From mao@csb0.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN  Wed Feb 25 02:14:12 1998
Received: from csb0.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN  for mao@csb0.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id BAA27896; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 01:18:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: by csb0.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN (920330.SGI/940406.SGI.AUTO)
	for CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net id AA12948; Wed, 25 Feb 98 14:18:21 -0800
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:18:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Fenglou Mao <mao@csb0.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN>
To: "CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net" <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Macromolecilar force field
Message-Id: <Pine.SGI.3.91.980225141523.12936A-100000@csb0.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear cclers,
     If someone knew the latest version of Amber or charmm force field,
please tell me the journal name and page number of them.
     Thanks a lot!

Sincerely Yours,

FengLou Mao
*******************************
ADD:Mr. FengLou Mao
    Peking University
    BeiJing
    P.R.China
Tel:86-10-62751490
Fax:86-10-62751725



From pitsel@chemul.uni.lodz.pl  Wed Feb 25 07:14:11 1998
Received: from chemul.uni.lodz.pl  for pitsel@chemul.uni.lodz.pl
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id HAA29708; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 07:12:53 -0500 (EST)
Received:  by chemul.uni.lodz.pl (5.65/25-eef)
	id AA14146; Wed, 25 Feb 98 13:11:12 +0100
Message-Id: <9802251211.AA14146@chemul.uni.lodz.pl>
From: pitsel@chemul.uni.lodz.pl (Piotr Seliger)
X-Mailer: SCO System V Mail (version 3.2)
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Co parameters for AM1 or PM3
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 98 13:11:11 MEZ


Hi,
I,m looking for Co and Ag parameters set for AM1 and PM3.
 
with regards

Piotr Seliger

 ~~r pit

From msj@fskru5.hre.hydro.com  Wed Feb 25 08:14:11 1998
Received: from fskru5.hre.hydro.com  for msj@fskru5.hre.hydro.com
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id HAA29767; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 07:34:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: by fskru5.hre.hydro.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	for chemistry@www.ccl.net id OAA15746; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:31:09 +0100
From: "Merethe Sjovoll" <msj@fskru5.hre.hydro.com>
Message-Id: <9802251431.ZM15744@fskru5.hre.hydro.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:31:08 +0100
Reply-To: Merethe.Sjovoll@hre.hydro.com
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: electron-electron interaction strength and hopping interaction strength
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Hi,

can somebody tell me what term a quantum chemist would use for
"electron-electron interaction strength"? Is it the same as electron
correlation?
And what is "hopping interaction strength"? Does it refer to integrals h(ij)
between orbitals i and j located on different atoms?

Best regards

Merethe

-- 

********************************************************
Merethe Sjovoll, Ph.D.                      *          *
Research Scientist                          *          *
Norsk Hydro a.s Research Center             *          * 
                                            *          *
P.O.Box 2560                                *  HYDRO   *
N-3901 Porsgrunn,                           * RESEARCH *  
Norway                                      *          *
                                            *   (((    *
email: Merethe.Sjovoll@hre.hydro.com        * (=====)  *
Phone:+47 35 56 48 97                       *          *
Fax  :+47 35 56 27 22                       *          *    
********************************************************

From mforster@nibsc.ac.uk  Wed Feb 25 12:14:19 1998
Received: from nibsc.ac.uk  for mforster@nibsc.ac.uk
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id LAA01319; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 11:18:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from chalsig.nibsc.ac.uk by nibsc.ac.uk via ESMTP (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1502/940406.SGI.1(NIBSC))
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net> id QAA24192; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 16:16:30 GMT
Received: by chalsig.nibsc.ac.uk (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1502/client-1.3.1(NIBSC))
	id QAA09427; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 16:16:30 GMT
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 16:16:30 GMT
From: mforster@nibsc.ac.uk (mforster)
Message-Id: <199802251616.QAA09427@chalsig.nibsc.ac.uk>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: summary J coupling calculation





 
Dear Net Chemists

Here is a summary of the responses received for my recent question
regarding codes for the computation of NMR spin-spin coupling
constants.

First the original request:
 
> I would like to gather information on software, either free or commercial,
> that can accomplish the computation of nmr spin-spin coupling constants
> for a known 3D coordinate set. This excludes parameterised methods
> such as Karplus equation schemes. For example QCPE currently offers
> packages 224 (FINITE) and 457 (SCF-FERMI) that compute the Fermi
> contact contribution to couplings using perturbation theory at the
> INDO/CNDO level. If you know of other codes please also clarify what
> form of input they require.
> 


Three responses are included in the summary:


Dear Dr.Forster,

You might be interesting in DALTON package:

  http://www.kjemi.uio.no/software/dalton/dalton.html
              dalton-admin@kjemi.uio.no

With The Dalton program one can calculate diamagnetic spin-orbit.,
Fermi-contact, paramagnetic spin-orbit., and spin-dipole
contributions to the total indirect spin-spin coupling constant.
It is possible to run the calculation with a set of 3D coordinates or
optimize geometry inside the package.

best wishes,
Valentin.

====================================================================
                                             ,         ,      ,   ,
Valentin P. Ananikov                         |\\\\ ////|     /////|
NMR Lab                                      | \\\|/// |    ///// |
ND Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry   |  |~~~|  |   |~~~|  |
Leninsky Prospect 47                         |  |===|  |   |===|  |
Moscow  117913                               |  |   |  |   |   |  |
Russia                                       |  | A |  |   | Z |  |
                                              \ |   | /    |   | /
e-mail: val@cacr.ioc.ac.ru                     \|===|/     |===|/
http://nmr.ioc.ac.ru/Staff/AnanikovVP/          '---'      '---'
  Fax +7 (095)1355328   Phone +7 (095)9383536
====================================================================


From: "Stavrev, Krassimir" <stavrev@hyper.com>

Mark: Have a look at the HyperNMR description and slide shows at
www.hyper.com under Products.

For pricing info, please contact sales@hyper.com

Regards,
Krassimir  
---
Krassimir Stavrev, PhD, Director of Scientific Support
Hypercube, Inc.  Florida Science  and  Technology Park
1115  N.W.  4th Street  Gainesville,   Florida   32601
Voice:(352) 371-7744/(800) 960-1871 Fax:(352) 371-3662


From: schrecke@t12.lanl.gov (Georg Schreckenbach)
Subject: Re: CCL:nmr coupling constants


Dear Mark:

spin-spin coupling constants are notoriously difficult to calculate
accurately, and they are not (yet?) available in the major
commercial programs, as far as I know.

Malkin et. al. have implemented them into their DFT based NMR
program. I think they give their program away although I am not
sure. Here are a few references from SciSearch:

CALCULATION OF NMR CHEMICAL-SHIFTS AND SPIN-SPIN COUPLING-CONSTANTS
      IN THE MONOSACCHARIDE METHYL-BETA-D-XYLOPYRANOSIDE USING A
                        DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL THEORY APPROACH
                   HRICOVINI M, MALKINA OL, BIZIK F, NAGY LT, MALKIN VG
                               JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
                               v. 101(#50) pp. 9756-9762 DEC 11, 1997

     NUCLEAR-MAGNETIC-RESONANCE SPIN-SPIN COUPLING-CONSTANTS FROM
              DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL THEORY : PROBLEMS AND RESULTS
                              MALKINA OL, SALAHUB DR, MALKIN VG
                                  JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
                               v. 105(#19) pp. 8793-8800 NOV 15, 1996

               CALCULATION OF SPIN-SPIN COUPLING-CONSTANTS USING
                               DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL THEORY
                              MALKIN VG, MALKINA OL, SALAHUB DR
                                    CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS
                                 v. 221(#1-2) pp. 91-99 APR 15, 1994

There is (at least) one other DFT paper on the same subject:

SPIN COUPLING-CONSTANTS FROM DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL THEORY
                           WITH SLATER-TYPE BASIS FUNCTIONS
                                      DICKSON RM, ZIEGLER T
                                JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY
                               v. 100(#13) pp. 5286-5290 MAR 28, 1996

I hope this helps. In any case, please summarize!

Regards, Georg

--
==============================================================
Dr. Georg Schreckenbach           Tel:     (USA)-505-667 7605
Theoretical Chemistry T-12        FAX:     (USA)-505-665 3909
M.S. B268, Los Alamos National      E-mail:  schrecke@t12.lanl.gov
Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 87545, USA
Internet:    http://www.t12.lanl.gov/~schrecke/
==============================================================




  Dr Mark J Forster Ph.D.
  Principal Scientist
  Informatics Laboratory
  National Institute for Biological Standards and Control
  Blanche Lane, South Mimms, 
  Hertfordshire EN6 3QG, United Kingdom.

  Tel 	01707 654753
  FAX 	01707 646730
  E-mail 	mforster@nibsc.ac.uk


From daizadeh@kappa.ucdavis.edu  Wed Feb 25 16:14:22 1998
Received: from kappa.ucdavis.edu  for daizadeh@kappa.ucdavis.edu
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id QAA03553; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 16:06:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daizadeh@localhost) by kappa.ucdavis.edu (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA11552; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:11:59 -0800
From: "Iraj Daizadeh" <daizadeh@kappa.ucdavis.edu>
Message-Id: <9802251311.ZM11550@kappa.ucdavis.edu>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:11:59 -0800
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: FOCK matrix summary.
Cc: Doug Fox <fox@gaussian.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii



Hello.

Answers to the questions (shown below) that I have recently posed on the CCL
are as follows:

Concerning Question 1.

The code that I wrote to print out the lower triangular portion of the overlap,
and fock matrices (alpha and beta spins) is incorrect in the sense that in G94
the modulus of the matrix element must be greater than a threshold value that
is set to Thresh = GFloat(10)**(Key-6) where Key is in most cases 0 (See LTOut
in utilam.F [line 47349]).  The corrected code is as follows:

---------------------------------------------------

      NTT = Nbasis*(NBasis+1)/2
      Zero = GFloat(0)
      Thresh = GFloat(10)**(-6)
      Call FileIO(2,-IRwSao,NTT,V,0)
      do 211 i=1,NTT
        If(Abs(V(i)).lt.Thresh) V(i) = Zero
211     write (IOvlp,2010) V(i)
C
      Call FileIO(2,-IRwFA,NTT,V,0)
      do 212 i=1,NTT
        If(Abs(V(i)).lt.Thresh) V(i) = Zero
212     write (IUnitFA,2010) V(i)
C
      Call FileIO(2,-IRwFB,NTT,V,0)
      do 213 i=1,NTT
        If(Abs(V(i)).lt.Thresh) V(i) = Zero
213     write (IUnitFB,2010) V(i)

--------------------------------------------------

I thank Professor Vincenzo Baronem who pointed this out.


As to Question 2)

I simply calculated:

	FC = eSC

using the output generated by my FORTRAN link in G94.  The left and right hand
sides of the above equation were equivalent.

Prof. Fink and Prof. Stuchebrukhov of UC Davis both pointed out this simple
test.

Thanks for all those that responded to my queries.

Iraj.



xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Question 1)
---
Hello.

I used the following to print out the FOCK (alpha, beta) matrix from Gaussian
94:

      NTT = Nbasis*(NBasis+1)/2
      Call FileIO(2,-IRwFA,NTT,V,0)
      do 212 i=1,NTT
212     write (IUnitFA,2010) V(i)
C
      Call FileIO(2,-IRwFB,NTT,V,0)
      do 213 i=1,NTT
213     write (IUnitFB,2010) V(i)

Interestingly, when I compared the values generated from this method to the
standard Gaussian output; viz., IOp(5/33=5); I found that my numbers were
slightly different from theirs.

Input Deck:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# HF/sto-2g 6d 10f field=z+1000000
geom=coord pop=regular IOp(5/33=5)

currents: H2  1+ ion , uhf

1  2
H  0.0  0.0  -4.0
He 0.0  0.0  0.0
H  0.0  0.0   4.0
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My output:						Gaussian output:
   -0.528103473677385300000000000000E+00		-0.528103D+00
   -0.207077182228009010000000000000E-03		-0.207077D-03
   -0.957752692231662150000000000000E+00		-0.957753D+00
    0.312943635332713380000000000000E-06		 0.000000D+00
   -0.257198121834262120000000000000E-03		-0.257198D-03
   -0.446838441550770900000000000000E+00		-0.446838D+00

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The problem lies in the (1,3) (transposed) element.  The number 10^-6 should
have been printed out in the standard Gaussian output file; it wasn't.

Any information would be greatly appreciated.  Since our calculations rely
almost completely on these small numbers, this may cause severe problems in our
calculations.

Thank you in advance for any aid into this matter.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Question 2)

Hello.

Is the FOCK matrix that is printed out from Gaussian 94

		F'C'=eC'

or is it:

		FC = eSC.

The molecular orbital coefficients must be C with eigenvalues e.  We need F
with C and S.  We can do this ourselves but we need to know what 'kind' is the
FOCK matrix: viz., F or F'.


Thank you.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
Iraj Daizadeh
Department of Chemistry
University of California
One Shields Ave.
Davis, CA  95616-5295
Phone:  530.754.8695
Fax:    530.752.8995
email:  daizadeh@kappa.ucdavis.edu

