYhEQ
From: "Ray Merewether" <Ray_Merewether-.at.-deepsea.com>
To: "utpal sarkar" <utpal-.at.-cts.iitkgp.ernet.in>, <chemistry-.at.-ccl.net>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by servernd.ccl.net id i0DJSnld013591

If your system is really white and passive, kTB should be a very good approximation to the noise power and a slide rule will suffice ( like Penzias and Wilson 1965).  If you have active semiconductors, like a Zener at breakdown, the noise power may be an order of magnitude higher.

To say anything about signal, one needs to know a lot more about the system.

Berkeley SPICE in its various incarnations can calculate SNR for lumped equivalent systems.  I have used  it to calculate plane wave acoustic noise amplitudes and velocities in solids and fluids.  You just need to map the mechanical masses, stiffnesses, etc. over to electrical properties in a reasonable manner.



-----Original Message-----
From: utpal sarkar [mailto:utpal-.at.-cts.iitkgp.ernet.in]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 4:37 AM
To: chemistry-.at.-ccl.net
Subject: CCL:Stochastic Resonance


Dear CCL Users,
               I am trying to calculate Signal to noise ratio for a 
stochastic system (with white noise). I can't understand how to calculate 
the noise power and signal power? Is there any free fortran/C progam 
available for this? Any kind of help is greatly acknowledged.
Thanking you.
With regards

Utpal Sarkar 
Indian Institute Of Technology
Kharagpur-721302
INDIA



-= This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =-
To send e-mail to subscribers of CCL put the string CCL: on your Subject: line
and send your message to:  CHEMISTRY-.at.-ccl.net

Send your subscription/unsubscription requests to: CHEMISTRY-REQUEST-.at.-ccl.net 
HOME Page: http://www.ccl.net   | Jobs Page: http://www.ccl.net/jobs 

If your mail is bouncing from CCL.NET domain send it to the maintainer:
Jan Labanowski,  jlabanow-.at.-nd.edu (read about it on CCL Home Page)
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+








From chemistry-request@ccl.net Tue Jan 13 15:24:17 2004
Received: from cornell.edu (cornell.edu [132.236.56.6])
	by servernd.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0DKODld014767
	for <chemistry[at]ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:24:13 -0500
Received: from cornell.edu (kili.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.241.146])
	by cornell.edu (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA02800
	for <chemistry[at]ccl.net>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:24:50 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <40045412.3080608[at]cornell.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:24:50 -0500
From: Connie Chang <cc236[at]cornell.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030703
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry[at]ccl.net
Subject: CCL:G98 & LINDA question
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------000900070505040506060007"
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=7.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_MESSAGE,
	HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000900070505040506060007
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi

I also have a question regarding a parallel job I am running on an 
already optimized geometry.  I am trying to get the frequencies/modes 
with the following simple route:
 
%mem=10000000
 %NProcLinda=3
 %rwf=/scratch/cc236/G98Batch/tempor1.rwf,200MW,/scratch/cc236/G98Batch/tempor2.r
 wf,200MW,/scratch/cc236/G98Batch/tempor3.rwf,200MW,/scratch/cc236/G98Batch/tempo
 r4.rwf,200MW,/scratch/cc236/G98Batch/tempor5.rwf,-1
 %chk=c72dftparallel.chk
 
 #B3LYP 6-31G SCF=(MaxCyc=2000) Geom=Allcheck Guess=Read Freq Test

This is what I am getting in output so far that concerns me.  The job 
has ran so far for about 20 hours...  A short cut and paste section 
follows the brief descriptions below (output is in bold):

What do the warnings mean where it says that the *smallest alpha delta 
epsilon is  0.57239995D-01* and the *largest alpha MO coefficient is  
0.17407377D+02*?

And what does this line mean:  *PrsmSu:  requested number of processors 
reduced to:   1 ShMem   1 Linda.*

Does it mean that instead of running a parallel job it is running serial 
now for some reason?


*Requested convergence on RMS density matrix=1.00D-08 within2000 cycles.
Requested convergence on MAX density matrix=1.00D-06.
SCF Done:  E(RB+HF-LYP) =  -2741.84228534     A.U. after    2 cycles
            Convg  =    0.6529D-08             -V/T =  2.0051
            S**2   =   0.0000
Range of M.O.s used for correlation:     1   648
NBasis=   648 NAE=   216 NBE=   216 NFC=     0 NFV=     0
NROrb=    648 NOA=   216 NOB=   216 NVA=   432 NVB=   432

**** Warning!!: The largest alpha MO coefficient is  0.17407377D+02


**** Warning!!: The smallest alpha delta epsilon is  0.57239995D-01

PrsmSu:  requested number of processors reduced to:   1 ShMem   1 Linda.
PrsmSu:  requested number of processors reduced to:   1 ShMem   1 Linda.
PrsmSu:  requested number of processors reduced to:   1 ShMem   1 Linda.
PrsmSu:  requested number of processors reduced to:   1 ShMem   1 Linda.
PrsmSu:  requested number of processors reduced to:   1 ShMem   1 Linda.
PrsmSu:  requested number of processors reduced to:   1 ShMem   1 Linda.
PrsmSu:  requested number of processors reduced to:   1 ShMem   1 Linda.
PrsmSu:  requested number of processors reduced to:   1 ShMem   1 Linda.
G2DrvN: will do    2 atoms at a time, making   36 passes doing MaxLOS=1. *


Thanks,
Connie

--------------000900070505040506060007
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Hi<br>
<br>
I also have a question regarding a parallel job I am running on an
already optimized geometry.&nbsp; I am trying to get the frequencies/modes
with the following simple route:<br>
&nbsp;<br>
%mem=10000000<br>
&nbsp;%NProcLinda=3<br>
&nbsp;%rwf=/scratch/cc236/G98Batch/tempor1.rwf,200MW,/scratch/cc236/G98Batch/tempor2.r<br>
&nbsp;wf,200MW,/scratch/cc236/G98Batch/tempor3.rwf,200MW,/scratch/cc236/G98Batch/tempo<br>
&nbsp;r4.rwf,200MW,/scratch/cc236/G98Batch/tempor5.rwf,-1<br>
&nbsp;%chk=c72dftparallel.chk<br>
&nbsp;<br>
&nbsp;#B3LYP 6-31G SCF=(MaxCyc=2000) Geom=Allcheck Guess=Read Freq Test<br>
<br>
This is what I am getting in output so far that concerns me.&nbsp; The job
has ran so far for about 20 hours...&nbsp; A short cut and paste section
follows the brief descriptions below (output is in bold):<br>
<br>
What do the warnings mean where it says that the <b>smallest alpha
delta epsilon is&nbsp; 0.57239995D-01</b> and the <b>largest alpha MO
coefficient is&nbsp; 0.17407377D+02</b>?
<br>
<br>
And what does this line mean:&nbsp; <b>PrsmSu:&nbsp; requested number of
processors reduced to:&nbsp;&nbsp; 1 ShMem&nbsp;&nbsp; 1 Linda.</b><br>
<br>
Does it mean that instead of running a parallel job it is running
serial now for some reason?
<br>
<br>
<br>
<b>Requested convergence on RMS density matrix=1.00D-08 within2000
cycles.
<br>
Requested convergence on MAX density matrix=1.00D-06.
<br>
SCF Done:&nbsp; E(RB+HF-LYP) =&nbsp; -2741.84228534&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A.U. after&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2 cycles
<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Convg&nbsp; =&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0.6529D-08&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; -V/T =&nbsp; 2.0051
<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; S**2&nbsp;&nbsp; =&nbsp;&nbsp; 0.0000
<br>
Range of M.O.s used for correlation:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1&nbsp;&nbsp; 648
<br>
NBasis=&nbsp;&nbsp; 648 NAE=&nbsp;&nbsp; 216 NBE=&nbsp;&nbsp; 216 NFC=&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0 NFV=&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0
<br>
NROrb=&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 648 NOA=&nbsp;&nbsp; 216 NOB=&nbsp;&nbsp; 216 NVA=&nbsp;&nbsp; 432 NVB=&nbsp;&nbsp; 432
<br>
<br>
**** Warning!!: The largest alpha MO coefficient is&nbsp; 0.17407377D+02
<br>
<br>
<br>
**** Warning!!: The smallest alpha delta epsilon is&nbsp; 0.57239995D-01
<br>
<br>
PrsmSu:&nbsp; requested number of processors reduced to:&nbsp;&nbsp; 1 ShMem&nbsp;&nbsp; 1
Linda.
<br>
PrsmSu:&nbsp; requested number of processors reduced to:&nbsp;&nbsp; 1 ShMem&nbsp;&nbsp; 1
Linda.
<br>
PrsmSu:&nbsp; requested number of processors reduced to:&nbsp;&nbsp; 1 ShMem&nbsp;&nbsp; 1
Linda.
<br>
PrsmSu:&nbsp; requested number of processors reduced to:&nbsp;&nbsp; 1 ShMem&nbsp;&nbsp; 1
Linda.
<br>
PrsmSu:&nbsp; requested number of processors reduced to:&nbsp;&nbsp; 1 ShMem&nbsp;&nbsp; 1
Linda.
<br>
PrsmSu:&nbsp; requested number of processors reduced to:&nbsp;&nbsp; 1 ShMem&nbsp;&nbsp; 1
Linda.
<br>
PrsmSu:&nbsp; requested number of processors reduced to:&nbsp;&nbsp; 1 ShMem&nbsp;&nbsp; 1
Linda.
<br>
PrsmSu:&nbsp; requested number of processors reduced to:&nbsp;&nbsp; 1 ShMem&nbsp;&nbsp; 1
Linda.
<br>
G2DrvN: will do&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2 atoms at a time, making&nbsp;&nbsp; 36 passes doing
MaxLOS=1.
</b>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Thanks,
<br>
Connie
<br>
</body>
</html>

--------------000900070505040506060007--



From chemistry-request@ccl.net  Fri Jan  9 01:04:02 2004
Return-Path: <chemistry-request.-at-.ccl.net>
Received: from yangtze.hku.hk (yangtze.hku.hk [147.8.148.244])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0963UX9023803
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 01:03:31 -0500
Received: from yangtze.hku.hk (yangtze.hku.hk [127.0.0.1])
	by yangtze.hku.hk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0962WXC018047
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:02:32 +0800
Received: from localhost (martin@localhost)
	by yangtze.hku.hk (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id i0962W4M018043
	for <chemistry.-at-.ccl.net>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:02:32 +0800
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:02:32 +0800 (HKT)
From: martin.-at-.yangtze.hku.hk
To: chemistry.-at-.ccl.net
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0401091359490.17939-100000.-at-.yangtze.hku.hk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Dear sir,

I wouls like to perform MD simulation of alkanthiol on gold surface with 
CHARMM. However, there is no parameter for interaction between Au and S, 
etc. Where can I look for the parameters?

Thank you very much

yours,
Martin


