From rochus@felix.anorg.chemie.tu-muenchen.de  Tue Oct 31 03:16:05 1995
Received: from felix.anorg.chemie.tu-muenchen.de  for rochus@felix.anorg.chemie.tu-muenchen.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id DAA03071; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 03:14:09 -0500
Received: by felix.anorg.chemie.tu-muenchen.de (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)
	 id JAA03117; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 09:13:00 +0100
From: "Rochus Schmid" <rochus@felix.anorg.chemie.tu-muenchen.de>
Message-Id: <9510310913.ZM3115@felix>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 09:12:59 +0100
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.0 26oct94 MediaMail)
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Loewdin charges/ DFT
Cc: rochus@felix.anorg.chemie.tu-muenchen.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Dear Netters,

Recently I've optimized a number of low valent Rhodium (I) complexes with
DGauss on the LDA level (DZVP basis). The Loewdin charges of the metal atom
calculated by the program show a reasonable tendency for the different
complexes, but the absolute values are always negative (down to -1), which I
didn't expect. Others (they do a lot of TM ab initio calculations) told me,
that they never get negative values in any charge analysis for TM atoms.

My questions are:

	- is this something to worry about? (I want to discuss the tendency
		only)
	- if it is something unusual, what is the origin: DFT or the Loewdin
		charge analysis?

I would be very happy about any hints/ comments on this matter.
I will summarize to the net.
Thanks in advance.

Rochus

-- 

********************************************************************************
Rochus Schmid
Technische Universitaet Muenchen	Tel. 	++49 89 3209 3140
Anorganisch Chemisches Institut 1	Fax. 	++49 89 3209 3473
Prof. W. A. Herrmann			E-mail:	
Lichtenbergstrasse 4			rochus@felix.anorg.chemie.tu-muenchen.de
85747 Garching
********************************************************************************

From eldbjorg@chem.uit.no  Tue Oct 31 05:16:06 1995
Received: from kvikk.uit.no  for eldbjorg@chem.uit.no
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id FAA04612; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 05:06:32 -0500
Received: from trypsin.chem.uit.no by kvikk.uit.no (8.6.12/MLH-1.2(V8)) id LAA02391 ; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 11:06:31 +0100
Received: by trypsin.chem.uit.no (911016.SGI/ABaa-2.0mini)
	id AA00005; Tue, 31 Oct 95 11:31:47 +0100
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 95 11:31:47 +0100
From: eldbjorg@chem.uit.no (Eldbjoerg S. Heimstad)
Message-Id: <9510311031.AA00005@trypsin.chem.uit.no>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Cavities within proteins



Does anyone of you have a way to calculate cavities within
proteins ?

All replies will be appreciated -

Regards,


#######################################################
# Eldbjoerg Sofie Heimstad                            #
# Protein Crystallography Group                       #
# University Of Tromsoe, IMR                          # 
# 9037 Tromsoe, NORWAY         phone: +47-776-45706   #
#                                             44737   #
#                               fax : +47-776-44765   #
# E-mail: eldbjorg@chem.uit.no                        #
# Web: http://www.chem.uit.no                         #
#######################################################



From laaksone@csc.fi  Tue Oct 31 06:46:07 1995
Received: from finsun.csc.fi  for laaksone@csc.fi
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id GAA05547; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 06:38:45 -0500
Received: (from laaksone@localhost) by finsun.csc.fi (8.6.9/8.6.9+CSC-2.0) id NAA05435; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 13:38:42 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 13:38:41 +0200 (EET)
From: Leif Laaksonen <laaksone@csc.fi>
Subject: Re: CCL:Cavities within proteins
To: "Eldbjoerg S. Heimstad" <eldbjorg@chem.uit.no>
cc: chemistry@www.ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <9510311031.AA00005@trypsin.chem.uit.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9510311346.A5341-0100000@finsun.csc.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Hi,

You should be able to calculate them in much the same way as we did it
for cavities in polyisobutylene (PIB):

http://www.csc.fi/lul/chem/movies/pib/pib_movies.html

Regards,

-leif laaksonen

On Tue, 31 Oct 1995, Eldbjoerg S. Heimstad wrote:

> 
> Does anyone of you have a way to calculate cavities within
> proteins ?
> 
> All replies will be appreciated -
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> #######################################################
> # Eldbjoerg Sofie Heimstad                            #
> # Protein Crystallography Group                       #
> # University Of Tromsoe, IMR                          # 
> # 9037 Tromsoe, NORWAY         phone: +47-776-45706   #
> #                                             44737   #
> #                               fax : +47-776-44765   #
> # E-mail: eldbjorg@chem.uit.no                        #
> # Web: http://www.chem.uit.no                         #
> #######################################################
> 
> 
> 
> -------This is added Automatically by the Software--------
> -- Original Sender Envelope Address: eldbjorg@chem.uit.no
> -- Original Sender From: Address: eldbjorg@chem.uit.no
> CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@www.ccl.net: Coordinator
> MAILSERV@www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher: www.ccl.net 73
> Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@www.ccl.net -- archive search
>              Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html 
> 
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Leif Laaksonen                     |  
Center for Scientific Computing    | Phone:      358 0 4572378
P.O. Box 405                       | Mobile:     358 400425203
FIN-02101 Espoo                    | Telefax:    358 0 4572302
FINLAND                            | Mail:  Leif.Laaksonen@csc.fi
---------URL: http://laaksonen.csc.fi/leif.laaksonen.html----------

              Tried to save the trees. Bought a plastic bag.
              The bottom fell out. It was a piece of crap.

                                          N. Young
-------------------------------------------------------------------



From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Tue Oct 31 08:16:10 1995
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id IAA06879; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 08:04:23 -0500
Received: from styx.iqm.unicamp.br  for anderson@IQM.Unicamp.BR
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id IAA13999; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 08:04:11 -0500
Received: (anderson@localhost) by styx.iqm.unicamp.br (8.6.10/IQM-ANSP1.5) id LAA23490; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 11:00:48 -0200
From: Anderson Coser Gaudio <anderson@IQM.Unicamp.BR>
Posted-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 11:00:48 -0200
Message-Id: <199510311300.LAA23490@styx.iqm.unicamp.br>
Subject: Fukui indices and molecular geometry
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 11:00:46 -0200 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1393      


Dear netters,

  I am interested in one aspect of the calculation
of the Fukui indices frontier electron density (FED),
frontier orbital density (FOD), and frontier radical
density (FRD). Does anyone know a paper that deals with
the dependence of these indices with the molecular
geometry ?
  Please write answers to my personal address. I will
resume them later in the list.

Anderson

| O |                                                        | O |
|   |                                                        |   |
+---+--------------------------------------------------------+---+
|   |                                                        |   |
| O |                                                        | O |
|   |  Anderson Coser Gaudio                                 |   |
| O |                                                        | O |
|   |  Inst. Quimica - Unicamp       anderson@iqm.unicamp.br |   |
| O |  CP 6154 - Cid. Universitaria  Phone: 55-0192-39 8413  | O |
|   |  Campinas - SP - Brazil        Fax:   55-0192-39 3805  |   |
| O |  CEP 13 081-970                                        | O |
|   |                                                        |   |
+---+--------------------------------------------------------+---+
|   |                                                        |   |
| O |                                                        | O |


From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Tue Oct 31 10:01:11 1995
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id JAA09443; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 09:54:11 -0500
Received: from nuhub.dac.neu.edu  for MARYJO@neu.edu
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id JAA15129; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 09:54:09 -0500
From: <MARYJO@neu.edu>
Received: from neu.edu by neu.edu (PMDF V4.3-7 #11963)
 id <01HX33RM1TS093FSFB@neu.edu>; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 09:56:24 EST
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 09:56:24 -0500 (EST)
Subject: size limits in MOPAC
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01HX33RM48KY93FSFB@neu.edu>
X-Envelope-to: chemistry@ccl.net
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Hello Everybody.

I am asking this question on behalf of a
colleague who is running MOPAC 6 (vintage
1993).  In this version, the maximum 
number of heavy atoms is 24.  His molecule
is bigger by a couple of atoms.  

Is there a version of MOPAC that will take
a slightly bigger molecule, and that runs
on a 486?

If so, where can we get a copy?

Thanks very much,

Mary j.o.

From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Tue Oct 31 11:16:12 1995
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id LAA11295; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 11:05:02 -0500
Received: from nomad.holonet.net  for BOBS@MDLI.COM
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id LAA15891; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 11:04:58 -0500
Received: from jubal.mdli.com by nomad.holonet.net (BOBS@mdli.com)
	id HAA19515; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 07:49:36 -0800
Received: from gimli.mdli.com by jubal.mdli.com (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/9393.1)
          id AA30570; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 07:49:02 -0800
Received: from mdli.com by mdli.com (PMDF V4.3-10 #6626)
 id <01HX2ZFV8608HXIX1B@mdli.com>; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 07:49:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 07:49:29 -0800 (PST)
From: "Bob Snyder, x1162" <BOBS@MDLI.COM>
Subject: CINF New Orleans talk deadline is November 1, 1995
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-Id: <01HX2ZFV860AHXIX1B@mdli.com>
X-Vms-To: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"
X-Vms-Cc: BOBS
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT


This is a reminder that the deadline for CINF talks in New Orleans is coming up 
November 1st.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Symposium:  Utilization of Information in Databases
            of Biologically Active Compounds

Location:   American Chemical Society 211th National Meeting
            Division of Chemical Information (CINF)
            New Orleans, Louisiana   USA

Date:       March 24-28, 1996


This symposium will focus on information requirements during drug
discovery and how information about biologically active compounds
can be used at all levels of the drug discovery process.

Several invited speakers have been confirmed for the symposium.  If 
you are interested in contributing to this symposium, please send a 
summary of about 200 words describing your presentation by 
November 1, 1995 to:

        Robert W. Snyder
        MDL Information Systems, Inc.
        14600 Catalina Street
        San Leandro,  CA   94577
        USA

        Phone:  (510) 895-1313
        Fax:    (510) 614-3652
        Email:  bobs@mdli.com

Abstracts for accepted papers must be submitted by November 15, 1995 on
official ACS abstract forms.

For those wishing to attend, I look forward to seeing you in New Orleans.

[This message has been posted to: CHEMIND-L, CHMINF-L, ACSMEDI, CCL,
ISISforum-L, and MOL-DIVERSITY lists]

From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Tue Oct 31 12:01:13 1995
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id LAA12899; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 11:51:53 -0500
Received: from pnl.gov  for ma_thompson@ccmail.pnl.gov
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id LAA16563; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 11:51:51 -0500
From: <ma_thompson@ccmail.pnl.gov>
Received: from ccmail.pnl.gov by pnl.gov (PMDF V4.3-13 #6012)
 id <01HX31MAXZPC8Y4WPY@pnl.gov>; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 08:51:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 08:48 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: CCL:M:size limits in MOPAC
To: chemistry@ccl.net, chemistry-request@www.ccl.net
Message-id: <01HX31MB06TE8Y4WPY@pnl.gov>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Regarding: M:size limits in MOPAC


A couple of solutions that I know of exist.

1).  Walter Thiel's MNDO program will certainly handle very large
     systems.  I believe it's distributed with a nominal charge.
     I don't know if it will run on a PC.

2).  HyperChem: certainly does MOPAC type stuff and obviously
     runs on a PC.

3).  CAChe: supports MOPAC, though I'm not sure if they have the
     same size limits.



4).  We are working very hard to finish preparing for a source-code 
     distribution of Argus 3.0.  Argus does implement the MNDO methods 
     (MNDO, AM1, and PM3), has no size limits, and does run on an PC
     (as well as Unix platforms). 

    For relevant details see the below references:

    Thompson, Mark A.  Molecular Dynamics Study of Li and Still's New
    Rigidified 18-Crown-6 Derivative Using a QM/MM Method.  
    Int. J. Quantum Chemistry, 1995 (in press).

    Thompson, Mark A.  Studies of Molecular Recognition Using QM/MM
    Methods.  The Potential of Mean Force for the Association of
    K+ with Dimethylether in Aqueous Solution.
    J. Am. Chem. Soc.,  1995  (in press, out in Nov).

    Thompson, Mark A. and Gregory K. Schenter. Excited States of the 
    Bacteriochlorophyllb Dimer of Rhodopseudomonas viridis:
    A QM/MM Study of the Photosynthetic Reaction Center That
    Includes MM Polarization.  J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 6374-6386.

    Thompson, Mark A.  Hybrid Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical
    Force Field Development for Large Flexible Molecules: A Molecular
    Dynamics Study of 18-Crown-6.  J. Phys. Chem.  1995, 99, 4794-4804.

    Thompson, Mark, A.; Glendening, Eric, D. and David Feller.  
    The Nature of K+/Crown-Ether Interactions: A Hybrid Quantum 
    Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Study.  
    J. Phys. Chem.  1994, 98, 10465.


Hope this helps.

Mark Thompson
Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Richland, Wa.  99352

ma_thompson@pnl.gov





_______________________________________________________________________________
Subject: CCL:M:size limits in MOPAC
From:    chemistry-request@www.ccl.net at -SMTPlink
Date:    10/31/95  6:56 AM

Hello Everybody.

I am asking this question on behalf of a
colleague who is running MOPAC 6 (vintage
1993).  In this version, the maximum
number of heavy atoms is 24.  His molecule
is bigger by a couple of atoms.

Is there a version of MOPAC that will take
a slightly bigger molecule, and that runs
on a 486?

If so, where can we get a copy?

Thanks very much,

Mary j.o.

-------This is added Automatically by the Software--------
-- Original Sender Envelope Address: owner-chemistry@ccl.net
-- Original Sender From: Address: MARYJO@neu.edu
CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@www.ccl.net: Coordinator
MAILSERV@www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher: www.ccl.net 73
Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@www.ccl.net -- archive search
             Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html

From mcgsw@cotton.vislab.olemiss.edu  Tue Oct 31 12:16:13 1995
Received: from sun1.mcsr.olemiss.edu  for mcgsw@cotton.vislab.olemiss.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id MAA13553; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 12:14:06 -0500
Received: from cotton.vislab.olemiss.edu by sun1.mcsr.olemiss.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA29373; Tue, 31 Oct 95 11:17:39 CST
Received: by cotton.vislab.olemiss.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA15127; Tue, 31 Oct 95 11:14:03 CST
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 11:14:00 -0600 (CST)
From: Scott Weston <mcgsw@cotton.vislab.olemiss.edu>
To: "Eldbjoerg S. Heimstad" <eldbjorg@chem.uit.no>
Cc: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:Cavities within proteins
In-Reply-To: <9510311031.AA00005@trypsin.chem.uit.no>
Message-Id: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951031110034.14904A-100000@cotton.vislab.olemiss.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Eldbjoerg,

Depending on what your exact needs are, one good approach to the 
isolation and visualization of protein cavities is the one encoded
in the CAVITY SEARCH program by Chris Ho and Garland Marshall at 
the Center for Molecular Design (J Comput Aided Mol Des (JCB), 1990 
Dec; 4 (4): 337-54.  More information is available at their Web site
at http://wucmd.wustl.edu.


Good luck,

Scott

=================================================================
Scott Weston                   Lab Phone:  (601) 232-7187
Grad. Student                  Lab FAX:  (601) 232-5118
Dept. of Medicinal Chemistry   Home Phone:  (601) 234-0067
University of Mississippi      mcgsw@cotton.vislab.olemiss.edu
University, MS  38677								
=================================================================

On Tue, 31 Oct 1995, Eldbjoerg S. Heimstad wrote:

> 
> Does anyone of you have a way to calculate cavities within
> proteins ?
> 
> All replies will be appreciated -
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> #######################################################
> # Eldbjoerg Sofie Heimstad                            #
> # Protein Crystallography Group                       #
> # University Of Tromsoe, IMR                          # 
> # 9037 Tromsoe, NORWAY         phone: +47-776-45706   #
> #                                             44737   #
> #                               fax : +47-776-44765   #
> # E-mail: eldbjorg@chem.uit.no                        #
> # Web: http://www.chem.uit.no                         #
> #######################################################
> 
> 
> 
> -------This is added Automatically by the Software--------
> -- Original Sender Envelope Address: eldbjorg@chem.uit.no
> -- Original Sender From: Address: eldbjorg@chem.uit.no
> CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@www.ccl.net: Coordinator
> MAILSERV@www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher: www.ccl.net 73
> Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@www.ccl.net -- archive search
>              Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html 
> 
> 


From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Tue Oct 31 12:46:12 1995
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id MAA14263; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 12:37:30 -0500
Received: from rani.chem.yale.edu  for lim@rani.chem.yale.edu
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id MAA17224; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 12:37:27 -0500
Received: by rani.chem.yale.edu; Tue, 31 Oct 95 12:37:28 -0500
From: Dongchul Lim <lim@rani.chem.yale.edu>
Message-Id: <9510311737.AA28985@rani.chem.yale.edu>
Subject: Standard orientation in Gaussian
To: chemistry@ccl.net (Computational Chemistry)
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 95 12:37:27 EST
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]


How does one get the standard orientation from
a Z-matrix (or input) orientation without
running Gaussian?
-D. Lim, lim@rani.chem.yale.edu



From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Tue Oct 31 13:31:13 1995
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id NAA15404; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 13:24:35 -0500
Received: from olimp.irb.hr  for kiralj@olimp.irb.hr
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id NAA17820; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 13:24:23 -0500
From: <kiralj@olimp.irb.hr>
Received: by olimp.irb.hr (MX V4.1 VAX) id 52; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 19:23:15 MET-DST
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 19:23:14 MET-DST
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
Message-ID: <00998B4E.CA06E9D6.52@olimp.irb.hr>
Subject: pi stacking area calculations again


Dear CCL Netters,

Last week I posted to the CCL inquiring with the following problem:

Does anybody know for some program applicable to crystals or molecules with pi
stacking interactions, that calculate area of the aromatic molecule or fragment
covered by the neighbour aromatic molecule or fragment?

Since I have no answers to summarize the subject, and supposing my question 
was not precise enough, I am asking for help on the pi stacking area 
calculations:
   Suppose one have several solved crystal structures or extracted from 
Cambridge Structural Database, or molecules are built and optimized by
molecular mechanics or quantum mechanics programs. If these molecules are 
partially or completely aromatic, then it is possible that
neighbour molecules or aromatic fragments are mutually parallel and on the
distance approximately 3.5 A. If one can find a suitable view normal to the 
aromatic planes, stacking could be observed as covering of one aromatic system
by one or two neighbour system. By changing the relative positional parameters
of the neighbour aromatic systems this covering is changed. In the first 
approximation it could be taken that measure of this covering is area of the
observed aromatic system (the system is taken as planar hexagons) or surface
area (the system is supposed to be three-dimensional in pi interactions, 
and the interacting surface is not a plane containing the hexagons).
The question is: 
Is there any program or appropriate reference dealing with such or similar 
calculations of the covering (pi stacking) areas or surface areas for a
specified set of relative positional parameters?
Any information or suggestion is welcome. Thanks in advance.


Rudolf
-------------

Rudolf Kiralj
Department of Materials Science and Electronics
Rudjer Boskovic Institute
Bijenicka 54
10 000 Zagreb
Croatia
e-mail: kiralj@olimp.irb.hr


From smb@smb.chem.niu.edu  Tue Oct 31 14:16:13 1995
Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu  for smb@smb.chem.niu.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id OAA17000; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 14:15:55 -0500
Received: from cz2.chem.niu.edu by mp.cs.niu.edu with SMTP id AA22750
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for <@mp.cs.niu.edu.chem.niu.edu:chemistry@www.ccl.net>); Tue, 31 Oct 1995 13:15:57 -0600
Received: from smb.chem.niu.edu by cz2.chem.niu.edu via SMTP (920330.SGI/890607.SGI)
	(for @mp.cs.niu.edu.chem.niu.edu:chemistry@www.ccl.net) id AA20461; Tue, 31 Oct 95 13:34:16 -0600
Received: by smb.chem.niu.edu (920330.SGI/890607.SGI)
	(for @cz2.chem.niu.edu:chemistry@www.ccl.net) id AA08577; Tue, 31 Oct 95 13:34:10 -0600
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 95 13:34:10 -0600
From: smb@smb.chem.niu.edu (Steven Bachrach)
Message-Id: <9510311934.AA08577@smb.chem.niu.edu>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: ECCC2 Starts Tomorrow



A reminder to all that the Second Electronic Computational Chemistry
Conference begins tomorrow.

You can register at

http://hackberry.chem.niu.edu/cgi-bin/discuss.cgi

Registration is open to all and there is no fee.

Steve

Steven Bachrach				
Department of Chemistry
Northern Illinois University
DeKalb, Il 60115			Phone: (815)753-6863
smb@smb.chem.niu.edu			Fax:   (815)753-4802



From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Tue Oct 31 14:25:35 1995
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id OAA16741; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 14:07:39 -0500
Received: from ucsub.colorado.edu  for garciae@ucsub.colorado.edu
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id OAA18757; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 14:07:36 -0500
Received: (from garciae@localhost) by ucsub.colorado.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12/CNS-3.6) id MAA16377; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 12:07:12 -0700
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 12:07:07 -0700 (MST)
From: Garcia Edgardo <garciae@ucsub.colorado.edu>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: CCL: BSSE safe zone
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951031115529.11909B-100000@ucsub.colorado.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Does anybody know which would be a good safe minimum distance to possition
two small molecules so that the resultant intermolecular energy, from ab 
initio and/or AM1 calculations, is free from BSSE ?

The distance can be considered to be from the center of mass of small 
molecules or minimum distance for two atoms one from each molecule.

Thanks for any hints.


Edgardo Garcia
Cristol Chem & Biochem
University of Colorado
BOULDER CO   USA


From ccl@cric.chemres.hu  Tue Oct 31 15:16:15 1995
Received: from cric.chemres.hu  for ccl@cric.chemres.hu
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id PAA18544; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 15:12:42 -0500
From: <ccl@cric.chemres.hu>
Received: by cric.chemres.hu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA12900; Tue, 31 Oct 1995 20:40:00 +0100
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 1995 20:40:00 +0100 (NFT)
To: Mike Peterson <system@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>
Cc: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:BOND ORDERS
In-Reply-To: <199509291850.OAA28935@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91.951031202830.15139D-100000@cric.chemres.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Sory, I have not followed CCL for some time. Mike is correct: diffuse 
orbitals are not of really atomic character, so the indices may go 
wrong. In such cases one may try to turn to a Lowdin-orthogonalized
basis (which I do not recommend for basis sets of "atomic" type).
I am working towards a scheme combining the merits of these without
their drawbacks, but this may require a while.

Regards to all,

Istvan Mayer

e-mail: mayer@cric.chemres.hu

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

On Fri, 29 Sep 1995, Mike Peterson wrote:

> Errol Lewars wrote:
> 
> >Re the question about algorithms for bond orders: Dr Istvan Mayer (Central
> >Research Institute, Hungarian Acad. of Sciences) argues that only his
> >algorithm really gives correct (sensible?) bond orders.  Thus the
> >Mayer bond order of H2+ is 0.5 (a 1-electron bond), but (all?) other
> >approaches give 0.25.
> 
> Although there is a theoretical basis for the Mayer method given
> in the papers, and it gives very sensible bond orders for a wide
> range of molecules and basis sets, including the * basis sets,
> it can be made to fail. For example, using 3-21+G, you will
> get C-C "bond order" results like:
> 
> Molecule            Mulliken           Mayer
> ---------------     --------           -----
> Ethane               -0.328            0.566
> Benzene              -5.008            2.179
> Ethylene              1.169            2.480
> Acetylene            -0.109            4.496
> 
> I suspect almost any basis set containing diffuse functions will cause
> the Mayer method to fail similarly, though it at least still produces
> ascending numbers. Note that the Mayer scheme can not produce negative
> bond orders due to its formulation.
> 
> For 3-21G, you get almost exactly 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 respectively
> with the Mayer method, and pretty close to that for 6-31G* as I recall.
> 
> Mike.
> --
> When the chips are down, switch to pretzels.       |  Mike Peterson, SysAdmin
>                                                    |  U/Toronto Chemistry
> E-mail: system@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca               Tel: (416)978-7094
> WWW:    http://www.chem.utoronto.ca/                  Fax: (416)978-8775
> 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------



