From darren@power.curtin.edu.au  Thu May 29 03:45:25 1997
Received: from power.curtin.edu.au  for darren@power.curtin.edu.au
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id DAA24346; Thu, 29 May 1997 03:36:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from barite.curtin.edu.au by power.curtin.edu.au via ESMTP (950413.SGI.8.6.12/940406.SGI.AUTO)
	for <@power.curtin.edu.au:chemistry@www.ccl.net> id PAA26713; Thu, 29 May 1997 15:35:43 +0800
Received: (from darren@localhost) by barite.curtin.edu.au (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA16596 for chemistry@www.ccl.net; Thu, 29 May 1997 15:35:41 +0800
From: "Darren Chiari" <darren@barite.curtin.edu.au>
Message-Id: <9705291535.ZM16594@barite.curtin.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 15:35:41 +0000
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Spin Contamination
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


I am running qm calculations on hydrocarbon radicals using SPARTAN.

Many of my jobs are returning <S**2> values of up to 1.4, hence spin
contamination.

Can anyone point me to a good reference which explains what spin contamination
is and possible ways to reduce it.

Thanks Darren.

From hxt10@po.cwru.edu  Thu May 29 07:45:27 1997
Received: from babar.INS.CWRU.Edu  for hxt10@po.cwru.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id HAA25322; Thu, 29 May 1997 07:30:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Silver.cwru.edu (dialin092.REMOTE.CWRU.Edu [129.22.220.92]) by babar.INS.CWRU.Edu with ESMTP (8.7.6+cwru/CWRU-3.0)
	id HAA23695; Thu, 29 May 1997 07:30:03 -0400 (EDT) (from hxt10@po.cwru.edu)
Message-Id: <199705291130.HAA23695@babar.INS.CWRU.Edu>
From: "Hui-Hsu (Gavin) Tsai" <hxt10@po.cwru.edu>
To: "Darren Chiari" <darren@barite.curtin.edu.au>
Cc: <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:Spin Contamination
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 07:31:14 -0500
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Hi, Darren:

    Please try to mix the HOMO and LUMO to reduce it.

Hui-Hsu (Gavin) Tsai


----------
> From: Darren Chiari <darren@barite.curtin.edu.au>
> To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
> Subject: CCL:Spin Contamination
> Date: Thursday, May 29, 1997 10:35 AM
> 
> I am running qm calculations on hydrocarbon radicals using SPARTAN.
> 
> Many of my jobs are returning <S**2> values of up to 1.4, hence spin
> contamination.
> 
> Can anyone point me to a good reference which explains what spin
contamination
> is and possible ways to reduce it.
> 
> Thanks Darren.
> 
> -------This is added Automatically by the Software--------
> -- Original Sender Envelope Address: darren@power.curtin.edu.au
> -- Original Sender From: Address: darren@barite.curtin.edu.au
> CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@www.ccl.net:
Coordinator
> MAILSERV@www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher: www.ccl.net
73
> Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@www.ccl.net -- archive search
>              Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html 
> 

From elewars@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca  Thu May 29 12:45:31 1997
Received: from alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca  for elewars@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id MAA26729; Thu, 29 May 1997 12:35:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from elewars@localhost) by alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (8.7.4/8.7.3) id MAA18570 for chemistry@www.ccl.net; Thu, 29 May 1997 12:35:37 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 12:35:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: "E. Lewars" <elewars@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>
Message-Id: <199705291635.MAA18570@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Ph-C:::C-Ph, A REF


1997 May 28

Hello,
Jorge Seminario asked about the rotational barrier in Ph-C:::C-Ph (diphenyl-
ethyne, diphenylacetylene), in connection with some odd results.
  This may be relevant:    "Direct correlation" frozen-core MP2/6-311G**
calcs on PhCCPh: S. Saebo et al, THEOCHEM, 59, 361 (1989).  312 basis functions
and 40 million doubly-substituted determinants (summary: I. N. Levine, Quantum
Chemistry, 4th ed, Prentice Hall, 1991, p 515).  Predicted: coplanar rings with
rot. barrier 0.64 kcal/mol; cf. exp: coplanar, barrier 0.57 kcal/mol.

   E. Lewars

From Britta.Goeoetz@Uni-Koeln.DE  Thu May 29 12:54:30 1997
Received: from rs1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE  for Britta.Goeoetz@Uni-Koeln.DE
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id LAA26531; Thu, 29 May 1997 11:59:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from acp15@localhost)
          by rs1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE (8.8.5/8.8.5)
	  id RAA52490; Thu, 29 May 1997 17:58:36 +0200
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 17:58:36 +0200 (MST)
From: Britta Goeoetz <Britta.Goeoetz@Uni-Koeln.DE>
To: "Hr. Dr. S. Shapiro" <toukie@zui.unizh.ch>
cc: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:first of the 2 unrelated questions
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19970522080328.006652d0@highdent.zzmk.unizh.ch>
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.91.970529174635.60312A-100000@rs1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Dear Dr. Shapiro,

MOPAC always has such problems with linear sequences. It may result from 
its treating z-matrices. I think the program devides by zero somewhere, but
I do not know exactly. 

I used following z-matrix for phenylacetylene using dummy atoms to define
the linear group.
 
  C    0.0000000  0      0.000000  0      0.000000  0    0    0    0 
  C    1.5        1      0.000000  0      0.000000  0    1    0    0 
  C    1.4        1    120.0       1      0.000000  0    2    1    0 
  C    1.4        1    120.0       1    180.0       1    3    2    1 
  C    1.4        1    120.0       1      0.0       1    4    3    2 
  C    1.4        1    120.0       1      0.0       1    2    3    4 
  C    1.5        1    120.0       1      0.0       1    6    2    3
  X    2.0        1     90.0       1      0.0       1    1    2    3 
  X    1.2        1     90.0       1    180.0       1    8    1    2 
  C    1.2        1     90.0       1      0.0       1    1    8    9 
  H    1.1        1     90.0       1    180.0       1   10    9    8 
  H    1.1        1    120.0       1      0.0       1    3    2    1 
  H    1.1        1    120.0       1    180.0       1    4    3    2
  H    1.1        1    120.0       1    180.0       1    5    4    3
  H    1.1        1    120.0       1      0.0       1    6    2    1
  H    1.1        1    120.0       1    180.0       1    7    6    2


Yours 

    Britta Goeoetz

P.S.: In computing p-tolylacetylene where is your CH3-group?


_________________________________________________________________________
Britta Goeoetz
Physikalische Chemie II
University of Cologne
e-mail: Britta.Goeoetz@uni-koeln.de
phone: 0221-4702494

From shenkin@still3.chem.columbia.edu  Thu May 29 13:45:32 1997
Received: from mailrelay1.cc.columbia.edu  for shenkin@still3.chem.columbia.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id NAA27025; Thu, 29 May 1997 13:17:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from still3.chem.columbia.edu (still3.chem.columbia.edu [128.59.112.36])
	by mailrelay1.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA02956;
	Thu, 29 May 1997 13:16:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by still3.chem.columbia.edu (950413.SGI.8.6.12/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	 id NAA29274; Thu, 29 May 1997 13:16:54 -0400
From: "Peter Shenkin" <shenkin@still3.chem.columbia.edu>
Message-Id: <9705291316.ZM29272@still3.chem.columbia.edu>
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 13:16:54 -0400
In-Reply-To: Jorge Seminario <jorge@cosm.sc.edu>
        "CCL:rotational barrier: experiment and theory" (May 29,  3:16am)
References: <199705290316.DAA12324@cosmos.psc.sc.edu>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To: Jorge Seminario <jorge@cosm.sc.edu>, CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:rotational barrier: experiment and theory
Cc: jorge@cosmos.psc.sc.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


On May 29,  3:16am, Jorge Seminario wrote:
> Subject: CCL:rotational barrier: experiment and theory
> Hello dear members:
> 
> I wonder if you could help me to clear up some problems to interpret my
> colleagues' experiment by using our computational tools. The molecule
> consists in two benzene rings connected by two carbon atoms.
> The experiment on Ph-C-C-Ph (where the central C-C bond is triple and
> the adjacents are single) indicates that a sudden rotation of one of
> the benzene rings with respect to the other is initiated when the
> temperature reaches 30 K.

What is meant by "sudden"?  All your other arguments seem to argue
for an activated process, which would imply Arrhenius-type behavior;
this is not usually called "sudden", though in colloquial sense
I suppose it is.

> ...  The calculations
> yield a barrier of about 0.5 kcal/mol for the rotation of the benzene
> rings. The argument against this theoretical barrier is that
> at 30K, the kT (or RT) available for this mode is only 0.06 kcal/mol and
> therefore, the rotation of the phenyl groups is not possible because the
> barrier is almost ten times bigger than the available energy.

Sorry, but this argument isn't right.  RT= ca. 2.5 kJ at 300K, yet
most chemical reactions of everyday interest have activation energies
many times greater than this.  For instance, we're told in school
that "typical" room-temperature reactions double in rate when the 
temperature is raised by 10 K.  A typical exam question is to compute 
the activation energy of such a reaction.  The answer is about 
53 kJ/mol, or more than 20 RT.  

The action proceeds because the "pre-exponential factor" is enormously
high at room temperature.  We now turn to the back of the proverbial
envelope.

Using Eyring formalism to estimate the pre-exponential factor,
kT/h_bar is equal to about 4x10^13/s at 300 K;  at 30 K, we get
4x10^12/s, which is still huge.

The Boltzmann factor comes out to about 2x10^-4 for your reaction
at 30 K, but multiplying this by the corresponding pre-exponential
factor gives a rate constant of about 8x10^8/sec, which is pretty
darn fast.

	-P.


-- 
**** "Deep Blue can't triumph in the game of life" (NY Times, 5/13/97) ****
* Peter S. Shenkin; Chemistry, Columbia U.; 3000 Broadway, Mail Code 3153 *
** NY, NY  10027;  shenkin@columbia.edu;  (212)854-5143;  FAX: 678-9039 ***
*MacroModel WWW page: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/chemistry/mmod/mmod.html *

From RHERRMAN@nucleus.org.chemie.tu-muenchen.de  Thu May 29 14:45:31 1997
Received: from sunsrv5.lrz-muenchen.de  for RHERRMAN@nucleus.org.chemie.tu-muenchen.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id NAA27433; Thu, 29 May 1997 13:57:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nucleus.org.chemie.tu-muenchen.de by sunsrv5.lrz-muenchen.de; Thu, 29 May 97 19:57:16 +0200
Received: from NUCLEUS/TEMPQ by nucleus.org.chemie.tu-muenchen.de (Mercury 1.1);
    Thu, 29 May 97 19:57:13 GMT
From: "Dr. Rudolf Herrmann" <RHERRMAN@nucleus.org.chemie.tu-muenchen.de>
To: "Hr. Dr. S. Shapiro" <toukie@zui.unizh.ch>
Date:          Thu, 29 May 1997 19:56:55 GMT
Subject: Re: CCL:2 unrelated questions
CC: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Return-receipt-to: "Dr. Rudolf Herrmann" <RHERRMAN@nucleus.org.chemie.tu-muenchen.de>
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.40
Message-Id: <338dc37c4aef002@sunsrv5.lrz-muenchen.de>


On 22 May 97 at 10:03, Hr. Dr. S. Shapiro wrote:

> 
> Question 1:  In order to obtain Mulliken partial atomic charges for some
> work in which we are engaged, I prepared a Z-matrix for the molecule
> p-tolylacetylene ("tolac.mop"), as follows:
> 
> 
> am1 nointer
> p-tolylacetylene
> 
> C     0.000000  0    0.000000  0    0.000000  0   0   0   0 
> C     1.401729  0    0.000000  0    0.000000  0   1   0   0 
> C     1.399999  0  120.081459  0    0.000000  0   2   1   0 
> C     1.399809  0  120.056900  0    0.000000  0   3   2   1 
> C     1.399806  0  119.942001  0    0.000000  0   4   3   2 
> C     1.400006  0  120.056679  0    0.000000  0   5   4   3 
> C     1.312333  0  120.109207  0  180.000000  0   1   2   3 
> C     1.200200  0  179.891647  0  180.000000  0   7   1   2 
> H     1.103619  0  119.699532  0  180.000000  0   2   3   1 
> H     1.103127  0  119.972672  0  180.000000  0   3   2   1 
> H     1.103111  0  120.028992  0  180.000000  0   4   3   2 
> H     1.103127  0  119.970596  0  180.000000  0   5   4   3 
> H     1.103619  0  119.699341  0  180.000000  0   6   5   4 
> H     1.059943  0  180.000000  0  180.000000  0   8   7   1 
> 
> 
> When I tried running it in MOPAC 6.0, I got the following output:
> 
> 
>                      CALCULATION ABANDONED AT THIS POINT
> 
> 
>            THREE ATOMS BEING USED TO DEFINE THE
>            COORDINATES OF A FOURTH ATOM, WHOSE BOND-ANGLE IS
>            NOT ZERO OR 180 DEGREEES, ARE IN AN ALMOST STRAIGHT
>            LINE.  THERE IS A HIGH PROBABILITY THAT THE
>            COORDINATES OF THE ATOM WILL BE INCORRECT.
> 
> 
>                     THE FAULTY ATOM IS ATOM NUMBER  14
> 
>                                 :
>                                 :
> 
>                          [some stuff omitted]
> 

Dear Dr. Shapiro,

your input matrix contains a mistake. Your first hydrogen atom (atom 
nr. 9) is connected to carbon atom nr. 2 and has a bonding angle to 
carbon atom nr. 3. Next, you should specify a torsional angle (i.e.
2 3 4), but instead of this, you gave another bond angle (2 3 1).
Correct this fault, and MOPAC should do the job.
Yours sincerely,
R.Herrmann.

 


Dr. Rudolf Herrmann
Institut fuer Organische Chemie und Biochemie der 
Technischen Universitaet Muenchen
Lichtenbergstr. 4
D-85747 Garching
Tel. + 49 - 89 - 28913325
Fax  + 49 - 89 - 28912727

From RHERRMAN@nucleus.org.chemie.tu-muenchen.de  Thu May 29 15:45:37 1997
Received: from sunsrv5.lrz-muenchen.de  for RHERRMAN@nucleus.org.chemie.tu-muenchen.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id PAA00042; Thu, 29 May 1997 15:14:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nucleus.org.chemie.tu-muenchen.de by sunsrv5.lrz-muenchen.de; Thu, 29 May 97 21:14:23 +0200
Received: from NUCLEUS/TEMPQ by nucleus.org.chemie.tu-muenchen.de (Mercury 1.1);
    Thu, 29 May 97 21:14:20 GMT
From: "Dr. Rudolf Herrmann" <RHERRMAN@nucleus.org.chemie.tu-muenchen.de>
To: "Hr. Dr. S. Shapiro" <toukie@zui.unizh.ch>
Date:          Thu, 29 May 1997 21:14:03 GMT
Subject: Re: CCL:2 unrelated questions;correction
CC: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Return-receipt-to: "Dr. Rudolf Herrmann" <RHERRMAN@nucleus.org.chemie.tu-muenchen.de>
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.40
Message-Id: <338dd5905415002@sunsrv5.lrz-muenchen.de>


Dear Dr. Shapiro,
in the message I sent you some minutes before, I was too rapid in 
scanning your input matrix. Atom nr. 9 is not a mistake. But as atoms 
14 - 8 -7 -1 lie almost on a straight line, you should not use this 
set to define atom nr. 14. I rapidly designed a phenylacetylene from 
the scratch using HYPERCHEMs model builder and this is the z-matrix I 
got which MOPAC should also accept:

C     00000.0000 0  00000.0000 0  00000.0000 0 0 0 0
C     00001.4066 1  00000.0000 0  00000.0000 0 1 0 0
C     00001.4054 1  00120.0704 1  00000.0000 0 2 1 0
C     00001.4049 1  00120.0669 1  00000.0000 1 3 2 1
C     00001.4049 1  00119.9254 1  00000.0000 1 4 3 2
C     00001.4051 1  00120.0482 1  00000.0000 1 5 4 3
C     00001.4263 1  00120.3081 1  00179.9997 1 1 2 3
C     00001.2042 1  00179.7105 1  00000.0313 1 7 1 6
H     00001.0515 1  00120.3258 1  00179.9993 1 2 1 6
H     00001.0511 1  00119.9968 1  00180.0016 1 3 2 1
H     00001.0509 1  00120.0457 1  00180.0012 1 4 3 2
H     00001.0510 1  00119.9880 1  00180.0009 1 5 4 3
H     00001.0515 1  00119.6299 1  00180.0000 1 6 5 4
H     00001.0120 1  00179.9096 1  00359.8138 1 8 7 6

Sorry for my mistake. Hope this helps.
Yours sincerely,
R.Herrmann.



 



Dr. Rudolf Herrmann
Institut fuer Organische Chemie und Biochemie der 
Technischen Universitaet Muenchen
Lichtenbergstr. 4
D-85747 Garching
Tel. + 49 - 89 - 28913325
Fax  + 49 - 89 - 28912727

From Johannes.Weber@Uni-Koeln.DE  Thu May 29 15:47:44 1997
Received: from rs1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE  for Johannes.Weber@Uni-Koeln.DE
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id OAA29940; Thu, 29 May 1997 14:52:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from acp64@localhost)
          by rs1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE (8.8.5/8.8.5)
	  id UAA33906; Thu, 29 May 1997 20:52:02 +0200
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 20:52:01 +0200 (MST)
From: Johannes Weber <Johannes.Weber@Uni-Koeln.DE>
To: Roberto Bianco <bianco@lord.Colorado.EDU>
cc: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:MCSCF / selection of configurations
In-Reply-To: <9705271714.AA04277@lord.Colorado.EDU>
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.91.970528153327.65131A-100000@rs1.rrz.Uni-Koeln.DE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear Roberto!

On Tue, 27 May 1997, Roberto Bianco wrote:

> 
> I would like to do a state-averaged MCSCF calculation for the first few
> electronic states of a relatively large system. 
> 
> Are there references about the possible strategies one could use to
> select the relevant configurations for my particular case ?

You didn't mention what kind of MCSCF calculation you want do and you 
didn't specify the molecule either, so my answer can't be very 
specific. In my opinion it seems to be quite difficult 
to treat 'a relative large system' with MCSCF at all (just depends 
on the word 'relative'). 

For a detailed overview of MCSCF methods you might look at
R. Shepard, Adv. Chem. Phys. _69_, 63 (1987).
 
In the CASSCF method (mostly used) you choose active molecular
orbitals (MO's) instead of configurations. If you want an overview to
CASSCF and some examples for choosing the active space (dealing with
rather small molecules) look at

B.O. Roos in 'Lecture Notes in Quantum Chemistry', 
Springer, Berlin (1992).
(There must be a review about CASSCF somewhere in a journal.) 

A more general but very instructing source for choosing configurations 
within the CI method (similar criteria as in MCSCF) is 
I. Shavitt  in Schaefer III, 'Modern Theoretical Chemistry', Vol.3, 
Chap. 6, Plenum Press, New York (1977). 

CASSCF/CASPT2 calculations of excited states on a 'larger' molecule 
(Biphenyl, C12H10) were done by
    
M. Rubio, M. Merchan, E.Orti, B.O. Roos, Chem. Phys. Lett. _234_, 
373 (1995). (Biphenyl, C12H10)

Just look in the section 'details of calculation' to find out the
authors strategies. The essence is, that MCSCF (or more precisely
CASSCF) isn't a 'black box' method, so one must combine observation
of the MO's (it's fine if you have NO's and occupation numbers) with
chemical intuition (e.g. selecting pi-MO's in aromatic compounds) and - 
last but not least - some stamina in doing
test calculations to find out the proper MO's or configurations. 

Hope it helps, Johannes.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Johannes Weber                     | Johannes.Weber@uni-koeln.de   |
| Institut fuer Physikalische Chemie | fax: 0049-(0)221-470-5144     |
| Lehrstuhl Prof. Dr. G. Hohlneicher | tel: 0049-(0)221-470-4816     |
| Universitaet zu Koeln              |                               |  
----------------------------------------------------------------------





From dew01@xray5.chem.louisville.edu  Fri May 23 15:49:55 1997
Received: from xray5.chem.louisville.edu  for dew01@xray5.chem.louisville.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id PAA23441; Fri, 23 May 1997 15:00:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from dew01@localhost) by xray5.chem.louisville.edu (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA28388 for chemistry@www.ccl.net; Fri, 23 May 1997 15:04:04 -0400
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 15:04:04 -0400
From: dew01@xray5.chem.louisville.edu (Donald E. Williams)
Message-Id: <199705231904.PAA28388@xray5.chem.louisville.edu>
Apparently-To: chemistry@www.ccl.net




NEW FORCE FIELD DEVELOPMENT SOFTWARE AVAILABLE

Program nbp (for nonbonded potentials) is a software tool which
derives an optimized force field from molecular crystal and/or
molecular cluster data.  Customized force fields can be developed
and optimized from any training set of data.  Nonbonded potential
functions can be of either the (exp-6-1) or (n-6-1) type,
including the possibility of non-atomic sites.  A given element may
be subdivided into several potential types.  Input to the program
is a set of any number of structures encoded in the mpa/mpg
(molecular packing analysis/molecular packing graphics) format.
The force field can also be scaled to one or more energies such
as heats of sublimation or heats of association.

For further information contact:

Dr. Donald E. Williams
Department of Chemistry
University of Louisville
Louisville, KY 40292 USA
email: dew01@xray5.chem.louisville.edu


From peter@cherwell.com  Fri May 23 10:44:20 1997
Received: from cherwell.com  for peter@cherwell.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA21562; Fri, 23 May 1997 10:24:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mersey.cherwell.com by cherwell.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA03864; Fri, 23 May 97 15:24:34 BST
Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970523151542.007da6c0@cherwell.com>
X-Sender: peter@cherwell.com
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32)
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 15:15:42 +0100
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: Peter Tebbutt <peter@cherwell.com>
Subject: ChemSymphony version 2.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"





Cherwell Sientific Publishing is pleased to announce a new version of
ChemSymphony is now available for beta testing and we are looking for
additional testers.

Also on the test site we have a alpha version of a web based drawing tool
which generates structures and SMILES strings and we are interested in
having suggestions from chemists on this tool.

We are also looking to collaborate with database providers who might wish
to offer a www-based service using input from ChemSymphony.

The version may be viewed at

http://www.cherwell.com/csbeta

Peter Tebbutt

-----------------------------------------------------------
Peter Tebbutt                 | e-mail:  peter@cherwell.com
Development Support           | Tel:     +44 (0)1865 784812
Cherwell Scientific Publishing| Fax:	+44(0)1865 784801
Oxford OX4 4GA, UK            | http://www.cherwell.com
-----------------------------------------------------------
Check Out ChemSymphony - rated top 1% Java applet by JARS
            http://www.cherwell.com/chemsymphony
-----------------------------------------------------------
                         


From ccl@www.ccl.net  Fri May 23 06:44:12 1997
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id GAA20204; Fri, 23 May 1997 06:33:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from wchd18.chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de  for claessen@wchd18.chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id GAA08194; Fri, 23 May 1997 06:33:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from claessen (wex041.extern.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.248.41]) by wchd18.chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA30362; Fri, 23 May 1997 20:01:18 +0200
Message-Id: <199705231801.UAA30362@wchd18.chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <claessen@wchd18.chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de>
From: "Rolf Claessen" <Rolf.Claessen@wchd18.chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de>
To: chemconf@umdd.umd.edu, CHEMED-L@UWF.EDU, chemistry@ccl.net,
        CHMINF-L@LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU, CICOURSE@iubvm.ucs.indiana.edu,
        orgchem@extreme.chem.rpi.edu, ysn@crow-t-robot.stanford.edu
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 12:32:31 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Fulltext Search
Reply-to: s101264@stud-mail.uni-wuerzburg.de
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.52)





Fulltext Search at the Rolf Claessen's Chemistry Index available

http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/5243/search_en.htm (Fulltext - Search)

http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/5243home_en.htm (Main Index)

Yours Rolf Claessen

Rolf Claessen
University of Wuerzburg
http://www.geocities.com/Tokyo/5243
s101264@stud-mail.uni-wuerzburg.de
Tel. +49 931 701814


From zuilhof@Sg1.OC.WAU.NL  Fri May 23 12:44:16 1997
Received: from net.wau.nl  for zuilhof@Sg1.OC.WAU.NL
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id MAA22423; Fri, 23 May 1997 12:25:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from SG1.OC.WAU.NL by NET.WAU.NL (PMDF V5.1-7 #17095)
 with SMTP id <01IJ7VX2CYEK00K522@NET.WAU.NL> for
 CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net; Fri, 23 May 1997 18:29:57 GMT +0100
Received: from [137.224.136.38] by SG1.OC.WAU.NL via SMTP
 (931110.SGI/930416.SGI) for @Net.WAU.NL:CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net id
 AA14859; Fri, 23 May 1997 18:25:48 +0200
Date: Fri, 23 May 1997 18:26:28 +0100
From: zuilhof@Sg1.OC.WAU.NL (Han Zuilhof)
Subject: use of CCL
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Message-id: <v01530502afab7fe36e74@[137.224.136.38]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"





Dear CCL'ers,

In the discussion about the use of CCL as a Gaussian hotline several things
can be added.
First, Gaussian is a very frequently used program with tons of rarely used
options that are useful for a small audience.  I LOVE discussions of this
type of problems on CCL, because it often is about problems that I haven't
heard/thought about before, and that appear to be relevant for my own
research a long time (up to years) later.  Detailed stuff about the use of
IOp's I've frequently picked up from (the archives of) CCL.   I would pity
it if that would stop.  For qunatum chemistry Gaussian is used a lot -> cut
out those Gaussian discussions, and CCL would be (significantly) less
interesting to me.

Second, a lot of the stuff on CCL is not directly interesting to me and my
research group, but points to issues that people are interested in.  In
this way I can via -sometimes pretty detailed- CCL questions find out about
issues that are not very-well described in the literature yet.  This
concerns in my case a lot of MM and MD work, but for others perhaps QM
work, and the most frequently used program (by far) is still Gaussian.  By
use of filters (automatic or just fast reading what a message is about) it
doesn't bother me at all if discussions are detailed in areas which do not
have my interest at all or 90% of the time.

Finally, several remarks have been made by contributors that the Gaussian
support is unworthy of a market-leader company.  A detailed description of
the meaning of all IOp-commands would be very useful for a LOT of people.
I hope Wavefunction, SemiChem, Hyperchem, Q-Chem, Schrodinger, etc. are
listening to the discussion:   combine your service with the flexibility of
G94, and many people's money can be yours!

With best regards,
Han

*********************************************************************
Han Zuilhof                         *  E-mail:  zuilhof@sg1.oc.wau.nl
Dept. of Organic Chemistry          *  FAX   :  31-317-484914
Wageningen Agricultural University  *  phone :  31-317-482367
P.O. Box 8026                       *
6700 EG  Wageningen                 *
The Netherlands                     *    "Excite a photochemist!"
*********************************************************************





From ccl@www.ccl.net  Mon May 26 03:44:46 1997
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id DAA02298; Mon, 26 May 1997 03:19:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from voxopm.minedu.fi  for laaksone@csc.fi
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id DAA22633; Mon, 26 May 1997 03:19:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from laaksonen.csc.fi (laaksonen.csc.fi [193.166.1.75])
	by voxopm.minedu.fi (8.8.5/8.8.5/CSC/SGI-2.59) with SMTP id KAA02456
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Mon, 26 May 1997 10:19:36 +0300 (EET DST)
Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 10:19:30 +0300 (GFT Daylight Time)
From: Leif Laaksonen <laaksone@csc.fi>
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: gOpenMol for Win 95/NT is now available
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.3.96.970526101731.229A-100000@laaksonen.csc.fi>
X-X-Sender: laaksone@voxopm.csc.fi
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII





Dear Netters,

Scarecrow Computing is pleased to announce the availability of
the first alpha release (v1.0A1) of the gOpenMol program for
the display and analysis of molecular systems. The program is
available for anybody interested. There is no time limit set
for the usage of the program but that remember it's an alpha 
version.

This first release is only for the Windows 95/NT platforms.
You will also need at least 16 MB of memory (32 MB is recommended)
and preferable at least 64 Kcolours. I also recommend that you have 
the service packs (up to SP3) for NT installed because this service 
pack fixes a bug in the Microsoft OpenGL implementation.

Information about gOpenMol is available at:

http://laaksonen.csc.fi/gopenmol/gopenmol.htmls

There is also a page with some examples of gOpenMol usage at:

http://laaksonen.csc.fi/gopenmol/gallery.htmls

The gOpenMol program is a rewrite of my old SCARECROW program.
gOpenMol is now implemented using OpenGL and Tcl/Tk. This gives
the user great flexibility to reconfigure almost the entire
program.

Regards,


-leif laaksonen

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Leif Laaksonen                     |  
Center for Scientific Computing    | Phone:      358 9 4572378
P.O. Box 405                       | Mobile:     358 400425203
FIN-02101 Espoo                    | Telefax:    358 9 4572302
FINLAND                            | Mail:  Leif.Laaksonen@csc.fi
-------- URL: http://laaksonen.csc.fi/leif.laaksonen.html ---------




From ccl@www.ccl.net  Mon May 26 05:44:47 1997
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id FAA02873; Mon, 26 May 1997 05:30:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from faui45.informatik.uni-erlangen.de  for model97@organik.uni-erlangen.de
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id FAA23375; Mon, 26 May 1997 05:30:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from derioc1.organik.uni-erlangen.de (derioc1.organik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.128.1]) by uni-erlangen.de with SMTP
	id LAA25801 (8.7.6/7.5c-FAU); Mon, 26 May 1997 11:26:53 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from indigo11.organik.uni-erlangen.de (indigo11.organik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.128.69]) by organik.uni-erlangen.de with SMTP
	id LAA23183 (8.6.12/7.4f-FAU);; Mon, 26 May 1997 11:25:46 +0200
Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 11:25:45 +0200 (MDT)
From: "Modelling '97" <model97@organik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: chem-com@mailbase.ac.uk, chem-mod@mailbase.ac.uk, chemistry@ccl.net,
        ipmdg-l@venus.co.uk, amber@cgl.ucsf.edu, c2-l@msi.com,
        cache@pacificu.edu, charmm-bbs@emperor.harvard.edu,
        hyperchem@hyper.com, mmodinfo@uoft02.utoledo.edu, quanta-l@msi.com,
        sybyl@extreme.chem.rpi.edu, watoc@ic.ac.uk
Subject: Model(l)ing '97 : Register NOW
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.95.970526112444.1197B-100000@indigo11.organik.uni-erlangen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII





Model(l)ing '97 is the annual international meeting of the Molecular
Graphics and Modelling Society (MGMS), which is being organised in
cooperation with the World Association of Theoretically Oriented Chemists
(WATOC) for the first time.  The meeting will take place from Tuesday,
September 2nd to Friday September 5th 1997 at the Institut fuer Organische
Chemie and the Computer-Chemie-Centrum of the Universitaet
Erlangen-Nuernberg in Erlangen, Germany. 

Conference fees will increase after the June 1st - so register now!!

For details of the conference and on-line registration see:

        http://www.organik.uni-erlangen.de/model97

With regards,

Peter Gedeck

-----
Model(l)ing '97 
Computer Chemie Centrum -  Institut f. Organische Chemie I
Naegelsbachstrasse 25   -  D-91052 Erlangen
Deutschland / Germany

Tel: 0049-9131 - 85 6581  Fax: 0049-9131 - 85 6565
E-Mail: model97@organik.uni-erlangen.de
WWW: http://www.organik.uni-erlangen.de/model97/






From MAILER-DAEMON@www.ccl.net  Mon May 26 09:44:50 1997
Received: from IRIS3  for MAILER-DAEMON@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id IAA03614; Mon, 26 May 1997 08:46:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by IRIS3 (931110.SGI/940406.SGI.AUTO)
	for chemistry@www.ccl.net id AA25514; Tue, 20 Dec 94 20:44:16 -0800
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 94 20:44:16 -0800
From: zjhu@IRIS3.shmm.ac.cn (Zhengjian Hu)
Message-Id: <9412210444.AA25514@IRIS3>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net





From: zjhu@iris3.shmm.ac.cn
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net

Dear CCL users,

  I have been trying to do some QSAR but I have no proper softwares.
I wonder if you could tell me how and where I can get the source code for
the following programs:
  1. Genetic algorithm
  2. Neural network
  3. Partial least squares
  4. Non-linear partial least squares
  5. Simulated annealing algorithm

Thank you in advance!!!

Hu Zengjian
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Hu Zengjian (zjhu@iris3.shmm.ac.cn)
 State Key Laboratory of Drug Research
 Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica
 Chinese Academy of Sciences
 294 Taiyuan Road, Shanghai 200031
 People's Republic of China
 Tel. 86-21-64311833-615
 Fax. 86-21-64370269
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------






From gadre@chem.unipune.ernet.in  Mon May 26 09:44:56 1997
Received: from naveen.ncst.ernet.in  for gadre@chem.unipune.ernet.in
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id IAA03630; Mon, 26 May 1997 08:49:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from unipune.ernet.in (unipune.ernet.in [196.1.114.1]) by naveen.ncst.ernet.in (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA06625 for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>; Mon, 26 May 1997 17:38:56 +0530
Received: from chem.unipune.ernet.in by unipune.ernet.in (8.8.5/UNIPUNE-MAILHUB(02.04.97))
	id RAA17562; Mon, 26 May 1997 17:30:15 -0500 (GMT)
Received: by chem.unipune.ernet.in (8.7.5/SMI-SVR4)
	id QAA17962; Mon, 26 May 1997 16:22:00 -0500
Date: Mon, 26 May 1997 16:22:00 -0500
From: gadre@chem.unipune.ernet.in (Prof. Shridhar R. Gadre)
Message-Id: <199705262122.QAA17962@chem.unipune.ernet.in>
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net





********************************************************************
Dear Sirs/Madams : 
Those who have expressed interest in receving Second announcement
may kindly acknowledge receipt. Thanks....Shridhar Gadre
*********************************************************************
               XII International Conference on Computers              
                 in  Chemical  Research  and Education                 
                             (XII ICCCRE)                             
                          SECOND ANNOUNCEMENT                          

It is our pleasure to invite you to the XII   International Conference 
on Computers in Chemical Research  and  Education  (ICCCRE)  which  is 
being organised at University of Pune, India  from  January  5  to  9, 
1998.  We are happy to inform you  that  we  have  received  excellent 
response from all over the world  and  many  eminent  scientists  have 
agreed to participate in the conference.  Some  of  the  speakers  who 
have already accepted our invitation are : 
Professor/Dr. A. L. Parrill-Baker, S.P. Bhattacharyya,  C.J.  Cramer, 
E.R. Davidson, M.J. Field, S.R. Gadre, F.A.  Gianturco,  K.  Hirao, 
S. Iwata, R.S. Lamba,  H.P. Luthi, P. Lykos, A.R. Moll,  M.  Marsili, 
C. Middlecamp,  K.  Raghavachari,  M.  Rami  Reddy,  A.P.   Rendell, 
S. Ramasesha,  H.F. Schaefer III, N.  Sathyamurthy,  J.J.P.  Stewart, 
W. Torop, I.K. Ugi, R. Viswanathan, N. Yathindra, S.E. Yoo, 
M.C. Zerner et al. The list is still expanding !      

The tentative program of the conference is given below.

Date        9.00-12.00            13.00-15.00           15.30-18.00
        Invited + Contributed    Poster Session    Invited + Contributed    
        Lectures                                   Lectures
        
Jan 5         T1                     P1                    T2

Jan 6         T2                     P2                    T3

Jan 7         T3                     P3                 Excursion

Jan 8         T4                     P4                    T5

Jan 9         T4                     P5                    T6   

The topics listed above are as follows.

T1 : Semi-Empirical, Ab initio and Density Functional Methods

T2 : Electronic journals, Publishing, Conferencing and Networks

T3 : Molecular modeling, Quantitative structure-Activity Relationship

T4 : Computers in Chemical Education

T5 : Artificial  intelligence,  Chemometrics, Neutral  networks  and 
     their chemical applications

T6 : New Algorithms and  Techniques  in  computational  chemistry  and 
     parallel computing

P1 : Topics covered under T1.

P2 : Topics under T3.

P3 : Topics discussed in T2 and T5.

P4 : Topics under T6.

P5 : Topics covered in T4.

On three days, there may be evening lectures from 19:30 to 20:30.
***********************************************************************
  Award Announcement :  
***********************************************************************

To commemorate the Golden Jubilee of India's Independence we are pleased
to announce TWO prizes, one each in the category of contributed lectures
and posters for the best presentation.

************************************************************************

Information on Abstracts :

Abstracts for invited talks/contributory presentations/posters  should 
be submitted not later than July 31, 1997 to 

Dr. Shridhar R. Gadre
Department of Chemistry
University of Pune
Pune-411 007. (INDIA)
fax : 0091-212-351728
e-mail : gadre@unipune.ernet.in



The printed area must be contained within a rectangle of  size  234  x 
156 mm (9.2" x 6.1").  Top 50 mm should be used  only  for  title  and 
Authors' name/s and address/es.  For title, a font size of 14 in  bold 
face is recommended.  The name and address may be done  in  font  size 
12.  Abstract should be preferably written  in  MS WORD or Mac WORD 
software (1.5 line spacing) using Times font  with a font size of 10.  
In case of unavailability of WORD the abstract may be written using 
any software.  The abstract should fit in one A4 size page.  
References denoted by  superscript  numbers  in  the  text  and 
should be listed at the  end  of  the  text  using  standard  Chemical 
Abstracts Source Service Index (CASSI) terminology, followed by  YEAR, 
VOLUME AND PAGE.   Please  note  that  abstracts  will  be  reproduced 
directly from the authors' originals and  hence  2  copies  should  be 
mailed without folding the paper.  A book of abstracts of all oral and 
poster contributions will be distributed at the meeting.

The registration fees for the participants from abroad are :

US$ 300  for  non-students  and  US$ 150  for  students.    The 
registration fees should be paid  before  July  31,  1997.   The  late 
registration fees  are  US$ 400  (non  students)   and  US$ 200 
(students) only upto September 30, 1997. Equivalent amount in British
pounds, Deutsche  marks or Japanese yens or of course, Indian Rupees is also
acceptable.  The fees are non-refundable.

The registration fees should be paid by demand-draft /banker's draft
in  the  name  of "The Registrar, University of Pune" payable at the 
State Bank of India, Pune.   Payment is also acceptable by visa and master 
card.  Please contact us  for  fuller  details  before  effecting  the 
payment.
The current exchange rate is approximately Rs.36 per US$.

Travel :

The participants are requested to book their flight arriving at Mumbai 
(Bombay) International airport.  There are  some  domestic  connecting 
flights from Mumbai to Pune.  You should try to  get  such  connecting 
flight (if available) to  reach  Pune.   Upon  your  arrival  at  Pune 
(domestic) airport, arrangements will be made to carry you  upto  your 
Hotel/conference site.  For the participants who do not have connecting 
flights from Mumbai to Pune, special  arrangements  may  be  made  to 
provide ground transportation  upto  Pune.   Our  volunteers  will  be 
available on  the  airport to receive you if you send us your  arrival 
schedule  in  advance  (at least 30 days before the conference).

For further information on Pune University  and  Pune  city,  you  may 
visit the web site
               http://www.unipune.ernet.in
               http://www.unc.edu/~pune
For travel information around Pune you may visit
               http://iucaa.iucaa.ernet.in/~snk/place1.html
               http://iucaa.iucaa.ernet.in/~snk/place2.html

For travel with in Maharashtra State visit web sites 
http://spiderman.bu.edu/misc/india/places/indiastates/maharashtra.html
http://www.clemson:edu/~nsankar/india/states/maharashtra.html
http://wwwvms.utexas.edu/~savkar/rashtra.html

Weather in Pune

The maximum and minimum temperatures in Pune  in  January  are  around 
27 and 7 degrees Celsius respectively.  Normally there are no  rains 
around  this time and relative humidity is normally less than 40%.

Hotels :

The accommodation is arranged in various hotels in Pune.   Your  room 
may be booked in any of the following hotels.  Please tell us your two 
preferences and we shall be happy to do the room booking for you.  All 
hotels accept credit cards( at least VISA and MASTER CARD ).

1.   Hotel  Span  Executive ; Revenue Colony, Shivaji Nagar, 
                                   Pune-411005, India.
     (Facilities : Luxury rooms, hot and cold water with showers,
     channel  music,  television,  round  the  clock   service,   pure 
     vegetarian breakfast)
     Rates : about Rs.400/- or US$12 per person per day(with double
     occupancy)

2.   Hotel Pride Executive ; 5, University Road, Shivajinagar,
                                   Pune-411005, India.
     This hotel belongs to a higher class.
     (Facilities : Excellent quality luxury rooms, hot and cold  water 
     with   showers,  channel  music,  television,  round  the  clock 
     service, breakfast, fruit basket, swimming  pool) 
     Rates  :  about Rs.2000/- or US$60 per person per day
     (with double occupancy).

3.   Hotel Sahara ; Senapati Bapat Road, Pune-411 007, India.
     (Facilities : Luxury rooms, hot and cold water with showers, free 
     shoe polishing, laundry service, channel music, television, round 
     the clock service, pure vegetarian breakfast).
     Rates : about Rs.350/- or US$11 per person per day  (on  double 
     occupancy basis).

4.   Hotel Ranjit, 870/7 Bhandarkar Institute Road,  Deccan  Gymkhana, 
     Pune-411 004.  
     (Facilities : Round the clock service, laundry service, cold  and 
     hot water, doctor on call,  breakfast,  car  rental,  two-channel 
     music)
     Rates : Rs.400/- or US$12 per person per day (with double occupancy).


Sponsors for the Conference :

     University of Pune
     Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi

Co-sponsors :

     National Chemical Laboratory (NCL), Pune
     Centre for Development of Advanced Computing(C-DAC), Pune
                        
                        
                        HOPE TO SEE YOU IN PUNE
                          IN JANUARY 1998 !
                                  ...





From schiffer@h1tw0036.hoechst.com  Tue May 27 09:51:30 1997
Received: from backup.hoechst.com  for schiffer@h1tw0036.hoechst.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id JAA08762; Tue, 27 May 1997 09:33:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by backup.hoechst.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id PAA15011; Tue, 27 May 1997 15:30:55 +0200
Received: from unknown(134.81.76.36) by backup via smap (V1.3)
	id sma014915; Tue May 27 15:29:00 1997
Received: from h1tw0024 by h1tw0036 via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI.AUTO)
	 id PAA25994; Tue, 27 May 1997 15:29:12 +0200
Message-ID: <338AE1A8.3F54@h1tw0036.hoechst.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 15:29:12 +0200
From: "Dr. Heinz Schiffer" <schiffer@h1tw0036.hoechst.com>
Organization: Hoechst Corporate Research & Technology
X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: E.Tajkhorshid@DKFZ-Heidelberg.de
CC: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:QM MD
References: <9705271233.ZM15216@mbp-sgi7.inet.dkfz-heidelberg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit





Emadeddin Tajkhorshid wrote:
> 
> Dear all
> 
> I am looking for any info. about quantom chemical molecular dynamics. Any
> program, web site and ....
> 
> Thanx

Hi Emaheddin,
look at

  http://www.mpi-stuttgart.mpg.de/docs/frames.html

and see, e.g.

	A. Bifone et al.
	Energy Storage in the Primary Photoproduct of Vision
	J. Phys. Chem. B, 101 (1997) 2954-2958

	F. Buda et al.
	Charge localization and dynamics in rhodopsin
	Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 4474-4477

	D. E. Sagnella et al.
	Ab initio molecular dynamics study of proton transfer
	in a polyglycine analog of the ion channel gramicidin A
	Biophys. J. 71 (1996) 1172-1178

	Juerg Hutter et al.
	Nonempirical Calculations of a Hydrated RNA Duplex
	J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 8710-8712

	M. Marchi et al.
	A first principles investigation of the structure
	of a bacteriochlorophyll crystal
	J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 7847-7848

	E. J. Meijer et al.
	A density-functional study of the intermolecular
	interactions of benzene
	J. Chem. Phys. 105 (1996) 8685

Ciao,
Heinz



-- 
Dr. Heinz Schiffer		Phone   ++49-69-305-2330
Hoechst CR&T			Fax     ++49-69-305-81162
Scientific Computing, G864	Email   schiffer@h1tw0036.hoechst.com
65926 Frankfurt am Main		        schiffer@msmwia.hoechst.com


From watts@qtp.ufl.edu  Tue May 27 14:47:52 1997
Received: from qtp.ufl.edu  for watts@qtp.ufl.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id OAA11781; Tue, 27 May 1997 14:29:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from visi15 by qtp.ufl.edu (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
	id OAA06868; Tue, 27 May 1997 14:27:54 -0400
Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 14:27:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: "John D. Watts" <watts@qtp.ufl.edu>
Reply-To: "John D. Watts" <watts@qtp.ufl.edu>
Subject: Re : CCL messages about coupled-cluster optimizations in G94, other progs
To: qibvigap@lg.ehu.es
Cc: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Message-ID: <libSDtMail.9705271427.3434.watts@qtp.ufl.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-MD5: NisJGOG/vy68esJ1CMBtSw==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2_22 SunOS 5.6 sun4c sparc 





Dear Pablo and other CCL subscribers,

   One of my colleagues brought these messages to my attention and asked me to
   send a note to you and the CCL. I apologize in advance to CCL subscribers
   who have already seen plenty of useful messages on this issue, but my
   colleague is persistent, so here goes ...
   
   anyway, the point i want to address is what the ACES II program from
   Professor R.J. Bartlett's group in the Quantum Theory Project of the Univer-
   sity of Florida can do as far as analytical CCSD and CCSD(T) derivatives
   (gradients) are concerned. a number of subscribers mentioned the capabil-
   ities of ACES II in this regard.
   
   ACES II can do analytical gradients for CCSD with RHF, UHF, ROHF, and
   certain classes of QRHF reference functions. it can also do CCSD gradients
   for a two-determinant reference for open-shell singlets based on QRHF
   orbitals. for CCSD(T) it can do analytical gradients for RHF, UHF, and
   ROHF references. it can also do QCISD and QCISD(T) gradients for RHF and
   UHF, although we prefer CCSD-based methods to the QCI truncations.
   
   analytical gradients are also available for the excited state CCSD method
   known as equation-of-motion CCSD (many call this linear response CCSD).
   
   please note that Qiang Cui's statement about analytical hessians does not
   apply to the version of ACES II distributed by the QTP; he has access to
   a private version of the code developed subsequent to their time at Florida
   by John Stanton and Juergen Gauss. my remarks refer to the code distributed
   by QTP.
   
   anyone who wants further information can send email to aces2@qtp.ufl.edu
   and/or visit our web page. the latter was given by Eric Patterson.
   
   i hope these remarks will be of some use. i am not a CCL subscriber, so if
   you want to follow up any of these points, please email me directly.
   
   John



From andy@neptune.chem.uga.edu  Wed May 28 12:48:21 1997
Received: from neptune.chem.uga.edu  for andy@neptune.chem.uga.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id MAA20085; Wed, 28 May 1997 12:11:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from andy@localhost) by neptune.chem.uga.edu (8.7.4/8.7.3) id MAA22656 for chemistry@www.ccl.net; Wed, 28 May 1997 12:11:29 -0400
Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 12:11:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Andy Dustman <andy@CCMSD.chem.uga.edu>
Sender: andy@neptune.chem.uga.edu
Reply-To: Andy Dustman <andy@CCMSD.chem.uga.edu>
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: G: The unoffical GAUSSIAN mailling list
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.94.970528120459.15195e-100000@neptune.chem.uga.edu>





-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

There seemed to be a lot of sentiment towards having a mailing list for
GAUSSIAN questions and problems, so I made one, and it's called G. To
subscribe, send the subject "subscribe" to g-request@CCMSD.chem.uga.edu. 
If you want the digested version, send the subject "subscribe" to
g-d-request@CCMSD.chem.uga.edu. To post messages to the list, send them to
g@CCMSD.chem.uga.edu.

I have no official connection to GAUSSIAN, Inc., and I am more likely to
ask questions than to answer them. Remember, this list is for
GAUSSIAN-related topics ONLY. Other more general computational chemistry
questions should go to CCL. NO CROSSPOSTING, PLEASE.

Report any errors to me. Everything should be working properly, but you
never know.

Andy Dustman / Computational Center for Molecular Structure and Design / UGA
    To get my PGP public key, send me mail with subject "send file key".
For the ultimate anti-spam procmail recipe, send me mail with subject "spam"
"Encryption is too important to leave to the government."  -- Bruce Schneier
http://www.ilinks.net/~dustman    mailto:andy@CCMSD.chem.uga.edu      <}+++<



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQEPAwUBM4xZLBOPBZTHLz8dAQFMegfPXuBxdM/A6cZXfdDzubJmjKBTcHVtan7G
4JEbecjOI1M+m3AnYMn3HLDoYUPGXzeUs+wdYp5z2GwYozUW4Db/ZSessYr71IW2
d+WIgSMsbxx2doe8EGfCV5q6gQ41SsA9PDlnd6OYpiz9hXvasGmdh72qUYUIiLCL
frTCJxS/DIdZuwCpMxY3V2N8JHeCY3hArJzNvuT8gDPi1Am8dJVT1scOQvQg3S2M
p7WAiSyxsy9K1mfwh4YpLGyq0qmxfchmVZT9ce6xRC69qJJC05efKDfVrrhoHI0U
nWFPTGXI4gW/ZSD2LKiZE3X3ME14NlKMrlYBf6L0eK89CQ==
=Kup+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


From gford@post.smu.edu  Wed May 28 13:50:35 1997
Received: from post.cis.smu.edu  for gford@post.smu.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id NAA20424; Wed, 28 May 1997 13:08:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by post.cis.smu.edu (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.3)
	id <m0wWmCx-000FoVC@post.cis.smu.edu>; Wed, 28 May 97 12:08 CDT
Message-Id: <m0wWmCx-000FoVC@post.cis.smu.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 May 97 12:08 CDT
From: "George P. Ford"  <gford@post.smu.edu>
Reply-To: "George P. Ford"  <gford@mail.smu.edu>
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject:  CCL:2 unrelated questions





Dr. S. Shapiro writes:
> 
> 
> Dear Colleagues;
> 
>         I have two quite unrelated questions for which perhaps some CCLers
> might be able to provide useful replies:
> 
> Question 1:  In order to obtain Mulliken partial atomic charges for some
> work in which we are engaged, I prepared a Z-matrix for the molecule
> p-tolylacetylene ("tolac.mop"), as follows:
> 
> 
> am1 nointer
> p-tolylacetylene
> 
> C     0.000000  0    0.000000  0    0.000000  0   0   0   0 
> C     1.401729  0    0.000000  0    0.000000  0   1   0   0 
> C     1.399999  0  120.081459  0    0.000000  0   2   1   0 
> C     1.399809  0  120.056900  0    0.000000  0   3   2   1 
> C     1.399806  0  119.942001  0    0.000000  0   4   3   2 
> C     1.400006  0  120.056679  0    0.000000  0   5   4   3 
> C     1.312333  0  120.109207  0  180.000000  0   1   2   3 
> C     1.200200  0  179.891647  0  180.000000  0   7   1   2 
> H     1.103619  0  119.699532  0  180.000000  0   2   3   1 
> H     1.103127  0  119.972672  0  180.000000  0   3   2   1 
> H     1.103111  0  120.028992  0  180.000000  0   4   3   2 
> H     1.103127  0  119.970596  0  180.000000  0   5   4   3 
> H     1.103619  0  119.699341  0  180.000000  0   6   5   4 
> H     1.059943  0  180.000000  0  180.000000  0   8   7   1 
> 
> 
The problem is that the dihedral angle for the acetylenic hydrogen is 
ill-defined because the defining atoms (8, 7, 1) are linear. The standard 
solutionis to add a dummy atom. For example, you could replace the last line of 
your Z-matrix by:

XX     1.0       0   90.0       0    0.0       0   8   7   6
 H     1.059943  0   90.000000  0  180.000000  0   8   9   7

This adds a dummy (XX) which redefines H14 in terms of three non-linear atoms:
       
                 X9     C6-C5
                 |     /    \
             H14-C8-C7-C1    C4
                       \    /
                        C2-C3

An alternative approach would be to use a Cartesian definition (include the 
keyword XYZ). This of course depends on your either having a compelete set of 
xyz coords available or being willing to figure out the missing set (for H14) 
and add them manually.
> 
> 
> Question 2:  I would like to know if there is some established quantitative
> measure of the "degree" of chirality.  For example, consider the chiral
> molecules CR1R2R3R4, where in one case R1 = H, R2 = D, R3 = T, and R4 = F,
> whereas in another case R1 = H, R2 = naphthyl, R3 = n-octyl, and R4 = NO2.
> Whilst both molecules are chiral, it is clear that the structural variation
> when R1 = H, R2 = naphthyl, R3 = n-octyl, and R4 = NO2 makes this a "more"
> chiral molecule than when R1 = H, R2 = D, R3 = T, and R4 = F.  But how to
> express in a quantitative fashion that the second chiral molecule is "more"
> chiral than the first?  I thought that perhaps the RMS deviation between the
> two enantiomorphs of each of these chiral molecules might provide
> quantification of chirality.  Does anyone have any further, possibly better,
> suggestions?
> 
By definition a molecule is either chiral or it isn't. Admittedly, the physical 
manifestation of chirality when the chirality is due only to isotopic 
substitution (the rotation of plane polarized light), is tiny. But this is a 
special situation. Such generalizations are rare for chemical substitutions. 

I think that to define "degree of chirality" in the way you suggest is just to 
define a degree of molecular similarity. In that sense it's not fundamentally 
different from comparing the similarity of any two molecules.

Without knowing more about your ultimate goals its hard to be specific. However,
I would incline towards some definition that was itself inherently chiral. 
Indices obtained in this way would then have a diasteriomeric character which 
might have a better chance of paralleling the chemical consequences of what you 
are refering to as "degree of chirality". 

Perhaps you could design some kind of real or artificial chiral "probe group" 
for investigating the surface of one of the enantiomers, or perhaps some kind of
chiral envelope or cavity onto which to fit it. A different approach, for 
molecules with chiral centers, might be to try to quantify the R/S definition. 
Instead of using the sequence rules perhaps you could use some kind of 
electronic and/or size criterion. Again, this rather depends on your ultimate 
purpose.

Hope some of this is useful.

George P. Ford



============================================================================
George P. Ford                          |       email:  gford@smu.edu
Department of Chemistry                 |   telephone:  (214)768-2479
Southern Methodist University           |         fax:  (214)768-4089
Dallas, Texas 75275                     |        http://www.smu.edu/~gford/
============================================================================
   



From cccc@qc.chem.ualberta.ca  Wed May 28 19:45:21 1997
Received: from quartz.ucs.ualberta.ca  for cccc@qc.chem.ualberta.ca
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id SAA22469; Wed, 28 May 1997 18:54:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from qc.chem.ualberta.ca (qc.chem.ualberta.ca [129.128.2.12])
	by quartz.ucs.ualberta.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA32160
	for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 28 May 1997 16:54:21 -0600
Received: (from cccc@localhost) by qc.chem.ualberta.ca (8.6.12/8.6.10) id QAA14253; Wed, 28 May 1997 16:50:37 -0600
Date: Wed, 28 May 1997 16:50:37 -0600
From: 3rd Canadian Computational Chemistry Conference <cccc@qc.chem.ualberta.ca>
Message-Id: <199705282250.QAA14253@qc.chem.ualberta.ca>
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: 3rd Canadian Computational Chemistry Conference (3rd Announcement)
Cc: mariusz@qc.chem.ualberta.ca
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII





 
         3rd Canadian Computational Chemistry Conference 1997
         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
                       Third Announcement
 
Updated information about the 3rd Canadian Computational Chemistry Conference
(July 19 - 23 in Edmonton, Alberta) is available
from the web site of the conference:
 
             http://www.chem.ualberta.ca/~cccc
 
Invited Lecturers
=================
 
 Christopher Bayly, Merck Frosst, Canada
 
 Axel D. Becke, Queen's University, Canada
 
 Russell J. Boyd, Dalhousie University, Canada
 
 David A. Case, Scripps Research Institute, U.S.A.
 
 Anne M. Chaka, The Lubrizol Corporation, U.S.A.
 
 Delano P. Chong, University of British Columbia, Canada
 
 Thomas R. Cundari, The University of Memphis, U.S.A.
 
 Ernest R. Davidson, Indiana University, U.S.A.
 
 Michel Dupuis, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, U.S.A.
 
 David F. Feller, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, U.S.A.
 
 Martin Head-Gordon, University of California (Berkeley), U.S.A.
 
 Kimihiko Hirao, University of Tokyo, Japan
 
 Ray Kapral, University of Toronto, Canada
 
 Jacek Karwowski, N. Copernicus University, Poland
 
 Peter Margl, University of Calgary, Canada
 
 Gren N. Patey, University of British Columbia, Canada
 
 Andrzej J. Sadlej, University of Lund, Sweden
 
 Dennis Salahub, Universite de Montreal, Canada
 
 H.F. Schaefer III, University of Georgia, U.S.A.
 
 Peter Taylor, San Diego Supercomputer Center, U.S.A.
 
 Thanh N. Truong, University of Utah, U.S.A.
 
 John S. Tse, Steacie Institute for Molecular Science, Canada
 
 Donald F. Weaver, Queen's University, Canada
 
 Michael Anthony Whitehead, McGill University, Canada
 
 Michael C. Zerner, University of Florida, U.S.A.
 
Deadlines
=========
 
1. Conference Registration (regular conference fee)  June 30, 1997
 
2. Submission of Abstracts                           June 30, 1997
 
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!                                                                             !
! The final title and abstract must be received by the organizers in Edmonton !
!     before June 30 in order to be included in the Conference Program.       !
!                                                                             !
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Conference Fees
===============
 
 Regular Participants          $220
 Graduate Students             $170
 
Conference fee covers the costs of the Opening Social, seven refreshment
breaks, munchies and beverage tickets during Poster Sessions, as well
as the costs of running the Conference (rental of the Timms Centre,
printing of Conference materials, etc). Please note that the Conference
fee includes 7% GST.
 
All costs are in Canadian dollars. Please make your cheques or money
orders payable to:
 
      3rd CCCC
 
and mail them to
 
      3rd Canadian Computational Chemistry Conference
      c/o Dr. M. Klobukowski
      Department of Chemistry
      University of Alberta
      Edmonton, AB, Canada
      T6G 2G2
 
 
Accommodations
==============
 
All hotel reservations must be done by participants. There are several
hotels with easy access to the Conference site:
 
(A) Lister Hall
 
Cost is $26.88 per day for single room, $35.84 for twin room (all taxes
included). Contact:
 
            The University of Alberta Guest Services
            44 Lister Hall Edmonton, AB
            T6G 2H6
 
            Phone: 403-492-4281
            Fax: 403-492-7032
 
(B) Campus Tower Suite Hotel
 
Cost is $65 per day (plus tax). The number of suites is limited. Contact:
 
            Campus Tower Suite Hotel
            11145 - 87 Avenue
            Edmonton, AB
            T6G 0Y1
 
            Phone: 403-439-6060
            Fax: 403-433-4410
 
Registration
============
 
You may register by WWW at the web site http://www.chem.ualberta.ca/~cccc.
Alternatively, you may send us (or fax) the text version of the
Registration Form, available from the Web site of the Conference
(http://www.chem.ualberta.ca/~cccc).
 
Correspondence regarding the Conference should be sent to:
 
      3rd Canadian Computational Chemistry Conference
      c/o Dr. M. Klobukowski
      Department of Chemistry
      University of Alberta
      Edmonton, AB, Canada
      T6G 2G2
 
      FAX: 403-492-8231
 
You may also reach us at
 
cccc@qc.chem.ualberta.ca
          or
EDGECOMK@QUCDN.QUEENSU.CA
 
 
We are looking forward to seeing you at the 3rd CCCC.
 
 
                               For the Organizing Committee of the 3rd CCCC,
 
                                   Mariusz Klobukowski and Ken Edgecombe


From chemtw@showme.missouri.edu  Thu May 29 16:45:36 1997
Received: from mail.missouri.edu  for chemtw@showme.missouri.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id QAA00492; Thu, 29 May 1997 16:05:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from black.missouri.edu (black.missouri.edu [128.206.2.222])
	by mail.missouri.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA19486
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Thu, 29 May 1997 15:05:45 -0500
Received: from localhost (chemtw@localhost)
	by black.missouri.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA23322
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Thu, 29 May 1997 15:04:55 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: black.missouri.edu: chemtw owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 15:04:55 -0500 (CDT)
From: Troy Wymore <chemtw@showme.missouri.edu>
X-Sender: chemtw@black.missouri.edu
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Density Distribution using CHARMM
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.3.95q.970529145409.92298A-100000@black.missouri.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Dear CCL,

I would like to know if it is possible to construct a density distribution
of a particular atom type say along the z axis using some type of analysis
facility in CHARMM version 24b2.  I have seen this sort of analysis before
when someone is studying lipid bilayer systems.

Any help would be much appreciated.

****************************************
Troy Wymore
Department of Chemistry
University of Missouri-Columbia
Columbia, MO 65211

e-mail: chemtw@showme.missouri.edu
http://www.missouri.edu/~chemtw/troy.html
*****************************************


From ahocquet@tamarugo.cec.uchile.cl  Thu May 29 22:45:36 1997
Received: from tamarugo.cec.uchile.cl  for ahocquet@tamarugo.cec.uchile.cl
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id WAA02963; Thu, 29 May 1997 22:25:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [146.83.10.18] by tamarugo.cec.uchile.cl (5.0/SMI-SVR4(Thom))
	id AA01705; Thu, 29 May 1997 22:27:09 +0400
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 22:27:09 +0400
Message-Id: <9705300227.AA01705@tamarugo.cec.uchile.cl>
X-Sender: ahocquet@tamarugo.cec.uchile.cl
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: Alexandre Hocquet <ahocquet@tamarugo.cec.uchile.cl>
Subject: a question about gaus...sorry  : about BIOGRAF


Dear CCLers,

I quickly ask my question before everybody lynches me :

In a publication about the DREIDING molecular mechanics force field
(Mayo et al. J. Phys Chem 1990 vol 94 p 8897)
the authors provide geometry optimisations of a set of molecules
to compare their results with crystalographic structures.
However they do not say (or i did not see) which termination
conditions they apply to their optimisations.
As they claim to use the BIOGRAF package, my question is thus :
Is there any default termination condition, such as 0.1kcal/molA for
the energy gradient in biograf, as it appears to be the case
in the cerius2 package that also uses Dreiding  ?

Thanks in advance
Alexandre Hocquet
Laboratorio de Cristalografia
Facultad de Ciencias Fisicas
Universidad de Chile
Blanco Encalada, 2008
Santiago Centro
Chile
fono : 56 2 678 45 19
fax : 56 2 696 73 59
email : ahocquet@cec.uchile.cl


From JeffAyres@worldnet.att.net  Thu May 29 22:49:58 1997
Received: from mtigwc03.worldnet.att.net  for JeffAyres@worldnet.att.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id WAA02906; Thu, 29 May 1997 22:14:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from LOCALNAME ([207.147.169.198]) by mtigwc03.worldnet.att.net
          (post.office MTA v2.0 0613 ) with SMTP id AAA8200
          for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>;
          Fri, 30 May 1997 02:12:52 +0000
Message-ID: <338E38B3.3EDB@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 19:17:23 -0700
From: "Jeffrey J. Ayres" <JeffAyres@worldnet.att.net>
Organization: independent
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win16; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: [Fwd: Re: ccl two unrelated questions]
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline


Message-ID: <338DF08C.604@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 14:09:32 -0700
From: "Jeffrey J. Ayres" <JeffAyres@worldnet.att.net>
Organization: independent
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win16; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: re:ccl two unrelated questions
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Hr. Dr. S. Shapiro wrote:
> >
> > Dear Colleagues;
> >
> >         I have two quite unrelated questions for which perhaps some CCLers
> > might be able to provide useful replies:
> >
> > Question 1:  In order to obtain Mulliken partial atomic charges for some
> > work in which we are engaged, I prepared a Z-matrix for the molecule
> > p-tolylacetylene ("tolac.mop"), as follows:
> >
> > am1 nointer
> > p-tolylacetylene
> >
> > C     0.000000  0    0.000000  0    0.000000  0   0   0   0
> > C     1.401729  0    0.000000  0    0.000000  0   1   0   0
> > C     1.399999  0  120.081459  0    0.000000  0   2   1   0
> > C     1.399809  0  120.056900  0    0.000000  0   3   2   1
> > C     1.399806  0  119.942001  0    0.000000  0   4   3   2
> > C     1.400006  0  120.056679  0    0.000000  0   5   4   3
> > C     1.312333  0  120.109207  0  180.000000  0   1   2   3
> > C     1.200200  0  179.891647  0  180.000000  0   7   1   2
> > H     1.103619  0  119.699532  0  180.000000  0   2   3   1
> > H     1.103127  0  119.972672  0  180.000000  0   3   2   1
> > H     1.103111  0  120.028992  0  180.000000  0   4   3   2
> > H     1.103127  0  119.970596  0  180.000000  0   5   4   3
> > H     1.103619  0  119.699341  0  180.000000  0   6   5   4
> > H     1.059943  0  180.000000  0  180.000000  0   8   7   1
> >
> > When I tried running it in MOPAC 6.0, I got the following output:
> >
> >                      CALCULATION ABANDONED AT THIS POINT
> >
> >            THREE ATOMS BEING USED TO DEFINE THE
> >            COORDINATES OF A FOURTH ATOM, WHOSE BOND-ANGLE IS
> >            NOT ZERO OR 180 DEGREEES, ARE IN AN ALMOST STRAIGHT
> >            LINE.  THERE IS A HIGH PROBABILITY THAT THE
> >            COORDINATES OF THE ATOM WILL BE INCORRECT.
> >
> >                     THE FAULTY ATOM IS ATOM NUMBER  14
> >
> >                                 :
> >                                 :
> >
> >                          [some stuff omitted]
> >
> >                                 :
> >                                 :
> >
> >             CARTESIAN COORDINATES UP TO FAULTY ATOM
> >
> >      I            X            Y            Z
> >      1          .00000       .00000       .00000
> >      2         1.40173       .00000       .00000
> >      3         2.10345      1.21144       .00000
> >      4         1.40648      2.42540       .00000
> >      5          .00667      2.42736       .00000
> >      6         -.69623      1.21660       .00000
> >      7         -.65833     -1.13526       .00000
> >      8        -1.26237     -2.17238       .00000
> >      9         1.95719      -.95365       .00000
> >     10         3.20658      1.20934       .00000
> >     11         1.95985      3.37966       .00000
> >     12         -.54306      3.38375       .00000
> >     13        -1.79982      1.22503       .00000
> >     14          .00000       .00000       .00000
> >
> >        ATOMS  8,  7, AND  1 ARE WITHIN  .0025 ANGSTROMS OF A STRAIGHT LINE
> >
> >         Adding the keyword "geo-ok" didn't help.  Does anyone know of a
> > workaround to this so that I can obtain Mulliken partial atomic charges for
> > the atoms of p-tolylacetylee using MOPAC?
Dr. Shapiro,
        Both acetylbenzene (acebenz.mop) and tolylacetylyne
(tolylace.mop)
were successful using MOPAC 6.  Each file was separately
entered into the interface function of molgen, configured for mopac, and
input files written.  The arc files displayed successful completion of
the calculation (acebenz.arc, tolylace.arc).  The dummy atoms were
placed automatically using molgen/mopac6.


AM1 NOINTER  T=100000
LINEARITY CHECK, W/O TOLYL GROUP

99     0.00000   0       0.00000   0         0.00000   0      0  0  0
 6     3.43972   1       0.00000   0         0.00000   0      1  0  0
 6     1.21234   1      64.66995   1         0.00000   0      2  1  0
99     1.00000   1      90.00001   1       180.00000   1      3  2  1
99     1.00000   1      90.00000   1       180.00000   1      3  2  1
99     1.00000   1      90.00000   1       180.00000   1      5  3  2
 6     1.31568   1      90.00011   1       359.99994   1      3  5  6
 6     1.39791   1     149.19049   1       119.94086   1      7  6  5
 6     1.39663   1     120.14005   1        72.87572   1      8  7  6
 6     1.39612   1     120.06921   1         0.00000   1      9  8  7
 6     1.39612   1     119.88985   1         0.00000   1     10  9  8
 6     1.39663   1     120.06889   1         0.00000   1     11 10  9
 1     1.10365   1     119.36862   1       180.00000   1     12 11 10
 1     1.10315   1     119.93962   1       180.00000   1     11 10  9
 1     1.10312   1     120.05508   1       180.00000   1     10  9  8
 1     1.10315   1     119.99132   1       180.00000   1      9  8  7
 1     1.10365   1     120.49116   1       252.87573   1      8  7  6
 1     1.08988   1     180.00000   1       329.12024   1      2  3  4
 0
99


AM1 NOINTER  T=100000
LINEARITY CHECK

99     0.00000   0       0.00000   0         0.00000   0      0  0  0
 6     3.48042   1       0.00000   0         0.00000   0      1  0  0
 6     1.21234   1      65.15163   1         0.00000   0      2  1  0
99     1.00000   1      90.00000   1       180.00000   1      3  2  1
99     1.00000   1      90.00000   1       180.00000   1      3  2  1
99     1.00000   1      90.00000   1       180.00000   1      5  3  2
 6     1.31563   1      89.99992   1         0.00000   1      3  5  6
 6     1.39705   1     149.14925   1       120.29477   1      7  6  5
 6     1.39659   1     120.22314   1        72.56248   1      8  7  6
 6     1.39913   1     120.88677   1       359.99326   1      9  8  7
 6     1.39902   1     118.43241   1         0.01592   1     10  9  8
 6     1.39633   1     120.99382   1       359.98410   1     11 10  9
 6     1.50826   1     121.44947   1       179.98825   1     10  9  8
 1     1.11359   1     112.38258   1       359.52576   1     13 10  9
 1     1.11378   1     110.22261   1       239.41864   1     13 10  9
 1     1.11377   1     110.19374   1       119.64949   1     13 10  9
 1     1.10366   1     119.40629   1       180.00584   1     12 11 10
 1     1.10282   1     119.58285   1       179.98978   1     11 10  9
 1     1.10264   1     119.11382   1       179.99895   1      9  8  7
 1     1.10369   1     120.40184   1       252.56161   1      8  7  6
 1     1.08988   1     180.00000   1       328.78256   1      2  3  4
 0
99




                     SUMMARY OF   AM1   CALCULATION

                                                            VERSION 
6.00


  C8  H6 
                                                      
Today                   
 AM1 NOINTER T=100000
 LINEARITY CHECK, W/O TOLYL GROUP
 


     HERBERTS TEST WAS SATISFIED IN BFGS                      
     SCF FIELD WAS ACHIEVED                                   


          HEAT OF FORMATION       =        76.494364 KCAL
          ELECTRONIC ENERGY       =     -4591.203173 EV
          CORE-CORE REPULSION     =      3486.776813 EV
          GRADIENT NORM           =         3.408224
          DIPOLE                  =          .25742 DEBYE
          NO. OF FILLED LEVELS    =        19
          IONIZATION POTENTIAL    =         9.289317 EV
          MOLECULAR WEIGHT        =       102.135
          SCF CALCULATIONS        =        27
          COMPUTATION TIME =  1 MINUTES AND  30.000 SECONDS


          FINAL GEOMETRY OBTAINED                                   
CHARGE
 AM1 NOINTER T=100000
 LINEARITY CHECK, W/O TOLYL GROUP
 
 XX     .0000000  0       .000000  0       .000000  0    0    0    0
  C    3.4420049  1       .000000  0       .000000  0    1    0   
0      -.1964
  C    1.1970294  1     56.641236  1       .000000  0    2    1   
0      -.1280
 XX     .9949193  1     89.708910  1   -178.211018  1    3    2    1
 XX    1.0314086  1     90.561397  1   -179.649559  1    3    2    1
 XX    1.0312117  1     91.796755  1   -178.745409  1    5    3    2
  C    1.4082800  1     89.641007  1      1.183807  1    3    5   
6       .0244
  C    1.4046426  1    150.539338  1    118.976516  1    7    6   
5      -.1065
  C    1.3929953  1    120.068775  1     75.174986  1    8    7   
6      -.1338
  C    1.3962067  1    120.142186  1      -.010894  1    9    8   
7      -.1217
  C    1.3939876  1    119.995132  1      -.061412  1   10    9   
8      -.1337
  C    1.3932708  1    120.308968  1      -.013960  1   11   10   
9      -.1064
  H    1.0996732  1    120.271218  1   -179.971165  1   12   11  
10       .1389
  H    1.0995514  1    119.955001  1    179.985241  1   11   10   
9       .1336
  H    1.0991887  1    120.075223  1    179.756408  1   10    9   
8       .1325
  H    1.0996151  1    119.852421  1    179.928846  1    9    8   
7       .1340
  H    1.1002619  1    120.153389  1   -104.967368  1    8    7   
6       .1387
  H    1.0602610  1    179.663366  1    -32.668745  1    2    3   
4       .2244





                     SUMMARY OF   AM1   CALCULATION

                                                            VERSION 
6.00


  C9  H8 
                                                      
Today                   
 AM1 NOINTER T=100000
 LINEARITY CHECK
 


     HERBERTS TEST WAS SATISFIED IN BFGS                      
     SCF FIELD WAS ACHIEVED                                   


          HEAT OF FORMATION       =        68.807359 KCAL
          ELECTRONIC ENERGY       =     -5708.507321 EV
          CORE-CORE REPULSION     =      4448.209853 EV
          GRADIENT NORM           =         8.420059
          DIPOLE                  =          .59447 DEBYE
          NO. OF FILLED LEVELS    =        22
          IONIZATION POTENTIAL    =         9.060931 EV
          MOLECULAR WEIGHT        =       116.162
          SCF CALCULATIONS        =        19
          COMPUTATION TIME =  1 MINUTES AND  15.000 SECONDS


          FINAL GEOMETRY OBTAINED                                   
CHARGE
 AM1 NOINTER T=100000
 LINEARITY CHECK
 
 XX     .0000000  0       .000000  0       .000000  0    0    0    0
  C    3.5326280  1       .000000  0       .000000  0    1    0   
0      -.1990
  C    1.1976710  1     64.343847  1       .000000  0    2    1   
0      -.1256
 XX     .9950910  1     89.718735  1   -179.799558  1    3    2    1
 XX    1.0631774  1     90.499463  1   -179.548425  1    3    2    1
 XX    1.0671355  1     93.240342  1    178.738851  1    5    3    2
  C    1.4083877  1     89.614201  1     -1.067792  1    3    5   
6       .0185
  C    1.4028014  1    148.269348  1    120.465800  1    7    6   
5      -.1030
  C    1.3912395  1    120.347943  1     71.689079  1    8    7   
6      -.1344
  C    1.3993752  1    120.943731  1      -.065872  1    9    8   
7      -.0594
  C    1.4006745  1    118.564109  1      -.007479  1   10    9   
8      -.1366
  C    1.3922484  1    121.050539  1       .148925  1   11   10   
9      -.1023
  C    1.4796965  1    121.182156  1    179.957555  1   10    9   
8      -.1804
  H    1.1171995  1    111.396064  1      -.329014  1   13   10   
9       .0825
  H    1.1187774  1    110.236680  1   -120.707040  1   13   10   
9       .0868
  H    1.1188312  1    110.222303  1    120.041819  1   13   10   
9       .0868
  H    1.0998633  1    120.262222  1    179.778452  1   12   11  
10       .1387
  H    1.1004308  1    119.254943  1   -179.985301  1   11   10   
9       .1326
  H    1.1011481  1    119.402368  1    179.852623  1    9    8   
7       .1328
  H    1.1004635  1    119.741479  1   -108.339046  1    8    7   
6       .1381
  H    1.0595952  1    179.883562  1    -31.417881  1    2    3   
4       .2240




From elewars@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca  Thu May 29 23:45:34 1997
Received: from alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca  for elewars@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id WAA03063; Thu, 29 May 1997 22:58:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from elewars@localhost) by alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca (8.7.4/8.7.3) id WAA18716 for chemistry@www.ccl.net; Thu, 29 May 1997 22:58:18 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 22:58:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: "E. Lewars" <elewars@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>
Message-Id: <199705300258.WAA18716@alchemy.chem.utoronto.ca>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: BUYING A MONITOR--HELP!


Hello, Please excuse this question since it's a little peripheral to comp
chem, but i can't do comp chem without a monitor: my SGI monitor went
kaput; who would sell a monitor for an SGI workstation (don't say SGI).
Please send replies to me.  Thanks.
  E. Lewars
=======

