From ccl@www.ccl.net Sat Jan 11 02:15:30 1997 Received: from bedrock.ccl.net for ccl@www.ccl.net by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id BAA23108; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 01:21:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from voimax.voima.jkl.fi for eloranta@voimax.voima.jkl.fi by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id BAA21579; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 01:21:05 -0500 (EST) Received: (from eloranta@localhost) by voimax.voima.jkl.fi (8.8.4/8.8.4) id IAA00083 for chemistry@ccl.net; Sat, 11 Jan 1997 08:21:09 +0200 From: Jussi Eloranta Message-Id: <199701110621.IAA00083@voimax.voima.jkl.fi> Subject: Re: CCL:viewmol question????? To: chemistry@ccl.net Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 08:21:09 +0200 (EET) In-Reply-To: from "Markus Dickebohm" at Jan 11, 97 03:44:56 am Content-Type: text >No, you are perfectly right: "viewmol" _is_ dependent on Motif. Maybe >you can give LessTif a try to compile viewmol -- many applications run >happily with Lesstif (a free Motif clone) dynamically linked. > I have already tried this. It didn't work. However if you have shared image of motif (distributed by some commercial package) then you can use the lesstiff include files to compile it ;-) (this applies to motif 1.2 because viewmol was compiled with motif 2.0). Also is anyone working on gaussian 94 support? At least the normal modes were not read in correctly since there are differences between the g92 and g94. BTW is this sort of info stored in the checkpoint file too? (but then there are probably byte ordering & float format probelms among various machines). Regards, Jussi Eloranta