From ragno@naxos.caspur.it  Tue Jan 21 03:26:17 1997
Received: from mail.caspur.it  for ragno@naxos.caspur.it
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id DAA03516; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 03:06:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from naxos.caspur.it (naxos.caspur.it [193.204.5.8])
          by mail.caspur.it (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id JAA25098 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 09:05:50 +0100
Received: from localhost (ragno@localhost)
          by naxos.caspur.it (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id JAA25666 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 09:05:50 +0100 (MET)
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 09:05:49 +0100 (MET)
From: Gianluca Sbardella <r.ragno@caspur.it>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Molar absorbivity of NNRTI 
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95.970121090506.25643A-100000@naxos.caspur.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Dear Colleagues,
I'm a medicinal chemist at the University of Rome (Italy). My research
team is very interested in NNRTI (non nucleoside reverse transcriptase
inhibitors). We're looking for molar absorbivity constants (UV
determination) of some well-known NNRTI (nevirapine, TIBO, HEPT, MKC 442).
Could anybody help us (references, addresses or whatsoever...)?

Thank you very much in advance,

Dr. Gianluca Sbardella

    ***************************************************************
    *                                                             *
    * Dr. Gianluca Sbardella     E-mail: r.ragno@caspur.it        *
    * Dip. Studi Farmaceutici                                     *
    * Universita' "La Sapienza"   Phone: 39-6-49913814            *
    * P.le A. Moro, 5               Fax: 39-6-491491              *
    * 00185 Roma                                                  *
    * ITALY                                                       *
    *                                                             *
    ***************************************************************




From ccl@www.ccl.net  Tue Jan 21 11:17:52 1997
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id LAA05865; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 11:05:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from myriad.cis.pitt.edu  for SATYAM@vms.cis.pitt.edu
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id LAA26449; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 11:05:22 -0500 (EST)
From: <SATYAM@vms.cis.pitt.edu>
Received: from vms.cis.pitt.edu by vms.cis.pitt.edu (PMDF V4.3-10 #16365)
 id <01IEH0T4EJSG95Y0EL@vms.cis.pitt.edu>; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 11:05:19 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 11:05:19 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Problems with Gaussian 94 on R8000 with Irix6.2..
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01IEH0T4FKIQ95Y0EL@vms.cis.pitt.edu>
X-Envelope-to: chemistry@ccl.net
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT



From ccl@www.ccl.net  Tue Jan 21 11:18:03 1997
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id LAA05886; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 11:09:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from myriad.cis.pitt.edu  for SATYAM@vms.cis.pitt.edu
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id LAA26594; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 11:09:54 -0500 (EST)
From: <SATYAM@vms.cis.pitt.edu>
Received: from vms.cis.pitt.edu by vms.cis.pitt.edu (PMDF V4.3-10 #16365)
 id <01IEH0ZCA7E895Y0EL@vms.cis.pitt.edu>; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 11:09:50 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 11:09:50 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: PROBLEMS WITH G94 on R8000 with IRIX6.2..
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Message-id: <01IEH0ZCBA0I95Y0EL@vms.cis.pitt.edu>
X-Envelope-to: chemistry@ccl.net
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT


Dear Netters,
I would appreciate if anyone of you have faced similar problem
like this on IRIX6.2 on R8000 and Gaussian94..

Problem :  When monitoring a running Gaussian Job  
           using Unix command top

           we see that the same process id 
           of the G94 link (submitted by user1)  
           is shown to be owned by root and 
           other users of the system (incl. user1) 
           as "top" refreshes it's screen.

           Even while other users are not logged on.

Please respond to me (satyam+@pitt.edu) or Marc(pedulla+@pitt.edu).
Thanks 
Satyam and Marc


From watts@gwinn.medc.umn.edu  Tue Jan 21 19:17:54 1997
Received: from chet.medc.umn.edu  for watts@gwinn.medc.umn.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id SAA09572; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 18:20:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from gwinn.medc.umn.edu (root@gwinn.medc.umn.edu [160.94.158.215]) by chet.medc.umn.edu (8.8.3/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA22713 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 17:20:37 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (watts@localhost) by gwinn.medc.umn.edu (8.8.3/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA13963 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 21 Jan 1997 17:20:35 -0600 (CST)
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 1997 17:20:35 -0600 (CST)
From: Chuck Watts <watts@chet.medc.umn.edu>
To: The Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Protein Hydration and Spectral Density Functions. (fwd)
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.95.970121172010.13956A-100000@gwinn.medc.umn.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Dear  CCL:

	I have a small queation for you that is not completely
computational in nature although it does pertain to the investigation of
biomolecular dynamics using NMR and I know that many NMR spectroscopists
subscribe to this list. I was recently reading the papers

Otting, G.; Liepinsh, E.; Wutrich, K. (1991) "Protein Hydration in Aqueous
Solution" Science 254, 974-980.

and

Kubinec, M. G.; Wemmer, D. E. (1992) "NMR Evidence for DNA Bound Water in
Solution" JACS 114, 8739-8740.

In these papers combined NOESY and ROESY experiments are used
to measure the lifetimes of waters bound to BPTI and DNA  as interpreted
by a Random Diffusion model.  The model consists of a protein molecule
with a radius rp, a proton spin displaced from the protein center by pp, and a
rotational correlation time of tp, a water molecule with a radius rw, a
proton spin displaced from the water center by pw, and a rotational
correlation time of tw, the protein and water are related to each other
via the diffusion coefficient D which can then be translated into a
correlation time for the interaction using the Einstein-Smoluchowski
relation.  The NOE and ROE rates dependency on the spectral density
function are then given as

	k(NOE) = 6J(2wo) - J(0)

	k(ROE) = 3J(wo) + 2J(0)

and it is stated that the spectral density is related to the rate
processes that govern the modulation of the dipole-dipole coupling of the
system.  My question is as follows, I can easily find the generic
treatment of the spectral density function that relates its dependency on
a single correlation time with the assumption of isotropic tumbling, how
is the spectral density function used in these studies different from this
and how specifically did they generate the NOE/ROE vs. 1/D curves for
this paper given the data above.
	Sorry, I know this pobably isn'y a short queation but I thought
someone on the list might have some insight as to the solution.

Best Wishes,

Charles R. Watts                      ************************************
Department of Medicinal Chemistry     *                                  *
College of Pharmacy                   *   An appeaser is one who feeds   *
University of Minnesota               *  a crocodile, hoping it will eat *
8-101 HSUF                            *           him last.              *
308 Harvard St. SE.                   *                                  *
Minneapolis, MN 55455                 *               -Winston Churchill *
Phone: (612) 624-5486                 *                                  *
Fax: (612) 626-4429                   *                                  *
E-Mail: watts004@128.101.118.21       ************************************





