From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Sun Feb 14 15:46:01 2010 From: "Roy Green powergreen*gmail.com" To: CCL Subject: CCL: BSSE MP2 Basis set Message-Id: <-41251-100214153943-11057-fXiAtCTXmcEsuf3eAk9hyw-x-server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: Roy Green Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f9c983a3a269f047f94a0de Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 14:37:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sent to CCL by: Roy Green [powergreen/a\gmail.com] --00c09f9c983a3a269f047f94a0de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear All, Can I believe the BSSE corrections if the the BSSE was comparable to the MP2 bonding energies before BSSE correction? I used a multi-reference based MP2 method for a complex pi-dimer. Also, such complex dimer, I not sure which basis set isl better, 6-31+G(d) or 6311+G(d). Due to the computational limitation, I can not use larger basis set. Thanks. Roy --00c09f9c983a3a269f047f94a0de Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear All,

Can I believe the BSSE corr= ections if the the BSSE was comparable to the MP2 bonding energies before B= SSE correction? I used a multi-reference based MP2 method for a complex pi-= dimer. Also, such complex dimer, I not sure which basis set isl better, 6-3= 1+G(d) or 6311+G(d). Due to the computational limitation, I can not use lar= ger=A0 basis set.
Thanks.

Roy

--00c09f9c983a3a269f047f94a0de--