From rajat@iiap.ernet.in  Tue Oct 21 00:32:00 1997
Received: from milan.doe.ernet.in  for rajat@iiap.ernet.in
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id XAA20754; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 23:45:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from iiap.ernet.in ([202.41.67.11]) by milan.doe.ernet.in (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA14099; Tue, 21 Oct 97 09:13:13+050
Received: by iiap.ernet.in (ERNET-IISc/SMI-4.1)
	   id LAA00143; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 11:48:10 +0500
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 11:48:10 +0500
From: rajat@iiap.ernet.in (rajat chaudhuri)
Message-Id: <199710210648.LAA00143@iiap.ernet.in>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Info on recent Carbon monoxide theoretical and expt. calculation


Is it possible to send me the information on recent expt. and
theoretical works on the excited states of Carbon monoxide.

I appreciate your help.

Sincerely

Rajat K Chaudhuri

From jlye@tx.ncsu.edu  Mon Oct 20 10:40:41 1997
Received: from ds10.tx.ncsu.edu  for jlye@tx.ncsu.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA15520; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 10:31:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by ds10.tx.ncsu.edu (5.65/Eos/C-U-09Sep93)
	id AA08076; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 10:30:54 -0400
From: "Jason Lye" <jlye@unity.ncsu.edu>
Message-Id: <9710201030.ZM8074@unity.ncsu.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 10:30:53 -0400
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.1 15feb95)
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net, cache@pacificu.edu
Subject: Spin State Splitting Energy
Cc: harold_freeman@ncsu.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii



Dear CCL'ers,

If it is within the capabilities of the package, I would like to use Zindo to
find the difference in energy between high-spin and low-spin electronic
configurations in iron (III) complexes.  Intially, I have optimized several
structures using an Open-shell Restricted HF (to minimize spin contamination),
however, the energies of the the low-spin (doublet) and high-spin (sextet)
structures do not agree with experimental magnetic susceptability data.

What is the best way to calculate the energy difference between different spin
states using CAChe Zindo?

If this task is beyond the capabilities of Zindo, then could someone please
recomend a method.

I will summarize responses, Thanks,
Jason


-- 

_______________________________________________________________________________

Jason Lye,                       |    
Dye Synthesis Research Group,    |    
College Of Textiles,  Box 8301,  |            "Too much of a 
North Carolina State University, |       good thing is wonderful"
Raleigh, N.C. 27695 - 8301       |                   	 
                                 |      		 - Mae West.
      Ph:   (919) 515-6615       |                     
      jlye@tx.ncsu.edu           |         
_______________________________________________________________________________




From ccl@www.ccl.net  Mon Oct 20 14:38:32 1997
Received: from bedrock.ccl.net  for ccl@www.ccl.net
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id OAA17320; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 14:11:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nmr.utmb.edu  for robert@pauli.utmb.edu
	by bedrock.ccl.net (8.8.6/950822.1) id OAA11845; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 14:11:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pauli.utmb.edu by nmr.utmb.edu via SMTP (931110.SGI/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for chemistry@ccl.net id AA14936; Mon, 20 Oct 97 14:14:59 -0600
Received: (from robert@localhost) by pauli.utmb.edu (950413.SUN.8.6.12/950213.SUN.AUTOCF) id NAA19275; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 13:09:44 -0500
From: "Robert Fraczkiewicz" <robert@pauli.utmb.edu>
Message-Id: <9710201309.ZM19273@pauli.utmb.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 13:09:44 -0500
In-Reply-To: <qiang@euch4e.chem.emory.edu>
        "CCL:PCM calculations.." (Oct 20, 12:29am)
References: <Pine.A32.3.96.971020001837.33044A-100000@euch4e.chem.emory.edu>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To: <qiang@euch4e.chem.EMORY.edu>, CCLink <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:PCM calculations..
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii




On Oct 20, 12:29am, <qiang@euch4e.chem.emory.edu> wrote:
> Subject: CCL:PCM calculations..
>
> Hi, folks. Got a few questions concerning PCM for solvation effect,
> I'd appreciate any comments from the experts ouut there.
>
>
> 3. Is there any new development in the gradient calculations with PCM
> recently? Or, any other methods has analytical gradients? (besides
> Truhlar's g-Born and Troung's GCOSMO)
>

Yes, program FANTOM can very quickly calculate analytical gradient of solvation
energy, if that fits your definition of "other methods". See
http://www.scsb.utmb.edu/fantom/ for details.

Robert Fraczkiewicz
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, TX 77555



From robert@pauli.utmb.edu  Mon Oct 20 14:38:38 1997
Received: from nmr.utmb.edu  for robert@pauli.utmb.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id OAA17206; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 14:02:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pauli.utmb.edu by nmr.utmb.edu via SMTP (931110.SGI/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for chemistry@www.ccl.net id AA14924; Mon, 20 Oct 97 14:07:08 -0600
Received: (from robert@localhost) by pauli.utmb.edu (950413.SUN.8.6.12/950213.SUN.AUTOCF) id NAA19235; Mon, 20 Oct 1997 13:01:51 -0500
From: "Robert Fraczkiewicz" <robert@pauli.utmb.edu>
Message-Id: <9710201301.ZM19233@pauli.utmb.edu>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 13:01:51 -0500
In-Reply-To: Pang Siu Kwong <pang@iris.chem.cuhk.edu.HK>
        "CCL:free energy of solvation" (Oct 18,  1:56pm)
References: <Pine.SGI.3.91.971018135103.7396B-100000@iris.chem.cuhk.edu.hk>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To: Pang Siu Kwong <pang@iris.chem.cuhk.edu.HK>, chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:free energy of solvation
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii




On Oct 18,  1:56pm, Pang Siu Kwong wrote:
> How are you?  I am a beginner of computational chemistry.  Is there any
> software or method to calculate the free energy of solvation of
> molecules.  The parameters for energy of solvation includes dielectric
> constant of solvent,  dipole-dipople interaction, van der Waals
> interaction and hydrogen bonding.
>

Program FANTOM (http://www.scsb.utmb.edu/fantom/) can calculate solvation
energies based on the assumption of continuous solvent and atomic solvation
parameters. These parameters are often derived from experimentally observed
free energies of transfer from hydrophobic medium to water. (D. Eisenberg, A.D.
McLachlan, Nature, 316, 199 (1986)).

Robert Fraczkiewicz
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, TX 77555



From bruno@antas.agraria.uniss.it  Tue Oct 21 04:32:05 1997
Received: from ICINECA.CINECA.IT  for bruno@antas.agraria.uniss.it
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id DAA21754; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 03:34:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cinymp.cineca.it by ICINECA.CINECA.IT (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
   with TCP; Tue, 21 Oct 97 09:33:24 ITA
Received: from antas.agraria.uniss.it by cinymp.cineca.it with SMTP (5.61/CRI-80.1)
	id AA74147; Tue, 21 Oct 97 09:32:34 +0200
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 09:30:43 +0100 (NFT)
From: "Dr. Bruno Manunza" <bruno@antas.agraria.uniss.it>
To: Michael Nolan <mnolan@nmrc.ucc.ie>
Cc: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:DFT software
In-Reply-To: <199710201129.LAA08795@laredo.nmrc.ucc.ie>
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91.971021092718.26065A-100000@antas.agraria.uniss.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII





On Mon, 20 Oct 1997, Michael Nolan wrote:

> Hello o great CCLers,
> 
> My supervisor has asked me to communicate the following to you:
> 
> Are there any downloadable (preferably free) programs for running DFT calculations on
> Windows95 and/or a HP machine? We already have Turbomole, but are running our DFT
> calculations as  direct calculations.
> 
> 
> All answers gratefully accepted
> 
> Michael

Dear Michael,
	you may found useful the DeFT program, free after signing a licence
see: 
http://hackberry.chem.niu.edu/ChemistrySoftware/DensityFunctionalPrograms/DeFT

also have a look to our links to DFT codes at:
http://antas.agraria.uniss.it/software.html

hope it helps

regards
Bruno



Dr Bruno Manunza
DISAABA (Dept. of Agricultural Environm. Sci)
University of Sassari
V.le Italia 39
07100 Sassari, ITALY
phone: 39 79 229215
fax:   39 79 229276
e-mail: bruno@antas.agraria.uniss.it
e-mail: bruno@tharros.dipchim.uniss.it
e-mail: gx6bot81@cray.cineca.it
web: http://antas.agraria.uniss.it


From Keith.Refson@earth.ox.ac.uk  Tue Oct 21 07:32:06 1997
Received: from earth.ox.ac.uk  for Keith.Refson@earth.ox.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id HAA22744; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 07:31:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from metropolis.earth.ox.ac.uk (metropolis [163.1.22.59])
	by earth.ox.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA27827
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 12:31:20 +0100 (BST)
From: Keith Refson <Keith.Refson@earth.ox.ac.uk>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Crystal structure viewer
X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under Emacs 19.34.1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.92)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 12:31:19 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <19971021123119.63295.FMU21799@metropolis>


I know this has been asked before, but it seems worth asking again to
see if anyone is aware of any recent developments.

Is there any such thing as a freely available (ie source) crystal
structure view and display program for unix machines?  Something like
RasMol but which can handle periodic repeats, space groups etc....

Keith Refson

From me00007@cc.uoi.gr  Tue Oct 21 10:32:06 1997
Received: from cc.uoi.gr  for me00007@cc.uoi.gr
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id KAA23867; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 10:12:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from persefoni.sci.uoi.gr ([193.92.7.206]) by cc.uoi.gr (8.8.4/8.8.3) with ESMTP id RAA21953 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 17:07:50 +0300 (EET DST)
Message-ID: <344CB82C.5D19D24C@cc.uoi.gr>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 16:11:57 +0200
From: Nikos <me00007@cc.uoi.gr>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Crystal Packing
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Hello...

I would like to ask if there are any information resources, around the
net,
dealing with crystal packing.

Thank you in advance.

Nikos Kourkoumelis   (me00007@cc.uoi.gr)
University of Ioannina
Greece


From msj@fskru5.hre.hydro.com  Tue Oct 21 10:42:42 1997
Received: from fskru5.hre.hydro.com  for msj@fskru5.hre.hydro.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id JAA23602; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 09:35:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fskru5.hre.hydro.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for chemistry@www.ccl.net id OAA19209; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 14:33:38 +0100
From: "Merethe Sjovoll" <msj@fskru5.hre.hydro.com>
Message-Id: <9710211433.ZM19207@fskru5.hre.hydro.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 14:33:38 +0100
Reply-To: Merethe.Sjovoll@hre.hydro.com
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Extended Huckel
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Hello everyone,

I am interested in articles on Extended Huckel theory and particularly articles
discussing the weak and strong points of the method. How is the method
performing in the calculation of density of states for instance? I also have
another question:

Is Extended Huckel the same thing as "Tight Binding" which is frequently used
in solid state physics, or is it one out of several tight binding schemes, or
are the methods just different?

Best wishes

Merethe

-- 

********************************************************
Merethe Sjovoll, Ph.D.                      *          *
Research Scientist                          *          *
Norsk Hydro a.s Research Center             *          * 
                                            *          *
P.O.Box 2560                                *  HYDRO   *
N-3901 Porsgrunn,                           * RESEARCH *  
Norway                                      *          *
                                            *   (((    *
email: Merethe.Sjovoll@hre.hydro.com        * (=====)  *
Phone:+47 35 56 48 97                       *          *
Fax  :+47 35 56 27 22                       *          *    
********************************************************

From satyam@indigo2.chem.pitt.edu  Tue Oct 21 13:32:09 1997
Received: from indigo2.chem.pitt.edu  for satyam@indigo2.chem.pitt.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id MAA24759; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 12:50:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by indigo2.chem.pitt.edu (920330.SGI/920502.SGI)
	for chemistry@www.ccl.net id AA12032; Tue, 21 Oct 97 12:49:35 -0400
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 12:44:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: satyam <satyam@indigo2.chem.pitt.edu>
Subject: Re: CCL:Extended Huckel
To: Merethe.Sjovoll@hre.hydro.com
Cc: chemistry@www.ccl.net
In-Reply-To: <9710211433.ZM19207@fskru5.hre.hydro.com>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.07.9710211250.C11868-b100000@indigo2.chem.pitt.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Merethe,
Here are the references : 
R. Hoffmann : J. Chem. Phys. 39(6) pp:1397-1412 (1963)

Classic Review :

R. Hoffmann, C. Janiak and C. Kollmar  Macromolecules 24(13)
                                       pp:3725-3746  (1991)

There is book: 

Solids and Surfaces :: by Hoffmann. 

Check these can you will answers to your questions.

Satyam





On Tue, 21 Oct 1997, Merethe Sjovoll wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> 
> I am interested in articles on Extended Huckel theory and particularly articles
> discussing the weak and strong points of the method. How is the method
> performing in the calculation of density of states for instance? I also have
> another question:
> 
> Is Extended Huckel the same thing as "Tight Binding" which is frequently used
> in solid state physics, or is it one out of several tight binding schemes, or
> are the methods just different?
> 
> Best wishes
> 
> Merethe
> 



             -----------------------------------------------------
                            Dr. Satyam Priyadarshy
                    107D, Chevron, Department of Chemistry
             University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, U.S.A
             Fon/Fax: +1-412-624-8200(Extn 1217or 8589) / 624-8552
             email: satyam+@pitt.edu OR satyam@hathi.chem.pitt.edu
             -----------------------------------------------------




From mnolan@nmrc.ucc.ie  Tue Oct 21 13:41:02 1997
Received: from bastion.nmrc.ucc.ie  for mnolan@nmrc.ucc.ie
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id NAA24986; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 13:17:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by nmrc.ucc.ie (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA06519
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 21 Oct 1997 18:19:18 +0100
From: Michael Nolan <mnolan@nmrc.ucc.ie>
Message-Id: <199710211642.QAA05065@laredo.nmrc.ucc.ie>
Subject: another DFT question
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 1997 16:42:07 +0000 (GMT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


Hello to CCL again....

I have another question on DFT for you all.

I'm trying to track down any systematic studies carried out using DFT, IN THE LAST 3 or 4 YEARS. These would especially include harmonic frequencies
and (or) comparisons with HF and highly correlated methods. I have some such studies up to about 1993, therefore these deal mostly with B88-LYP or
B88 in combination with Perdew's correlation functionals (also Xalfa, VWN etc..). What I am most interested in is the following:

 systematic tests on B3-LYP AND B3-PW91 (see above), as it seems that PW91 may perform better than LYP. Basis sets would be regular basis sets such
as 6-31G* or DZP (due to computational pressure). Important are the strengths and weaknesses of the functionals (and a reason, if known)


[I have looked in Chem. Abstr. but there is rather a lot under the heading of DFT, and we do NOT have it on CD-ROM; as my Masters exams are due soon,
I do not have time to go looking in JCP, JPC, JACS etc]

Many thanks for any helpful replies I recieve

Michael

********************************************************************************************************************************
Michael Nolan
Postgraduate
Materials Group
National Microelectronics Research Centre
Lee Maltings
Prospect Row
Cork

IRELAND

mnolan@nmrc.ucc.ie
********************************************************************************************************************************* 

