From surjit@chemistry.iitd.ernet.in  Thu Feb  6 03:21:18 1997
Received: from kriti.iitd.ernet.in  for surjit@chemistry.iitd.ernet.in
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id DAA28400; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 03:12:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from henna.iitd.ernet.in by kriti.iitd.ernet.in (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
	id AA06984; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 13:39:57 +0530
Received: from chemistry.iitd.ernet.in (netearth) by henna.iitd.ernet.in (4.1/SMI-4.1-MHS-7.0
 )
	id AA03908; Thu, 6 Feb 97 13:39:14 IST
X-Organisation: Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi.
Received: by chemistry.iitd.ernet.in; id AA09890; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 13:39:14 +0530
Received: by chemistry; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 13:39:14 +0530
	id AA09890; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 13:39:14 +0530
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 13:39:13 +0530 (IST)
From: "Surjit B. Dixit" <surjit@chemistry.iitd.ernet.in>
Sender: "Surjit B. Dixit" <surjit@chemistry.iitd.ernet.in>
Reply-To: "Surjit B. Dixit" <surjit@chemistry.iitd.ernet.in>
Subject: vdw radii from Insight Discover
To: CCL <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.89.9702061331.B9525-0100000@chemistry.iitd.ernet.in>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII




you could find this value from the *.frc file.
In the pull down where you select potential, you can save the
ff (make a copy). If cvff is the force field you saved, you
would get a file cvff.frc. Within this file there would be
a set of vdw parameters, the Aij abd Bij values.
you can calculate r and e values from there.
Aij = 4*e*r^12
Bij = 4*e*r^6

yes, vdw radii can also be noted from the modify/elements
pull down but that might not be the value used by Discover.

> 
> does anyone know how to extract values of the van der waals
> radii from Insight Discover? 
> 

____________________________
Surjit B.Dixit
PhD Student                         Telephone:+91 11 666979 Extn.:7602
Chemistry Department,                Facsimile:+91 11 6862037
Indian Institute of Technology,      Email : surjit@chemistry.iitd.ernet.in
Hauz Khas,                                   surjit@netearth.iitd.ernet.in
New Delhi 110016,
India.




From toukie@zui.unizh.ch  Thu Feb  6 03:35:41 1997
Received: from rzusuntk.unizh.ch  for toukie@zui.unizh.ch
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id CAA28225; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 02:41:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from rzurs3.unizh.ch by rzusuntk.unizh.ch (4.1/SMI-4.1.14)
	id AA11133; Thu, 6 Feb 97 08:40:58 +0100
Received: by rzurs3.unizh.ch (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA89287; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 08:40:57 +0100
From: "Dr. S. Shapiro" <toukie@zui.unizh.ch>
Message-Id: <9702060740.AA89287@rzurs3.unizh.ch>
Subject: MOPAC for nitrophenols
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 08:40:57 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 PGP2]
Content-Type: text


Forwarded message:
From toukie@zui.unizh.ch Thu Feb  6 08:38:56 1997
Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19970206074030.0066d320@zui.unizh.ch>
X-Sender: toukie@zui.unizh.ch (Unverified)
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 08:40:30 +0100
To: toukie@zui.unizh.ch
From: "Hr. Dr. S. Shapiro" <toukie@zui.unizh.ch>
Subject: MOPAC for nitrophenols

Dear Colleagues;


        Looking through my notes, I found the following quote from a CCL
posting:

        "From a practical point of view, PM3 is clearly better for NO2
compounds, as a larger number of these were included in the MBSP ...."

        My question is: I am interested in calculating HOMO, LUMO, alpha
polarisabilities, Mulliken partial atomic charges, and dipole moments for
some nitrophenols of fixed geometry (all optimisation flags = 0).  Should
one do _all_ of these calculations using the PM3 parametrisation, or just
some of them?  If AM1 is preferable for some parameters and PM3 for others,
which parametrisations should be used for which?

        Thanks in advance to all responders.


Sincerely,

S. Shapiro
toukie@zui.unizh.ch



From M.T.Storr@reading.ac.uk  Thu Feb  6 07:21:21 1997
Received: from sussdirt.rdg.ac.uk  for M.T.Storr@reading.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id GAA29182; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 06:23:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from indys (actually host scsgind5) by sussdirt.rdg.ac.uk;
          Thu, 6 Feb 1997 11:23:00 +0000
Received: from indys by indys 
          via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/930416.SGI)	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net> 
          id LAA02536; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 11:22:34 GMT
Sender: marks@reading.ac.uk
Message-ID: <32F9BEFA.794B@rdg.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 11:22:34 +0000
From: marks <M.T.Storr@reading.ac.uk>
Organization: Reading University
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP22)
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Sorption Files
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


Dear All,

I was wondering if anyone who uses Cerius has written a script or know
of a way to extract a given configuration number out of a sorption file
so that you may then view that configuration within Cerius, basically I
want to extract the low energy configurations from the sorption file and
then view them within Cerius so that I may examine the adsorption
geometry of my sorbate.
Any help would be gratefully accepted.

Thanks in advance

Mark
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mark T. Storr,            Tel: +44 (0)1189 875123  extn 7415
Department of Chemistry,  Fax: +44 (0)1189 311610
University of Reading,    mailto:M.T.Storr@reading.ac.uk
Whiteknights,             W.W.W.: 
READING             http://www.chem.rdg.ac.uk/g50/mmrg/marks/mark.html
RG6 6AD                                
U.K.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

From schiffer@h1tw0036.hoechst.com  Thu Feb  6 10:21:27 1997
Received: from backup.hoechst.com  for schiffer@h1tw0036.hoechst.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id JAA00374; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 09:52:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: by backup.hoechst.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id PAA28384; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 15:50:14 +0100
Received: from unknown(134.81.79.248) by backup via smap (V1.3)
	id sma028379; Thu Feb  6 15:49:21 1997
Received: from 134.81.76.36 by fra28.hiserv.de with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.994.63)
	id DAR8MHLL; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 15:54:36 +0100
Received: from h1tw0024 by h1tw0036 via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI.AUTO)
	 id PAA12944; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 15:49:55 +0100
Message-ID: <32F9EF93.7DE1@h1tw0036.hoechst.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 15:49:55 +0100
From: "Dr. Heinz Schiffer" <schiffer@h1tw0036.hoechst.com>
Organization: Hoechst Corporate Research & Technology
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: benzoic acid
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Hi all,
does anyone knows the precise experimental values for the
dipole moment, static dipol polarizability, electron affinity,
ionization potential of the benzoic acid molecule ? Does anyone
knows the precise experimental molecular structure of the benzoic
acid molecule in the gas phase ? Does anyone knows the dielectric
properties of benzoic acid liquid or crystal ? After looking
into the literatur I could not find anything useful experimental
data. I know, there are such things like benzoic acid dimers,
but even for these dimers there are no such experimental data.
The only thing I found was the precise experimental crystal 
structure of benzoic acid. But nothing about molecules !
For help I would be very thankful ( I do not know the english
expression for : Fuer Hilfe waere ich sehr dankbar ! ).
Regards,
Heinz
-- 
Dr. Heinz Schiffer		Phone   ++49-69-305-2330
Hoechst CR&T			Fax     ++49-69-305-81162
Scientific Computing, G864	Email   schiffer@h1tw0036.hoechst.com
65926 Frankfurt am Main		        schiffer@msmwia.hoechst.com

From Matthew.Harbowy@unilever.com  Thu Feb  6 10:31:05 1997
Received: from gatekeeper.homecare.com  for Matthew.Harbowy@unilever.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id JAA00177; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 09:27:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from x500mhub.lo.u1388.unilever.com by gatekeeper.homecare.com (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/24Jan95-0439PM)
	id AA13061; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 14:26:33 GMT
X400-Received: by /c=GB/admd=telemail/prmd=Unilever/; Relayed; 
  06 Feb 1997 14:05:39 Z
X400-Received: by mta MTAandromeda in /c=GB/admd=telemail/prmd=Unilever/;
   Relayed; 06 Feb 1997 14:05:39 Z
X400-Mts-Identifier: [/c=GB/admd=telemail/prmd=Unilever/; 0343D32F9E533386-MTAandromeda]
Content-Identifier: 0343D32F9E533386
Content-Return: Allowed
X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
Conversion: Allowed
Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
Priority: normal
Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
X400-Originator: Matthew.Harbowy@unilever.com
X400-Recipients: non-disclosure;
Message-Id: 
  <0343D32F9E533386*/c=gb/admd=telemail/prmd=unilever/o=unilever/ou=andromeda/ou=ccmail/s=Harbowy/g=Matthew/@MHS>
Date: 06 Feb 1997 14:05:39 Z
From: "Matthew Harbowy" <Matthew.Harbowy@unilever.com>
To: "chemistry@www.ccl.net" <chemistry@www.ccl.net> (Return requested)
Subject: Re: CCL:M:MOPAC for nitrophenols
Mime-Version: 1.0



     As a general rule, never, ever, try to cross-compare results generated 
     from differing levels of theory. The errors internal to one method are 
     typically different for another, and although all methods should be 
     reproducing the same physical observables, the assumptions inherent in 
     all treatments cannot assure proper representation in any case despite 
     coincidence with a few fitted parameters.
     
     In some of the papers on various semiempirical treatments, they 
     describe 'goodness of fit' between experimental and theoretical 
     absolute heats of formation, geometries, etc. This approach suffers 
     from the problem that any system, no matter how flawed the theory or 
     approximation, given enough adjustible parameters will always fit the 
     data set.
     
     Either use AM1, or PM3. At least you have the assurance that at that 
     level of theory, you gain some insight into internal comparison. 
     Furthermore, if you are not minimizing the structures, you are going 
     to want better assurance of internal consistency since it is highly 
     unlikely you are going to be able to compare it to physical 
     observables.
     
     matt
     
     
     
     --------------------------------------------------------------
     
        Looking through my notes, I found the following quote from a CCL
posting:
     
        "From a practical point of view, PM3 is clearly better for NO2
compounds, as a larger number of these were included in the MBSP ...."
     
        My question is: I am interested in calculating HOMO, LUMO, alpha
polarisabilities, Mulliken partial atomic charges, and dipole moments for 
some nitrophenols of fixed geometry (all optimisation flags = 0).  Should 
one do _all_ of these calculations using the PM3 parametrisation, or just 
some of them?  If AM1 is preferable for some parameters and PM3 for others, 
which parametrisations should be used for which?
     
        Thanks in advance to all responders.

From PHogue@space.honeywell.com  Thu Feb  6 11:21:22 1997
Received: from fl51mail.space.honeywell.com  for PHogue@space.honeywell.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA00818; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 10:46:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from fl51m03.space.honeywell.com by fl51mail.space.honeywell.com with SMTP
	(1.38.193.5/16.2) id AA21666; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 10:58:48 -0500
Received: by fl51m03.space.honeywell.com with Microsoft Exchange (IMC 4.0.838.14)
	id <01BC141A.9C286710@fl51m03.space.honeywell.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 10:43:38 -0500
Message-Id: <c=US%a=_%p=honeywell%l=FL51/EXCH99/0029B91D@fl51m03.space.honeywell.com>
From: "Hogue, Pat (AZ76)" <PHogue@space.honeywell.com>
To: CCL <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Cc: Julie Bryant <julie@msi.com>
Subject: Solid State Diffusion
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 08:39:00 -0500
X-Mailer:  Microsoft Exchange Server Internet Mail Connector Version 4.0.838.14
Encoding: 5 TEXT


Does anyone know of any programs to calculate solid state diffusion
rates of metal solute atoms (e.g., Ni)  in metal solvents (e.g., Sn)? 
It would also be nice to have the same program calculate the rate of
intermetallic (e.g., Ni3Sn2) growth; and all of this adjusted for
temperature, of course.

From kshippos@tc.cornell.edu  Thu Feb  6 11:25:20 1997
Received: from theory.tc.cornell.edu  for kshippos@tc.cornell.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA00771; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 10:38:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [128.84.51.45] (FIREFLY.TC.CORNELL.EDU [128.84.51.45]) by theory.tc.cornell.edu (8.8.4/8.8.3/CTC-1.0) with SMTP id KAA46311; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 10:12:03 -0500
Message-Id: <v02140b06af1f97abb4aa@[128.84.51.45]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 10:16:46 -0400
To: (Recipient list suppressed)
From: kshippos@TC.Cornell.EDU (Kathy Shippos)
Subject: Parallel Computing Workshop



Workshop on Parallel Programming for the IBM RS/6000 SP


            Tuesday, April 1 - Friday, April 4, 1997
                   Cornell Theory Center
                     Cornell University
                         Ithaca, NY

            Registration deadline: February 26, 1997


The Cornell Theory Center (CTC), a nationally funded
high-performance computing center, is offering a four-day workshop
including lectures and laboratory sessions on parallel programming
for the IBM SP. CTC's SP, which consists of 512 RISC processors
connected by a high-performance switch, is the largest of its kind in
the world. The SP architecture is distributed memory.


Announcement and registration form:

   http://www.tc.cornell.edu/Edu/Workshops/1997/SP.Apr/sp.html


This workshop will offer lectures and lab sessions on the following topics:

   CTC Essentials:

      These sessions will introduce the participants to the
      logistical and system issues that are essential to using the
      IBM SP at CTC.

   Using CTC's IBM SP Effectively

      These workshop sessions will explore the effect of computer
      architecture on program execution. Basic concepts related to
      timing, tracing, profiling, and modeling program performance
      on the SP architecture will be discussed.

   The Message Passing Interface (MPI) Standard Library

      These sessions present the MPI Standard Library and its
       use in developing a distributed memory parallel program.
       Topics covered include the fundamental MPI subroutine calls,
        point-to-point and collective communication routines, groups
        and communicators, and derived data types.


   High Performance Fortran; Fortran90

      These sessions are intended to introduce Fortran77
      programmers to the more advanced language concepts in
      Fortran90, and to the basics of writing data parallel
      programs using HPF and Fortran90.

All topics are presented through a combination of lecture and lab
exercise. The workshop is intended to give participants a working
knowledge of the fundamental issues involved in writing parallel
programs for the IBM SP at CTC.

Kathy Shippos
Conference Assistant
Cornell Theory Center
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY  14853
kshippos@tc.cornell.edu
(607) 254-8640



From citra@syrres.com  Thu Feb  6 12:21:24 1997
Received: from syrres.syrres.com  for citra@syrres.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id MAA01502; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 12:02:05 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 97 11:40 EST
Message-ID: <9702061140.AA25632@syrres.syrres.com>
Received: from syrres.com by syrres.syrres.com; Thu,  6 Feb 97 11:40 EST
X-Sender: citra@syrres.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: Mario Citra <citra@syrres.com>
Subject: CCL:M:MOPAC for nitrophenols



S. Shapiro wrote:
"My question is: I am interested in calculating HOMO, LUMO, alpha
polarisabilities, Mulliken partial atomic charges, and dipole moments for 
some nitrophenols of fixed geometry (all optimisation flags = 0).  Should 
one do _all_ of these calculations using the PM3 parametrisation, or just 
some of them?  If AM1 is preferable for some parameters and PM3 for others, 
which parametrisations should be used for which?"

Better to stick with one level of theory for all computed quantities when
comparing a class of compounds.  Since nitrophenols are fairly common
compounds a great deal of experimental data exists for these compounds.  Try
optimizing the geometries and computing physical properties with both AM1
and PM3; then compare calculated values to any experimental data you find.
This should allow you to make a rational judgement about which method to
employ for your fixed point calculations.

Mario J. Citra
MJC
Syracuse Research Corp.


From ccl@www.ccl.net  Wed Feb  5 07:21:12 1997
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id GAA20465; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 06:35:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ns1.tu-graz.ac.at  for hassler@ftug01.dnet.tu-graz.ac.at
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id GAA01804; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 06:34:57 -0500 (EST)
From: <hassler@ftug01.dnet.tu-graz.ac.at>
Received: from FTUG01.DECnet MAIL11D_V3 by ns1.tu-graz.ac.at (5.57/Ultrix3.0-C)
	id AA24345; Wed, 5 Feb 97 12:34:19 +0100
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 97 12:34:19 +0100
Message-Id: <9702051134.AA24345@ns1.tu-graz.ac.at>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: spectra visualization



Dear members of CCL!

I am looking for a program that depicts and draws (visualizes)
IR spectra and Raman spectra
if you input calculated ab initio wavenumbers and relative (IR,Ra) intensities.
I guess there are programs that use an appropriate output of gamess or gaussian?
I hope you can help me!
Nice greetings to everyone

K. Hassler (Department of inorganic chemistry, TU Graz, Austria)
present e-mail:
hassler@ftug01.tu-graz.ac.at



From ccl@www.ccl.net  Wed Feb  5 10:25:03 1997
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA21983; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 10:05:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hrz-fserv7.hrz.uni-kassel.de  for gdanitz@hrz-serv1.hrz.uni-kassel.de
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA06993; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 10:05:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hrz-serv1.hrz.uni-kassel.de (hrz-serv1.hrz.uni-kassel.de [141.51.192.30])
          by hrz-fserv7.hrz.uni-kassel.de (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id QAA27973 for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 16:05:21 +0100
Received: (from gdanitz@localhost)
          by hrz-serv1.hrz.uni-kassel.de (8.8.4/8.8.4)
	  id PAA21912 for chemistry@ccl.net; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 15:47:55 +0100
From: Robert Gdanitz <gdanitz@hrz.uni-kassel.de>
Message-Id: <199702051447.PAA21912@hrz-serv1.hrz.uni-kassel.de>
Subject: crystal packing calculations and programs
To: chemistry@ccl.net (Computational Chemistry List)
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 15:47:55 +0100 (MEZ)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 PGP3 *ALPHA*]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



Dear Colleagues:
 
Concerning the discussion of crystal structure prediction, I would like point
out a few things that might be of interest for scientists working in the topic:

* My review called "Ab-Initio Prediction of Possible Molecular Crystal 
  Structures" has just been published by Wiley & Sons in the book "Theoretical 
  Aspects and Computer Modeling," edited by A. Gavezzotti.

  It also describes the algorithm of my paper "Prediction of molecular crystal 
  structures by Monte Carlo simulated annealing without reference to diffraction
  data," Chem. Phys. Lett. 190 (1992) 391, in a more didactical way. In "Are 
  Crystal Structures Predictable?," Acc. Chem. Res. 27 (1994) 309, Gavezzotti 
  assesses the computer software used in this work and later (mainly by 
  Karfunkel), as "presumably the best available at the moment".

* I have originally written this software for Karplus' "CHARMm", but I recently 
  generated a separate Fortran Code, which is to be interfaced to an arbitrary
  molecular modeling program. This code now is being used by Hoechst/Germany. 
  My original software (see above) meanwhile has found its way from Ciba-Geigy/
  Switzerland into Cerius2 of MSI (without making me rich - contrary to a 
  royalty agreement with MSI/Cambridge).

* To the question of predicting the space group, I would like to point out, that
  already in the first paper of my method (see above), it has been demonstrated,
  how the space group can be determined by assuming no symmetry and varying Z. 
  However, because owing to increasing problems with the optimization of each 
  Monte-Carlo trial structure, this approach is, in general, likely to be less 
  efficient than simply scanning all possible space groups. First of all there 
  is only a finite number (230 including the enantiomorphic pairs) of which only
  a small subset is found for organic molecular crystals, the no. most probable
  groups being about 20. Additionally there is the problem of the possibility of
  varying numbers of molecules in the asymmetric unit, which may cause 
  additional problems (see e.g. the above book for more details).

Anyway, since computers presently can expected to become 10 times faster every 
5 years, there is hope, that problems that now appear to be much too time 
consuming to be solvable, become tractable in the near future. In 1989, when I 
started to develop the method mentioned above, I barely could get enough
CPU-time - I do not believe I would have made it 5 years earlier!

Robert
-- 
+-----+  Robert J. Gdanitz                      email: gdanitz@hrz.uni-kassel.de
| GhK |  Gesamthochschule Kassel                Tel.: +(49) 561-804-4120
|     |  Fachbereich 18 (Physik)                Fax:  +(49) 561-804-4006
+-----+  D-34109 Kassel, Germany


From morokuma@euch4e.chem.emory.edu  Thu Feb  6 10:21:20 1997
Received: from euch4e.chem.emory.edu  for morokuma@euch4e.chem.emory.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id JAA00435; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 09:59:29 -0500 (EST)
From: <morokuma@euch4e.chem.emory.edu>
Received: by euch4e.chem.emory.edu (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA13389; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 09:59:30 -0500
Message-Id: <9702061459.AA13389@euch4e.chem.emory.edu>
Subject: 9th ICQC 97 
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 09:59:30 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



@@@@  DEADLINE IS APPROACHING @@@@@

IMPORTANT REMINDER FROM

9th International Congress of Quantum Chemistry (9th ICQC 97)

Emory Conference Center Hotel
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, USA
June 9-14, 1997

The Deadline for Submission of a Contributed Paper:  MRACH 1, 1997
The Dealine for Registration:                        MARCH 1, 1997
The Cutoff Date for Hotel Reservation:               MARCH 1, 1997

For detail of the Congress, visit the web site
http://www.emerson.emory.edu/conferences/icqc97.html
and download the entire Second Circular and all the necessary forms. 

If you have any difficulties, contact icqc@euch4g.chem.emory.edu.
______________________
Keiji Morokuma
Emerson Center for Scientific Computation and Department of Chemistry
Emory University 
Atwood Hall,  1515 Pierce Dr., Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Phone (404) 727-2180; Fax (404) 727-6586
E-mail: morokuma@emory.edu


From gaussian.com!fox@lorentzian.com  Thu Feb  6 18:21:26 1997
Received: from relay5.UU.NET  for gaussian.com!fox@lorentzian.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id RAA05527; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 17:56:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: from uucp5.UU.NET by relay5.UU.NET with SMTP 
	(peer crosschecked as: uucp5.UU.NET [192.48.96.36])
	id QQcbtz27323; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 17:55:59 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <QQcbtz27323.199702062255@relay5.UU.NET>
Received: from m10.UUCP by uucp5.UU.NET with UUCP/RMAIL
        ; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 17:55:59 -0500
Received: by m10.lorentzian.com; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 17:55:55 -0500
Received: by mousse.gaussian.com; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 16:23:31 -0500
From: gaussian.com!fox@lorentzian.com (Doug Fox)
Subject: Gaussian 94 on the Cray T3E
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 16:23:30 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



 
   At present there are no properly ported or certified versions of G94 for
 the T3E.  Cray is working on such a version, however we do not know if
 their efforts will be successful; or if they were to be successful when
 such a version would become available for distribution to the user
 community.  
 
   Information on which platforms are supported with Gaussian 94 can be
 found either by inquiry to help@gaussian.com or by checking our web page,
 www.gaussian.com.

  Douglas J. Fox
  Director of Technical Support
  help@gaussian.com


From story@bent.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb  6 23:21:27 1997
Received: from sgi.sgi.com  for story@bent.engr.sgi.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id WAA06450; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 22:32:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id TAA01156; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 19:32:41 -0800
Received: from bent.engr.sgi.com (bent.engr.sgi.com [198.29.108.110]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id TAA00156; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 19:25:29 -0800
Received: (from story@localhost) by bent.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id TAA08363; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 19:25:24 -0800
From: story@bent.engr.sgi.com (David Story)
Message-Id: <199702070325.TAA08363@bent.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: CCL:Cosmo Player version 1.0 beta 3]
To: mbenzel@sgi.com (Mark Benzel)
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 19:25:24 -0800 (PST)
Cc: chemistry@www.ccl.net, toukie@zui.unizh.ch
In-Reply-To: <32F5F476.2781@sgi.com> from "Mark Benzel" at Feb 3, 97 06:21:42 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


> From: "Hr. Dr. S. Shapiro" <> Dear Colleagues;
> 
>         I have just examined the Cosmo Player version 1.0 beta 3 version be-
> ing distributed by SGI for Windows 95, and I see that it is set to expire on
> 1 April 1997.  Does anyone know with what it will be replaced, and will that
> replacement be distributed gratis or on a fee-basis only?
> 
>         Thanks in advance to all responders.

Keep checking in at http://vrml.sgi.com/cosmoplayer -- Beta 3a is now
available and this is the default locatio for new browsers.

With many MILLIONS of customers, you can rest assured we won't let the
timebombs expire without a new version to download.

Cheers,

David Story, story@sgi.com            Info on VRML:  http://vrml.sgi.com
Cosmo VRML Engineering, SGI           Info on Cosmo: http://cosmo.sgi.com


From Y0H8797@ACS.TAMU.EDU  Thu Feb  6 23:24:51 1997
Received: from VMS2.TAMU.EDU  for Y0H8797@ACS.TAMU.EDU
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id XAA06640; Thu, 6 Feb 1997 23:11:35 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 1997 22:11:37 -0600 (CST)
From: YONG HUANG <Y0H8797@ACS.TAMU.EDU>
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Message-Id: <970206221137.2059f028@ACS.TAMU.EDU>
Subject: Summary of non-aqueous solution pKa


---------------------------The Original Question------------------------------
> Does anybody know where I can find pKa of phenol and some carboxylic acids in
> non-aqueous solution such as ammonia? Thanks very much.
> 
> Yong

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:	SMTP%"ascanio@salve5.salve.edu"  5-DEC-1996 12:58:19.92

See if you can find any papers by Charles A. Kraus of Brown University.  
He published from before the turn of the century into the 1960's or 
later.  He did a great deal of work in liquid ammonia.  
Pacem in Calcio 
Ciao
Fr. Ascanio, C.H.S.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:	SMTP%"jlr@chem.ucla.edu"  5-DEC-1996 20:08:02.51

Dear Yon,

Bordwell has done several studies of compounds in DMSO.  I know these studies
included some carboxylic acids.  I don't know if they included any phenols.
His full name is Frederick G. Bordwell. 

Jennifer Radkiewicz
Department of Chemistry
University of California, Los Angeles
email: jlr@chem.ucla.edu

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:	SMTP%"ritaw@mail.utexas.edu"  9-DEC-1996 16:34:48.12
Subj:	Your message to Dr. Lagowski

Hello Yong!

I am Dr. Lagowski's secretary.  We spoke on the phone when you called last
week.  In the interest of expediency, I am sending you Dr. Lagowski's reply
to your e-mail.
rita
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Yong,

	My apologies for not answering your query sooner, but it came at a VERY BAD
time.  The following references represent the extent of my knowledge about
quantitative descriptions of acid-base equilibria in liquid ammonia.

1.  "Indicator Equilibria in Liquid Ammonia,"  E. C. Fohn, Dissertation, The
University of Texas, 1963.
This source contains:
(a) a good analysis of dissociation and ion-pairing equilibria in liquid
ammonia.
(b) a reasonable overview of extant literature up to the publication date of
this dissertation.
(c) the work described is based on precision optical absorption measurements.

2.  "Acid-Base Equilibria in Liquid Ammonia," J. H. Takemoto, Ph.D.,
Dissertation, The University of Texas, 1968.
This source is concerned with carbon and nitrogen acids and employs the
techniques and analyses described in (1) above.  This source incorporates a
nice review of the literature of semi-qualitative methods to establish a
relative order of acidity.

3.  W. L. Jolley and T. Buchall, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 88, 5439 (1966).
This source uses an nmr method to establish equilibrium constants.

4.  There are a number of papers derived from (1) and (2) in the open
literature which provide the usual summaries of the dissertation work.  The
details, which may be of interest to you, appear in the full dissertations.
You can find the relevant papers under the names of the authors of the
dissertations who, by convention for this laboratory, are listed as the
first authors.

I hope this is sufficient for your purposes.

My regards to Dr. Zingaro.

Best regards,
J. J. Lagowski
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Life is what happens while you're making other plans..."~~Betty Talmadge
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rita Wilkinson
Administrative Associate for             
J. J. Lagowski, Professor of 
Chemistry & Education
512/471-3288 ofc.
512/471-8696 fax
WEL 4.422

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From:	SMTP%"ritaw@mail.utexas.edu" 12-DEC-1996 18:01:52.13
Subj:	RE: Your message to Dr. Lagowski

Hi, Yong!
I have a reply from Dr. Lagowski for you!
rita
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My instinct tells me that benzoic acid is sufficiently acidic in liquid
ammonia that it would be completely ionized, but the ions would not be
completely dissociated because of the low dielectric constant of the
solvent.  The pKa of benzoic acid in water is similar to that of acetic acid
and it's possible to isolate the ammonium salt of acetic acid from liquid
ammonia.  Ammonium acetate is surely ionic in the solid state (but possibly
H-bonded).  I am less certain about phenol.

Regards,
J. J. Lagowski
Professor of Chemistry and Education
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Life is what happens while you're making other plans..."~~Betty Talmadge
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rita Wilkinson
Administrative Associate for             
J. J. Lagowski, Professor of 
Chemistry & Education
512/471-3288 ofc.
512/471-8696 fax
WEL 4.422

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My comments: Two of Dr. Lagowski's recommendations seem very important: J.H.
Takemoto "Acid-Base Equilibria in Liquid Ammonia" and E. Fohn "Indicator
Equilibria in Liquid Ammonia" but unfortunately they can't be checked out
through inter-library loan. They can only be read at Univ. of Texas @Austin
library.

I found a reference listing pKa of phenol in liquid NH3 = 3.5 (Treatise on
Anal. Chem. Part 1 Vol.2, 2nd ed., Kolthoff and Elving eds., p.335, citing M.
Herlem and A. Thiebault, Bull.Soc.Chim.Fr.,1970,383, in French), with a note
"solutions in 0.10M KI. I believe KI is used to increase the ionic strength of
the solution. But does this make a comparison with a pKa not in KI solution
unfair?

In the same book, p.366, pKa of benzoic acid is 9.8 in pyridine, citing L.M.
Mukherjee et al. J.Phys.Chem., Vol.72, 3410(1968), Table IV. No pKa of benzoic
acid in liquid NH3 is found.

Yong 

