From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Thu Feb 29 01:31:22 1996
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id BAA01980; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 01:20:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cleo.univ-reims.fr  for jean.brion@univ-reims.fr
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id BAA27386; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 01:20:36 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199602290620.BAA27386@bedrock.ccl.net>
Received: from centre01.univ-reims.fr by cleo.univ-reims.fr with SMTP
	(1.37.109.4/16.2) id AA24814; Thu, 29 Feb 96 07:20:40 +0100
Received: by centre01.univ-reims.fr
	(1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA01578; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 06:50:14 +0100
From: Brion Jean <jean.brion@univ-reims.fr>
Subject: FACSIMILE prog.
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 96 6:50:14 MET
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]



    Dear netters,

Does somebody know where I can find information
(address, price, etc...)
about FACSIMILE program which is used to simulate
kinetic experiments ?

	   Thank you in advance,

			F. Bohr





**************************************************
*     Dr F. Bohr                                 *
*     Laboratoire de Chimie Physique             *
*     Universite de Reims, Faculte des Sciences  *
*     Moulin de la Housse                        *
*     B.P. 1039                                  *
*     51687 Reims Cedex 2                        *
*     FRANCE                                     *
*     Tel: (33) 26-05-32-33                      *
*     Fax: (33) 26-05-31-47                      *
*     E-mail: jean.brion@univ-reims.fr           *
**************************************************

From SUNDIUS@phcu.helsinki.FI  Thu Feb 29 03:31:23 1996
Received: from hearnvax.nic.surfnet.nl  for SUNDIUS@phcu.helsinki.FI
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id CAA02383; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 02:41:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailhost.rug.nl by HEARNVAX.nic.SURFnet.nl (PMDF V4.2-12 #3330)
 id <01I1S2LZX0F400SKN3@HEARNVAX.nic.SURFnet.nl>; Thu,
 29 Feb 1996 08:43:37 +0100 (MET)
Received: from rugch4.chem.rug.nl by mailhost.rug.nl with SMTP (PP); Thu,
 29 Feb 1996 08:41:04 +0100
Received: from LUMO.helsinki.fi by rugch4.chem.rug.nl (CAA25087); Thu,
 29 Feb 1996 02:40:42 -0500
Received: from phcu.helsinki.fi by phcu.helsinki.fi (PMDF V4.3-13 #1) id
 <01I1S47DBADSPU7GHV@phcu.helsinki.fi>; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:41:28 +0200 (EET)
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:37:01 +0200 (EET)
From: Tom Sundius U of Helsinki +358 0 1918339 <SUNDIUS@phcu.helsinki.FI>
Subject: CCL:origin of names Z-matrix and Hessian
In-reply-to: Your message dated "Wed, 28 Feb 1996 16:45:14 +0100"
 <3134788A.4707@chem.rug.nl>
To: "R. L. W. M. Erens" <R.L.W.M.Erens@chem.RUG.NL>,
        chemistry@www.ccl.net
Message-id: <01I1S4MR94IEPU7GHV@phcu.helsinki.fi>
X-Envelope-to: chemistry@www.ccl.net
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


The Hessian matrix is named after Ludwig Otto Hesse (1811-1874)

   Greetings, Tom S.

> Sorry if this question and its answer are already in the archives, but
> the infomeister server seems to busy to allow me to search them.
> I'm just curious about the origin of the names
> Hessian matrix and Z-matrix
> (the latter one probably has German roots?).



+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
!  Tom Sundius                     Decnet:   63569::SUNDIUS, 63539::SUNDIUS !  
!  Department of Physics           PsiMail:  PSI%244203008::SUNDIUS         !
!  PO Box 9 (Siltavuorenpenger 20) Bitnet:   SUNDIUS@FINUHCB, SUNDIUS@FINUH !
!  SF-00014 UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI                                          !
!  Finland                         Internet: sundius@phcu.helsinki.fi       !
!  Phone : +358 0 1918339                    Tom.Sundius@Helsinki.fi        !
!  Fax   : +358 0 1918680                    sundius@csc.fi                 !
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+

From hutschka@quantix.u-strasbg.fr  Thu Feb 29 04:31:23 1996
Received: from quantix.u-strasbg.fr  for hutschka@quantix.u-strasbg.fr
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id EAA03143; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 04:10:08 -0500 (EST)
From: <hutschka@quantix.u-strasbg.fr>
Received: by quantix.u-strasbg.fr (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA48944; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 10:11:43 +0100
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 10:11:43 +0100
Message-Id: <9602290911.AA48944@quantix.u-strasbg.fr>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: G92 optim with ECP and F functions
Cc: hutschka@quantix.u-strasbg.fr



Hello,

I had troubles with trying to optimize a geometry
with g92 (RevE.2).
I'm trying to optimize a geometry at the HF level
using the Berny algorithm.
A RECP describe the core electrons of the metal and it contains
G,S-G,P-G,D-G,F-G components.
The basis set associated with this RECP is a [3s,3p,2d,2f]
GTF basis set.
I've no troubles to perform single point calculations but the
optimization lead to the following error message :

------
RHF calculation of E
------
 Compute integral first derivatives.
 ... and contract with generalized density number  0.
 Use density number 0.
 RysSet:  KIntrp=     2534   KCalc=        0   KAssym=     2170
 L702 exits ... SP integral derivatives will be done elsewhere.
 Compute integral first derivatives.
 Integral derivatives from FoFDir, PRISM(SPDF).
 MinBra= 0 MaxBra= 3 MinLOS=-1 MaxLOS=-1 MinRaf= 0 MaxRaf= 3 MinLRy= 4.
 IRaf=       0 NMat=   1 IRICut=       1 DoRegI=T DoRafI=F ISym2E=1 JSym2E=1.
 Fock matrices symmetrized in FoFDir.
 Use density number 0.
 MaxL=3 MaxP=3 NDeriv=1 MaxT=77
 L709 cannot do derivatives in this basis.
 Error termination in Lnk1e.

------

The error is arrising from the l709 link
I've looked at the code and it cames from the ECPGRD Subroutine
wich compute the derivatives of one electron integrals over effective
core potentials.
I looked at the manual and found nothing...
I've tried other tests and my believe is that it is not possible to
have F function describing the valence electrons of the metal
if you have a ECP (or RECP) for the core and if you intend to
optimize a geometry.
So my question is :
Does anybody know such limitations with g92 and ECP ?
More what are the limits in term of component (S,P,D,F)
of a basis set for an atom ?.
Does anybody know if this problem could be avoided with
g94 ?.
So any help or comment would be appreciated.
I will sumarize for the list.

Thanks.

HUTSCHKA Francois
Laboratory of Quantum Chemistry
Universite Louis Pasteur
STRASBOURG
FRANCE.
E-Mail : hutschka@quantix.u-strasbg.fr


From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Thu Feb 29 06:31:22 1996
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id GAA03808; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 06:05:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk  for dkwm2@cus.cam.ac.uk
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id GAA29342; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 06:05:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from apus.cus.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.2] (ident = root) 
	by bootes.cus.cam.ac.uk with smtp 
	(Smail-3.1.29.0 #36) id m0ts6Ai-000C0nC; Thu, 29 Feb 96 11:05 GMT
Received: by apus.cus.cam.ac.uk 
	(Smail-3.1.29.0 #36) id m0ts6Ah-000343C; Thu, 29 Feb 96 11:05 GMT
Sender: dkwm2@cus.cam.ac.uk (D.K.W. Mok)
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 11:05:19 +0000 (GMT)
From: Daniel Mok <dkwm2@cam.ac.uk>
X-Sender: dkwm2@apus.cus.cam.ac.uk
To: Computational-Chemistry list <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Calculation of Electron affinity
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960229105827.22771D@apus.cus.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear all,

I'm going to calculate the electron affinity of Si2. I've done some 
calculation with diffuse basis to give more balanced description on Si2 and
Si2-. However, the electron affinity is still far from experimental value.
I would guess the problem due to the extra electron which make the the basis
set baised to Si2 and thus underestimates the E.A. It seems that if I 
used a lot of diffuse functions, the basis set become linearly dependent 
and may give odd results. Any suggestion on how should I do the calculation?

Thanks

Daniel

********************************************************************************
* Daniel K.W. Mok                                                              *
* E-Mail: dkwm2@cam.ac.uk                                Phone: 01223-336423   *
* Office: Dept. of Chemistry, University of Cambridge                          *
*         Lensfield Rd., Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.                                *
********************************************************************************


From ANDRUNIO@Trurl.ch.uj.edu.pl  Thu Feb 29 08:31:25 1996
Received: from nms.cyf-kr.edu.pl  for ANDRUNIO@Trurl.ch.uj.edu.pl
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id IAA04862; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 08:02:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from Trurl.ch.uj.edu.pl (trurl.ch.uj.edu.pl [149.156.72.6]) by nms.cyf-kr.edu.pl (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id OAA01870 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 14:06:06 +0100
Received: from TRURL/MAILQUEUE by Trurl.ch.uj.edu.pl (Mercury 1.21);
    29 Feb 96 13:57:19 GMT+2
Received: from MAILQUEUE by TRURL (Mercury 1.21); 29 Feb 96 13:57:16 GMT+2
From: "Tadeusz Andruniow" <ANDRUNIO@Trurl.ch.uj.edu.pl>
Organization:  Faculty of Chemistry, UJ
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date:          Thu, 29 Feb 1996 13:57:11 MET+2
Subject:       transition moments
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.22
Message-ID: <BE68826277@Trurl.ch.uj.edu.pl>



 Dear colleague!
 
   Does anyone know how to calculate transition moments (GAMESS 95)
   between different electronic states of molecule (naphthalene).
   I would appreciate any kind of information.
   
   Tadek A.

From gerardo@houston.cray.com  Thu Feb 29 09:31:25 1996
Received: from timbuk.cray.com  for gerardo@houston.cray.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id IAA05113; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 08:35:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from houston.cray.com (gerardo@houston.cray.com [128.162.61.112]) by timbuk.cray.com (8.6.12/CRI-gate-8-2.11) with ESMTP id HAA15927; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 07:23:45 -0600
Received: by houston.cray.com (SMI-8.6/CRI-5.13)
	id HAA08959; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 07:23:43 -0600
From: gerardo@houston.cray.com (Gerardo Cisneros)
Message-Id: <199602291323.HAA08959@houston.cray.com>
Subject: REMINDER: Abstract Deadline
To: amber@cgl.ucsf.edu, anneal@cs.ucla.edu, apchem@mailbase.ac.uk,
        c2-l@msi.com, cache@pacificu.edu, charmm-bbs@emperor.harvard.edu,
        chemconf@umdd.umd.edu, chemistry@www.ccl.net,
        dibug@comp.bioz.unibas.ch, hyperchem@hyper.com,
        mmodinfo@uoft02.utoledo.edu, sybyl@extreme.chem.rpi.edu
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 07:23:43 -0600 (CST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24-CRI-c]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


A brief reminder:

  +---------------------------------------------------------------+
  |       ----THIRD UNAM-CRAY SUPERCOMPUTING CONFERENCE----       |
  |           -----------------------------------------           |
  |        C O M P U T A T I O N A L    C H E M I S T R Y         |
  |            A symposium to be held in Mexico City              |
  |           from August 13th through the 16th, 1996             |
  +---------------------------------------------------------------+

    THE ABSTRACT DEADLINE IS MARCH 3, 1996.

    Besides details on invited speakers, topics, etc., there
    is a registration form available via the WWW at

    http://www.super.unam.mx/super/symposium/simposio96.html

I will be happy to e-mail the announcement and registration form to
those for whom WWW access is awkward or nonexistent, or who just want
a plain ASCII copy.

Saludos,

Gerardo
-- 
Dr. Gerardo Cisneros	|Cray Research de M'exico, S.A. de C.V.
Technical Services Mgr.	|Tuxpan 10-403, Col. Roma Sur
gerardo@cray.com	|06760 M'exico, D.F.
(+52+5)622-8584 	|MEXICO

From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Thu Feb 29 10:31:28 1996
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id KAA06272; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 10:26:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from saturn.kent.edu  for raeker@saturn.kent.edu
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id KAA02855; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 10:26:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: by saturn.kent.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA15279; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 10:27:08 -0500
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 10:27:08 -0500 (EST)
From: "Todd J. Raeker" <raeker@saturn.kent.edu>
To: CCL <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: CCL:  Summary of Responses on MM comparison to experiment
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91.960229102617.14507A-100000@saturn.kent.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII




Hello all,

A while back I asked about articles that evaluate a number of MM force field 
in comparison to experimental data.  Here is a summary of all the replies.  
Sorry it took so long, replies were still trickling in last week.

Regards.

Todd.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Abby Parrill     abby@mercury.aichem.arizona.edu              

Dr. Raeker,
  We have completed this type of forcefield comparison on several 
carbohydrate derivatives.  The results were presented this fall in the 
first electronic glycoscience conference and are available at
http://mercury.aichem.arizona.edu/abby.html
by selecting the "Electronic Glycoscience Conference 1 Paper" link.  This 
paper has been accepted with revision to Glycoscience Journal.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Per-Ola Norrby    peon@medchem.dfh.dk (Per-Ola Norrby)

        Dear Todd,

        We recently completed a fairly thorough conformational
energy/rotation barrier study for 14 different force fields, for 40+
different organic compounds (most of the published cases for which accurate
potential energy / enthalpy data in the gas phase is available, plus some
:-).  The study is in press in J.Comp.Chem., it should appear in
March/April.  A previous version of this study, for some older force fields
as well as some semiempirical methods, has been published, "K. Gundertofte,
J. Palm, I. Pettersson, A. Stamvik, J. Comput. Chem. 12, 200 (1991)".

        If you are in a hurry, I could send you the text version of the
paper by Email.  To summarize: most MM2/MM3-based force fields (including
MM2(85) from the previous study), and the new MMFF from Tom Halgren, gave
good results (average errors below 1 kcal/mol).  Amber* is slightly worse,
but also gets in below the 1 kcal/mol limit in accuracy.  Most others gave
much worse results.  CFF91 is a special case.  It picks bad parameters
automatically, and therefore got a bad average, but for the systems where
it had well-determined parameters, it was among the very best.  Good but
risky!

        Regards,

        PeO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:  Benzion (Fuchs) bfuchs@post.tau.ac.il Thu Feb 15 07:09:58 1996

Hi Todd,

Here are some references from our work on stereoelectronics
and crown ethers (there will be more soon):

Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, '36', 9193.
Tetrahedron, 1994 '50', 9691, 9707 and previous refs. cited there.

Regards,

Benzion (Fuchs)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Klaus Gundertofte 3206 <KGU@lundbeck.dk>

Have a look in 

1991:142342   Document No. 114:142342  A comparison of conformational
     energies calculated by molecular mechanics (MM2(85), Sybyl 5.1,
     Sybyl 5.21, and ChemX) and semiempirical (AM1 and PM3) methods.
     Gundertofte, Klaus; Palm, Jonas; Pettersson, Ingrid;
     Stamvik, Anders (H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen-Valby, DK-2500, Den.).
     J. Comput. Chem., 12(2), 200-8 (English) 1991.  CODEN: JCCHDD.
     ISSN: 0192-8651.  

Furthermore, in the March issue of J.Comp.Chem to be issued very soon, we have 
a paper updating the above and including a wider variety of MM force fields.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Gregor Fels" <GF@chemie.uni-paderborn.de>

Todd,

there are a few articles on this topic in the "Reviews in Comp. 
Chemistry" series, e.g.
Vol 2, p. 81 - 97, 1991: J.P. Bowen and N.L. Allinger, Molecular 
Mechanics: The Art and Science of Parametrization
Vol. 6, p73 - 148, 1995: C.R. Landis, D. M. Root, T. Cleveland, 
Molecular Mechanics Force Field for Modeling Inorganic and 
Organometallic Compounds

By the way you can look up the articles of that series at
http://chem.iupui.edu/~boyd/rcc.html#home1.

As I am looking myself for articles on molecular mechanics that I can 
use for teaching I would very much appreciate if you let me know the 
answers you get on your request.

Gregor
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Mark Shenderovich   shenderm@u.Arizona.EDU Mon Feb 19 12:11:40 1996

Dear Todd,

There was an interesting discussion in late 80-th on performance of 
different MM force fields for peptides and proteins:

Rotrman et al., Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics, 1989, 7, 
pp. 391-419 & 421-453 (2 papers).

These papers were followed by a discussion between Kollman's and 
Scheraga's groups in the same journal (1991, 8, 1103-1111). Of course, all 
force field tested in these 
papers have been updated since that, but in my opinion the papers and the
following discussion are important methodologically.



Dr. Todd J. Raeker          |  Department of Chemistry
Theoretical Chemistry Group |  Kent State University
raeker@saturn.kent.edu      |  Kent, OH 44242-0001
Phone (216)-672-2986        |  



From d.w.price@reading.ac.uk  Thu Feb 29 12:31:28 1996
Received: from sussdirt.rdg.ac.uk  for d.w.price@reading.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id LAA07350; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 11:31:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from INDIGOH (actually host indigoh.chemistry.rdg.ac.uk) 
          by sussdirt.rdg.ac.uk with SMTP - Local (PP);
          Thu, 29 Feb 1996 15:39:44 +0000
Received: from INDIGOH by INDIGOH 
          via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)	for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net> 
          id PAA29001; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 15:39:10 GMT
Sender: dave@reading.ac.uk
Message-ID: <3135C89D.41C6@reading.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 1995 15:39:09 +2400
From: Dave Price <d.w.price@reading.ac.uk>
Organization: none-what-so-ever
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b6a (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP20)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: ADF and dummy atoms
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Dear All,
           I am trying to run the ADF program using Cerius2 v2.0 as
a GUI, but it refuses to generate the input file for ADF saying:
        
             "ADF input file for job TEMP cannot be saved"

Anyone have any ideas?
              Thanks in advance,
                   Dave

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. David W. Price,       Tel: +44 (0)1734 875123  extn 7415
Department of Chemistry,  Fax: +44 (0)1734 311610
University of Reading,    e-mail: d.w.price@reading.ac.uk
Whiteknights,             W.W.W.: 
READING                HTTP://www.chem.rdg.ac.uk/g50/mmrg/dave/dave.html
RG6 2AD                                
U.K.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

From MASS@sauron.quimica.uniovi.es  Thu Feb 29 15:31:30 1996
Received: from opalo.etsiig.uniovi.es  for MASS@sauron.quimica.uniovi.es
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id PAA10139; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 15:10:18 -0500 (EST)
From: <MASS@sauron.quimica.uniovi.es>
Received: from SAURON (SAURON) by etsiig.uniovi.es (PMDF V5.0-3 #4541)
 id <01I1S95YPGTSDBGM7N@etsiig.uniovi.es> for chemistry@www.ccl.net; Thu,
 29 Feb 1996 11:51:32 +0100 (GMT)
Received: from sauron.quimica.uniovi.es by sauron.quimica.uniovi.es
 (PMDF V5.0-3 #4543) id <01I1S92AA7T08WW9HU@sauron.quimica.uniovi.es> for
 chemistry@www.ccl.net; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 11:58:32 +0000 (WE)
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 11:58:32 +0000 (WE)
Subject: Clusters containing octahedral Ti
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Message-id: <01I1S92AA8QU8WW9HU@sauron.quimica.uniovi.es>
X-VMS-To: AIN"chemistry@www.ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT



	Hello:

	I am looking for some references about theoretical

	calculations (ab-initio, semiempirical or force-field)

	on molecules or clusters containing Ti(IV) or Zr(IV) with 

	octahedrical coordination.

	I will send a summary of the answers.

				Thanks in advance 



				Miguel A. Salvado


Miguel Angel Salvado Sanchez
Dpto. Quimica Fisica y Analitica
Universidad de Oviedo
E-mail: mass@dwarf1.quimica.uniovi.es


From Jeffrey.Gosper@brunel.ac.uk  Thu Feb 29 17:31:29 1996
Received: from cook.brunel.ac.uk  for Jeffrey.Gosper@brunel.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id QAA11067; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:41:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from chem-pc-18 (actually chem-pc-18.brunel.ac.uk) 
          by cook.brunel.ac.uk with SMTP (PP); Thu, 29 Feb 1996 15:22:28 +0000
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 15:21:44 GMT
From: Jeffrey J Gosper <Jeffrey.Gosper@brunel.ac.uk>
Reply-To: Jeffrey.Gosper@brunel.ac.uk
Subject: Re: CCL:G:Unichem transition state search
To: willsd@conrad.appstate.edu
cc: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Message-ID: <ECS9602291544A@brunel.ac.uk>
Priority: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII



On Wed, 28 Feb 1996 07:27:22 -0400 (EDT) willsd@conrad.appstate.edu wrote:

Re: Transition state location.
> 
> I would like to learn about using unichem (initially just the semi-empirical
> methods, but later dgauss and/or gaussian) to model transition states. .....

>  Unichem does have an option to optimize to
> a transistion state, but seems to lack the tools needed to find an 
> approximate structure that is close enough for the optimizer to take over.
 .....
> Any suggestions?
> 
> 
Why not have a look at the WWW pages I have setup that include a number of TSs (fully optimized 
and characterized) from PM3 and AM1 calculations. These should give you a good starting point for 
experimentation on a number of derivatives or alternative parameter sets. If you (or anyone else for 
that matter) has TSs that there willing to share with others I would welcome them being deposited 
at this location. The URL is:
http://http1.brunel.ac.uk:8080/depts/chem/ch241s/re_view/re_view.htm

Addtionally, if you (or anyone else) generates TSs via semi-empirical methods I would be prepared to 
help generate an animation sequence and multi-structure file of the reaction being simulated. 

Please contact me if your interested.


/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
 Dr. Jeff Gosper                                         
 Dept. of Chemistry		                        
 BRUNEL University                                     
 Uxbridge Middx UB8 3PH, UK                            
 voice:  01895 274000 x2187                            
 facsim: 01895 256844                                  
 internet/email/work:   Jeffrey.Gosper@brunel.ac.uk     
 internet/WWW: http://http1.brunel.ac.uk:8080/~castjjg 
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/



From owner-chemistry@ccl.net  Thu Feb 29 20:31:32 1996
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for owner-chemistry@ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id UAA12621; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 20:02:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nomad.holonet.net  for davidm@mdli.com
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id UAA13364; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 20:02:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hawk.mdli.com by nomad.holonet.net (davidm@mdli.com)
	id RAA06893; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 17:01:14 -0800
Received: by hawk.mdli.com (8.7.3/BCH1.0)
	id BAA22391; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 01:00:04 GMT
From: "David Mostardi" <davidm@mdli.com>
Message-Id: <9602291700.ZM22389@hawk.mdli.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 17:00:04 -0800
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.0 26oct94 MediaMail)
To: chemind-l@derwent.co.uk, chminf-l@iubvm.ucs.indiana.edu,
        acsmedi@cms.cc.wayne.edu, isisforum-l@mdli.com, chemistry@ccl.net,
        mol-diversity@listserv.arizona.edu
Subject: MDL-Fiz Chemie Announcement
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


       				CONTACT:  Barbara Ross
	      			          MDL Information Systems, Inc.
					  (510) 895-1313 ext. 1481



             MDL INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. AND FIZ CHEMIE BERLIN
        JOIN FORCES TO PRODUCE NEW DATABASE FOR COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY

SAN LEANDRO, California February 26, 1996 MDL Information Systems, Inc. (Nasdaq
National Market System:  MDLI), the leading supplier of chemical information
management systems, and Fachinformationszentrum Chemie GmbH (FIZ CHEMIE Berlin)
today announced an agreement to jointly produce a new reaction database
covering solid-phase organic synthesis methodology.  Solid-phase synthesis is
playing a key role in the rapidly expanding area of combinatorial chemistry.
MDL and FIZ CHEMIE Berlin are developing the Solid-Phase Organic REactions
database (SPORE) in response to requests from scientists for information in
this area.

The first release of SPORE, scheduled for spring of 1996, will contain several
thousand reactions, covering the literature through 1995.  Quarterly updates
will be provided to keep the database current with advances in the area of
solid-phase organic synthesis. Sources of information will come principally
>from the primary literature.  The database will contain datafields unique to
solid-phase organic synthesis and will also allow for simultaneous searching of
solution- and solid-phase reaction databases.

"FIZ CHEMIE Berlin is committed to providing high quality information to
research chemists,"  said Jost T. Bohlen, product manager at FIZ CHEMIE
Berlin.  "This new agreement extends our successful partnership with MDL in
producing reaction databases for the exciting and rapidly growing field of
solid-phase organic chemistry.  The joint resources of MDL and FIZ CHEMIE
Berlin will guarantee that SPORE will become another outstanding research
tool."

Doug Hounshell, vice president of database production products at MDL said,
"This database, along with its browsing application for use with ISIS, will be
a critical tool for research chemists in the design of combinatorial libraries,
and will also complement existing solution-phase reaction databases.  MDL is
excited to be producing this new research tool in conjunction with FIZ CHEMIE
Berlin."

About FIZ CHEMIE Berlin

Founded in 1981, FIZ CHEMIE Berlin is a major scientific information and
documentation center for chemistry.  Its work is the brokerage of scientific
and technical information concerning all areas of chemistry and related
sciences.  Its activities include the preparation of databases, software,
books and other printed information services such as abstracting journals,
periodicals, and special information services.

About MDL

Established in 1978, MDL Information Systems, Inc. is the leading commercial
supplier of chemical information management software, chemical information
databases, and related services to the pharmaceutical, agrochemical, and
chemical industries.  The Company's software and database products enable its
customers to discover and develop new products more rapidly by allowing
scientists to access and use scientific information more effectively.  MDL has
offices worldwide with headquarters in San Leandro, California.

                                  # # #

MDL is a registered trademark and ISIS and Solid-Phase Organic REactions are
trademarks of MDL Information Systems, Inc.  All other products are trademarks
or registered trademarks of their respective holders.

From jerry@dft.chem.cuhk.hk  Thu Feb 29 22:31:31 1996
Received: from iris.chem.cuhk.hk  for jerry@dft.chem.cuhk.hk
	by www.ccl.net (8.7.1/950822.1) id VAA13443; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 21:34:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dft.chem.cuhk.hk by iris.chem.cuhk.hk via SMTP (931110.SGI/940406.SGI.AUTO)
	for chemistry@www.ccl.net id AA14095; Fri, 1 Mar 96 10:34:17 +0800
Received: by dft (950511.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH526/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	 id KAA02858; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 10:34:14 +0800
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1996 10:34:10 +0800 (HKT)
From: Jerry C C Chan <jerry@dft.chem.cuhk.hk>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Definition of diffuse function?
Message-Id: <Pine.SGI.3.91.960301101347.2814A-100000@dft>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear everyone,

	I am currently working with the TZV cobalt basis set developed by A. 
Schafer et.al. (JCP, 97 (1992) 2571.).  If the TZV basis set is uncontracted
>from (842111/631/411) to (61121111111/3111111111/111111) and then 2
polarization p functions prepared by Wachters are added, I would like 
to know how I should label the new basis set? 

i.  (61121111111/311111111111*/111111)
i.  (61121111111/311111111111+*/111111)
ii. (61121111111/311111111111+*/111111+)

In the new basis set, the smallest components are 0.043402 and 0.3038145779
for p and d, respectively.  I think the answer depends on the definition of
diffuse function.  Could anybody please comment on this issue.  Thank you
very much. 

Jerry C.C. Chan

jerry@dft.chem.cuhk.hk
	


