From JF@ctch20.itc.tu-clausthal.de  Sun Dec 17 03:48:42 1995
Received: from ctch02.itc.tu-clausthal.de  for JF@ctch20.itc.tu-clausthal.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id DAA09880; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 03:40:58 -0500
Received: from ctch20.itc.tu-clausthal.de by ctch02.itc.tu-clausthal.de (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA11853; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 16:27:12 +0100
Received: from VARRAN/MAIL by ctch20.itc.tu-clausthal.de (Mercury 1.21);
    17 Dec 95 09:39:46 +1
Received: from MAIL by VARRAN (Mercury 1.21); 17 Dec 95 09:39:34 +1
From: "J. Fleischhauer" <JF@ctch20.itc.tu-clausthal.de>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date:          Sun, 17 Dec 1995 09:39:32 GMT+1
Subject:       charge equilibration
Priority: normal
X-Mailer:     Pegasus Mail v3.1 (R1a)
Message-Id: <2F086539DB@ctch20.itc.tu-clausthal.de>


Dear Netters


In our approach to describe charge influences in Force Field 
calculations, we want to try the an empirical method so called 
<charge equilibration> (QEq), described in :
A. K. Rappe, W. A. Goddard, J. Phys. Chem., 95, 3358, 1991.

This method is also available in the commercial CERIUS2 package.

Our problem is that there is no detailed description of the 
algorithm. 
Does anybody knows other sources of information dealing with the 
charge equilibration algorithm?

Especially we can't find an mathematical expression used for the 
calculation of the coulomb potential between center A and B = Jab(R). 

The Problem is the following :
The simple coulomb expression between unit charges on center A and B 
separated by the distance R is :

(14)                     Jab(R) = 14.4 / R

14.4    conversion factor, R in Angstroem, Jab in eV

Equation (14) is no longer valid for atoms with overlapping charge 
distributions (e.g. mostly bonded atoms). For R = 0 (14) leads to an 
infinite value whereas Jab(R=0) should reach a finite value Jaa 
instead. Like described in the reference, they use a shielding 
corrections to (14). The shielding to (14) will be quite large for 
bonded atoms (small R). The shielding correction to (14) were 
described in terms of a coulomb integral between atomic densities 
witch are expressed in form of slater orbitals. 
(eq.15)


(15)        Phi_slater = Nn * r power( n-1 ) * exp(-zeta*r) 

Nn      normalisation constant
n       long periodic row
zeta    Slater exponent
r       distance


The diatomic Coulomb integral Jab is evaluated exactly.


Our question :

1) Witch is the correct mathematical expression to describe the 
   coulomb interaction Jab(R) to get a potential with a finite 
   value for R=0 ?







_________________________________________________

Dipl. Chem. Juergen Fleischhauer

Technical University Clausthal
Dept. of Technical Chemistry
Erzstr. 18
D-38678 Clausthal Zellerfeld
Germany

Tel.    : 05323-72-2647
Fax.    : 05323-72-3655
E-Mail  : jf@ctch20.itc.tu-clausthal.de
__________________________________________________

From chpajt@bath.ac.uk  Sun Dec 17 04:48:42 1995
Received: from goggins.bath.ac.uk  for chpajt@bath.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id EAA10061; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 04:44:58 -0500
Received: from bath.ac.uk (actually host midge.bath.ac.uk) 
          by goggins.bath.ac.uk with SMTP (PP); Sun, 17 Dec 1995 09:44:53 +0000
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 09:44:50 +0000 (GMT)
From: A J Turner <chpajt@bath.ac.uk>
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re Charmm - alpha carbons constraint
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.951217094032.19577G-100000@midge.bath.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Hi!

I have a large interest in constraining alpha-carbpns during 
minimisations.  Basically I want to prevent Charmm from trying to change 
the bulk structure of the enzyme - just the small scale structure.

Does anyone have experiance of this - what sort of constraint would be 
best - and maybe if there is an easy way on defining the selection.

Oh - thanks for the units interconversion stuff - I am totally snowed 
under with your generous replies.

Cheers

Alex

+--------------------------------------------------+
|Alternate E-mail A.J.Turner@Bath.ac.uk            |
|www home @ http://www.bath.ac.uk/~chpajt/home.html|
+--------------------------------------------------+ 


From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Sun Dec 17 16:03:51 1995
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id PAA13065; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 15:58:06 -0500
Received: from nic.cerf.net  for dgregory@biosym.com
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id PAA22902; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 15:58:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from biff.biosym.com (biff.biosym.com [146.202.0.225]) by nic.cerf.net (8.6.10/8.6.9) with SMTP id MAA27392 for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 12:57:57 -0800
Received: from [146.202.14.3] by biff.biosym.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA21805; Sun, 17 Dec 95 12:54:03 PST
Message-Id: <9512172054.AA21805@biff.biosym.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 1995 13:00:04 -0500
To: chemistry@ccl.net
From: dgregory@biosym.com (Don Gregory)
X-Sender: dgregory@146.202.0.225
Subject: Re: CCL:Re Charmm - alpha carbons constraint


On Dec 16th, A J Turner wrote: 
> I want to prevent Charmm from trying to change 
>the bulk structure of the enzyme - just the small scale structure.
>
>Does anyone have experiance of this - what sort of constraint would be 
>best - and maybe if there is an easy way on defining the selection.
>
A J, I would recommend using a harmonic restraint to hold the
alpha-carbons *close* to their current positions, but allowing them
some flexibility.
Of course, the easy thing to do, is to *fix* the atoms in space, this
can be done with:
CONS FIX SELE TYPE CA END
Assuming, of course, all the alpha carbons are named CA.

Restraining with the harmonic potential is just as easy, as long
as one knows the force constant to apply.  

CONS HARM SELE TYPE CA END FORCE 100.0 

Determining the force constant depends on what forces (energy)
you want to counter-balance with the restraint.  For example,
if you want to make sure the restraint can counter any opposing
bond stretching, you might want to apply a counter restraint
such that if the alpha carbon moves 1 Angstrom away from its
current position, it would impose a restraint of 100 kcal/mol,
analogous to bond stretching.
To do this, simply apply a force constant of 100.
This is what I've done in the above example; a complete description
of these CHARMm commands can be found in the "data/doc" directory
if you have an installation of Quanta. 
Alternatively, you can see these commands via the web, looking at
the support pages of "http://www.msi.com".

Don Gregory


From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Sun Dec 17 19:03:53 1995
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id SAA13969; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 18:51:08 -0500
Received: from Ladyhawk.Levels.UniSA.Edu.Au  for CTARG@Levels.UniSA.Edu.Au
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id SAA23573; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 18:51:05 -0500 (EST)
From: <CTARG@Levels.UniSA.Edu.Au>
Received: from Levels.UniSA.Edu.Au by Levels.UniSA.Edu.Au (PMDF V5.0-4 #9510)
 id <01HYY6PFXLDC9AMRSB@Levels.UniSA.Edu.Au> for chemistry@ccl.net; Mon,
 18 Dec 1995 10:20:18 +0930
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 10:20:18 +0930
Subject: summer schools in Europe?
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01HYY6PFZ78I9AMRSB@Levels.UniSA.Edu.Au>
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Hi,

   Does anybody know of any summer schools in quantum chemistry/
molecular modelling that are taking place in the coming summer in
Europe? I know there was one last year in Italy. Is this an annual
event?


Thanks Andrea


From arthur_j@chem.usyd.edu.au  Sun Dec 17 19:14:16 1995
Received: from lars.chem.su.oz.au  for arthur_j@chem.usyd.edu.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.6.10/950822.1) id SAA13976; Sun, 17 Dec 1995 18:55:25 -0500
Received: (from arthur_j@localhost) by lars.chem.su.oz.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id KAA17068; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 10:55:15 +1100
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 10:55:13 +1100 (EDT)
From: Jonathan Arthur <arthur_j@chem.usyd.edu.au>
Subject: SUMMARY: Fortran debugger
To: Computational chemistry list <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.3.89.9512181043.A17058-0100000@lars.chem.su.oz.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Hello all,

Recently I posted the following query:

>Does anyone know of a good (and free!) utility to assist in debugging 
>Fortran programs? (For UNIX)
>
>And if so where can I get it from?

The following is a summary of the responses that I receieved to the query
for those who are interested.

Now all that remains is to decipher how these programs work ;-)

Thanks to all who responded

Jonathan

__________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY OF RESPONSES:

The GNU debugger:

   gdb and xxgdb
   debugs C, Fortran or whatever

   Available from:
      - Any GNU software site
      - ftp://archie.au/gnu/
      - Most major ftp sites
      - The GNU archive (possibly at MIT)
      - prep.ai.mit.edu or its mirror sites
      - gatekeeper.dec.com


Fortran check:

   ftnchek
   Information from finger ftnchek@mary.fordham.edu

   Available from:
      - the netlib site
      - by ftp from netlib.att.com, directory /netlib/fortran,
        file ftnchek.tar.gz. It comes complete with a manual and
        test cases. Installation is straightforward
      - http://www.fortran.com/fortran/market.html


UNIX platforms standard debugger

   dbx, xdbx, dbm, dde
   codes need to be compiled with the -g option
   works in every language

   Available from:
      - is free with all UNIX platforms


ups

   Available from:
      - nearest sunsite (mirror) Linux/devel/debuggers 
      - standard X11/contrib/devel_tools directories


g77
   
   Available from:
      - gatekeeper.dec.com


For the PC:

   Turbo Debugger
   CodeView


_______________________________________________________________
Jonathan Arthur                       Theoretical Chemistry
e-mail:    arthur_j@chem.usyd.edu.au  School of Chemistry (F11)
telephone: +61-2-351-4416             The University of Sydney
fax:       +61-2-351-3329             NSW 2006 AUSTRALIA
URL:       http://www.usyd.edu.au/~jarthur/jono.html
_______________________________________________________________


