From zuilhof@Sg1.OC.WAU.NL  Fri Jan  9 03:13:53 1998
Received: from net.wau.nl  for zuilhof@Sg1.OC.WAU.NL
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id CAA03388; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 02:24:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from SG1.OC.WAU.NL by NET.WAU.NL (PMDF V5.1-9 #23446)
 with SMTP id <01IS605E62N0006NC4@NET.WAU.NL> for
 CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 08:25:29 GMT +0100
Received: from [137.224.136.38] by SG1.OC.WAU.NL via SMTP
 (931110.SGI/930416.SGI) for @Net.WAU.NL:CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net id
 AA02431; Fri, 09 Jan 1998 08:24:38 +0100
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 08:24:38 +0100
From: zuilhof@Sg1.OC.WAU.NL (Han Zuilhof)
Subject: Re: CCL:question on irc
To: Armando Juan Navarro Vazquez <qoajnv@usc.es>,
        CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Message-id: <v0153051eb0db8f25c09e@[137.224.136.38]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


At 8:29 PM 1/8/98, Armando Juan Navarro Vazquez wrote:
>Dear netters:
>I have tried to perform a irc calculation on a system with a very flat
>potential surface, but it could be only completed sucessfully on one side
>of the potential, but only one point is located in the other side (program
>considers is as a minimum). How can I calculate further points on this
>side of the potential?.
>Thanks in advance
>  Armando Navarro
>  Departamento de quimica Organica. Facultade de quimica. Universidade de
>  Santiago de Compostela.
>  e-mail:qoajnv@uscmail.usc.es
>
Dear Armando,

Try bigger step size.  This often helps to find points on the reaction
coordinate which are indeed lower in energy than the TS;  once you're going
downhill, further IRC following becomes easier.  I've bumbed into this
situations myself several times, and this was the solution to at least my
problems.  Don't make the stepsize TOO big, as this might mean that you
lose track of the IRC, and start to wander about on the potential energy
surface.

Finally, several questions and answers on problems with IRC are available
in the CCL archives, which -with the new web search engine- is a really
easy to use tool.

Best regards,
Han

______________________________________________________________________
Han Zuilhof                         |  E-mail:  ZUILHOF@SG1.OC.WAU.NL
Laboratory of Organic Chemistry     |  FAX   :  31-317-484914
Department of Biomolecular Sciences |  phone :  31-317-482367
Wageningen Agricultural University  |
Dreijenplein 8                      |
6703 HB  Wageningen                 |    "Excite a photochemist!"
The Netherlands                     |   




From eloranta@voimax.voima.jkl.fi  Fri Jan  9 05:13:53 1998
Received: from voimax.voima.jkl.fi  for eloranta@voimax.voima.jkl.fi
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id EAA04395; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 04:48:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from eloranta@localhost)
	by voimax.voima.jkl.fi (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA08113
	for chemistry@www.ccl.net; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 11:47:56 +0200
From: Jussi Eloranta <eloranta@voimax.voima.jkl.fi>
Message-Id: <199801090947.LAA08113@voimax.voima.jkl.fi>
Subject: calculation of hyperfine coupling constants using molpro?
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 11:47:55 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text



Dear Netters,


Does anyone know how to calculate isotropic (and possibly anisotropic)
hyperfine coupling constants for radical molecules using MOLPRO? I have tried
to look at the populations analysis module but have not found anything
concerning spin densities.



Thanks,


Jussi Eloranta (eloranta@jyu.fi)


From N.Goldberg@tu-bs.de  Fri Jan  9 06:13:59 1998
Received: from rzcomm1.rz.tu-bs.de  for N.Goldberg@tu-bs.de
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id FAA04567; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 05:51:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tu-bs.de (bonding.org-chem.nat.tu-bs.de [134.169.19.161])
	by rzcomm1.rz.tu-bs.de (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA07823
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 11:51:22 +0100 (MET)
Message-ID: <34B6027E.BE5D9C36@tu-bs.de>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 11:57:03 +0100
From: Norman Goldberg <N.Goldberg@tu-bs.de>
Organization: TU-Braunschweig
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [de] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Computational Chemistry <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: hardware-dependent CCSD results
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Hi,

I've been getting some strange results and was wondering if anybody
out there has experienced s.th. similar - has an explanation:

I ran CCSD(T)/6-31G* single point calculations (preoptimized at the
B3LYP/6-311G** level)
of several small unsaturated hydrocarbons on an SGI O2/R10000
(IRIX6.3/32 bit) and a
SGI PowerChallenge (IRIX 6.2/64 bit) (identical Gaussian94 revisions on
the machines).

The results I get up to the MP4SDQ level are identical, but the CCSD and
CCSD(T) results
strongly depend on the hardware used. The CCSD(T) values I obtain on the
O2 are
always 8 +- 0.1 kcal/mol higher than the values from the 64 bit machine!

Is this simply a numerical problem and/or is there a way around it?

Greetings,

Norman

--
______________________________________

Dr. Norman Goldberg   (N.Goldberg@tu-bs.de)
Technische Universitaet Braunschweig
Institut fuer Organische Chemie
Hagenring 30
D-38106 Braunschweig (FRG)

Tel.: +(0)531-391-5312
Fax : +(0)531-391-5388
______________________________________



From XIENING@MEENA.CC.UREGINA.CA  Fri Jan  9 12:13:58 1998
Received: from veena.cc.uregina.ca  for XIENING@MEENA.CC.UREGINA.CA
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id LAA06209; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 11:26:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from meena.cc.uregina.ca by meena.cc.uregina.ca (PMDF V5.1-9 #27364)
 id <01IS6433DO1IBESZ4U@meena.cc.uregina.ca> for chemistry@www.ccl.net;
 Fri, 9 Jan 1998 10:26:23 CST
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 10:26:22 -0600 (CST)
From: "XIE, NING" <XIENING@MEENA.CC.UREGINA.CA>
Subject: molecule-drawing software ?
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Message-id: <01IS6433DO1KBESZ4U@meena.cc.uregina.ca>
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@www.ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII


Hi, again,
I'm wondering if anybody can tell me where I can find a free or
shareware for molecule-drawing so that I can draw a molecule and 
save it as pdb file that can then be opened in Gaussian? I am
currently using hyperchem for this purpose. I'm going to move to
another institute where only Gaussian is available. It is too
difficult to write z-matrix files by yourself for large molecules.
Any suggestion is welcome and thank you for your help.
ning

From XIENING@MEENA.CC.UREGINA.CA  Fri Jan  9 12:36:28 1998
Received: from veena.cc.uregina.ca  for XIENING@MEENA.CC.UREGINA.CA
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id LAA06176; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 11:18:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from meena.cc.uregina.ca by meena.cc.uregina.ca (PMDF V5.1-9 #27364)
 id <01IS63LJ05VKBESZ4U@meena.cc.uregina.ca> for chemistry@www.ccl.net;
 Fri, 9 Jan 1998 10:18:00 CST
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 1998 10:17:59 -0600 (CST)
From: "XIE, NING" <XIENING@MEENA.CC.UREGINA.CA>
Subject: entropy & HOMO/LUMO energy
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Message-id: <01IS63LJ7EAQBESZ4U@meena.cc.uregina.ca>
X-VMS-To: IN%"chemistry@www.ccl.net"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII


Hi, there, Good day!
I'm using Gaussian to calculate HOMO/LUMO energies of some sulfur-
containing compounds. When a molecule is optimized, we can get the
heat of formation because the entropy effect is not taken into
consideration. Here is my question: Is the HOMO/LUMO energy calculated
this way related to entropy? In another word, does it matter with
the value of HOMO/LUMO energy if the entropy effect is taken into
consideration or not? If they are related, what should I do to 
include the entropy effect?
Thank you for your time.
ning

From mem2!mem2.ilc.msu.su!mal@gw.ilc.msu.su  Fri Jan  9 14:13:56 1998
Received: from gw.ilc.msu.su  for mem2!mem2.ilc.msu.su!mal@gw.ilc.msu.su
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id NAA07051; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 13:59:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mem2.UUCP (uumem2@localhost) by gw.ilc.msu.su (8.6.12/8.6.12) with UUCP id WAA17606 for chemistry@www.ccl.net; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 22:00:59 GMT
Received: by mem2.ilc.msu.su (dMail for Windows v1.2P, 23Jul96);
          Fri,  9 Jan 1998 21:55:43 +0300
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Organization: ILC MSU
Message-Id: <ABVLbUu4QG@mem2.ilc.msu.su>
From: mal@mem2.ilc.msu.su (Dmitriy Malakhov)
Date: Fri,  9 Jan 1998 21:55:43 +0300 (MSK)
X-Mailer: dMail [Demos Mail for Windows v1.2 Professional]
Return-Receipt-To: mal@mem2.ilc.msu.su
Subject: MOPACK calculation
Lines: 18
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


                    Dear Chemists!
I am newcomer in computation chemistry.
I wish to calculate  the structure of molecule
in AM1 forcefield (simple geometry optimization) with
some constrains. As I know these constraints can
be done on internal coordinates by MOPACK program,
but I need to constrain some angles and distances which
are not internal coordinates. Is it possible to restrain not only
internal coordinates in MOPACK  or I have to choose
internal coordinate properly?
Thank you for answer!
Best regards                                    Phd. St.  DmitryMalakhov
                                                        Moscow State University,
                                                        Moscow, Russia
E-mail: mal@mem2.ilc.msu.su or malakhoff@hotmail.com





From bruno@antas.agraria.uniss.it  Fri Jan  9 18:14:00 1998
Received: from cinymp.cineca.it  for bruno@antas.agraria.uniss.it
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id RAA08106; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 17:15:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from antas.agraria.uniss.it by cinymp.cineca.it (5.61/UNICOS-PP)
	id AA78321; Fri, 9 Jan 98 22:15:17 GMT
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 23:12:40 +0100 (NFT)
From: "Dr. Bruno Manunza" <bruno@antas.agraria.uniss.it>
To: "XIE, NING" <XIENING@MEENA.CC.UREGINA.CA>
Cc: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:G:molecule-drawing software ?
In-Reply-To: <01IS6433DO1KBESZ4U@meena.cc.uregina.ca>
Message-Id: <Pine.A32.3.91.980109231048.23196A-100000@antas.agraria.uniss.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII





On Fri, 9 Jan 1998, XIE, NING wrote:

> Hi, again,
> I'm wondering if anybody can tell me where I can find a free or
> shareware for molecule-drawing so that I can draw a molecule and 
> save it as pdb file that can then be opened in Gaussian? I am
> currently using hyperchem for this purpose. I'm going to move to
> another institute where only Gaussian is available. It is too
> difficult to write z-matrix files by yourself for large molecules.
> Any suggestion is welcome and thank you for your help.
> ning
> 

Dear Ning,
	you may try molgen for MSDOS it's free at:

ftp://www.ccl.net/pub/chemistry/software/MS-DOS/molgen/

Hope it helps
bye
Bruno


Dr Bruno Manunza
DISAABA (Dept. of Agricultural Environm. Sci)
University of Sassari
V.le Italia 39
07100 Sassari, ITALY
phone: 39 79 229215
fax:   39 79 229276
e-mail: bruno@antas.agraria.uniss.it
e-mail: bruno@tharros.dipchim.uniss.it
e-mail: gx6bot81@cray.cineca.it
web: http://antas.agraria.uniss.it


From editor@mactech.com  Fri Jan  9 20:14:01 1998
Received: from neon.chem.ucla.edu  for editor@mactech.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id TAA08508; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 19:16:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [128.97.76.42] ([128.97.76.42]) by neon.chem.ucla.edu (8.8.0/8.8.0) with ESMTP id QAA13852 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Fri, 9 Jan 1998 16:18:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender: nick@128.97.35.251
Message-Id: <v03102803b0dc608c0a80@[128.97.76.42]>
In-Reply-To: <01IS6433DO1KBESZ4U@meena.cc.uregina.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 1998 16:20:40 -0700
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: Nick DeMello <editor@mactech.com>
Subject: Re: CCL:G:molecule-drawing software ?





    It's not freeware/shareware, but I find the commercial
      product "Chem3D" from CamSoft <http://www.camsoft.com>
      is an excellant tool for this job.  Basically, it's
      a swiss army knife for computational chemists--very
      flexible with a wealth of molecular structure reading,
      visualizing, manipulating, and saving tools.  Hope this
      helps,


______________

>I'm wondering if anybody can tell me where I can find a free or
>shareware for molecule-drawing so that I can draw a molecule and
>save it as pdb file that can then be opened in Gaussian? I am
>currently using hyperchem for this purpose. I'm going to move to
>another institute where only Gaussian is available. It is too
>difficult to write z-matrix files by yourself for large molecules.
>Any suggestion is welcome and thank you for your help.
>ning





____Nicholas C. DeMello, Ph.D.________________________________________
  Editor of MacTech Magazine, for Mac OS Developers and Programmers
     http://www.MacTech.com/
                                       _/   _/  _/  _/_/_/   _/   _/
  Chemistry: nick@chem.ucla.edu       _/_/ _/  _/  _/   _/  _/_/_/
    MacTech: editor@MacTech.com      _/ _/_/  _/  _/       _/ _/
       http://www.chem.ucla.edu/~nick/   _/  _/   _/_/_/  _/   _/



