From David.DeVito@chiphy.unige.ch  Sat Mar 14 04:17:44 1998
Received: from sc2a.unige.ch  for David.DeVito@chiphy.unige.ch
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id DAA07557; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 03:25:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from PCC2340E.unige.ch ([129.194.52.14])
 by sc2a.unige.ch (PMDF V5.1-10 #10385)
 with SMTP id <01IUNGVI12ZQ001GDY@sc2a.unige.ch> for chemistry@www.ccl.net;
 Sat, 14 Mar 1998 09:25:10 MET
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 09:25:10 +0100
From: David De Vito <David.DeVito@chiphy.unige.ch>
Subject: Problem with Internal coordinates under GAMESS
To: CCL <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Message-id: <002d01bd4f22$b4708fc0$0e34c281@PCC2340E.unige.ch>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
X-Priority: 3


Dear GAMESS users,

I am trying to do a RHF optimization on an hexa-aquo rhodium complex
(without any symetry) in internal coordinates since a want to freeze an H2O
molecule during the optimization.

But my internal coordinates choice is wrong because the SCF convergence
doesn't work and I get the error message below (my input follow this
section).


Could somebody please help me with my internal ("infernal") coordinates ?


Thanks in advance to all responders! And thank you very much for the
preciously help !


Yours most respectfully, D. De Vito (new GAMESS user).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

          MAXIMUM GRADIENT =  0.4824830    RMS GRADIENT = 0.0736738
          FORCE CONSTANT MATRIX NOT UPDATED --- TAKING FIRST STEP
          MIN SEARCH, CORRECT HESSIAN, TRYING PURE NR STEP
               NR STEP HAS LENGTH         =   1.989906
          TRIM/QA LAMBDA FOR NON-TS MODES =  -1.48744894
          TRIM/QA STEP HAS LENGTH         =   0.300000
          RADIUS OF STEP TAKEN=   0.30000  CURRENT TRUST RADIUS=   0.30000
          TRANSFORMING DISPLACEMENT FROM INTERNALS TO CARTESIANS
          THE ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR IN ITERATION   1 IS   1.621425

THE DETERMINANT OF THE G MATRIX IS 10**-69
* * * WARNING * * *
YOUR B MATRIX HAS A SMALL DETERMINANT.
THIS SUGGESTS YOU MAY HAVE BADLY CHOSEN COORDINATES.
          THE ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR IN ITERATION   2 IS  21.832047

THE DETERMINANT OF THE G MATRIX IS 10*****
* * * WARNING * * *
YOUR B MATRIX HAS A SMALL DETERMINANT.
THIS SUGGESTS YOU MAY HAVE BADLY CHOSEN COORDINATES.
          THE ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR IN ITERATION   3 IS 297.052785

THE DETERMINANT OF THE G MATRIX IS 10*****
* * * WARNING * * *
YOUR B MATRIX HAS A SMALL DETERMINANT.
THIS SUGGESTS YOU MAY HAVE BADLY CHOSEN COORDINATES.
          THE ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERROR IN ITERATION   4 IS **********

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is my input:


$CONTRL SCFTYP=RHF RUNTYP=OPTIMIZE EXETYP=RUN ECP=READ
  ICHARG=3 MULT=1 UNITS=ANGS NZVAR=51 MAXIT=100 $END
$SYSTEM TIMLIM=10000000 MEMORY=10000000 $END
$SCF dirscf=.t. $END
$statpt IFREEZ(1)=43 NSTEP=100 opttol=1.e-6 dxmax=0.3 purify=.t. $END
$ECP
Rh-ECP SBK
O-ECP NONE
H-ECP NONE
H-ECP NONE
O-ECP NONE
H-ECP NONE
H-ECP NONE
O-ECP NONE
H-ECP NONE
H-ECP NONE
O-ECP NONE
H-ECP NONE
H-ECP NONE
O-ECP NONE
H-ECP NONE
H-ECP NONE
O-ECP NONE
H-ECP NONE
H-ECP NONE
$END
$DATA
Rh(H2O)6 sym REACTION PATH
CN       1

RH1      45.0      0.0004475324      0.0000000000      0.0000140267
   SBK

O2          8.0     -1.4142318687      0.0000000000      1.4137615969
   N31    6
   D      1
     1         1.2000000000  1.00000000

H3          1.0     -1.1557310639      0.0000000000      2.3797726392
   N31    6

H4          1.0     -2.3800723742      0.0000000000      1.1546243396
   N31    6

O5          8.0      1.4124940472      0.0000000000     -1.4163632676
   N31    6
   D      1
     1         1.2000000000  1.00000000

H6          1.0      2.3788150350      0.0000000000     -1.1590235146
   N31    6

H7          1.0      1.1521963168      0.0000000000     -2.3818916678
   N31    6

O8          8.0      1.4143581846      0.0000000000      1.4145304344
   N31    6
   D      1
     1         1.2000000000  1.00000000

H9          1.0      1.7678358477      0.8660254038      1.7681595363
   N31    6

H10         1.0      1.7678358477     -0.8660254038      1.7681595363
   N31    6

O11         8.0     -1.4159297620      0.0000000000     -1.4120324881
   N31    6
   D      1
     1         1.2000000000  1.00000000

H12         1.0     -1.7700240856      0.8660254038     -1.7650441168
   N31    6

H13         1.0     -1.7700240856     -0.8660254038     -1.7650441168
   N31    6

O14         8.0      0.0004475324      2.0000000000      0.0000140267
   N31    6
   D      1
     1         1.2000000000  1.00000000

H15         1.0      0.6130216821      2.5000000000     -0.6121566284
   N31    6

H16         1.0     -0.6121266174      2.5000000000      0.6121846819
   N31    6

O17         8.0      0.0004475324     -2.0000000000      0.0000140267
   N31    6
   D      1
     1         1.2000000000  1.00000000

H18         1.0     -0.6120560392     -2.5000000000      0.6122552985
   N31    6

H19         1.0      0.6129511039     -2.5000000000     -0.6122272450
   N31    6

$END
$ZMAT   IZMAT(1)=
         1,   2,   1,
         1,   3,   2,
         2,   3,   2,   1,
         1,   4,   2,
         2,   4,   2,   1,
         3,   4,   2,   1,   3,
         1,   5,   1,
         2,   5,   1,   2,
         3,   5,   1,   2,   3,
         1,   6,   5,
         2,   6,   5,   1,
         3,   6,   5,   1,   2,
         1,   7,   5,
         2,   7,   5,   1,
         3,   7,   5,   1,   6,
         1,   8,   1,
         2,   8,   1,  17,
         3,   8,   1,   2,   3,
         1,   9,   8,
         2,   9,   8,   1,
         3,   9,   8,   1,   2,
         1,  10,   8,
         2,  10,   8,   1,
         3,  10,   8,   1,   9,
         1,  11,   1,
         2,  11,   1,   2,
         3,  11,   1,   2,   3,
         1,  12,  11,
         2,  12,  11,   1,
         3,  12,  11,   1,   2,
         1,  13,  11,
         2,  13,  11,   1,
         3,  13,  11,   1,  12,
         1,  14,   1,
         2,  14,   1,   2,
         3,  14,   1,   2,   8,
         1,  15,  14,
         2,  15,  14,   1,
         3,  15,  14,   1,   2,
         1,  16,  14,
         2,  16,  14,   1,
         3,  16,  14,   1,  15,
         1,  17,   1,
         2,  17,   1,   2,
         3,  17,   1,   2,   8,
         1,  18,  17,
         2,  18,  17,   1,
         3,  18,  17,   1,   8,
         1,  19,  17,
         2,  19,  17,   1,
         3,  19,  17,   1,  18,
$END

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

****************************************************************

D. De Vito
Department of Physical Chemistry
Group of Prof. Weber (Computational Chemistry)
University of Geneva
Office 106 - Sciences II
30, Quai Ernest-Ansermet
1211 Geneva 4 / Switzerland
+4122 / 702.65.35 (Office)
+4179 / 310.05.76 (Mobile)
+4122 / 733.38.35 (Home)
http://lcta/~devito (Personal Page)
http://www.unige.ch/sciences/chimie (Web Master)

****************************************************************



From pang@dft.chem.cuhk.edu.hk  Sat Mar 14 09:17:45 1998
Received: from iris.chem.cuhk.edu.hk  for pang@dft.chem.cuhk.edu.hk
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id IAA07972; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 08:19:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dft by iris.chem.cuhk.edu.hk via ESMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI.AUTO)
	for <@iris.chem.cuhk.edu.hk:chemistry@www.ccl.net> id VAA04584; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 21:20:57 +0800
Received: by dft (950511.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH526/930416.SGI.AUTO)
	 id VAA03846; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 21:16:38 +0800
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 21:16:38 +0800 (HKT)
From: patrick <pang@dft.chem.cuhk.edu.hk>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: electronic spatial extent
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.91.980314210937.3841A-100000@dft>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Hello!  In Gaussian 94, the electronic spatial extent are given.  Do you 
know how to calculate it?  Is it a span/greatest distance/diameter of 
electron cloud of molecule after square root of the given value?
Thank you for your attention.

Patrick Pang

From casida@CERCA.UMontreal.CA  Sat Mar 14 19:17:52 1998
Received: from condor.CC.UMontreal.CA  for casida@CERCA.UMontreal.CA
	by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/950822.1) id SAA10507; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 18:21:29 -0500 (EST)
From: <casida@CERCA.UMontreal.CA>
Received: from balzac.CERCA.UMontreal.CA (balzac.CERCA.UMontreal.CA [132.204.150.21]) by condor.CC.UMontreal.CA with ESMTP id SAA15944
  (8.6.11/IDA-1.6); Sat, 14 Mar 1998 18:21:28 -0500
Received: from racine.CERCA.UMontreal.CA by balzac.CERCA.UMontreal.CA (940816.SGI.8.6.9/5.17)
	id SAA22253; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 18:21:46 -0500
Received: by racine.CERCA.UMontreal.CA (950413.SGI.8.6.12/5.17)
	id SAA02012; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 18:21:45 -0500
Message-Id: <199803142321.SAA02012@racine.CERCA.UMontreal.CA>
Subject: GAUSSIAN: need platform comparison
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 18:21:45 -0500 (EST)
Cc: belletem@ERE.UMontreal.CA
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL33 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Hi,

I am forwarding this request in the hopes that someone on the
list has some experience answering it:

> From: Michel Belletete <belletem@ERE.UMontreal.CA>
> To: casida@chimie.umontreal.ca
> Subject: gaussian 94 vs gaussian 94W
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> As we discussed before, I send you a message about Gaussian 94W. I
> would like to know approximately the difference in the time of
> calculation to run Gaussian 94W (windows 95 Version) on a 300 MHz
> Pentium and to run Gaussian 94 on a Silicon Graphics Challenge R4000
> work station. I will mainly use Gaussian to optimize the geometry of
> bithiophene and terthiophene derivatives.
> 
> If a pentium is fast enough, what capacity of hard disk and what amount
> of internal memory do you consider sufficient?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Michel Belletete

My fear would be that GAUSSIAN would be cache and memory limited on
the Pentium when compared with an SGI with the following hardware
inventory:

8 100 MHZ IP19 Processors
CPU: MIPS R4400 Processor Chip Revision: 4.0
FPU: MIPS R4000 Floating Point Coprocessor Revision: 0.0
Data cache size: 16 Kbytes
Instruction cache size: 16 Kbytes
Secondary unified instruction/data cache size: 1 Mbyte
Main memory size: 384 Mbytes, 2-way interleaved
I/O board, Ebus slot 15: IO4 revision 1
Integral EPC serial ports: 4
Integral Ethernet controller: et0, Ebus slot 15
EPC external interrupts
Integral SCSI controller 1: Version WD33C95A, differential, revision 1
Disk drive: unit 5 on SCSI controller 1
Disk drive: unit 4 on SCSI controller 1
Disk drive: unit 3 on SCSI controller 1
Disk drive: unit 2 on SCSI controller 1
Disk drive: unit 1 on SCSI controller 1
Integral SCSI controller 0: Version WD33C95A, single ended, revision 1
Disk drive: unit 4 on SCSI controller 0
Disk drive: unit 3 on SCSI controller 0
Disk drive: unit 2 on SCSI controller 0
Integral SCSI controller 4: Version SCIP/WD33C95A
Integral SCSI controller 3: Version SCIP/WD33C95A
Integral SCSI controller 2: Version SCIP/WD33C95A
Tape drive: unit 6 on SCSI controller 2: DLT
Disk drive: unit 4 on SCSI controller 2
Integral EPC parallel port: Ebus slot 15
VME bus: adapter 0 mapped to adapter 61
VME bus: adapter 61

However the SGI is definitely dated at this point and it would not be
hard to have a Pentium with a faster CPU.

Please respond to me (casida@chimie.umontreal.ca) with a copy to
Dr. Belletete (belletem@ERE.UMontreal.CA).  I will try to summarize
if there are sufficient interest and responses.

			Many thanks,

-- 
*-------------------------------------------------------*
|          Mark E. Casida                               |
|          Chemistry Computing Professional/            |
|          Professionnel en chimie theorique            |
|          et calcul numerique                          |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|          B-605 Pavillon principal                     |
|          Departement de chimie          \_____/       |
|          Universite de Montreal         /\0|0/\       |
|          Case postale 6128              | | | |       |
|          Succursale centre-ville        \/   \/       |
|          Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7    -----"-"----     |
|          Canada                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|          tel: (514) 343-6111 poste/extension 3901     |
|          fax: (514) 343-2468                          |
|          e-mail: casida@chimie.umontreal.ca           |
|              or  Mark.Casida@umontreal.ca             |
|          http://www.centrcn.umontreal.ca/~casida      |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|          === HPCnet at UdeM ===                       |
|          http://www.centrcn.umontreal.ca/             |
|                      ~casida/HPCnet.d/index.html      |
|          === deMon Users' Home Page ===               |
|          http://www.cerca.umontreal.ca/deMon/         |
*-------------------------------------------------------*


