From anthony.scott@anu.edu.au  Sat May 14 09:54:18 1994
Received: from anu.anu.edu.au  for anthony.scott@anu.edu.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id JAA21724; Sat, 14 May 1994 09:32:43 -0400
Received: from cscgpo.anu.edu.au by anu.anu.edu.au (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA10701; Sat, 14 May 94 23:32:32 EST
Received: from huxley.anu.edu.au by cscgpo.anu.edu.au (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA29339; Sat, 14 May 94 23:33:30 EST
Date: Sat, 14 May 94 23:33:30 EST
From: anthony.scott@anu.edu.au (Anthony P Scott)
Message-Id: <9405141333.AA29339@cscgpo.anu.edu.au>
Received: by huxley.anu.edu.au (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA02658; Sat, 14 May 94 23:31:21 EST
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: A question about enthalpy
To: Chemistry.ccl.net@ccl.net
Subject: A Question about Enthalpy



Given the following:


             A \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ A

A molecule A2 in which the internuclear distance is large and hence the 
vibrational frequency that can be ascribed to A2 is small.

Now if we work out the enthalpy contributions for A2 we get:

          translational: 3/2RT
          rotational   : 2/2RT
          vibrational  : RT
          Total        : 7/2RT

The vibrational contribution tends towards RT as the vibrational frequency
tends to zero.

Now consider two isolated A atoms.

            A                     A

separated by a large distance. The total enthalpy for the two A atoms
is:

          Total       : 6/2RT

Why is there a difference of 1/2RT for these two systems that appear to
be similar?

Any pointers to this would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

Anthony P. Scott
Research Officer
Computational Chemistry Group
Research School of Chemistry
Australian National University
Canberra, ACT, Australia


From raman@bioc01.uthscsa.edu  Sat May 14 12:54:18 1994
Received: from thorin.uthscsa.edu  for raman@bioc01.uthscsa.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id MAA22287; Sat, 14 May 1994 12:03:46 -0400
Received: from bioc01.uthscsa.edu by thorin.uthscsa.edu with SMTP;
          Sat, 14 May 1994 11:05:57 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by bioc01.uthscsa.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA03552; Sat, 14 May 94 11:04:12 CDT
From: raman@bioc01.uthscsa.edu (C.S.RAMAN)
Message-Id: <9405141604.AA03552@bioc01.uthscsa.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:software for protein structure det. and docking
To: lchirlia@cc.brynmawr.edu (Chirlian Lisa E)
Date: Sat, 14 May 1994 11:04:11 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <9405101344.AA19110@cc.brynmawr.edu> from "Chirlian Lisa E" at May 10, 94 09:44:17 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL3]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1185      


Lisa:

> 
> 	I am interested in hearing peoples opinions on any
> commercially available (or public domain) software for protein
> structure determination and docking.  Please e-mail, I will summarize
> for anyone interested.  Thanks,

For docking try:  DOCK (new version to be released shortly).  For an
academic license you need to contact Tac Kuntz at UCSF.

There are a lot of protein structure determination programs, depends on
what you exactly want to do.

Cheers
-raman
-- 
C.S.Raman                           
UNIX Programming & Administration   
SPARC & SGI Systems                 raman@bioc01.uthscsa.edu - INTERNET
Department of Biochemistry          raman@mintaka.chpc.utexas.edu - CHPC
UTHSCSA                             c.raman@launchpad.unc.edu
7703 Floyd Curl Dr.                 (210) 567-6623   [Tel]
San Antonio, TX 78284-7760          (210) 567-6595   [Fax]
******************************************************************************
         If a man's wit be wandering, let him study the Mathematics
                                                            -Francis Bacon   
******************************************************************************

From jkl@ccl.net  Sat May 14 18:54:22 1994
Received: from hawkeye.ccl.net  for jkl@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id SAA23293; Sat, 14 May 1994 18:14:33 -0400
From: Jan Labanowski <jkl@ccl.net>
Received: from localhost  for jkl@ccl.net
	by hawkeye.ccl.net (8.6.4/920428.1525) id SAA18422; Sat, 14 May 1994 18:14:32 -0400
Date: Sat, 14 May 1994 18:14:32 -0400
Message-Id: <199405142214.SAA18422@hawkeye.ccl.net>
To: msrge@csv.warwick.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Molecular viewing software
In-Reply-To: Mail from 'Craig Wilson <cw@ccl.net>'
      dated: Sat, 14 May 94 14:36:42 BST
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net


Craig,

Craig Wilson <msrge@csv.warwick.ac.uk> writes:
> I would very much like to obtain a good piece of software for displaying 
> molecular structures from my ab initio calculations. Ideally, the program

Write yourself a simple perl/awk script which will extract coordinates
>from your ab initio output file and produce XYZ file for Xmol (Xmol
is available from ftp.msc.edu in /pub/xmol as far as I remember).

Examples of perl scripts which extract data from output files
of some ab initio programs are on anonymous ftp on www.ccl.net
in /pub/chemistry/software/perl/geom

Jan Labanowski
jkl@ccl.net

P.S.  Always give your e-mail address in the signature of your message.
In your case, the From: address of your message is messed up (though the
Reply-To: is OK). If people wanted to answer your message directly to you,
they may have a problem.


From bradt@gac.edu  Sat May 14 23:54:26 1994
Received: from gac.edu  for bradt@gac.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.4/930601.1506) id XAA24547; Sat, 14 May 1994 23:32:52 -0400
Received: by gac.edu (NeXT-1.0 (From Sendmail 5.52)/GAC-1.0.R9309061)
	id AA04518; Sat, 14 May 94 22:32:11 CDT
Date: Sat, 14 May 94 22:32:11 CDT
From: bradt@gac.edu (Brad Thompson)
Message-Id: <9405150332.AA04518@gac.edu>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject:  CCL:A question about enthalpy



Regarding Anthony Scott's question about the enthalpy difference
between to independent atoms A:  (6/2) RT and a molecule A-A with a
very weak bond: (7/2) RT, which Scott describes as "two systems that
appear to be similar" --

As long as the two atoms are bound, from an enthalpy standpoint it is
of little consequence if the bond vibrational frequency "tends to
zero" (Scott's term) as long as it doesn't actually reach zero.  As
the frequency decreases, there are more vibrational levels thermally
accessable, and the energy of any sizeable assembly of molecules
(such as a mole) stays the same.  Vibrational degrees of freedom can
store potential energy, something translations and rotations can't do.  

Of course, at some point the approximations we use will break down,
but for any "normal" very weak bond, A-A is not all that "similar"
to two A's thermodynamically.

                    | H. Bradford Thompson   [Brad]
bradt@gac.edu       | Scholar in Residence, Chemistry & Physics
                    | Gustavus Adolphus College, St. Peter MN 56082-1498

