From taisung@chem.duke.edu  Mon Jan  5 15:13:05 1998
Received: from chem.duke.edu  for taisung@chem.duke.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id OAA10409; Mon, 5 Jan 1998 14:56:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from density.chem.duke.edu (density.chem.duke.edu [152.3.169.4]) 
	by chem.duke.edu (8.7.4/Duke-1.1) with SMTP id OAA09737;
	Mon, 5 Jan 1998 14:56:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 14:56:54 -0500 (EST)
From: Taisung Lee <taisung@chem.duke.edu>
To: computational chemistry list <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Question: the nuclear-nuclear interaction in MOPAC
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980105143458.19518A-100000@density.chem.duke.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Hi Everyone,

    I got a question about  the nuclear-nuclear interaction in MOPAC
program.  I couldn't find Dr. James Stewart's email address.  If anyone
here can answer my question or forward Dr. Stewart's email address to me,
I really appreciate.

    I found in the MOPAC93 R2 manual p115, the core-core term in MNDO for
NH/OH pair is in the form of 

    Eab=ZaZb<SaSa|SbSb>(1 + exp( -Rab*Ab) / Rab + exp( -Rab*Aa) )--(1)

    while in the MOPAC program (subroutine rotate.f) and in the orginal
MNDO paper (JACS 99 4899 (1977)) this term is in the form of

    Eab=ZaZb<SaSa|SbSb>(1 + exp( -Rab*Ab) * Rab + exp( -Rab*Aa) )--(2)


    They give quite different answers.  Could anyone tell me which is the
correct one?


    Thanks in advance.



Taisung Lee
Research Associate 
Department of Chemistry
Duke University
taisung@chem.duke.edu


From genghis@darkwing.uoregon.edu  Mon Jan  5 16:13:07 1998
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu  for genghis@darkwing.uoregon.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id PAA10507; Mon, 5 Jan 1998 15:15:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (genghis@localhost)
	by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA02650
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Mon, 5 Jan 1998 12:15:00 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 12:14:59 -0800 (PST)
From: "Dale A. Braden" <genghis@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
To: cclpost <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Summary: variation of B3LYP parameters
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980105120424.20749A-100000@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear CCL,

Many thanks to all who responded to my question about varying the three
parameters in the hybrid DFT functionals:

Original question:

"Does anyone know of any references to studies in which the three
parameters in the B3LYP (or similar) density functionals were varied? 

"Although the optimized parameter values for the B3-hybrids were based
upon fits to experimental data for a set of molecules which did not
contain any transition metals, the B3-hybrids have been used with some
success in modelling transition metal-containing compounds as well. 
However, wouldn't one expect much better results if a new parameter set
for transition metals could be determined?"

In summary, there are no published data yet, although there are at least
two studies about to be published.  Efforts have been mostly directed at
developing entirely new functionals-- see A.D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 107
(1997) 8554.  However, the new functionals are optimized for organic
molecules-- no transition metals are in the training set.  Thus, there is
still a need, I think, for developing optimized parameters for transition
metal compounds.  The problem, I suppose, is gathering together
thermochemical data for TM compounds that is as accurate as that for the
G1 and G2 molecule sets.

Best wishes to all,

Dale

Dale Braden
Department of Chemistry
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR 97403-1253
genghis@darkwing.uoregon.edu


From boufer@cennas.nhmfl.gov  Mon Jan  5 19:13:07 1998
Received: from cennas.nhmfl.gov  for boufer@cennas.nhmfl.gov
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id SAA11570; Mon, 5 Jan 1998 18:56:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (boufer@localhost)
	by cennas.nhmfl.gov (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id SAA28475
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Mon, 5 Jan 1998 18:56:01 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 1998 18:56:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Ahmed Bouferguene <boufer@CeNNAs.nhmfl.gov>
X-Sender: boufer@cennas
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: From XYZ to spherical harmonics
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.95.980105185508.28439A-100000@cennas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Greetings all,

Does anybody know a reference giving the recipe allowing to go from

x^u y^v z^w exp(-a r^2) to a linear combination of

r^t Y_{lm} (theta, phi) exp(-a r^2) 

Thanks for your help. 

--
Ahmed Bouferguene



