From oscar@bilbo.edu.uy  Sun Mar  5 10:09:46 1995
Received: from seciu.uy  for oscar@bilbo.edu.uy
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id JAA05566; Sun, 5 Mar 1995 09:33:21 -0500
Received: from bilbo.edu.uy by seciu.uy with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #27) id m0rlHLX-000m58C; Sun, 5 Mar 95 11:31 GMT-3:00
Received: by bilbo.edu.uy (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA14199; Sun, 5 Mar 1995 11:30:45 -0300
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 1995 11:30:44 -0300 (TZ )
From: "Oscar N. Ventura" <oscar@bilbo.edu.uy>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: Threat to the Internet
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91.950305110443.13424A-100000@bilbo.edu.uy>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Hi,
 The message yesterday about the Senate Bill S.314 (Communications Decency
Act) reports on a very real threat to the Internet (once the land of
the free men). I imagine it is just the natural process of "civilization":
the process by which a set of consensual, autoimposed, "natural" regulations
ruling the interconnection of a bunch of pioneers, is substituted by a 
body of laws implanted from outside the group so as to allow the masses 
to participate in a "properly ordered" and "well-behaved" way. Like
any beautiful natural place perishes under the feet of mass tourism once
publicity popularizes it, the Internet is dying under the burden of its
own usefulness.
 I am skeptical about the force any amount of pressure from scientists
may carry in this subject but, of course, we should try it. On the other
side, what happens in the USA is affecting also all of us, scientists
located in many other countries and relying heavily on the Internet for
our work. I am concious that perhaps these messages are not too appropriate
for the CCL, but may I suggest that the knowledgeable US scientists 
post some recommendations as to how we foreigners can act upon this subject?
After all, even if Internet is global, the Senate Bill S.314 is rather
local.
 Thanks and sorry for the bandwith abuse!
 O. 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Oscar N. Ventura                 Tel.     +(5982)941860
MTC-Lab                              Fax      +(5982)941906
Gral.Flores 2124, C. C. 1157         E-mail   oscar@bilbo.edu.uy
Montevideo 11800, URUGUAY            MTC-Lab  http://bilbo.edu.uy/MTC-Lab.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


From doki@indy.mars.vein.hu  Sun Mar  5 12:09:58 1995
Received: from miat0.vein.hu  for doki@indy.mars.vein.hu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id LAA06387; Sun, 5 Mar 1995 11:34:44 -0500
Received: by miat0.vein.hu (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3)
	id AA00488; Sun, 5 Mar 1995 17:34:13 -0600
Received: by indy.mars.vein.hu (931110.SGI/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for @miat0.vein.hu:Chemistry@ccl.net id AA16084; Sun, 5 Mar 95 17:37:30 +0100
From: "Abonyi Janos" <doki@indy.mars.vein.hu>
Message-Id: <9503051737.ZM16082@indy.mars.vein.hu>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 1995 17:37:23 +0100
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.1.0 22feb94 MediaMail)
To: Chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Summary calix(4)arenes
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0



To the CCL Subscribers:

On 27 Feb. 1995, I posted some questions concerning calixarenes.
I received a number of helpfull responses.
I have summarized those.
To all of you, who sent, thank you very much !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
My original question:

Hi,
I am intrested in calix(4)arenes.
I am making molecular mechanics, dimamics calcualtion and energetical
study for alkyled Calix(4)arens, but I havent got X-ray structures.
I would like to make molecular dinamics simulation in solvelt.
I need some info about metods, publications, and force field parameters.
I am using Cerius2, Spartan, PCMODEL and MM3.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
The answers:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:    Gouldson P R (goulpj@essex.ac.uk)


Have a look for the Amber suit of programs you amy have to work out or estimate
the force fields slightly in an .frcmod file but you can do that from the code

There is a http page for the group at San Fran that developed the program

http://www.amber.ucsf.edu/amber/amber.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:    Francois BAYARD (bayard@coms1.univ-lyon1.fr)

Most of crystal structures of calix(4)arens are in the Cambridge
Databank

Follow the papers I published in the laboratory where I worked
previously:

Reconnaissance moliculaire des xylhnes par le paraisopropyli- calix(4)arhne

R.Perrin, M.Bourakhouadar, M.Perrin, Oehler, F.Gharnati, S.Lecocq, J.Royer,
C.Dicoret et F.Bayard

C.R.Acad.Sci.Paris, 1991 12 (II) 1135-1140

-----

Exploration of reaction paths for the interconversion of conformers f
calix(4)arenes using mmp2 calculations

J.Royer, F.Bayard and C.Decoret

J. Chim. Phys. 1990, 87 1695-1700

-----
The conformational properties of calix(4)arenes 1H NMR and molecular
mechanics calculations

F.Bayard, C.Decoret, D.Pattou, J.Royer, A.Satrallah and J.Vicens

J. Chim. Phys., 1989, 86(5), 945-954
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:    Lipkowitz (lipkowitz@chem.iupui.edu)

I published a paper on this topic. It contains some cautionary information.
See: Lipkowitz& Pearl, J. Org. Chem., 1993, 58(24), 6729-36.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:    Randy Zauhar (uunet.uu.net!tripos!rigel!zauhar)

    My collaborator Alex Varnek (U. Strasbourg) has done a lot of work
  on these compounds, including dynamics in various solvents. One paper is
  Varnek, et. al., J. Comp. Chem., vol 16 p. 1 (1995). He has other stuff
  submitted.

     Randy
All opinions expressed here are mine, not my employer's
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:    Tom Stockfisch (tps@iris27.biosym.com)

Have you  seen the article in JACS 1995, 117 on these compounds, together
with anions and radicals?
--
Tom Stockfisch, BIOSYM Technologies	tps@biosym.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:    m.langoor@ams.chem.ruu.nl (m.langoor@ams.chem.ruu.nl)

the following recent publications might be usefull
to you:

T. Harada et al., Tetrahedron, 50(47), pp.
13377-13394, 1994.

I. Thondorf et al., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2,
1994, pp. 2259-2267.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Janos Abonyi                     |
 University of Veszprem           |
 Dept. Org. Chem	          | Phone: +36-(94)-321833
 Veszprem, H-8201                 |
 Egyetem u. 10                    | Email: doki@indy.mars.vein.hu
 P.O.Box 158                      |
 HUNGARY                          |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------



From stoutepf@lldmpc.dnet.dupont.com  Sun Mar  5 14:09:53 1995
Received: from gatekeeper.es.dupont.com  for stoutepf@lldmpc.dnet.dupont.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id NAA07467; Sun, 5 Mar 1995 13:57:15 -0500
Received: by gatekeeper.es.dupont.com; id AA05125; Sun, 5 Mar 95 13:56:00 -0500
Received: from [158.117.200.143] (llm200143.dmpc.com) by chemsci1.dmpc.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA00842; Sun, 5 Mar 95 13:54:25 EST
X-Sender: stoutepf@chemsci1.dmpc.com
Message-Id: <v01510105ab7faf77807f@[158.117.200.143]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Eudora 1.5.1 for Macintosh
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 1995 13:55:02 -0500
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
From: stoutepf@lldmpc.dnet.dupont.com (Pieter Stouten)
Subject: Re: CCL:Threat to the Internet
Cc: water@gibbs.oit.unc.edu, shogi-l@technion.technion.ac.il,
        dibug@comp.bioz.unibas.ch, biblio@iris.claremont.edu


Oscar N. Ventura <oscar@bilbo.edu.uy> commented on the Communications Decency
Act (Senate Bill S.314) as probably being part of the natural process of
civilization. I am afraid it is far more and far more serious than that.
The proposed lawcould make providers of internet services (companies,
universities, AOL, CompuServe, etc.) liable for "indecent" postings which
is the same as holding the Post Office responsible for delivery of
"indecent" mail. Also, e-mail between individual, private users would be
subject to censorship. Where does that leave freedom of speech?

Contrary to what Oscar thinks, I think that the community of internet users
can have considerable influence. I append an e-mail note posted earlier to
the Info-Mac Digest and other newsgroups and mailing lists, which provides
you with a very easy way of making your opinion (including those of
foreigners!) heard. As of Saturday 4 March 76,323 signatures for the
internet petition opposing S.314 and H.R.1004 have been received! For more
info refer to:

http://www.phantom.com/~slowdog
ftp://ccl.net/pub/chemistry/legal/senate314

Sorry for wasting bandwidth, but soon there may not may be any bandwidth to
waste anymore.

Pieter Stouten, speaking for himself, not for his employer.
<stoutepf@lldmpc.dnet.dupont.com>

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Info-Mac Digest             Sun, 26 Feb 95       Volume 13 : Issue 27

[...]

Date: 95-02-26 02:04:27 EST
From: KEISNER@CENTER.COLGATE.EDU
Subject: Censorship

A matter has come to my attention that is of the utmost importance
to all of us online.

Simply put, a couple of senators have proposed a particularly
heinous piece of legislation titled the "Communications
Decency Act of 1995"  (Senate Bill S. 314).  Basically, the
bill would subject all forms of electronic communication --
from public Internet postings to your most private email --
to government censorship.  The effects of the bill onto the
online industry would be devastating -- most colleges and
private companies (AOL, Compuserve, etc.) would probably have
to shut down or greatly restrict access, since they would be
held criminally liable for the postings and email of private
users.

Obviously, this bill is designed to win votes for these senators
among those who are fearful of the internet and aren't big
fans of freedom of speech -- ie., those who are always trying to
censor "pornography" and dirty books and such.  Given the
political climate in this country, this bill might just pass
unless the computer community demonstrates its strength as a
committed political force to be reckoned with.  This, my friends,
is why I have filled your mailbox with this very long message.

A petition, to be sent to Congress, the President, and the media,
has begun spreading through the Internet.  It's easy to participate
and be heard -- to sign it, you simply follow the instructions
below -- which boil down to sending a quick email message to a
certain address.  That's all it takes to let your voice be heard.
(You know, if the Internet makes democracy this accessible to the
average citizen, is it any wonder Congress wants to censor it?)

Finally, PLEASE forward this message to all your friends online.
The more people sign the petition, the more the government will
get the message to back off the online community.  We've been doing
fine without censorship until now -- let's show them we don't plan on
allowing them to start now.  If you value your freedoms -- from
your right to publicly post a message on a worldwide forum to your
right to receive private email without the government censoring it --
you need to take action NOW.  It'll take fifteen minutes at the most,
a small sacrifice considering the issues at hand.  Remember, the age
of fighting for liberty with muskets and shells is most likely over;
the time has come where the keyboard and the phone line will prove
mightier than the sword -- or the Senate, in this case.

Yours in liberty,
                       -don
............................................................

To to sign the petition via e-mail:

     Send an e-mail message to:  S314-petition@netcom.com

       The message (NOT the subject heading) should read as follows:

     SIGNED <your online address> <your full name> <U.S. Citizen (y/n)>
 eg.   SIGNED JAMES.RANDI@GENIE.GEIS.COM   James Randi  YES

That's all there is to it, so PLEASE send in your signature.  It's
really important.



From laiter@gibbs.oit.unc.edu  Sun Mar  5 15:09:57 1995
Received: from gibbs.oit.unc.edu  for laiter@gibbs.oit.unc.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id OAA07833; Sun, 5 Mar 1995 14:57:03 -0500
Received: from localhost by gibbs.oit.unc.edu (8.6.4.3/10.1)
	id OAA00135; Sun, 5 Mar 1995 14:56:57 -0500
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 1995 14:56:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Sergei Laiter <laiter@gibbs.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: models of B2 adrenoreceptors
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9503051424.A29560-0100000@gibbs.oit.unc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Dear netters,
I'm modeling G-protein coupled receptors and I'm particularly interested in
existing models of B2 adrenoreceptors. If anyone would provide me with their
models of these receptors I would appreciate it.

-Sergei

From JEREMYW@num-alg-grp.co.uk  Sun Mar  5 15:18:14 1995
Received: from sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk  for JEREMYW@num-alg-grp.co.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id OAA07865; Sun, 5 Mar 1995 14:59:38 -0500
Via: uk.co.iec; Sun, 5 Mar 1995 19:59:30 +0000
Message-Id: <13085.9503052001@nags2.nag.co.uk>
Received: from vax.nag.co.uk (nagvax) by nags2.nag.co.uk (4.1/UK-2.1) 
          id AA13085; Sun, 5 Mar 95 20:01:22 GMT
Date: 5 Mar 95 20:01:00 WET
From: JEREMY WALTON <JEREMYW@num-alg-grp.co.uk>
Subject: Re: CCL:Problem with SGI 'Explorer' using another X-terminal.
To: chemistry <chemistry@ccl.net>
Cc: chem8 <chem8@vax.york.ac.uk>


>>    Hi Netters,

Hi John,

>> I have been asked to find out whether anyone has come up agaigst the
>> following problem and solved it. If so how (apart from buying an SGI
>> terminal)? For example, should an SGI emulator be used and if so where
>> can one get such software?
>> 
>> An SGI 'Crimson' is available which has the package 'Explorer'. When 
>> these routines are run from the console, an SGI X-terminal, it works
>> fine. However, when other, colour X-terminals, HPs specifically, are
>> used to run this program, connected through an ethernet, the window that
>> should contain the final display (results) remains blank and the
>> following messages are obtained:

(messages deleted)

These are Explorer complaining that the HP terminal doesn't recognise
some colours and actions that it's asking the terminal to perform.  I
think that some of these (e.g. fonts that are uncommon on other X
servers) shave been addressed in later releases of Explorer - can you
say which version you're running?

More specifically, rendering on the HP terminal (i.e. viewing the output
of the Render module) requires that the X server understands the OpenGL 
protocol.  You should contact the supplier of the X terminal to check
this, and ask for it if they don't support it.

I hope this is helpful.  More information on IRIS Explorer (including
details of a comprehensive support service, including upgrade to the new
version of IRIS Explorer for SGI, to be released at the end of this
month) can be obtained from the IRIS Explorer Center.  In the UK, the 
contact details are:

 IRIS Explorer Center                    
 PO Box 50                              
 Oxford OX2 8JU                         
 UK                                     
 Tel:   +44 (0)1865 516377               
 Fax:   +44 (0)1865 516388               
 email: helpdesk@iec.co.uk               
        infodesk@nag.co.uk
 WWW:	http://www.nag.co.uk:70/1h/Welcome_IEC

Cheers,

Jeremy

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  Jeremy Walton                                   nagjpw@vax.oxford.ac.uk |
|  The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd, Oxford, UK  jeremyw@nag.co.uk       |
|                                                  Tel: +44 1865 511245    |
|                                                  Fax: +44 1865 310139    |
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


