From akn@hcocvx.uni-c.dk  Mon Oct 10 05:18:45 1994
Received: from danpost.uni-c.dk  for akn@hcocvx.uni-c.dk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id FAA27128; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 05:08:47 -0400
Received: from hcocvx.uni-c.dk (hcocvx.uni-c.dk [129.142.6.92]) by danpost.uni-c.dk (8.6.4/8.6) with ESMTP id KAA11292 for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 10:08:37 +0100
Received: from localhost by hcocvx.uni-c.dk (8.6.4/10.0.0.3)
	id KAA06493; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 10:05:26 +0100
From: akn@hcocvx.uni-c.dk (Anita Kildebaek Nielsen)
Message-Id: <199410100905.KAA06493@hcocvx.uni-c.dk>
Subject: CCL:Question: a N+Ar potential
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 94 10:05:25 MET
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]


Dear Netters

I would like to do simulaions of N2(g) in an argon cluster, but I
have been unsuccessful in finding a (probably Lennard-Jones 6-12)
potential between argon-atom and nitrogen-atom.
Can anyone help me with references or other informations?
Please send it directly to me.I will of course give the results
here if anyone should be interested.

Thank you for your help in advance. Anita Kildebaek.


*************************************
* Anita Kildebaek Nielsen           *
* Dept. of Chemistry                *
* Division of Theoretical Chemistry *
* Aarhus University                 *
*                                   *
* E-mail:akn@hcocvx.uni-c.dk        *
* S-mail:Langelandsgade 140,        *
*        8000 Aarhus C              *
*        Denmark                    *
* Phone: +45 89 42 38 33            *
*************************************
*    "All of science is physics     *
*        or stamp collecting"       *
*                     Rutherford    *
*************************************

From CULMER@uoft02.utoledo.edu  Mon Oct 10 09:18:58 1994
Received: from uoft02.utoledo.edu  for CULMER@uoft02.utoledo.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id IAA29353; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 08:57:13 -0400
Received: from UOFT02.UTOLEDO.EDU by UOFT02.UTOLEDO.EDU (PMDF V4.3-7 #5345)
 id <01HI3T18WF800000HT@UOFT02.UTOLEDO.EDU>; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 08:57:08 EST
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 1994 08:57:07 -0500 (EST)
From: "Chuck Ulmer, D.A.Smith Group" <CULMER@uoft02.utoledo.edu>
Subject: AVS on DEC Alpha
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01HI3T18WF820000HT@UOFT02.UTOLEDO.EDU>
X-Envelope-to: chemistry@ccl.net
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"
X-VMS-Cc: CULMER
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Let me first apologize for sending to the list; however, I am not able to
send directly to the poster of the original question.

Duane Walker writes:
>
>Hello,
>
>WE are considering buying a DEC alpha system for our computational chemsitry
>group.  I need to know if AVS or another similar visualization package is
>available for the alpha systems running OSF, if they are available,  what the 
>academic pricing is,  and finally how is the performace for generation of 
>isosurfaces.  I am especially interested in avs with the chemistry viewer 
>added.
>
>
>all information appreciated
>
>Duane Walker
>Mathematical Chemistry Research Unit
>University of Saskatchewan
>Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
>
>walkerd@usask.sask.ca
--

Duane:

  AVS does run on the Alpha with OSF/1.  The DASGroup, Inc., has all rights
to the development, distribution, and sales of the the AVS Chemistry
Viewer and we have done the port to the DEC Alpha under OSF/1.  I constantly
run the Chem. Viewer on an Alpha with Denali graphics and am amazed at
the performance.  While I have not seen the Chemistry Viewer running on
an Alpha with ZLX graphics, I have been told that responce time is "fantastic".
  If and when you get an Alpha running AVS, let me know and I can give you
a demo copy of the AVS Chemistry Viewer and you can judge for yourself.  I
have also written several demo scripts which Degital Equipment Corp. has
used to show off the graphics at various shows.  These scripts demonstrate
several Chemistry Viewer features, such as molecular orbital display, electro-
static potential, vibrational frequency animation, setting up Gaussian and
Mopac input, and of course, the moleclar editor.

Thanks,
Chuck
--
 Charles W. Ulmer, II
 Senior Scientist
 Product Manager - The AVS Chemistry Viewer
 The DASGroup, Inc.
 3807 Elmhurst Road
 Toledo,  OH  43613
 
 phone: (419)537-4028		culmer@uoft02.utoledo.edu
 fax:   (419)537-4033

From savary@sc2a.unige.ch  Mon Oct 10 10:18:52 1994
Received: from UNI2B.UNIGE.CH  for savary@sc2a.unige.ch
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id KAA00986; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 10:01:54 -0400
Received: from PCC2333F (129.194.51.63) by uni2b.unige.ch (PMDF V4.3-8 #2502)
 id <01HI462OPPY8003FPG@uni2b.unige.ch>; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 15:01:45 WET-DST
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 1994 15:01:44 +0100
From: savary@sc2a.unige.ch (Francois Savary)
Subject: simple geometry minimizer
X-Sender: savary@sc2a.unige.ch
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Message-id: <01HI462P90EA003FPG@uni2b.unige.ch>
X-Envelope-to: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.3b4
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Hi dear CCListers,

I'm looking for a simple molecular mechanics minimization tool, the simpler
the better, if possible with source. (:-)


thanks in advance


Francois Savary


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Francois Savary
University of Geneva
Department of Physical Chemistry CHIFI Weber
30 quai Ernest-Ansermet
CH-1211 Geneva 4

Lab       : 112
Phone     : +4122 702 65 32
Fax       : +4122 702 65 18
e-mail    : savary@sc2a.unige.ch
HTML      : http://scsg9.unige.ch/tabmat.html  (in french)
          : http://scsg9.unige.ch/eng/toc.html (in english)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


From SATYAM@vms.cis.pitt.edu  Mon Oct 10 10:19:57 1994
Received: from VAXVM2.CIS.PITT.EDU  for SATYAM@vms.cis.pitt.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id KAA01008; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 10:04:10 -0400
From: <SATYAM@vms.cis.pitt.edu>
Received: from vms.cis.pitt.edu by vms.cis.pitt.edu (PMDF V4.2-14 #4065) id
 <01HI3UYWLOHCB9SJ9M@vms.cis.pitt.edu>; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 10:04:07 EST
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 1994 10:04:07 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Help with ... Installing .. MOPAC.93... on SGI with 4.0.5 and 5.2..?
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01HI3UYWLY4IB9SJ9M@vms.cis.pitt.edu>
X-Envelope-to: chemistry@ccl.net
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Dear Netters,
 The sys. adm. of our group wants to know 
  the changes made to (i) Makefile (s) (ii) Sources 
  of the MOPAC 93 (a Sun version from QCPE) for Installing
  it on SGI (Indigo/INDY using OS 4.0.5/5.2 ). 

  Some of you have done this..and..this will save lot of time
  for the Grad. Student..who will be installing it.
  
  Please send replies to  me.   Satyam@vms.cis.pitt.edu

Thanks in advance.
Regards
Satyam
______________________________________________________________________________
Dr. Satyam Priyadarshy              Quantum Mechanics enables us to understand
905,Chevron Science Center                  Electron Transfer in DNA
Department of Chemistry                          which in turn
University of Pittsburgh                          helps us to 
Pittsburgh, PA 15260, U.S.A                       understand 
Fax   : 1-412-624 8552                  Some Aspects of Complicated LIFE  
Phone : 1-412-624 1217 (W)                     1-412-247 4652 (H)
Email : satyam@vms.cis.pitt.edu            satyam@babar.chem.pitt.edu
______________________________________________________________________________


From Don_Gregory@msi.com  Mon Oct 10 10:21:02 1994
Received: from msi.com  for Don_Gregory@msi.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id JAA00565; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 09:40:29 -0400
Received: from qmail-gw.msi.com by msi.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA24397; Mon, 10 Oct 94 09:41:10 EDT
Message-Id: <9410101341.AA24397@msi.com>
Date: 10 Oct 1994 09:39:53 +0000
From: "Don Gregory" <Don_Gregory@msi.com>
Subject: counterions for N.A.
To: "Chemistry osc" <chemistry@ccl.net>


                       Subject:                               Time:10:51
AM
  OFFICE MEMO          counterions for N.A.                   Date:10/9/94
To accompany Drs. Monaco and Loomis' note on their mac program for
generating ions around nucleic acids:

"	We have written a Mac application, CounterIon 1.0, which will place
counterions around a DNA helix (from a pdb file format). This may be
useful to users of CHARMm ..."

We, too, have heard this request from a number of users; note the
spirited discussion on this BBS a number of weeks ago about
empirical and theoretical investigations into the "appropriate"
number of counter ions around nucleic acids.
For working with CHARMm, I recently created a CHARMm RTF
file for DNA which places a sodium ion near the phosphate
oxygens.  As an example as to how easily this could be done,
we have provided this RTF file on our anon. ftp server
(server.msi.com: archives/quanta/dna_na.rtf.Z and 	dnaions.txt.Z)
This RTF can be used both with QUANTA/CHARMm, and with 
CHARMm standalone.
This file not meant as a reference on the positioning, nor the
number of recommended counter ions around nucleic acid, but
rather a template as to how one may include them should one
wish.
Don Gregory
Mgr.Appl.Science, MSI



From akn@hcocvx.uni-c.dk  Mon Oct 10 10:21:46 1994
Received: from danpost.uni-c.dk  for akn@hcocvx.uni-c.dk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id FAA27128; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 05:08:47 -0400
Received: from hcocvx.uni-c.dk (hcocvx.uni-c.dk [129.142.6.92]) by danpost.uni-c.dk (8.6.4/8.6) with ESMTP id KAA11292 for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 10:08:37 +0100
Received: from localhost by hcocvx.uni-c.dk (8.6.4/10.0.0.3)
	id KAA06493; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 10:05:26 +0100
From: akn@hcocvx.uni-c.dk (Anita Kildebaek Nielsen)
Message-Id: <199410100905.KAA06493@hcocvx.uni-c.dk>
Subject: CCL:Question: a N+Ar potential
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 94 10:05:25 MET
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]


Dear Netters

I would like to do simulaions of N2(g) in an argon cluster, but I
have been unsuccessful in finding a (probably Lennard-Jones 6-12)
potential between argon-atom and nitrogen-atom.
Can anyone help me with references or other informations?
Please send it directly to me.I will of course give the results
here if anyone should be interested.

Thank you for your help in advance. Anita Kildebaek.


*************************************
* Anita Kildebaek Nielsen           *
* Dept. of Chemistry                *
* Division of Theoretical Chemistry *
* Aarhus University                 *
*                                   *
* E-mail:akn@hcocvx.uni-c.dk        *
* S-mail:Langelandsgade 140,        *
*        8000 Aarhus C              *
*        Denmark                    *
* Phone: +45 89 42 38 33            *
*************************************
*    "All of science is physics     *
*        or stamp collecting"       *
*                     Rutherford    *
*************************************

From psubram@texaco.com  Mon Oct 10 14:18:51 1994
Received: from texaco.com  for psubram@texaco.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id NAA04991; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 13:53:54 -0400
Received: by texaco.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA26601; Mon, 10 Oct 94 12:53:41 CDT
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 94 12:53:41 CDT
From: psubram@texaco.com (Palavo Subramanian)
Message-Id: <9410101753.AA26601@texaco.com>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Summary Interaction


Hi,
  Sometime back I had posted a query regarding using MOPAC to calculate
interaction energy of octane, I have summarised all the responses that 
I recd.  Thank you all for the responses The general consensus seems
to be to use MM rather than semi-empirical procedures.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
        A quick tip:  One of the main (long-range) interactions between
alkanes is London dispersion forces.  As these are an effect of electron
correlation, you will not be able to account for these using a semi-empiric
calculation (eg, MOPAC).
        If you want a result, use a molecular mechanics method.  MM2 and
MM3 are parameterized to reproduce alkane heats of sublimation, so
interactions between octanes should be OK (at least in MM3).
        If you want to get a non-MM, non-experimental result (why would
you?), you have to go to fairly large ab initio methods with electron
correlation.

        Per-Ola Norrby

 *  Per-Ola Norrby
 *  The Royal Danish School of Pharmacy, Dept. of Med. Chem.
 *  Universitetsparken 2, DK 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
 *  tel. +45-35376777-506, +45-35370850    fax +45-35372209
 *  Internet: peon@medchem.dfh.dk

***************************************************************************
I've found that you can only get quasi-decent interaction energies using MOPAC
for materials that have strong H-bonding interactions, like base pairs in DNA.
For weaker interactions, you won't get much of anywhere, which is the case
for octane.  

There's a program called AMYR that lets you calculate the interactions between
2 *rigid* molecules that WILL give you results for weaker interactions, but
won't compute any structural changes.

For the full treatment, you'd be better off using a properly parametrised 
force field & molecular dynamics.  I assume texaco has some sort of library
service?  A search ought to reveal some references.



I had a file with references to AMYR somewhere, but can't seem to locate it
right now, sorry...

Good luck,
Irene Newhouse
**************************************************************************

I would have thought that you would want to calculate the interaction of the 
octane molecules using a MD package as opposed to Mopac.  Simply duplicate 
the basic molecule and turn it loose in a periodic box.  Knowing the energy 
of an individual molecule and determining the energy of the liquid you would 
come up with an interaction energy.  Because the geometry of two interacting 
molecules is highly variable, it seems it would be extremely tedious to do 
using a semi-empirical technique.  You can do MD using semi-empirical 
techniques in Hyperchem but to handle more than a couple of molecules would 
be very time consuming.      

Ross Underhill
*************************************************************************

With regard to using MNDO for calculating the intereaction energy
of octane or any weakly intereaction system, it is possible in 
a computational sense, i.e. one will get a number, but the results
are of no particularly value (not publishable in a well reviewed 
journal).

Why?  Semiempirical methods present in MOPAC were not developed for 
weak interaction calcutions. The interaction energies would be
weak in such a case (less than 1-2 kcal),which is far smaller than
the standard deviation errors of the method. Even in ab initio theory,
where basis set composition, basis set superposition error, and
correlation can be taken into account the interaction energy between
two alkanes would be a formidable calculation. 

One method which has been used in computing crystallization enthalpies
is Allinger's molecular mechanics programs, espcially those which 
take into account dispersion terms. Since there are no strong dipole
dipole intereactions, the interaction energy in alkcanes is dominated
by dispersion forces, and the van der Waals type interaction potentials
used in some modeling schemes will take into account this. 

Good luck

Earl Evleth 
*********************************************************************** 
There's no big problem DOING the type of calculation you are attempting:

>    I am interested in calculating interaction energies between 2 
> octane molecules. I would like to use MOPAC.  Could someone let me know 
> as to how I should go about setting the calculation etc. ( I am 
> assuming that this can be done using MOPAC!). 

It would be another matter, however, to get MEANINGFUL results.  If an 
interaction energy for a specific geometry is adequate (a geometry from an X-
ray Crystal Structure, for instance) then you could just input the geometry 
with two octanes and calculate the enthalpy and subtract the enthalpy of a 
single octane.  (If you need free energies, you will need to do a FORCE 
calculation to include the entropy, but an XRD geometry will not be suitable: 
you will have to optimize the geometry within the semi-empirical method.  
Otherwise, you will end up with negative eigenvalues and the frequency 
calculations will be meaningless.)

If you are trying to study the interaction energy in the bulk liquid, there 
are two problems.
 1) You will need to consider the many possible conformations and 
orientations of the two octanes relative to each other.  You could generate a 
set of representative starting geometries to sample the real distribution, 
then optimize each, calculate the energies, and calculate a weighted average 
(assuming a Boltzman distribution).  This would not be a pleasant task to do 
manually with Mopac, although I have done this sort of thing.  Even then, you 
will not be sure how accurately your sample represents the true distribution 
(especially if you missed the most stable configuration which would be the 
major contributor to the energy).  A Monte Carlo, or Molecular Dynamics type 
code which uses AM1 or PM3 energy calculations would do a more proper job of 
sampling, but I don't know of a commercial product to recommend.
 2) In my experience, I have not found Mopac (or any of the semi-empirical 
Hamiltonians) to represent long range interactions (ie. intermolecular) very 
accurately:  it is difficult to even find stable geometries for molecule 
pairs.  For your type problem, I would expect Molecular Mechanics to provide 
better answers.  MM is what is typically used in the commercial Molecular 
Dynamics and Monte Carlo codes, anyway, and hydrocarbons should be handled 
particularly well.

I hope this helps.


                                        EC

--W-h-o---W-h-o---W-h-o---W-h-o--|--W-h-e-r-e---W-h-e-r-e---W-h-e-r-e--
                                 |
Ernie Chamot                     |  Amoco Chemical Company
Senior Research Chemist          |  PO Box 3011
Computational Chemistry Project  |  Naperville, Illinois, 60566
echamot@amoco.com                |  Voice (708)961-0752, Fax 420-4678

---C-o-r-p-o-r-a-t-e---R-e-q-u-i-r-e-d---D-i-s-c-l-a-i-m-e-r---

Should any of my views expressed in this EMail message resemble the
official views and/or an endorsement by my corporation, I would be
astonished and gratified at Amoco's sudden enlightenment.

*************************************************************************

Unfortunately I stripped off the header info. while saving and some
of the respondents email info. is missing.  My apologies for that.
Once again thank you all for taking the time.

P.S.Subramanian
psubram@texaco.com

From berry@ccl.net  Mon Oct 10 16:25:39 1994
Received:  for berry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id QAA07327; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 16:02:22 -0400
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 1994 16:02:22 -0400
From: "Robby A. Berry" <berry@ccl.net>
Message-Id: <199410102002.QAA07327@www.ccl.net>
To: tchemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Test message
Cc: berry@ccl.net


Just getting a baseline reading.  If anybody besides Jan or myself can
read this, please notify me (berry@ccl.net) immediately.  Thanks!

Rob

From bak@isadora.albany.edu  Mon Oct 10 16:25:53 1994
Received: from UACSC2.ALBANY.EDU  for bak@isadora.albany.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id QAA07552; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 16:15:13 -0400
Received: from isadora.albany.edu by UACSC2.ALBANY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with TCP; Mon, 10 Oct 94 16:12:25 EDT
Received: by isadora.albany.edu (931110.SGI/920502.SGI)
	for @uacsc2.albany.edu:chemistry@ccl.net id AA11897; Mon, 10 Oct 94 16:14:48 -0400
From: bak@isadora.albany.edu (Brian A. Kell)
Message-Id: <9410102014.AA11897@isadora.albany.edu>
Subject: Re: counterions for N.A.
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 94 16:14:47 EDT
In-Reply-To: <9410101341.AA24397@msi.com>; from "Don Gregory" at Oct 10, 94 9:39 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]


At the risk of sounding like a "me too"...

Last December, a BCL macro for InsightII was posted on the DIBUG
(Discover and Insight -- Biosym Users' Group) mailing list, which also
places specified counterions around DNA molecules.  It is available in
the DIBUG archives.  Or, I can send it directly to interested parties.

brian

------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Kell                                          bak@biosym.com
Scientific Support Manager, Eastern Region     Tel. (518) 482-1436
Biosym Technologies, Inc.                      Fax. (518) 482-5433
------------------------------------------------------------------


From bak@isadora.albany.edu  Mon Oct 10 19:18:54 1994
Received: from UACSC2.ALBANY.EDU  for bak@isadora.albany.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id TAA09748; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 19:03:21 -0400
Received: from isadora.albany.edu by UACSC2.ALBANY.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with TCP; Mon, 10 Oct 94 18:59:13 EDT
Received: by isadora.albany.edu (931110.SGI/920502.SGI)
	for @uacsc2.albany.edu:chemistry@ccl.net id AA13498; Mon, 10 Oct 94 19:00:50 -0400
From: bak@isadora.albany.edu (Brian A. Kell)
Message-Id: <9410102300.AA13498@isadora.albany.edu>
Subject: How to subscribe to DIBUG
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 94 19:00:50 EDT
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]


After recieving a number of requests, I realized that not everyone may
be aware of how to subscribe to DIBUG.

DIBUG (Discover and Insight, the Biosym User's Group) is a mailing
list maintained by the users of Biosym software.  It is not controlled
by Biosym; however, some Biosym employees subscribe to it.

For information, or to subscribe, please send your requests to:

	dibug-request@comp.bioz.unibas.ch

brian

------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Kell                                          bak@biosym.com
Scientific Support Manager, Eastern Region     Tel. (518) 482-1436
Biosym Technologies, Inc.                      Fax. (518) 482-5433
------------------------------------------------------------------


From chamankh@duke.usask.ca  Mon Oct 10 20:18:55 1994
Received: from skycat.usask.ca  for chamankh@duke.usask.ca
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id TAA10034; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 19:32:50 -0400
Received: from duke.usask.ca by SKYCAT.USask.CA (PMDF V4.3-11 #5952)
 id <01HI4BB8D7N48Y5SFN@SKYCAT.USask.CA>; Mon, 10 Oct 1994 17:32:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: by duke.usask.ca; (5.65/1.1.8.2/03May94-0555AM) id AA22886; Mon,
 10 Oct 1994 17:32:00 -0600
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 1994 17:31:59 -0600 (CST)
From: Mahmood Chamankhah <chamankh@duke.usask.ca>
Subject: Theoretical Log P values
Sender: Mahmood Chamankhah <chamankh@duke.usask.ca>
To: Chemistry@ccl.net
Reply-to: Mahmood Chamankhah <chamankh@duke.usask.ca>
Message-id: <Pine.3.88.9410101723.B21902-0100000@duke.usask.ca>
X-Envelope-to: Chemistry@ccl.net
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Hi everybody;

I've seen a couple of questions about how to calculate Log P values. 
2 Questions:

1) Has the Reckker's method of calculating log P values been integrated 
in a software?
 
2) Recently we tried to calculate Log P values for a series of compounds 
which are substituted phenyl ring conjugated to a double bond using 
Reckker's f values (f values are tabulated in Reckker's book, hopefully 
those who are interested have seen the book). We would like to know if 
there are substituents in ortho, meta and para positions of this system, 
would it affect the calculated lipophilicity of the whole molecule or 
not, because there is no direct explanation in the book regarding such 
effects and how to include it.

I appreciate any comments about the above problem specially from those 
who are using log P values (calculated or observed) routinely in their 
QSAR analysis.
 
Yours all

M.Chamankhah
Canada


