From chemistry-request@ccl.net Wed Jul  7 23:36:43 2004
Received: from atom.chem.iupui.edu (atom.chem.iupui.edu [134.68.137.125])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i684ahsu008296
	for <chemistry$at$ccl.net>; Wed, 7 Jul 2004 23:36:43 -0500
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (adsl-68-253-41-132.dsl.ipltin.ameritech.net [68.253.41.132])
	by atom.chem.iupui.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC60A75945
	for <chemistry$at$ccl.net>; Wed,  7 Jul 2004 23:43:45 -0500 (CDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <92DF6D93-D099-11D8-AE4F-003065F96212$at$chem.iupui.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
To: chemistry$at$ccl.net
From: Kelsey Forsythe <forsythe$at$chem.iupui.edu>
Subject: announcing Jaguar mailing list
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 23:45:02 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=7.5 tests=MY_DSL,RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net

CCL subscribers,

A new mailing list is available for questions, comments and discussion 
of topics related to Schrodinger's Jaguar software.
Goto

http://atom.chem.iupui.edu/mailman/listinfo/jaglist

to subscribe.

Regards,

Kelsey

Kelsey Forsythe, PhD
Director, Computational Molecular Science Facility
IUPUI Chemistry
LD 320
402 North Blackford St.
Indianapolis, IN 46202
Ph: 317-278-2202
Fax: 317-274-4701



From chemistry-request@ccl.net Thu Jul  8 07:52:58 2004
Received: from web90106.mail.scd.yahoo.com (web90106.mail.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.94.77])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id i68Cqv2W023541
	for <chemistry^at^ccl.net>; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:52:57 -0500
Message-ID: <20040708125843.64677.qmail^at^web90106.mail.scd.yahoo.com>
Received: from [137.153.0.36] by web90106.mail.scd.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2004 20:58:43 CST
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 20:58:43 +0800 (CST)
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?paul=20nuber?= <paulnuber2^at^yahoo.com.hk>
Subject: "work function" calculation for molecule
To: chemistry^at^ccl.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-657365205-1089291523=:63232"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=7.5 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
	HTML_MESSAGE,MK_BAD_HTML_04,RM_ft_Iso8859 autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net

--0-657365205-1089291523=:63232
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Dear all
 
Is it reasonable to use a planewave code to calculate the ionization energy of a molecule?
 
I mean the usual way of doing this for solid surface is that one makes a difference of the electrostatic potential at vacuum and the bulk fermi energy.  
 
thanks in advance for your answer
Paul



---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com.hk address at Yahoo! Mail.

--0-657365205-1089291523=:63232
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<DIV>Dear all</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Is it reasonable to use a planewave code to calculate the ionization energy of a molecule?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I mean the usual way of doing this for solid surface is that one makes a difference of the electrostatic potential at vacuum and the bulk fermi energy.&nbsp; </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>thanks in advance for your answer</DIV>
<DIV>Paul</DIV><p><br><hr size=1><b>Do You Yahoo!?</b><br>Get your free @yahoo.com.hk address at <a href="http://mail.english.yahoo.com.hk/">Yahoo! Mail</a>.<br>
--0-657365205-1089291523=:63232--


From chemistry-request@ccl.net Thu Jul  8 11:10:06 2004
Received: from mx3.trentu.ca (mx3.trentu.ca [192.75.12.4])
	by server.ccl.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id i68GA4dI030389
	for <chemistry*at*ccl.net>; Thu, 8 Jul 2004 11:10:04 -0500
Received: (qmail 14653 invoked by uid 510); 8 Jul 2004 16:15:50 -0000
Received: from elewars*at*trentu.cA by mx3.trentu.ca by uid 501 with qmail-scanner-1.20rc3 
 (f-prot: 4.4.1/3.14.11. spamassassin: 2.62.  Clear:RC:1:. 
 Processed in 0.019087 secs); 08 Jul 2004 16:15:50 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: elewars*at*trentu.cA via mx3.trentu.ca
X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20rc3 (Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 0.019087 secs)
Received: from unknown (HELO trentu.cA) (209.42.102.47)
  by mx3.trentu.ca with SMTP; 8 Jul 2004 16:15:50 -0000
Message-ID: <40ED7448.10107*at*trentu.cA>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 12:20:24 -0400
From: Errol Lewars <elewars*at*trentu.cA>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry*at*ccl.net
Subject: CCL: conformers and rate
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.5 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	servernd.ccl.net

2004 July 8

The rate of formation of products Pa and Pb from quickly interconverting
conformers Ca and Cb is treated with the the Curtin/Hammett and
Winstein-Holness equations (the Curtin-Hammett principle, in particular,
is well-known): J. I Seeman, Chem Rev, 1983, 83, 83; E. L. Eliel, "From
Cologne to Chapel Hill", ACS, 1990, pp. 31-33.

Question: has anyone a reference to a discussion of the case of rapidly
interconverting conformers Ca and Cb, where Ca, although the minor
conformer, is the only one that can react with X to form a product CaX,
through transition state Ta; intuition aside, has someone explicitly
addressed whether the _experimental_ activation E is measuring the Ta-Ca
energy difference, or the Ta-Cb difference?

Thanks,

EL
=====



