Amanda Barnard (CSIRO Australia), recent recipient of the Feynman award,= is a notable omission.

Dear Anna,

please google = this name: "Prof. Dr. Habibah A. Wahab"

She is the bes= t example as a powerful woman, talented scientist and great mother at the s= ame time.

Best regards

Hassan

On Sunday, August 28, 2016= 9:20 PM, Marcel Swart marcel.swart..icrea.cat <owner-chemistry : ccl.ne= t> wrote:

Sent to CCL by: "Marcel Swart" [marcel.swart]![icrea.cat] Dear all,

I am sending a message on behalf of Anna Krylov (USC):

Colleagues,

As a new academic year rolls in, I would like to remind you about this webs= ite:

iopenshell.usc.edu/wtc

This is a web-directory of women in theoretical chemistry holding ind= ependent research positions.
There are more of us than you think!

Please send me updates, corrections, and new names.

Enjoy and pass it along.
Anna

http:= //chem.usc.edu/faculty/Krylov.html
krylov .. usc.edu

_____________________________________
Prof. Dr. Marcel Swart, FRSC

ICREA Research Professor at
Institut de Qumica Computacional i Catlisi (IQCC)
Univ. Girona (Spain)

COST Action CM1305 (ECOSTBio) chair
Girona Seminar 2016 organizer
IQCC director
RSC Advances associate editor
Young Academy of Europe member

web
http://www.marcels= wart.eu
vCard
addressbook://www.marcelswart.eu/MSwart.vcf

-=3D This is automatically added to each message by the mailing script =3D-= the strange characters on the top line to the : sign. You can also
E-mail to subscribers: CHEMISTRY : c= cl.net or use:
http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message=

E-mail to administrators: CH= EMISTRY-REQUEST : ccl.net or use
http://www.ccl.net/cgi-bin/ccl/send_ccl_message=
http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/sub_unsub.shtml

Before posting, check wait time at: http://www.ccl.net

Job: http://www.ccl.n= et/jobs
Conferences: http://server.ccl.net/chemistry/announcements/conferences/

Search Messages: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/searchccl/index.shtml
http://www.ccl.net/spammers.txt

RTFI: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/aboutccl/instructions/

--_000_147242407053312921csiroau_-- From owner-chemistry@ccl.net Mon Aug 29 11:14:01 2016 From: "Muhammad Abduh Nasution abduh^mhs.unimed.ac.id" To: CCL Subject: CCL: HOMO energy and redox potential Message-Id: <-52366-160829055657-24723-WJyp07eESrReU0/9qS5pmg(_)server.ccl.net> X-Original-From: "Muhammad Abduh Nasution" Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 05:56:49 -0400 Sent to CCL by: "Muhammad Abduh Nasution" [abduh]~[mhs.unimed.ac.id] Dear CCL members. First, forgive me if this discussion may be not too computational chemistry. I've read many literature states that there are relationship between HOMO energy and redox potential, even this topic can be found on CCL archive. So I try to relate them based on data from "Oxtoby, D. W. (2008). Principles of Modern Chemistry" and "Lide, David R. (ed). (2005). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics". I found that Ionization Potential of alkali metal and logaritmic function from \frac{V}{Mr\times r^5}\ (where V is redox potential in Volt, Mr is relative mass of atom in kg, and r is atomic radii in m), is have strong correlation showed by its R-squared. Here is script written in R, altough basically I'm python programmer. # data sequences of alkali metal properties > element<- c('Li','Na','K','Rb','Cs') # Ionization Potential of alkali metal > IP<- c(520.2,495.8,418.8,403,375.7) # redox potential of alkali metal > V<- c(-3.0401, -2.71, -2.931, - 2.98, -3.026) # defining Angstrom unit > A = 10^-10 # atomic radii of alkali metal > r<- c(1.52*A, 1.86*A, 2.27*A, 2.47*A, 2.65*A) # atomic relative mass of alkali metal in kg > m<- c(0.0069412, 0.02298977, 0.03909831, 0.08546783, 0.132905452) # defining k > k = V/(m*(r^5)) # relating between k and ionization potential > data <- data.frame(x=log(-k), y=IP) > pro <- lm(y ~ x, data=data) > summary(pro) Call: lm(formula = y ~ x, data = data) Residuals: 1 2 3 4 5 - 10.883 25.245 -13.378 2.646 - 3.629 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) -14167.3 2164.1 - 6.547 0.00725 ** x 3074.9 455.5 6.751 0.00664 ** --- Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 Residual standard error: 17.84 on 3 degrees of freedom Multiple R- Squared: 0.9382, Adjusted R- squared: 0.9177 F-statistic: 45.58 on 1 and 3 DF, p-value: 0.006638 > data.entry(data) > plot(data) Well, is it relationship right? or it is just mathematical fit? If it is right, what theory behind it? I've search for it but until now I not get the theory. Best Regards Muhammad Abduh