From zhy@pchsgi25.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN  Mon Apr  3 01:56:10 1995
Received: from pchsgi25.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN  for zhy@pchsgi25.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id BAA08688; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 01:44:00 -0400
Received: by pchsgi25.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN (911016.SGI/911001.SGI)
	for CHEMISTRY@ccl.net id AA04760; Mon, 3 Apr 95 13:46:25 +0800
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 95 13:46:25 +0800
From: zhy@pchsgi25.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN (Zhang Hongyu)
Message-Id: <9504030546.AA04760@pchsgi25.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: Summary on "Request of 3d graph softwares"



Dear netters,

Please let me express my pleasant thanks to all of those who repspond to my
post of "Request of 3d graph softwares". To those with the same interest,
I'd like to recommand the gnuplot, which is refered by most responses. 
First, it's free and easily got from many gnu ftp site, such as
ftp://prep.ai.mit.edu/pub/gnu, and also it's portable in many machines.
I've tried it, it's ok.

Cheers

Henry H. Zhang
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Henry Hongyu Zhang, Ph.D. student |  email: zhy@pchsgi25.ipc.pku.edu.cn
Molecular Design Laboratory       |  Tel: 861-2501490
Institute of Physical Chemistry   |  Fax: 861-2501725
Peking University                 |
Peking 100871 , China		  | 
-----------
               Too stiff, easily broken
                   Too soft,  easily crashed
                      			------------ old Chinese Saying


From h9290218@hkusub.hku.hk  Mon Apr  3 02:41:13 1995
Received: from hkusub.hku.hk  for h9290218@hkusub.hku.hk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id CAA09154; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 02:33:08 -0400
Received: from hkusua.hku.hk by hkusub.hku.hk (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA01535; Mon, 3 Apr 95 14:35:45 HKT
Received: by hkusua.hku.hk (5.0/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA16436; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 14:31:27 +0800
From: h9290218@hkusub.hku.hk (Danny Yau)
Message-Id: <9504030631.AA16436@hkusua.hku.hk>
Subject: translational order parameter 
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 1995 14:31:26 +0800 (HKT)
Cc: h9290218@hkusub.hku.hk (Danny Yau)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1094      


 
 Dear Netters:
 
 	I am doing the Monte-Carlo simulation of simple fluid. I would
 	like to calculate the translational order parameter(melting
 	factor) of the fluid which is started from fcc lattice. According
 	to the text book Allen, it shown the parameter is equal to :
 
		1/N * Sum of cos(k*r) 

 	where N is no. of particle, k is a reciprocal lattice vector of
 	the initial lattice = ((2N)sup(1/3)*pi/L)
 	r is the position vector of the molecule.
 
 	The book also metion the parameter should be 
 	unity in a lattice. However, I cannot get unity from my starting
 	configuration even it is a fcc lattice.
 
 	Would anyone know how to calculate the order parameter and 
 	reciprocal lattice vector k and how to get the unity from
 	lattice?
 
Best wishes,
-- 
Danny Yau                       email: h9290218@hkuxa.hku.hk   
Department of chemistry,           or  h9290218@hkusub.hku.hk
The university of Hong Kong.		
 


-- 
Danny Yau                       email: h9290218@hkuxa.hku.hk   
Department of chemistry,           or  h9290218@hkusub.hku.hk
The university of Hong Kong.		

From praa2@cluster1.urz.uni-halle.de  Mon Apr  3 03:11:12 1995
Received: from mlucom.urz.uni-halle.de  for praa2@cluster1.urz.uni-halle.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id CAA09411; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 02:56:03 -0400
From: <praa2@cluster1.urz.uni-halle.de>
Received: from cluster1.urz.Uni-Halle.DE by mlucom.urz.uni-halle.de with SMTP
	(1.36.108.7/15.6) id AA24678; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 08:54:18 +0200
Posted-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 1995 08:53:24 +0200 (MESZ)
Received-Date: Mon, 3 Apr 1995 08:54:18 +0200
Received: by cluster1.urz.uni-halle.de (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA57137; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 08:53:24 +0200
Message-Id: <9504030653.AA57137@cluster1.urz.uni-halle.de>
Subject: summary: 'low cost' methods available ?
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 1995 08:53:24 +0200 (MESZ)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 8084      



Dear colleguages,

now there is the summary of my recent inquiry about 'low-cost' methods.
My pleasant thank to all the people who answered me.

My original posting:

Dear colleagues,

I'm trying to model the key steps of catalytic reactions involving one or several
transition metal atoms (for the present only 1st row TM atoms are involved).
Because of the largeness of the systems ab-initio techniques (HF-, post-HF or DFT)
can only be applied to distict pre-evaluted key structures (or simplfied models)
wich are previously examined by any lower cost methods. Such methods are the 
common semiempirical approaches (CNDO, ZINDO, NDDO-type methods, ...) or maybe
force field methods, but they should yield reliable enough results. 
Our experiences with ZINDO are not so encouranging because they not give the 
desired accuracy of the results.

We are mainly interested in describing the interaction of saturated/unsaturated 
hydrocarbons with nickel.
So there is my question. Are there any recommended 'low cost' methods available
that can be used side by side with ab-initio techniques in order to get a
basic knowledge of the potential energy surface, that can be used in further
examinations by ab-initio methods ? 
Is there a way out to self-contruct an appropriate force field for nickel describing
the structural and energetical behaviour of some model systems obtained by 
ab-initio methods ?

Any hints, suggestions or pointers are highly appreciated.
Regards

	Peter

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: jle@world.std.com (Joe M Leonard)

Spartan V4.0 has implemented Thiel's MNDO/d formalism for both MNDO
and PM3 parameter sets.  Ni has been included in the first set of Trans.
Metals for PM3(tm)...  Have you seen Spartan in the past?  Would
you like additional information?

Joe Leonard
jle@world.std.com
jle@wavefun.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: pavan@daffy.bnpi.com


Dear Peter,

I saw your note in the CCL for a low-cost
semiempirical/MM program for working with
1st row transition metal complexes.

Have you ever tried PRDDO (Partial retention
of diatomic Differential overlap) program
. It is a program well tested for transition
metals (especially 1st row) complexes by
Dennis Marynick's group at Univ. of Texas at Arlington
, Arlington, Texas. 

If u need further info about Dennis I can 
pass on the info. 

pavan

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: young@slater.cem.msu.edu (Dave Young)


Hi,

	Please post a summary of your replies.

	I can't give you much hope, however.  We do transition metal
systems at high levels of theory (multi-reference CI) and have found
even simple things like HF to be pretty useless.  

	Occassionally you will find a mechanics calculation where
someone has parameterized the metal to behave correctly, but only for that
one specific corridination environment.  Trying to ask mechanicstic 
questions in this type of format generally range from very crude
to totally useless.

	Good Luck.

				Dave Young
				young@slater.cem.msu.edu

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: CCL:'low cost' methods available ?

        Dear Peter,

        There are some ways to do what you want, som hard and some less
hard, but it may be difficult to assess the reliability in advance.
Starting with the easiest to implement, there have just recently become
available some new semi-empirical methods that are especially well suited
for transition metals.  The first of these, and the bases for other
implementations, is Thiel's MNDO-d.  I have only experience with PM3(tm) in
Spartan, I know it is parameterized for nickel.  This is in Spartan 4.0,
which was announced today!  There, you will also have access to DFT from
the same interface.  I only made a few quick tests with nickel, but I'm
satisfied with the accuracy in palladium calculations, in both PM3 and DFT.
        As for force field methods, that is definitely possible.  If you
can't find something that works, you should be able to implement your own
force field for a limited range of nickel complexes without too much
difficulty.  You will be able to calculate you complex immediately with
UFF, available in Cerius2 from Molecular Simulation.  However, my
experiences with this force field are mixed.  Some complexes are very well
treated, whereas others just give junk.  You will just have to try to see
if your complex is one where you can get reliable results.  The same is
true about ESFF in Insight.  I know that a few other programs are
parameterized for some metals (eg. PCModel), but I have no experience of my
own.
        If you can't find anythin that works without modification, I would
suggest that you parameterize a program that can handle the required
coordination on the metal.  I have best experience with MM2* and MM3* in
MacroModel, but also some with MM3 (I'm using Allingers code with the
MacMimic package).  I have heard Dr. Allinger talk about an MM3
specifically parameterized to reproduce ab initio (6-31G*), not
experimental geometries.  That may be your best option, but you'll have to
contact Dr. Allinger directly for it.  MM3 is also one of the few force
fields that is able to reproduce nonstationary low-energy points on the
energy hypersurface (others are CFF and, I believe, Halgrens MMFF).

        Regards,

        Per-Ola Norrby

 *  Per-Ola Norrby
 *  The Royal Danish School of Pharmacy, Dept. of Med. Chem.
 *  Universitetsparken 2, DK 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
 *  tel. +45-35376777-506, +45-35370850    fax +45-35372209
 *  Internet: peon@medchem.dfh.dk, peo@compchem.dfh.dk

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Dr. Jan Hrusak" <HRUSAK@jh-inst.cas.cz> (in german)

Hallo Peter,


wir haben in den letzten drei Jahren an aehnlichen Problemen 
gearbeitet. (d.h. TM Reaktionen  mit liganden) es ist eine sehr 
hartes Brot wenn man eine gewisse genauigkeit erwartet. Unsere 
erfahrung zeigt, dass man die semiempirischen Verfahren schlicht 
vergessen kann.  Force field Methoden  sind manchmal gute startpunkte 
aber wie kann man eine dative Bindung und/oder Bindungsbruch 
beschrieben? 
Die DFT (oder DFT /HF) methoden (mit RECP) scheinen die ainzige 
Alternative zu sein.
Wir haben fast fuer alle TM metalle 3d, 4d, 5d einschliesslich der
Lanthanide Testrechnungen durchgefuehrt und die Uebereinstimmung mit 
qualitativ hoeheren (CCSDT)) daten ist verbluffend gut. Weiterhin ist 
die Basisatzkonvergenz der Ergebnisse viel schneller als bei SCF oder 
gar CI Methoden. D.h. man kann gute Geometrieabschaetzung mit DZ(p) 
machen und dan auf dieser Geometrie eine single point Rechnung mit 
einer besseren Basis Durchfuehren. Der Aufwandt ist c. das 1.5 fache 
einer SCF. Sicher kann man auch hier auf Grenzen hinsichtlich der 
Groesse stossen , aber wir haben ohne groessere Probleme eine 
vollstaendige (C1 Symmetrie ) Optimierung fuer Systeme Fe+(C10Hn) 
n=10, 12, 14 oder Au+ (Buten, Benzen) durchstehen koennen.
die ergebnisse sind bedeutend besser, als sie mit einer anderen 
Methode sein koennen.

Gruesse 

Jan


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Jan Hrusak                               ###############################
J. Heyrovsky Institute of Physical Chemistry ## MEMOR ESTO CONGREGATIONIS ##
Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic    ##   TVAE QVAM POSSEDISTI    ##
Dolejskova 3, CZ-182 23 Prague 8             ##         AB INITIO         ##
Czech Republic                               ###############################
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Phone: (0042 2) 66 05 3436                    FAX: (0042 2) 858 2307
                     E-Mail: hrusak@jh-inst.cas.cz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Once again, many thankx to all people who responded.
Regards

	Peter

From KSK@tifrvax.tifr.res.in  Mon Apr  3 08:26:15 1995
Received: from tifrvax.tifr.res.in  for KSK@tifrvax.tifr.res.in
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id IAA11689; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 08:25:23 -0400
From: <KSK@tifrvax.tifr.res.in>
Received: from tifrvax.tifr.res.in by tifrvax.tifr.res.in (PMDF #12198) id
 <01HOUVABEDKW002VNG@tifrvax.tifr.res.in>; Sun, 2 Apr 1995 08:35 +0530
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 1995 08:35 +0530
Subject: Jobs in Molecular Biology TIFR Bombay
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01HOUVABEDKW002VNG@tifrvax.tifr.res.in>
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"




Molecular Bology Unit, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research is
seeking to expand in the following broad areas: Cell Biology, Genetics
Neurobiology and Development. Currently there are active groups in  
Neural Deevelopment in Drosophila, Cell Biology of Synapse, Regulation
of yeast glycolysis,plant development and differentiation and mechanisms
of homologous recombination in plants.  Young persons with between three
and five years of post doctoral experience and with a flair for Molecular
Cell Biological and Genetic appraoches to study of Deevelopment and function
of the nervous system, Cell Biology and genetic regulation in yeast and 
development and Differentiation in plants will find this a condusive
place to develop a viable research program. Those interested may contact
 The chairman, Molecular Biology Unit, Tata Institute Of Fundamental
Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Bombay 400 005. India
FAX 215 2110/2181 E mail MOLBIO@TIFRVAX. If you need clarifications you
might write to me at my mail address Krishnan: KSK@TIFRVAX

From KSK@tifrvax.tifr.res.in  Mon Apr  3 08:41:16 1995
Received: from tifrvax.tifr.res.in  for KSK@tifrvax.tifr.res.in
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id IAA11818; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 08:33:27 -0400
From: <KSK@tifrvax.tifr.res.in>
Received: from tifrvax.tifr.res.in by tifrvax.tifr.res.in (PMDF #12198) id
 <01HOVC4YOXN8003ZV7@tifrvax.tifr.res.in>; Sun, 2 Apr 1995 16:37 +0530
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 1995 16:37 +0530
Subject: jobs in Molecular Biology TIFR
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01HOVC4YOXN8003ZV7@tifrvax.tifr.res.in>
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"




Molecular Bology Unit, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research is
seeking to expand in the following broad areas: Cell Biology, Genetics
Neurobiology and Development. Currently there are active groups in  
Neural Deevelopment in Drosophila, Cell Biology of Synapse, Regulation
of yeast glycolysis,plant development and differentiation and mechanisms
of homologous recombination in plants.  Young persons with between three
and five years of post doctoral experience and with a flair for Molecular
Cell Biological and Genetic appraoches to study of Deevelopment and function
of the nervous system, Cell Biology and genetic regulation in yeast and 
development and Differentiation in plants will find this a condusive
place to develop a viable research program. Those interested may contact
 The chairman, Molecular Biology Unit, Tata Institute Of Fundamental
Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Bombay 400 005. India
FAX 215 2110/2181 E mail MOLBIO@TIFRVAX. If you need clarifications you
might write to me at my mail address Krishnan: KSK@TIFRVAX

From KSK@tifrvax.tifr.res.in  Mon Apr  3 08:46:42 1995
Received: from tifrvax.tifr.res.in  for KSK@tifrvax.tifr.res.in
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id IAA11815; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 08:33:17 -0400
From: <KSK@tifrvax.tifr.res.in>
Received: from tifrvax.tifr.res.in by tifrvax.tifr.res.in (PMDF #12198) id
 <01HOVC2WQWB4003ZV7@tifrvax.tifr.res.in>; Sun, 2 Apr 1995 16:36 +0530
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 1995 16:36 +0530
Subject: Jobs In Molecular Biology TIFR
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01HOVC2WQWB4003ZV7@tifrvax.tifr.res.in>
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"




Molecular Bology Unit, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research is
seeking to expand in the following broad areas: Cell Biology, Genetics
Neurobiology and Development. Currently there are active groups in  
Neural Deevelopment in Drosophila, Cell Biology of Synapse, Regulation
of yeast glycolysis,plant development and differentiation and mechanisms
of homologous recombination in plants.  Young persons with between three
and five years of post doctoral experience and with a flair for Molecular
Cell Biological and Genetic appraoches to study of Deevelopment and function
of the nervous system, Cell Biology and genetic regulation in yeast and 
development and Differentiation in plants will find this a condusive
place to develop a viable research program. Those interested may contact
 The chairman, Molecular Biology Unit, Tata Institute Of Fundamental
Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Bombay 400 005. India
FAX 215 2110/2181 E mail MOLBIO@TIFRVAX. If you need clarifications you
might write to me at my mail address Krishnan: KSK@TIFRVAX

From mbdtsnm@hpf.ch.man.ac.uk  Mon Apr  3 09:11:17 1995
Received: from nessie.mcc.ac.uk  for mbdtsnm@hpf.ch.man.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id JAA12527; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 09:01:41 -0400
Received: from hpf.ch.man.ac.uk (actually mchhpf.ch.man.ac.uk) 
          by nessie.mcc.ac.uk with SMTP (PP); Mon, 3 Apr 1995 14:01:13 +0100
From: Nathaniel (noj) Malcolm <mbdtsnm@hpf.ch.man.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <6832.9504031300@hpf.ch.man.ac.uk>
Subject: SAS summary
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 95 14:00:39 BST
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]


Here is the summary of replies that i recieved 
 concerning the location of a number of points
 (solvation sights) on the accessable molecular
 surface (AMS as defined by Richards) 


my original question was:
............................................................................


>Does anyone have a program that will generate a
>set of equally spaced  points (in xyz coordinates)
>on a surface of over-lapping spheres?
>
>   If so i would be very interested,and will summarise
>any replies that i get for respondants.
>
>        thank-you
>        Noj Malcolm
>
>        Noj.Malcolm@man.ac.uk
>
............................................................................

Thanks to all who replied, i had tried implementing a triangulation
method for generating the points around the spheres, this is of course the
easy bit.  Removing points that are too close (on adjacent spheres etc.) , 
and setting up  points to replace is as has benn pointed out the "tricky"
bit. This is probably a larger problem than i first imagined and 
involves more work than i have time for at the moment.

............................................................................
............................................................................

I would be particularly interested in your summary.  I have written a
program (GERM) to generate a receptor site model by placing a shell of
atoms around one or more active ligands.  I first tried a rectangular grid
of points for generating the shell.  Currently I am generating a shell by
(1) centering the ligand(s) in the coordinate system; (2) placing points on
a sphere much larger than the ligands; (3) bringing each point in radially
toward the origin until it contacts the ligands.  It's better than the
rectangular grid, but I suspect it is still not ideal.  Please let me know
what you find.

Best regards,

Eric Walters

  D. Eric Walters, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Biological Chemistry
  Finch University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School
  3333 Green Bay Road, North Chicago, IL  60064
  ph 708-578-3000, x-498;fax 708-578-3240; email: walterse@mis.finchscms.edu

............................................................................
............................................................................


It depends what you mean by "equally-spaced":  this is not as simple
mathematically as you may think.

I think that the "gnomonic projection" should interest you - see the 
papers from P. M. Dean's group  (J. Molec. Graph.  5, 97, (1987) and later
papers).

In addition about 1 year ago there was a similar posting (I think from the
group at U. Montreal) on CCL about methods to disperse points on the
surface of a sphere.  There were quite a number of replies - you should
definitely check the archives.

Yours, 

Richard Bone



__________________________________________________________

Richard G. A. Bone, PhD.
Computational Chemist
Terrapin Technologies, Inc.
South San Francisco
USA

E-mail  rgab@trpntech.com

............................................................................
............................................................................


It's not quite clear to me what type of point distribution you're 
interested in but you should have a look at GEOPOL from QCPE, e-mail 
qcpe@ucs.indiana.edu.  This "vanilla" f77 program generates an regular 
array of points on the surface of intersecting spheres (polyhedra) such 
that each point then represents an equal fraction of the spheres surface 
area.  Points within neighboring spheres are eliminated.  The equilateral 
triangles, tesserae, formed by neighboring points give the appearance of a 
geodesic dome if visualized - a more pleasing appearance than simple dots. 
GEOPOL is very fast and you, as I have, could easily compute higher dot 
densities by computing the centers of the tesserae and extrapolating to the 
sphere's surface.

You might also want to check an article by Truhlar, Cramer, et. al., in the 
most recent J. Comp. Chem. on improved solvation models for AMSOLV, also 
available from QCPE.  They discuss their new/improved method analytical 
computation of solvent-accessible surface areas.
 _______________________________________________________________________
/                                                                       \ 
| Comments are those of the author and not Unilever Research U. S.      |
|                                                                       |
| Karl F. Moschner, Ph. D.                                              | 
|                                                                       | 
| Unilever Research U. S.      e-mail: Karl.F.Moschner@urlus.sprint.com | 
| 45 River Road                Phone:  (201) 943-7100 x2629             | 
| Edgewater, NJ 07020          FAX:    (201) 943-5653                   | 
\_______________________________________________________________________/


............................................................................
............................................................................


 
I was impressed with the optimal distribution of
points on the surface of a sphere given by
Scott leGrand and Ken Merz in J Comp. Chem. 14, 349-352
(1993) in their paper titled, "Rapid Approximation to
molecular surface area via the use of boolean logic
and look-up tables". 

Their implementation minimizes the function:

U(x,y) = SUM((180 - B)**2)

where B is the arc length on the sphere in degrees
between points x and y.


-----> richard


***********************************************************
Richard D. Macdonald, Ph.D.  voice: (619) 546-5527
Lead Scientist                 fax: (619) 458-0136
Biosym Technologies     internet: richard@biosym.com
9685 Scranton Road
San Diego, CA 92121-2777
***********************************************************


............................................................................
............................................................................

The following article proposes an improved 'marching-cube' method
for molecular surface triangulation.
-Dongchul Lim, Dept. of Chemistry, Yale Univ.

X. Zhexin, S. Yunyu, and X. Yingwu, "Calculating the Electric
Potential of Macromolecules: A Simple Method for Molecular
Surface Triangulation", J. Comp. Chem. 1995, 16, 512-6.


............................................................................
............................................................................


> 
> The following article proposes an improved 'marching-cube' method
> for molecular surface triangulation.
> -Dongchul Lim, Dept. of Chemistry, Yale Univ.
> 
> X. Zhexin, S. Yunyu, and X. Yingwu, "Calculating the Electric
> Potential of Macromolecules: A Simple Method for Molecular
> Surface Triangulation", J. Comp. Chem. 1995, 16, 512-6.


I belive that the marching cubes algorithm is already implemented in the
program GRASP available from Anthony Nicholls (Barry Honig's group).  He
can be reached at nicholls@cuhhca.hhmi.columbia.EDU.

Cheers
-raman
-- 
   _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
   _/                                                                      _/
   _/                           C.S.RAMAN                                  _/
   _/                   Department of Biochemistry                         _/
   _/            University of Texas Health Science Center                 _/
   _/                     7703 Floyd Curl Drive                            _/
   _/                  San Antonio, TX 78284-7760                          _/
   _/                              USA                                     _/
   _/                                                                      _/
   _/                    Tel:     (210) 567-6623                           _/
   _/                    Fax:     (210) 567-6595                           _/
   _/                 E-mail:  raman@bioc01.uthscsa.edu                    _/
   _/                                                                      _/
   _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/  
   _/                                                                      _/
   _/      How can it be that mathematics, a product of human thought      _/ 
   _/      independent of experience, is so admirably adapted to the       _/ 
   _/      objects of reality?   "-Albert Einstein"                        _/
   _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/


............................................................................
............................................................................



From arthur@pchindigo2.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN  Mon Apr  3 10:12:33 1995
Received: from pchindigo2.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN  for arthur@pchindigo2.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id KAA13735; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 10:03:18 -0400
Received: by pchindigo2.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN (920330.SGI/911001.SGI)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id AA01661; Fri, 3 Mar 95 22:04:09 +0800
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 1995 22:04:08 +0800 (SST)
From: Wang Arthur <arthur@pchindigo2.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN>
To: CCL mailing list <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:Q:Free Energy Perturbation
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.85.9504021859.A10322-0100000@carbo.chem.binghamton.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.SGI.3.91.950303220139.1410B-100000@pchindigo2.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII




On Sun, 2 Apr 1995, Steven Schafer wrote:

> 
> 	Can anyone recomend any good introductory books or articles on the 
> topic of Free Energy Perturbation Theory?

Hi, Steven!

Look at Chem.Rev., 1993, 93:2395-2417. This is a good review with many 
many cross references.

Regards,

Arthur

+===========================================================+
|                                                           |
|    Arthur Wang                     Doctoral Candidate     | 
|                                                           |            
|    Molecular Design Lab                                   |
|    Institute of Physical Chemistry, Peking University     |
|    Beijing 100871, P.R.China                              |
|                                                           |
|    E-mail: arthur@pchindigo2.ipc.pku.edu.cn               |
|    Tel: 86-10-2501490    Fax: 86-10-2501725               |
|    WWW: ftp://162.105.177.1/sys/www/arthur/homepage.html  |
|         http://www.ipc.pku.edu.cn/arthur/homepage.html    |
|                                                           |
+===========================================================+




From stoutepf@chemsci1.dmpc.com  Mon Apr  3 10:26:19 1995
Received: from gatekeeper.es.dupont.com  for stoutepf@chemsci1.dmpc.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id KAA14045; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 10:19:02 -0400
Received: by gatekeeper.es.dupont.com; id AA06997; Mon, 3 Apr 95 10:19:01 -0400
Received: from [158.117.153.76] (esm153076.dmpc.com) by chemsci1.dmpc.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA05793; Mon, 3 Apr 95 10:17:27 EDT
Message-Id: <v01510100aba5c0bdee54@[158.117.153.76]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Organization: The DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Company
X-Mailer: Eudora 1.5.1 for Macintosh
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 1995 10:19:41 -0500
To: kamal@univ-orleans.fr (Kamal Azzaoui)
From: stoutepf@chemsci1.dmpc.com (Pieter Stouten)
Subject: Re: CCL:GROMOS PARAMETERS
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net


Hi Kamal,

>I try to make MD on glucose (beta and alpha conformers) in a water box
>using GROMOS force field.
>I am looking for angle parameters of O-C-OH where C is the anomeric carbon.
>Does any one can help me ?
>
This is a follow-up to my previous mail. Here are the relevant references:
* B.P. van Eijck & J. Kroon, "Molecular Dynamics simulations of
  <beta>-D-ribose and <beta>-D-deoxyribose solutions." J. Mol. Struct.
  195 (1989) 133.
* J. Koehler, W. Saenger & W.F. van Gunsteren, "Molecular Dynamics
  simulation of crystalline <beta>-cyclodextrin at 293K and 120K."
  Eur. Biophys. J. 15 (1987) 211.

I know that van Eijck has done more work on sugars (including glucose),
subsequently. Just do a literature search or contact him by e-mail:
vaneyck@chem.ruu.nl.

Hope this helps, Pieter.

--
Pieter Stouten, Senior Research Scientist
Computer Aided Drug Design Group
The DuPont Merck Pharmaceutical Company
P.O. Box 80353, Wilmington, DE 19880-0353
Phone: +1 (302) 695 3515
Fax: +1 (302) 695 2813
Internet: stoutepf@chemsci1.dmpc.com
CompuServe: 73172,2004
WWW: http://www.halcyon.com/stouten/stouten.html



From ramon@ce.ifisicam.unam.mx  Mon Apr  3 11:11:21 1995
Received: from ce.ifisicam.unam.mx.ifisicam.unam.mx  for ramon@ce.ifisicam.unam.mx
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id KAA14858; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 10:56:46 -0400
Message-Id: <199504031456.KAA14858@www.ccl.net>
Received: by ce.ifisicam.unam.mx
	(1.38.193.3/16.2) id AA10272; Mon, 3 Apr 95 09:47:15 -0500
From: Ramon Garduno <ramon@ce.ifisicam.unam.mx>
Subject: Re: CCL:ACS in Anaheim
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 95 9:47:15 CDT
In-Reply-To: <Pine.ULT.3.91.950331230218.19450B-100000@student.uq.edu.au>; from "ch172954" at Mar 31, 95 11:03 pm
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]


> 
> 	Dear Netters,
> 
> 
> 	Sometimes ago, I received a message from Dr. Andrew Holder,
> 	through the net, with the subject of " AM1 vs. PM3 " ( the
> 	posting was on Tue, 12 Apr 1994 19:33:55 CST ). I would like
> 	to ask how I can refer to that message in my thesis. Is there
> 	any scientific way for this sort of references.
> 
> 	Many thanks,
> 	Mansoor
> 
> 

Hi fellows!

I think that this question is easily answered. Just treat it as a
personal communication, after all what he got was private mail. Unless
he decides to make public the contest of the letter (email) I think
there is no need to flame up this issue. Please save band width!!

Cheers,

Ramon
--

____________________________________________________________________________
		  	 Dr. Ramon Garduno-Juarez
                     Research Professor in Biophysics
INSTITUTO DE FISICA                  |  EMAIL:  ramon@ce.ifisicam.unam.mx
UNIVERSIDAD NAL. AUTONOMA DE MEXICO  |          rgard@redvax1.dgsca.unam.mx
Laboratorio de Cuernavaca            |  VOICE:	(73)175388
Apdo. Postal 139-B                   |          (73)111611
62191 Cuernavaca, Morelos            |  FAX:	(73)111603
MEXICO                               |		(73)173077
___________________________________ EOF _____________________________________

From mayer@cric.chemres.hu  Mon Apr  3 11:41:19 1995
Received: from cric.chemres.hu  for mayer@cric.chemres.hu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id LAA15541; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 11:27:42 -0400
From: <mayer@cric.chemres.hu>
Received: by cric.chemres.hu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA14729; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 18:27:33 +0200
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 1995 18:27:33 +0200
Message-Id: <9504031627.AA14729@cric.chemres.hu>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Mail was lost


Dear Netters,

Recently I have posted a message about Ab initio bond orders.
Unfortunately, there was a restart at our mashine and any mail
you might have sent me was lost. Please repeat your messages.
Preferably use this (brand-new) e-mail address.

Sorry and thank you.

Istvan Mayer

   Central Research Institute for Chemistry of the
          Hungarian Academy of Sciences
E-mails:
         mayer@cric.chemres.hu
   and
         IB13lVIB@HUEARN.sztaki.hu (or IB13lVIB@HUEARN.bitnet)
         (Reserve path: H1376May@ella.hu  or  H1376May@HUELLA.bitnet)



From PA13808@UTKVM1.UTK.EDU  Mon Apr  3 11:46:15 1995
Received: from phem3  for PA13808@UTKVM1.UTK.EDU
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id LAA15595; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 11:31:24 -0400
From: <PA13808@UTKVM1.UTK.EDU>
Received: from UTKVM1.BITNET (MAILER@UTKVM1) by phem3.acs.ohio-state.edu (PMDF
 V4.2-13 #5888) id <01HOWFOXGIW098R5GZ@phem3.acs.ohio-state.edu>; Mon,
 3 Apr 1995 11:31:06 EDT
Received: from UTKVM1.UTK.EDU (PA13808) by UTKVM1.BITNET (Mailer R2.10 ptf000)
 with BSMTP id 3043; Mon, 03 Apr 95 11:16:48 LCL
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 95 11:05:01 LCL
Subject: SUN install of G92
To: comp chem network <chemistry@ccl.net>
Message-id: <01HOWFP0XDHY98R5GZ@phem3.acs.ohio-state.edu>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


 After almost two years of legal wrangling we managed to get a site licence
 for G92. However we are now having installation problems and would appreciate
advice.
    In attempting to run on a SUN Solaris ( SUM OS 5.3) with compiler version
  3.0 optimisation causes an error message
          DATA TREE IS CORRUPTED
    This could be due to our using a later compiler than was used for the progr
am. It leads to a great deal of frustration when trying to run many of the test
 cases. Any ideas on how to get rid of this error.
       In trying to instal on an IBM MVS machine( dont ask why, please) we try
to use the fancy installation pro supplied by IBM and it doesnt work and IBM
 apparently too busy to offer help at the present time. Any one else tried to d
 install G92 on an IBM/3090. and how did you do it.
           PA13808 at UTKVM1.utk.edu( John Bloor, Univ. Tenn.at Knoxville)

From rbw@msc.edu  Mon Apr  3 15:56:21 1995
Received: from noc.msc.edu  for rbw@msc.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id PAA21825; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 15:49:29 -0400
Received: from uh.msc.edu by noc.msc.edu (5.65/MSC/v3.0.1(920324))
	id AA29480; Mon, 3 Apr 95 14:48:51 -0500
From: rbw@msc.edu (Richard Walsh)
Received: (rbw@localhost) by uh.msc.edu (8.6.8.1/8.6.6) id OAA22147 for chemistry@ccl.net; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 14:48:49 -0500
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 1995 14:48:49 -0500
Message-Id: <199504031948.OAA22147@uh.msc.edu>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Semi-empirical parameters for Ag ...



Hello,

There was some discussion of Ni parameters for semi-empirical
methods over the last week; what is the current state of development 
of parameters for Ag. Replies from the authors/vendors of MOPAC, 
AMPAC, MNDO, SPARTAN, and HYPERCHEM might be expected. Are there
references?

Sincerely,


Richard Walsh
Minnesota Supercomputer Center, Inc.


From ramon@ce.ifisicam.unam.mx  Mon Apr  3 16:26:21 1995
Received: from ce.ifisicam.unam.mx.ifisicam.unam.mx  for ramon@ce.ifisicam.unam.mx
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id QAA22365; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 16:21:30 -0400
Message-Id: <199504032021.QAA22365@www.ccl.net>
Received: by ce.ifisicam.unam.mx
	(1.38.193.3/16.2) id AA10404; Mon, 3 Apr 95 15:11:58 -0500
From: Ramon Garduno <ramon@ce.ifisicam.unam.mx>
Subject: PROCHECK
To: chemistry@ccl.net (POST MSG's)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 95 15:11:58 CDT
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]



Dear Netters:


Today I sent an email to Dr. Roman Laskowski author of PROCHECK: a program
to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures (J. Appl. Crys.
V26:283 (1993)). the email address given in his paper is 
 roman@uk.ac.ucl.bioc.bsm        but all I got was 
 501 <roman@uk.ac.ucl.bioc.bsm>... 
 550 Host unknown (Name server: uk.ac.ucl.bioc.bsm: host not found)

Thus, my question is obvious.

Does any one of you know of his whereabouts?

It may help if you know that the address given in the paper was
Biomolecular Structure and Modelling Unit, Dept. of Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology, University College, Gower Street, London, England.

Cheers,

--

____________________________________________________________________________
		  	 Dr. Ramon Garduno-Juarez
                     Research Professor in Biophysics
INSTITUTO DE FISICA                  |  EMAIL:  ramon@ce.ifisicam.unam.mx
UNIVERSIDAD NAL. AUTONOMA DE MEXICO  |          rgard@redvax1.dgsca.unam.mx
Laboratorio de Cuernavaca            |  VOICE:	(73)175388
Apdo. Postal 139-B                   |          (73)111611
62191 Cuernavaca, Morelos            |  FAX:	(73)111603
MEXICO                               |		(73)173077
___________________________________ EOF _____________________________________

From gavin@vangogh.chem.uab.edu  Mon Apr  3 18:41:23 1995
Received: from vangogh.chem.uab.edu  for gavin@vangogh.chem.uab.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id SAA24170; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 18:27:32 -0400
From: <gavin@vangogh.chem.uab.edu>
Received: by vangogh.chem.uab.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA17791; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 17:21:46 -0500
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 1995 17:21:46 -0500
Message-Id: <9504032221.AA17791@vangogh.chem.uab.edu>
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Subject: INSTABILITY
Cc: GAVIN@vangogh.chem.uab.edu


 
    Dear Nettlers,

      Someone can show me how to do the instability analysis ?
    ANY INFO will appreciate!

                                Gavin Tsai

From raman@bioc01.uthscsa.edu  Mon Apr  3 19:11:23 1995
Received: from thorin.uthscsa.edu  for raman@bioc01.uthscsa.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id TAA24497; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 19:03:47 -0400
Received: from bioc01.uthscsa.edu by thorin.uthscsa.edu with SMTP;
          Mon, 3 Apr 1995 18:07:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by bioc01.uthscsa.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA20581; Mon, 3 Apr 95 18:03:35 CDT
From: raman@bioc01.uthscsa.edu (C.S.RAMAN)
Message-Id: <9504032303.AA20581@bioc01.uthscsa.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:PROCHECK
To: ramon@ce.ifisicam.unam.mx (Ramon Garduno)
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 1995 18:03:34 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: chemistry@ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <199504032021.QAA22365@www.ccl.net> from "Ramon Garduno" at Apr 3, 95 03:11:58 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL3]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 3703      


Ramon:

> Today I sent an email to Dr. Roman Laskowski author of PROCHECK: a program
> to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures (J. Appl. Crys.

To get PROCHECK you need to complete the license agreement available via
the PDB gopher site and return it to them.  I am appending the
information for acquiring this program:

**************************************************************************
We are pleased to announce that the Procheck software package is being
made available for electronic distribution from the PDB.  Oxford Molecular,
Ltd. and the PDB have agreed that, upon receipt of a signed license agreement
at the PDB, the source and documentation for Procheck will be made available
free of charge.  The Procheck software package which was created by J. M.
Thornton, M. W. MacArthur, R. A. Laskowski, and D. S. Moss, performs 
evaluations of the stereochemical quality of protein structures.

        In order to acquire a copy of Procheck, you must obtain the license
agreement, copies of which are available via ftp or gopher from the PDB in the
file called procheck-license.  You must complete and sign this license 
agreement, returning it to the PDB.  Once we have your signed agreement, we 
will either e-mail the source to you or place it on the machine of your choice 
via ftp.  Your signed license agreement will be forwarded to Oxford Molecular 
who will keep you up to date about further developments.  All queries 
concerning the software should be directed to Steve Gardner at Oxford 
Molecular at the address below.
        Dr. Steve Gardner
        Macromolecular Product Mananger
        Oxford Molecular, Ltd.
        The Magdalen Centre
        Oxford Science Park
        Sanford-on-Thames
        Oxford, England
        OX4 4GA
        (Tel: +44-865-784600)
*************************************************************************

> V26:283 (1993)). the email address given in his paper is 
>  roman@uk.ac.ucl.bioc.bsm        but all I got was 
>  501 <roman@uk.ac.ucl.bioc.bsm>... 
>  550 Host unknown (Name server: uk.ac.ucl.bioc.bsm: host not found)
> 

just do a 180 degree flip of everything after the @ symbol and it should
work fine.

Cheers
-raman
-- 
   _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
   _/                                                                      _/
   _/                           C.S.RAMAN                                  _/
   _/                   Department of Biochemistry                         _/
   _/            University of Texas Health Science Center                 _/
   _/                     7703 Floyd Curl Drive                            _/
   _/                  San Antonio, TX 78284-7760                          _/
   _/                              USA                                     _/
   _/                                                                      _/
   _/                    Tel:     (210) 567-6623                           _/
   _/                    Fax:     (210) 567-6595                           _/
   _/                 E-mail:  raman@bioc01.uthscsa.edu                    _/
   _/                                                                      _/
   _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/  
   _/                                                                      _/
   _/      How can it be that mathematics, a product of human thought      _/ 
   _/      independent of experience, is so admirably adapted to the       _/ 
   _/      objects of reality?   "-Albert Einstein"                        _/
   _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/


From jeremy@med.su.oz.au  Mon Apr  3 21:56:25 1995
Received: from blackburn.med.su.oz.au  for jeremy@med.su.oz.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id VAA26132; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 21:53:30 -0400
Received: (jeremy@localhost)
	by blackburn.med.su.oz.au (8.6.10/8.6.4)
	id LAA26649 for chemistry@ccl.net
	Tue, 4 Apr 1995 11:51:45 +1000
From: Jeremy R Greenwood <jeremy@med.su.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199504040151.LAA26649@blackburn.med.su.oz.au>
Subject: nmr & point charges / free-radical visualisation
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 1995 11:51:44 +1000 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1454      


Dear CCL,

Two unrelated queries:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Firstly, it occurs to me, that since the chemical shift of a proton or
carbon 13 nucleus depends on electronic shielding (in an nmr experiment),
there should be some (at least loose and qualitative) correlation between
point charges calculated by one or other theoretical method, and
chemical shift (not withstanding solvent effects).

I am attempting to identify the correct structures of some isomeric
heterocycles from their 1H and 13C spectra. Would you expect changes
in point charges to reflect changes in shift between equivalent
centres of the isomers? If so, calculated by which method? I'm using 
semi-empirical (AM1, PM3), and HF calculations. My intuition is that 
ESP-derived charges are more likely to reflect trends in chemical
shift.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Secondly, I am interested in visualising localisation of free radicals
calculated by MOPAC or G92. Some kind of map of spin density would
seem to be an appropriate method. Can anyone suggest software (preferably
cheap or free!) which can extract and produce this kind of output?
I believe that Spartan has this capability, but is outside our price-range.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jeremy Greenwood
Department of Pharmacology
University of Sydney
NSW 2006 Australia

From ch172954@student.uq.edu.au  Mon Apr  3 22:56:26 1995
Received: from student.uq.edu.au  for ch172954@student.uq.edu.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/930601.1506) id WAA26556; Mon, 3 Apr 1995 22:47:31 -0400
Received: from student.uq.edu.au (ch172954@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by student.uq.edu.au (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA19404; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 12:46:59 +1000
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 1995 12:46:53 +1000 (GMT+1000)
From: ch172954 <ch172954@student.uq.edu.au>
To: Ramon Garduno <ramon@ce.ifisicam.unam.mx>
cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject:  Citation
In-Reply-To: <199504031456.KAA14858@www.ccl.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.ULT.3.91.950404124450.14555D-100000@student.uq.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII




On Mon, 3 Apr 1995, Ramon Garduno wrote:

> 
> I think that this question is easily answered. Just treat it as a
> personal communication, after all what he got was private mail. Unless
> he decides to make public the contest of the letter (email) 
> 


	Hello there,

	I would like to add that the message was not a private
	communication as far as you consider " chemistry@ccl.net"
	a public mail server; besides, many responses have been
	delivered during the time.

        Now, I would like to ask if there is an archive for these
	articles and whether or not they are available by anonymous-ftp.
 
	Finally, those who have been interested in the original article
	I will send them by snail post, since I have just access to the
	hard copy at the moment, or perhaps Dr. Andrew Holder can help
	me to send it again to the net, if he has access to the article.

	Best Regards,
	Mansoor


