From graham@sentex.net  Thu Feb 23 00:52:08 1995
Received: from granite.sentex.net  for graham@sentex.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id XAA26037; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 23:57:17 -0500
Received: from kw-ttyd3.sentex.net (kw-ttyd3.sentex.net [204.50.3.21]) by granite.sentex.net (8.6.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id XAA15921; Wed, 22 Feb 1995 23:48:31 -0500
Message-Id: <199502230448.XAA15921@granite.sentex.net>
X-Sender: graham@mail.sentex.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 23:32:59 -0500
To: marvin@biosym.com (Marvin Waldman), CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
From: graham@sentex.net (Graham Hurst)
Subject: Re: CCL:conformational isomers


At 02:47 PM 2/22/95 -0800, Marvin Waldman <marvin@biosym.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 21 Feb 95 4:08:12 EST, Dongchul Lim wrote:
>
>> Is there a simple way of testing if two given conformational isomers
>> are equivalent?

[good stuff deleted]

>The ideal/correct solution would be to
>compare both the energy as well as all combinations of RMS comparisons
>of topologically equivalent atoms until the RMS difference found
>for a given comparison pair fell below some threshold.  I am not
>aware of a software package that has actually implemented such
>an algorithm, and would be very interested to hear about one that
>does.

The Conformational Search module of the ChemPlus set of extensions
for HyperChem uses energy and RMS compairisons of topologically
equivalent atom pairings.

I've been following this discussion with some interest.  When I
wrote the Conformational Search module of ChemPlus, I implemented
the following tests to compare for equivalent conformations that
might result from the search.  The comparisons available are (in
the order that the program can optionally execute them) are:

1. Changed chirality (R or S) of chiral centers with 4 bonded
   neighbours. (Chiral centers are determined by HyperChem.)

2. Energy (from HyperChem) within a user adjustable range.

3. Varied torsions within a user adjustable range.  This test is
   turned off by default, since it doesn't handle topologically
   equivalent dihedral angles.

4. R.M.S. deviation for a least-squares overlay of atoms.  As Marvin
   Waldman pointed out, one needs to compare with all topologically
   equivalent permutations of atom order and this option (discussed
   further below) is available in ChemPlus.  A subset of atoms can
   also be specified for the comparision.

I initially included an option for comparison of inertial moments
(suggested earlier by Leif Norskov <lnl@novo.dk>) but I abandoned it
because it seemed too sensitive a measure, with suitable tolerances
varying widely with the number of atoms.

If the option to use equivalent atoms in the RMS comparison is
turned on, the program generates all equivalent atom order
permutations.  The algorithm I used for this is basically brute
force, O(N!) at worst, but being able to compare element type
and number of bonds for each topological "node" allows considerable
trimming of the paths.  Further trimming results from only considering
a subset of atoms (eg. no hydrogens or only backbone atoms) so
that permutations of ignored atoms are unnecessary (assuming
equivalent sets are either all included or all excluded).

>So, the bottom line answer to the question, is: No, I don't think
>there is a SIMPLE way to do this.

I agree!  It took me about a month to puzzle out and implement an
algorithm for generating equivalent atom orders!  As Valery
Golender <valery@actcom.co.il> pointed out, the conformational
isomer problem is a specific instance of isomorphism of 3D objects.

Cheers,

Graham

P.S. If you want more ChemPlus or HyperChem product info, please
send email to info@hyper.com, not to me because I don't work
there anymore.
-------
Graham Hurst, PhD <graham@sentex.net> or <graham@watcom.on.ca>
Cambridge, Ontario, Canada


From CHEM8@vax.york.ac.uk  Thu Feb 23 08:53:37 1995
Received: from leeman.york.ac.uk  for CHEM8@vax.york.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id IAA01260; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 08:37:41 -0500
Via: uk.ac.york.vax; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 13:33:32 +0000
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 95 13:34 GMT
From: "John Waite, Tel: ++30-1-7238958, N.H.R.F., Organic Chemistry Institute, Vas. Konstantinou 48, Athens 116-35" 
      <CHEM8@vax.york.ac.uk>
To: CHEMISTRY <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: Jerry N. Silverman, where are you?
Message-ID: <"leeman.yor.444:23.01.95.13.33.43"@york.ac.uk>


    Does anyone out there know of the whereabouts of Prof. Jerry
 N. Silverman of PVRR fame? I wish, urgently, to get back in contact
 with him. He was last heard of in Fort Worth, Texas and prior to
 that in Cambridge UK. A phone number would be most useful and/or
 a postal (e-mail) address. (Our beloved supervisor, Jan, has
 sanctioned this request).
    Hopefully,
      John Waite

From CHEM8@vax.york.ac.uk  Thu Feb 23 09:00:14 1995
Received: from leeman.york.ac.uk  for CHEM8@vax.york.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id IAA01111; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 08:27:42 -0500
Via: uk.ac.york.vax; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 13:23:14 +0000
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 95 13:24 GMT
From: "John Waite, Tel: ++30-1-7238958, N.H.R.F., Organic Chemistry Institute, Vas. Konstantinou 48, Athens 116-35" 
      <CHEM8@vax.york.ac.uk>
To: CHEMISTRY <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>
Subject: Summary: 'ghost' writers available
Message-ID: <"leeman.yor.210:23.01.95.13.23.26"@york.ac.uk>


 Hi Netters,
    Just over a week ago I asked CCL about getting in contact with
 a 'ghost' writer. Below are the replies of people interested in 
 doing this.
    My thanks to all who replied and CCL,
      John



From: sparkin@com.imag-alchemy (Steven H. Parkin)

Professor Waite:

Both my wife, an extremely proficient editor, and I, a sometime
computational physical chemist, are interested in your proposal to be
"ghost" writers. Your terms seem satisfactory, and we think we fill your
fluency/access requirements.

FYI, my wife is Linda Parkin. Our phone/fax is (619) 329-2774; our address
is 67-642 Club House Road, Desert Hot Springs, CA 92241, USA; and our e-mail
address is found in my signature.

We look forward to working with you in the future.



 
Steven H. Parkin
Imaginative Alchemy
sparkin@imag-alchemy.com

From: sparkin@com.imag-alchemy (Steven H. Parkin)

Professor Waite:

In our haste to respond to your post regarding a 'ghost writer,' we failed
to include a list of qualifications.

My wife, Linda Parkin, has a BS in English, Drama, and Journalism from BYU.
She has taught English writing in the 8-10 grades and Journalism in the 9-12
grades. She also worked in and managed the publications department of Hughes
Semiconductors (Newport Beach, CA) for 7 years, editing the works of the
engineers and scientists for publication and in the preparation of grant
proposals. She currently operates an editing and desktop publishing service
for several companies in So. California.

I have an BS in Chemistry from Stanford, an MS in Chemistry from Univ. of
So. California, and I am still trying to finish a Ph.D. in Theoretical
Chemical Physics from Univ. of Calif., Irvine. I have over 30 years
experience in various fields of chemistry, including 7 years as the
owner/operator of an analytical biochemistry laboratory that was sold to
Smith, Kline & French, and 5 years as a principal in a pharmaceutical
manufacturing company in Los Angeles and Beirut (prior to the war!!). Over
the last 4 years, I have been working on the development of an instrument,
really a prototype, to test one of my theories of a new paradigm to
non-destructively analyze metals in aircraft for corrosion and fatigue. This
is why we coined the name - Imaginative Alchemy. Also, as I recall, I have
been the author or co-author of 4 or 5 publications, abstracts and posters,
dealing primarily in the use of HPLC and GC in the analysis of hormones and
toxic substances.

I hope this additional information is of value to you, and that Linda and I
can assist you as 'ghost writers' in the future.

Thank you for your consideration.
Steven H. Parkin
Imaginative Alchemy
sparkin@imag-alchemy.com

From: stan@pl.gda.univ.chem.sun1 (Stanislaw Oldziej)

Dear Mr Waite,

 i'm finishing my PhD Thesis and i'm looking for new good scientific theme.
It's an intresting offer for me.

Best regards,

Stan



Stanislaw Oldziej
Faculty of Chemistry
University of Gdansk
Sobieskiego 18, 80-952 Gdansk
POLAND
fax: (048-58)-41-03-57
e-mail: stan@sun1.chem.univ.gda.pl or stan@icm.edu.pl




From: champagn@be.ac.fundp.scf.messiaen (Benoit Champagne)

Hello Dr. Waite,

	My name is Benoit CHAMPAGNE and I am interested by your
proposition.  I got my PhD in the University of Namur under
the supervision of Professor J.M. Andre in 1992. Then I
spent 7 months at the Quantum Theory Project of the
University of Florida with Dr. Y. Ohrn as supervisor. Now,
I am a Senior Research Assistant of the Belgium National
Fund for Scientific Research.  

	I am working on the development, characterization and
 use of techniques to compute the polarizabilities and 
hyperpolarizabilities of oligomers and polymers. Recent 
developments are the application of RPA to polymers to get
 the coupled Hartree-Fock asymptotic longitudinal
 polarizabilities per unit cell (static and dynamic); the
 use of the double harmonic approximation to evaluate the 
vibrational contribution to the polarizability of finite
 polyacetylene chains and the investigation of such
 correlation effects. 

	If you want, I can give you a list of some reference
papers.

	We have a phone, a fax,...
	
	Some comments would come  in the future if
 considering computational chemistry and/or NLO properties.

	Sincerely yours,

	Benoit 

From antonio@linus.qui.ub.es  Thu Feb 23 10:02:16 1995
Received: from morgana.ird.ub.es  for antonio@linus.qui.ub.es
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id JAA01677; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 09:01:53 -0500
Received: from linus.qui.ub.es by morgana.ird.ub.es with SMTP
	(16.7/16.2) id AA14432; Thu, 23 Feb 95 14:45:38 +0100
Received: by linus.qui.ub.es (931110.SGI/930416.SGI)
	for @merlin.ub.es:chemistry@ccl.net id AA04500; Thu, 23 Feb 95 14:59:16 -0800
From: "Antonio Buljan" <antonio@linus.qui.ub.es>
Message-Id: <9502231459.ZM4498@linus.qui.ub.es>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 1995 14:59:15 -0800
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.1.0 22feb94 MediaMail)
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: DFT-plane waves codes
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0


Dear Netters!
             I would like to receive information about
the opinions and experiences with the Density Functional
codes using plane waves (commercial codes as castep from MSI,
plane wave from Biosym or public domain codes like fhi93cp or
others).
             I promise to summarize the answers.

Thanks in advance

Antonio Buljan
Department of Physical-Chemistry
e-mail: antonio@linus.qui.ub.es



From matt@synthesis.chem.arizona.edu  Thu Feb 23 10:05:52 1995
Received: from synthesis.chem.arizona.edu  for matt@synthesis.chem.arizona.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id JAA02987; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 09:30:31 -0500
Received: by synthesis.chem.arizona.edu (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
	id AA10561; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 07:26:43 -0700
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 1995 07:26:43 -0700 (MST)
From: Matt Stahl <matt@synthesis.chem.arizona.edu>
To: Marvin Waldman <marvin@biosym.com>
Cc: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:conformational isomers
In-Reply-To: <199502222247.OAA02375@iris131.biosym.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.ULT.3.90.950223064452.10512A-100000@synthesis.chem.arizona.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Greetings,
	The problem of duplicate conformer removal certainly is 
challenging, especially to anyone doing extensive conformational 
searches.  The "easy" method of detection is to compare a unique 
identifier based on atomic coordinates.  Shape descriptors such as the 
sum of interatomic distances, or the sum of all triangles in a molecule 
provide a single number to identify a conformation.  In this sense, 
energy is also a "shape descriptor" because it is simply a function 
operated on a set of coordinates.  As pointed out by Dr. Waldman, there 
is always the possibility of ambiguity when using this kind of 
descriptor.  I have seen cases in larger bicyclo alkanes where very 
different conformations had the same mechanics energy to the 5th or 
6th decimal place!
	There are several matters that must be addressed with regard to 
comparing conformations.  Rms fitting may not be the best measure of 
similarity when comparing long acyclic chains because of the 'torque' 
effect.  Torsional comparisons certainly have valid applications.  In 
general, rms fits work well with the exception of the problems of 
automorphism and enantiomeric coordinates.  Generating enantiomers is 
trivial.  Simply multiply all of the x, y, or z coordinates by -1 to 
generate the mirror image.  Automorphisms can be more of a problem.  They 
can be discovered by connectivity matrix manipulations (see 
balasubramanian in j. chem. inf. comp. sci. may/june 1994).  A much 
quicker approach is to effectively do an atom-by-atom max common 
substructure search using comparisons of atom types.  Once the 
automorphisms are discovered they can be used in both torsional and rms 
comparisons.
	Pat Walters and i have written a program called Padre (Population
Analysis and Duplicate REmoval) that will read multi-structure files,
automatically generate the automorphisms (and enantiomers if desired), and
do rms or torsional comparisons and identify duplicate conformers.  It
will also map rings onto each other and compare all possible overlays.  
Padre is FAR from completion, but the features currently implemented are 
solid.  Please contact me directly if you are interested in this software.

sincerely,
matt

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mr. Matthew Stahl			| 
Department of Chemistry			| I'd rather be right half of the
University of Arizona			| time than half right all the
Tucson, AZ  85721			| time.
matt@synthesis.chem.arizona.edu		|	-Malcom S. Forbes
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



From dimitris@3dp.com  Thu Feb 23 10:06:46 1995
Received: from boris.3dp.com  for dimitris@3dp.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id JAA03805; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 09:47:49 -0500
Received: from europa.3dp.com by boris.3dp.com via SMTP (931110.SGI/930416.SGI)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id AA11498; Thu, 23 Feb 95 10:45:08 -0500
Received: by europa.3dp.com (931110.SGI) id AA13205; Thu, 23 Feb 95 10:41:26 -0500
From: "Dimitris Agrafiotis" <dimitris@3dp.com>
Message-Id: <9502231041.ZM13203@europa.3dp.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 1995 10:41:26 -0500
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.1.0 22feb94 MediaMail)
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Summary Part 2: metrics of molecular diversity
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0


There were two more replies to my posting regarding metrics for molecular
diversity that I did not include in my previous message. One is attached,
and the other was unfortunately not saved. It was sent by James Wikel
>from Lilly Research Labs. Maybe he's kind enough to repost his message to
the net. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Ciao,



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 95 08:04:57 +0100
From: byw@novo.dk (Robert Bywater)
Message-Id: <9501090704.AA25135@ligand.novo.dk>
To: dimitris
Status: OR



Dear Dr. Agrafiotis

You might wish to include the method of shape descriptors in your search for
methods of studying molecular diversity in multidimensional physicochemical
space.

I am presently writing ( one or two more ) articles on this subject ( see the
references to find what has already been published.

You might also wish to consult a book, shortly to be published: " Molecular
Similarity
and Reactivity: from Quantum Chemistry to Phenomenonolgical Approaches " R.
Carbo, Ed.
Kluwer Verlag 1994/5 where you will find articles on essentially all aspects of
this subject. Call me back if you have any specific enquiries.


Robert Bywater



\item Leicester S.E., Finney J.L., and Bywater R.P., Description of molecular
surface shape using Fourier descriptors. J. Mol. Graph. (~1988~) {\bf 6}
104-108.
\item Leicester S.E., Finney J.L. and Bywater R.P., A quantitative
representation of molecular surface shape  i) Theory and development of the
method. {\em J. Math. Chem.} (~accepted for publication 1994~)
\item Leicester S.E., Finney J.L. and Bywater R.P., A quantitative
representation of molecular surface shape ii) Protein classification using
Fourier descriptors and classical scaling. {\em J. Math. Chem.} (~accepted for
publication 1994~)
\item Max N.L. and Getzoff E.D. Spherical harmonic molecular surfaces.
{\em IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications} (~1988~) {\ 8} 42-50.
\end{itemize}


                     ******************************
                     *                            *
                     *      Robert Bywater        *
                     *                            *
                     *  Biostructure Department   *
                     *      NOVO NORDISK A/S      *
                     *                            *
                     *    email byw@novo.dk       *
                     *   fax :: +45 4442 1400     *
                     ******************************





-- 
Dimitris K. Agrafiotis, PhD             | e-mail: dimitris@3dp.com
3-Dimensional Pharmaceuticals, Inc.     | tel:    (215) 222-8950
3700 Market Street                      | fax:    (215) 222-8960
Philadelphia, PA 19104



From dimitris@3dp.com  Thu Feb 23 10:07:43 1995
Received: from boris.3dp.com  for dimitris@3dp.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id JAA02495; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 09:22:31 -0500
Received: from europa.3dp.com by boris.3dp.com via SMTP (931110.SGI/930416.SGI)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id AA11295; Thu, 23 Feb 95 10:19:46 -0500
Received: by europa.3dp.com (931110.SGI) id AA13183; Thu, 23 Feb 95 10:16:05 -0500
From: "Dimitris Agrafiotis" <dimitris@3dp.com>
Message-Id: <9502231016.ZM13181@europa.3dp.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 1995 10:16:04 -0500
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.1.0 22feb94 MediaMail)
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Summary: metrics of molecular diversity
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0


Here is my original posting and a summary of the responses I received
regarding metrics of molecular diversity. Thanks to all who responded, and
sorry for the rather long delay in posting the summary.

Ciao,


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Dimitris Agrafiotis" <dimitris>
Message-Id: <9501061004.ZM3762@europa.3dp.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 1995 10:04:10 -0500
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.1.0 22feb94 MediaMail)
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: CCL:metrics for molecular diversity
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: chemistry-request@ccl.net
Errors-To: jkl@ccl.net
Precedence: bulk
Status: OR


I am looking for a review of all the metrics that have been used to measure
molecular diversity in multidimensional physicochemical space. I am not so
much interested in metrics of distance between two compounds such as
Minkowski indices etc, but rather indices that measure the diversity
exhibited by a particular set of chemical compounds. I would appreciate
any pointers to books/reviews/papers on that subject and will summarize
the results in a future note. Thanks for your help.



--
Dimitris K. Agrafiotis, PhD             | e-mail: dimitris@3dp.com
3-Dimensional Pharmaceuticals, Inc.     | tel:    (215) 222-8950
3700 Market Street                      | fax:    (215) 222-8960
Philadelphia, PA 19104




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 95 15:46:56 -0800
From: moises@biosym.com (Moises Hassan)
Message-Id: <9501062346.AA23727@iris123.biosym.com>
To: dimitris (Dimitris Agrafiotis)
Subject: Re: metrics for molecular diversity
Status: ORp


There is a recent review of molecular indices (topological,geometrical,
electronic, ...) in the context of QSAR/QSPR in:

Katritzky, Alan and Gordeeva, Ekaterina, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.
1993, 33, 835-857

I"m also very interested in the area of assessment of molecular
similarity/diversity. Perhaps we can establish contact and share
information

--


===================================================================
   Moises  Hassan,Ph.D.
   Life Sciences Business Unit

   Biosym Technologies, Inc. 		  Phone:  (619) 546-5314
   9685 Scranton Road			  Fax:    (619) 458-0136
   San Diego, CA  92121-2777              e-mail: moises@biosym.com
===================================================================


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 1995 08:59:09 -0600 (CST)
From: MARTIN%cmda@randb.abbott.com
Subject: Re: CCL:metrics for molecular diversity
To: dimitris
Message-Id: <01HLMXRPOWO28YM5S5@RANDB.PPRD.Abbott.Com>
X-Vms-To: RANDB::IN%"dimitris@3dp.com"
X-Vms-Cc: MARTIN
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Status: ORp

Let me know what you hear.

My favorite, unpublished per se, is to calculate distances between Hbond
donors, acceptors, positively charged groups, and negatively charged groups;
detect the cliques in common; count how many unique cliques there are. Sorry,
I forgot to add "hydrophobic" groups, because they give shape. We are part way
to
being able to do this automatically, but have been diverted by more "practical"
things.

I'll see if I can dig up a place where I have published any of this.

Yvonne




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 1995 10:12:19 -0500 (EST)
From: Norah Shemetulskis <shemetn@aa.wl.com>
Subject: Re: CCL:metrics for molecular diversity
To: Dimitris Agrafiotis <dimitris>
In-Reply-To: <9501061004.ZM3762@europa.3dp.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9501090938.B587-0100000@ddi11.cadd.aa.wl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: ORSp

Hi Dimitris,

I'd be interested in hearing about any work in this area.
In case you might find the most recently published work
out of Chiron useful see:

	Simon, R.J.; Martin, E. J.; Miller, S.M.; Zuckermann, R.N.; Moos, W.H.
Using Peptoid Libraries[Oligo N-Substituted Glycines] for Drug Discovery.
Tech Protein Chem. 1994, V, 533-539.

and

  	Zuckermann, R.N.;Martin E.J., Spellmeyer, D.C.;Stauber,
G.B.;Shoemaker, K.R.;Kerr, J.M.;Figliozzi, G.M.;Goff, D.A.;Siana, M.A.;
Simon, R.J.;Banville, S.C.;Brown, E.G.;Wang,L.;Richter,L.S.;Moos, W.H.
Discovery of Nanomolar Ligands for 7-Transmembrane G-Protein-
Coupled Receptors from a Diverse N-(Substituted)glycine Peptoid Library.
J. Med.Chem. 1994,37(17),2678-2685.

I'm not sure whether this reference will be much use to you, but just
in case here it is (its on D-Optimal design):

  Baroni,M.'Clementi, S.;Cruciani, G.;Kettanch-Wold,N.;Wold,S.
D-Optimal Designs in QSAR. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 12, 225-231(1993).

Happy New Year,
Norah


Norah E. Shemetulskis
Biomolecular Structure and Drug Design
Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research Division
Warner Lambert Company
(313)998-3360
shemetn@aa.wl.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 95 10:07:05 -0800
From: uunet.uu.net!chiremv!andromeda!martine (Eric Martin)
Message-Id: <9501091807.AA20290@andromeda>
To: uunet.uu.net!uunet!3dp.com!dimitris
Subject: CCL:metrics for molecular diversity
Status: ORSp

Hello Dimitris,

I am very interested in your summary of responses.  Although it is not
explicitly over a "multidimensional physicochemical space", I have used
a simple method to compare "substructural diversity" of sets of
compounds based on the Daylight database fingerprints.  The Daylight
fingerprint routines search through a molecular structure to find all
of its substructures of up to 7 bonds.  A hashing algorithm randomly
assigns each substructure to one bit in a 2048 bit string.  The number
of bits set by the union of all fingerprints from a set of compounds
is, thus, a measure of substructural diversity of that collection.
Since several substructures may be assigned at random to the same bit,
the number of fragments (f) required to set a given number of number of
bits (b) is approximately f=2048(ln(2048/(2048-b))).  Since my interest
is in screening for orally available drugs, I have also divided this
value by the average molecular weight of the set as a measure of
"diversity density", i.e. how many substructures are available packed
into small molecules.  I do not have a reference, but the work is in
review at J. Med. Chem.

Good luck, -Eric

Eric Martin
martine@chiron.com
4560 Horton St., Emeryville, CA 94608
(510)601-3306,  FAX (510)601-3360



-- 
Dimitris K. Agrafiotis, PhD             | e-mail: dimitris@3dp.com
3-Dimensional Pharmaceuticals, Inc.     | tel:    (215) 222-8950
3700 Market Street                      | fax:    (215) 222-8960
Philadelphia, PA 19104



From edel@batata.fh.huji.ac.il  Thu Feb 23 11:54:00 1995
Received: from batata.fh.huji.ac.il  for edel@batata.fh.huji.ac.il
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id LAA07042; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 11:40:01 -0500
Received: by batata.fh.huji.ac.il (931110.SGI/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id AA23754; Thu, 23 Feb 95 18:38:58 +0200
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 95 18:38:58 +0200
From: edel@batata.fh.huji.ac.il (Arieh Edelstein)
Message-Id: <9502231638.AA23754@batata.fh.huji.ac.il>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: New Book from Ellis Horwood


Ellis Horwood Series in Physical Chemistry, 1995
Series Editor: Professor T.J.Kemp, University of Warwick
Quantum Chemical and Statistical Theory of Solutions
A Computational Approach
B.Ya Simkin and I.I.Sheikhet
Containing detailed reviews of developments in the investigation of various
physical and chemical processes in liquids, this bookUs main emphasis lies in
the theory of solutions used.
The first  part is theoretically based, and discusses methods of quantum
chemistry and statistical physics as applied to simulation of liquid phase
properties.  Various methods are considered, including the semi-empirical and
non-empirical methods of quantum chemistry, dielectric models, Monte Carlo and
molecular dynamics methods.  The influence of the calculational scheme on the
results of calculations on solutions is discussed.
The second part covers the applications of methods in the study of the
properties of infinitely diluted electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions, the
mechanisms of association, chemical reactions including electron and proton
transfer, and the  medium influence on spectral characteristics.  Emphasis is
given to the powerful and informative applications of statistical physics.
In combining quantum chemical and statistical approaches in one volume, this
book allows readers to find their bearings in a large number of theoretical
methods, and assists in applying their findings to solve various problems in
solution chemistry.
Readership.  Physical and organic chemists; biochemists and biophysicists
engaged in investigation of properties of liquids and reaction mechanisms in
solutions.




From fant@bioc.rice.edu  Thu Feb 23 12:52:46 1995
Received: from moe.rice.edu  for fant@bioc.rice.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id MAA08611; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 12:27:27 -0500
Received: from babs.rice.edu by moe.rice.edu (AA18541); Thu, 23 Feb 95 11:27:26 CST
Received: by babs.rice.edu (931110.SGI/)
        (for chemistry@ccl.net) id AA14994; Thu, 23 Feb 95 11:29:36 -0600
From: "Andrew Fant" <fant@babs.rice.edu>
Message-Id: <9502231129.ZM14992@babs.rice.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 1995 11:29:36 -0600
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.1.0 22feb94 MediaMail)
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: where is Multi?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0


Greetings:
    I keeps seeing Multi, a molecular modeling program for SGI written at
NIEHS, referenced both here and on site lists, but I can't seem to find it
anymore.  THe ftp site on the nameserver at niehs.nih.gov is gone now, and
ftp.niehs.nih.gov only has some strange PC software that I don't need.  Has
anyone seen multi lately, and could you tell me where to find it now?

Thanks In Advance,
		Andy



From dec@proteus.co.uk  Thu Feb 23 13:06:11 1995
Received: from eros.britain.eu.net  for dec@proteus.co.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id MAA08252; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 12:11:59 -0500
Message-Id: <199502231711.MAA08252@www.ccl.net>
Received: from proteus.co.uk by eros.britain.eu.net with UUCP 
          id <g.15244-0@eros.britain.eu.net>; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 17:11:25 +0000
From: David Clark <dec@proteus.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 95 16:12:41 GMT
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: CCL: CPU ratios




I am trying to compare CPU times from a DEC MicroVax 3500 with
an R3000 SGI Indigo. Does anyone have any idea of an
approximate ratio that would enable me to make a fair
comparison?

Many thanks

David

David E. Clark                   | 
Proteus Molecular Design Ltd.,   |  Tel: 01625-500555
Lyme Green Business Park,        |  Fax: 01625-500666
Macclesfield, Cheshire,          |  Email: D.E.Clark@proteus.co.uk
SK11 0JL, UK                     |


From ALAMBERT@Marsh.VINU.edu  Thu Feb 23 15:52:24 1995
Received: from VUNET.VINU.EDU  for ALAMBERT@Marsh.VINU.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id PAA12997; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 15:26:35 -0500
Received: from marsh.vinu.edu by VUNET.VINU.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP;
   Thu, 23 Feb 95 15:27:01 EST
Received: from MARSH/SMTPQueue by marsh.vinu.edu (Mercury 1.11);
    Thu, 23 Feb 95 15:23:24 GMT-5
Received: from Mailqueue by MARSH (Mercury 1.11); Thu, 23 Feb 95 15:23:19 GMT-5
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: "Allyn Lambert" <ALAMBERT@Marsh.VINU.edu>
Organization: Vincennes University, Shake LRC
Date:         Thu, 23 Feb 1995 15:23:14 EST (GMT-5)
Subject:      i have a problem
Return-receipt-to: "Allyn Lambert" <ALAMBERT@Marsh.VINU.edu>
Priority: normal
X-mailer:     WinPMail v1.0 (R2)
Message-ID: <3714A57200@marsh.vinu.edu>


i have a problem and i need a quick answer 
how do i get off the chem list 
i sort of through away the hard copy of my letter telling me how to do 
all of the stuff
I'm very sorry for taking up bandwidth.


------------------------------------------------------
= Allyn Lambert  "Bert"     = "I woke up in between/ =
= Vincennes University      = a memeory and a dream" =
=   alambert@marsh.vinu.edu =     -Tom Petty '94     =
------------------------------------------------------
======================================================
==========         ////////          ================
=========    ////    //     ////    ================
========     //     //      //     ================
=======     //     //      //     ================
======     //     //      //     ================
=====     /////////////////     ================
====            //             ================
===         ////////          ================
============================================

From kappler@SECS.UCSC.EDU  Thu Feb 23 17:52:18 1995
Received: from MOLENG.UCSC.EDU  for kappler@SECS.UCSC.EDU
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.9/930601.1506) id QAA14512; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 16:59:11 -0500
Received: by SECS.UCSC.EDU (MX V3.1C) id 14351; Thu, 23 Feb 1995 13:58:27 PST
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 1995 13:58:25 PST
From: Mick Kappler <kappler@SECS.UCSC.EDU>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
CC: kappler@SECS.UCSC.EDU
Message-ID: <0098C6AD.FE72265B.14351@SECS.UCSC.EDU>
Subject: conformational isomers - annotated synopsis                     


On Tue, 21 Feb 95 4:08:12 EST, Dongchul Lim wrote:

> Is there a simple way of testing if two given conformational isomers
> are equiva
lent?

This question can be interpreted in two ways, as Joel Polowin indicated.

On Wed, 22 Feb 95 10:29:54 -0500, Joel Polowin wrote:

> I don't think the situation is quite so simple -- possibly depending on
> what is meant by conformers being "the same".

If one is interested in structural equivalency independent of conformation,
the SEMA algorithm (JACS, 96, 4834, 1974) is a solution.  If one is interested
in structural equivalency dependent of conformation, the solution is more
complex, as Marvin Waldman pointed out.

On Wed, 22 Feb 1995 14:47:42 -0800, Marvin Waldman wrote:

> This is, in fact, quite a difficult and subtle question.  The SEMA
> algorithm which Mick Sappler proposed can be used to detect if
> two CONFIGURATIONAL isomers are equivalent (ie. they have the
> same or different stereochemistry).  However, it will not detect
> if the same configurational isomers are equivalent or not in
> a CONFORMATIONAL sense.  SEMA cannot detect the difference between
> the gauche and trans forms of n-butane.  These are CONFORMATIONAL
> isomers.

This is correct.  The ultimate solution to the structural equivalency dependent
of conformation problem will depend on analytical features of the two
structures only.

On Thu, 23 Feb 1995 01:47:29 EST, CBAS25 ::P_BLADON ::CBAS25 wrote:

> There are several points to consider.
>
> (1) If the problem involves small molecules like butane where the number
> of stable conformers is known...

We can not assume we have anything but the two conformations that we wish to
compare.  Given a hypothetical structure, who knows the set of stable
conformers?

> (2) If the structures are more complex... then the number of conformers
> could be large.  But suppose that you have a set of such structures...

Again, let's not assume we know.

> (3) To do the matching you could use atom to atom matching...

This could take a long time, considering the size of the set of structures to
compare.  Is time an issue?  I imagine it is if you have a large set of
structures to compare.

On Wed, 22 Feb 1995 23:36:21 -0800, Victor M. Rosas Garcia wrote:

> ...The best implementation I have seen to solve this problem is in the
> program GMMX, a global minimum search utility by Serena Software.

If this works for you, this is great.  Unfortunately, this technique is only
as good as the software and comparison of conformation A by software X to
conformation B by software Y is impossible.  Hence, comparisons between
research groups may be a problem.  This is not to mention the multiple minima
problem, as E. Lewars pointed out.

On Wed, 22 Feb 1995 17:10:28 -0500, E. Lewars wrote:

> ...enantiomers have precisely the same energies...

On Wed, 22 Feb 1995 23:32:59 -0500, Graham Hurst wrote:

> The Conformational Search module of the ChemPlus set of extensions
> for HyperChem uses energy and RMS compairisons of topologically
> equivalent atom pairings.

RMS comparisons look promising at first.  Unfortunately, before the comparison
can be made, the conformations need to be superimposed, which is independent of
the conformation itself.  Although the superimposition can be solved
analytically, it is sometimes solved iteratively, and can be a source of
contention.  Can we solve this problem indepedent of transformation?

I would love to hear more from experts in this field.  This is an interesting
problem and this discussion has increased our interest in publishing our latest
work relating to conformational comparisons.

                                        Mick Kappler
                                        Molecular Engineering Laboratory
                                        W. T. Wipke Group
                                        Univ. of California, Santa Cruz

