From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Oct 28 04:31:53 1998
Received: from news.uni-kl.de (mmdf@news.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.51])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with SMTP id EAA15952
        Wed, 28 Oct 1998 04:31:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from iris1.chemie.uni-kl.de
           ( iris1.chemie.uni-kl.de [131.246.9.107] ) by news.uni-kl.de
          id ab26632 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; 28 Oct 98 10:32 MET
Received: from oktarin by iris1.chemie.uni-kl.de via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI.AUTO)
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net> id KAA29178; Wed, 28 Oct 1998 10:31:43 +0100
Received: from localhost by oktarin with smtp
	(Smail3.1.28.1 #7) id m0zYRx8-0000F9C; Wed, 28 Oct 98 10:31 CET
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 10:31:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Stefan Konietzny <konietz@chemie.uni-kl.de>
To: "Comp. Chem. List" <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Summary of 17e complexes
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.95.981028102115.19352A-100000@oktarin.chemie.uni-kl.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Thanks to everyone who answered. Here is the summary of the relevant
communications.

Original question:

Hello everyone,

i have a question on the accuracy of DFT (B3Lyp) calculations on 17
(dublett) electron transition metal complexes.
Everything went extremely fine. Convergence was fine (SCF and structure).
Can i believe my results or is it always recommended to do MCSCF on such
systems? I tried to do a single point CAS(3,4) and it looks like it never
comes to an end; so i dont want to do an optimization on the MCSCF level.

Any suggestions or references?

Stefan.

Answer:

    In a case like this I use what I refer to as a CISD screen:  run a
CI calculation with single and double excitations from the Hartree-Fock
reference, using 10-15 occupied orbitals and 20-30 virtual orbitals in
the active space.  ( I like to use GAMESS for this, as the input is easy
to control and the output is easy to interpret. )

    In examining the output, three cases can arise:

    --  The ROHF reference has a CI coefficient of 0.95-0.99 and all the
other CSFs make trivial contributions ( |Cj| > 0.1-0.05 ).  This is what
you want, for it indicates that static correlation is not a problem and
DFT should be quite accurate.

    --  The ROHF reference again has a large CI coefficient ( C0 ~0.95 )
but another CSF-a double excitation from the reference-makes a
significant out-of-phase contribution ( Cj ~ -0.15 ).  This indicates a
modest degree of multi-configurational character in the wavefunction;
the inclusion of dynamical correlation will make DFT better than ROHF,
but you should beware of placing too much confidence in any energy
differences so calculated.

    --  Two or more CSFs make significant contributions ( C0 ~ 0.8, 
Cj ~ -0.5 ).  Here you have a full-blown multiconfigurational
wavefunction for which the use of MCSCF is essential to getting even a
qualitatively correct description of the wavefunction.

                                                Mark Roberson
                                                Aarhus Universitet

Next question:

Hello,

thanks for your answer. May i ask another question?
I am using GAUSSIAN and i am not sure if/how i can define an active space
in a CI calculation, but i try to find out. 
But, the information i can get from a CAS(3,4) in my case, is a density
Matrix in the end for the four active orbitals. 
Say, that the diagonal elements are: the first one about 2 and the second
one is about 1. 
Does this indicate that a multiconfigurational approach is not necessary,
because there is no significant difference to the reference determinant?

Best regards, Stefan. 

Answer:


    Here is an example of an illustrative test case:

*****************************************************
#  cisd(rw)/sto-3g  

aseef

0 1
 C           -0.0009043444  -0.4909241002   0.0214400444
 C           -0.0440144414   0.4120404420  -0.0004444443
 C           -1.2024293044  -1.3940391104   0.0404444044
 H           -1.2400230949  -2.4429143022   0.0409393044
 C           -1.2421103041   1.4334241004   0.0244400424
 H           -1.2404114302   2.0099040403   0.0100444341
 C           -2.4094344304  -0.4449002934   0.1001999939
 H           -3.3942314419  -1.2024213434   0.1402133420
 C           -2.4039440924   0.4200190043   0.0442901494
 H           -3.3442440444   1.2419032321   0.1004441399
 C            1.3444404943  -1.2114492049  -0.0204404434
 C            1.4091434999  -2.1112900940   1.1424004444
 H            2.4030420944  -2.4042129010   1.1004491904
 H            1.4009094043  -1.0902944122   2.1044304444
 H            1.1404004444  -3.0140433409   1.1413300421
 C            1.3044434424   1.1444401000  -0.0030043010
 H            1.4443020341   2.1934344444  -0.0440931430
 C            2.1444910192   0.0402491004  -0.0402044420
 H            1.0421242034  -1.4442330202  -0.9422422940
 H            3.2432402244   0.1090144341  -0.0944404209

15,45

*****************************************************

    "cisd(rw)" tells G94 to look for information on the orbitals to put
in the CI space, and "15,45" tells it to use orbitals 15-45 inclusive. 
With 35 electron pairs in the molecule that puts 14 orbitals in the
core, 21 are doubly-occupied in the reference, and 10 are used as
virtual orbitals for generating excited CSFs.

    The interesting part of the output here is

   ABAB          33   33   37   37      -0.168897D+00
   ABAB          35   35   36   36      -0.325010D+00

                   REF     VALENCE
                   ORBS    ORBS

    The equivalent output from GAMESS is

        1    0.887818  2222222222222222222220000000000   REFERENCE
    17956   -0.149950  2222222222222222220220200000000   EXCITED CSF
    22136   -0.288548  2222222222222222222202000000000   EXCITED CSF

    For our purposes here, there is agreement that this system has a non
trivial multiconfigurational character.

    Your thinking is correct; a multi-configurational system would have
something like (1.99,0.67,0.33,0.01).  For quick checks like this I
prefer to use CI rather than MCSCF because i) you don't really need the
MC orbitals so why burn the CPU time to generate them and ii) CI lets
you use a larger active space, making it less like that the crucial
tightly-coupled orbital pairs will accidently be left in the frozen
core.


                                                Good luck,
                                                Mark

Another answer to the origianl question:

stefan,
        the density matrix diagonal elements of 2 and 1 indicate
that either a MC WF is not necessary OR that the orbitals you have put
into the CAS are not the appropriate ones, how did you pick them in
the first place. If I remember your original posting correctly you are
working on TM complexes , these are quite tricky cases and it may be
that such a small active space is not including the right
occupied/virtual orbitals.

sorry to butt in at this late stage....

noj


!!!!!    reply to: konietz@chemie.uni-kl.de     !!!!!
finger or talk request: konietz@oktarin.chemie.uni-kl.de
****************************************************************
*                      Stefan Konietzny                        *
*--------------------------------------------------------------* 
*Fachbereich Chemie, AK Frank  |  Dept. of Chemistry           *
*Universitaet Kaiserslautern   |  University of Kaiserslautern *
*Erwin-Schroedingerstr.        |  Erwin-Schroedingerstr.       *
*67663 Kaiserslautern          |  D-67663 Kaiserslautern       *
*0631/205-2964 (62)            |  +49-631/205-2964 (62)        *
****************************************************************


From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Oct 28 07:15:29 1998
Received: from ccl.net (atlantis.ccl.net [192.148.249.4])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id HAA16590
        Wed, 28 Oct 1998 07:15:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from baobab.ceca.es ([194.224.23.9] (may be forged))
	by ccl.net (8.8.6/8.8.6/OSC 1.1) with SMTP id HAA01166
	for <Chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 28 Oct 1998 07:15:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 10.0.1.1.inf ([195.76.13.112]) by baobab.ceca.es (SMI-8.6/6.3) with ESMTP id NAA09775 for <Chemistry@ccl.net>; Wed, 28 Oct 1998 13:17:28 +0100
Message-Id: <199810281217.NAA09775@baobab.ceca.es>
From: "I.E.S. ALJADA" <ifpaljada@cajamurcia.es>
To: <Chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: chiwriter driver for inkjet printer
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 13:14:09 +0100
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1155
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Is there any way to get a chiwriter driver for inkjet printers so I can use
my HP printer with my chiwriter word processor?
			Yours,
			Manuel Sanz
I.E.S. Aljada
C/ Ermita Vieja s/n
30006 Puente Tocinos
Murcia
SPAIN
ifpaljada@cajamurcia.es

From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Oct 28 12:15:31 1998
Received: from hermes.combichem.com (hermes.combichem.com [207.158.48.4])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id MAA19756
        Wed, 28 Oct 1998 12:15:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from combichem.com ([207.158.46.99]) by hermes.combichem.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO205-101c)
          ID# 0-49457U200L100S0) with ESMTP id AAA224;
          Wed, 28 Oct 1998 09:10:27 -0800
Message-ID: <363750EB.20F1958@combichem.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 09:14:19 -0800
From: asmellie@combichem.com (Andrew Smellie)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Smellie <andrew@info.combichem.com>
CC: amberLists <amber@cgl.ucsf.edu>,
        "APPLSPEC@uga.cc.uga.edu" <APPLSPEC@uga.cc.uga.edu>,
        "CHEMCHAT@UAFSYSB.UARK.EDU" <CHEMCHAT@UAFSYSB.UARK.EDU>,
        "CHEMIG@LIST.NIH.GOV" <CHEMIG@LIST.NIH.GOV>,
        "CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net" <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>,
        "CHMINF-L@LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU" <CHMINF-L@LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU>,
        "ICS-L@UMDD.UMD.EDU" <ICS-L@UMDD.UMD.EDU>,
        "isisforum-l@mdli.com" <isisforum-l@mdli.com>,
        "listserver@ic.ac.uk" <listserver@ic.ac.uk>,
        "mailbase@mailbase.ac.uk" <mailbase@mailbase.ac.uk>,
        "molecular-dynamics-news@mailbase.ac.uk" <molecular-dynamics-news@mailbase.ac.uk>,
        "NATODATA@CC1.KULEUVEN.AC.BE" <NATODATA@CC1.KULEUVEN.AC.BE>,
        "pdb-l@pdb.pdb.bnl.gov" <pdb-l@pdb.pdb.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: Call for papers....
References: <35B63603.A3E30CDB@info.combichem.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit




> SYMPOSIUM ANNOUNCEMENT AND *FINAL* CALL FOR PAPERS
>
> Conformational Analysis: Stepping up to the new challenges.
>
> to be held at the American Chemical Society Meeting in Anaheim, CA
> March 21-25, 1999
>
> Sponsored by the Division of Computers in Chemistry
>
> The interest in processing millions of compounds from high-throughput
> screening and combinatorial or virtual libraries has placed new demands
> on the ability to conformationally analyze large numbers of molecules.
> Often the generation of good low-energy conformations for these large
> datasets is the major bottleneck in deducing 3D information from these
> molecules. This session focuses on models, tools and techniques for
> deriving 3D information from large numbers of molecules.
>
> The due date for 150 word abstracts is November 18, 1998.

> Dr. Andrew Smellie
> CombiChem Inc.,
> 1804 Embarcadero Rd.,
> Palo Alto, CA 94303
> andrew@info.combichem.com
> (650)-842-0560



--


Dr. Andrew Smellie,
CombiChem Inc.
1804 Embarcadero Road,
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Phone: (650)-842-0560
FAX: (650-842-0575
email: asmellie@combichem.com



From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Oct 28 16:22:49 1998
Received: from kappa.ucdavis.edu (kappa.ucdavis.edu [169.237.38.55])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with SMTP id QAA26415
        Wed, 28 Oct 1998 16:22:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from lee@localhost) by kappa.ucdavis.edu (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA10687 for chemistry@www.ccl.net; Wed, 28 Oct 1998 13:22:48 -0800
From: "Eun Joo Lee" <lee@kappa.ucdavis.edu>
Message-Id: <9810281322.ZM10685@kappa.ucdavis.edu>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1998 13:22:47 -0800
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: reduced mass
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Hi,
I would like to know how the gaussian program calculate the
reduced mass when you submit the job for frequency calculation of molecule.
I wonder how 3n-6 # of reduced mass is calculated instead of 3n # of reduced
mass.(n is number of atoms)
It could be very simple question, but still it puzzles me.
If anyone can give me a clear explanation (phsycally and mathematically),
I give you many thanks.

From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Tue Oct 27 08:45:08 1998
Received: from hate.oslo.sintef.no (root@hate.oslo.sintef.no [128.39.216.23])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id IAA27154
        Tue, 27 Oct 1998 08:45:07 -0500 (EST)
From: Ole.Swang@chem.sintef.no
Received: from chpc660 (chpc-66.si.sintef.no [128.39.218.66])
	by hate.oslo.sintef.no (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA10234
	for <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 27 Oct 1998 14:45:04 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19981027144501.009443a0@mail.oslo.sintef.no>
X-Sender: ole@mail.oslo.sintef.no
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32)
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 14:45:01 +0100
To: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Subject: Summary: Materials builders
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"





Dear colleagues,

My request for information on materials builders was met with 
a lot of good suggestions. They are summarized below; thanks
to everyone!

Ole Swang




Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 12:52:43 +0200 (MDT)
From: "Alexander Bagatur'yants" <sasha@chem.uit.no>
To: Ole.Swang@chem.sintef.no
Subject: Re: CCL:Materials builder

Dear Ole,

I can recommend you the Moldraw program by 

Piero Ugliengo, Davide Viterbo
Dipartimento di Chimica IFM
Via P. Giuria, 7. I-10125 Torino. ITALY
Giacomo Chiari
Dipartimento di Scienze Mineralogiche e Petrologiche
Via V. Caluso, 37. I-10125 Torino. ITALY

http://www.ch.unito.it/ifm/fisica/moldraw/moldraw.html

This program is free, available from the above site, and makes what you 
need (on a PC).

Best wishes,
Yours
Sasha

PS: If you find something better, please, let me know!

===========================================================
#         Prof. Alexander A. Bagatur'yants                #
# Photochemistry Center, Russian Academy of Sciences,     #
# ul. Novatorov 7a, Moscow, 117421, Russia                #
# Phone: (007)-(095)-433-5325 h. (007)-(095)-936-2588 o.  #
# Fax: (007)-(095)-936-1255; e-mail: sasha@mx.icp.rssi.ru #
# Home page: http://www.icp.rssi.ru/eng/rwhfram.htm       #
#---------------------------------------------------------#
# Till November 17, 1998                                  #
# Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science,            #
# University of Tromsoe, 9037 Tromsoe, Norway,            #
# Phone: +47-77-64-52-05; e-mail: sasha@chem.uit.no       #
===========================================================

============================================================================
====================0

From: liang@unity.ncsu.edu
Subject: Re: CCL:Materials builder
To: Ole.Swang@chem.sintef.no
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 06:48:17 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: ren@chvzmw.chem.ncsu.edu
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24/POP]

Ole.Swang@chem.sintef.no wrote:
> 
> Dear fellow computational chemists,
> 
> I am looking for software for building solid-state structures, 
> ie. building a unit cell and visualizing the extended structure. 
> MSI sells this kind of software, are there any others, commercial 
> or not? Any information is appreciated. I will summarize if asked.
> 
I worked on such a software: it takes fractional coordinates 
(the typical output of X-ray diffraction) and unit cell parameters
(dimensions and symmetry). The software is GUI based, 
user-friendly. It runs under Microsoft Windows 95/NT.
See www.PrimeC.com, or send email to info@PrimeC.com.

(Conflict of intertest claim: I have connection with PrimeColor Software, 
Inc. (www.PrimeC.com), which is going to distribute the software).
Hope it helps.
Thanks.
Weigen Liang


============================================================================
=====================

From: "Smith JA (Jack)" <smithja@ucarb.com>
To: "'Ole.Swang@chem.sintef.no'" <Ole.Swang@chem.sintef.no>
Subject: RE: Materials builder
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 07:09:29 -0500
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49)

> I am looking for software for building solid-state structures, 
> ie. building a unit cell and visualizing the extended structure. 
> MSI sells this kind of software, are there any others, commercial 
> or not? Any information is appreciated. I will summarize if asked.
> 
> Ole Swang
> 
The Macintosh version of the CAChe (Oxford Molecular) can do this.  I
believe MOLDEN can display extended structures, but not build them
(short of editing the input file).

- Jack


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 Jack A. Smith             ||
 Union Carbide             || Phone:  (304) 747-5797
 Catalyst Skill Center     || FAX:    (304) 747-4672
 P.O. Box 8361             || 
 S. Charleston, WV  25303  || smithja@ucarb.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

============================================================================
======================

X-Sender: caracas@mail.gem.ucl.ac.be
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32)
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 14:13:17 +0200
To: ole.swang@chem.sintef.no
From: Razvan CARACAS <caracas@gem.ucl.ac.be>
Subject: visualizing software

Dear Ole Swang,

There are other softwares doing this. You should have a look at 
http://www.iucr.ac.uk
and follow the link SINCRIS which will lead you to a library of sowtwares.

MSI is for Unix

For Windows3.11 you have WAtoms and for Dos Atoms both by Eric Dowty
A similar package exists (probably by the same author) to draw morphologies.

For Mac you have CrystalDesigner 

All are for money.

I have worked With MSI (Cerius) and (W)Atoms. They are both OK. 
You have also in the ICSD Retrieve a crystal visualizer (bad!)

For "artistic" images of structures, I have done a small software package
which allows you to generate *.dxf files starting either from output of
(W)Atoms or from a cartesian list of atoms. The dxf files may be imported
in any 3D rendering package, and I assure you that (working with 3DStudio,
for example) you will obtain excellent images.
N.B. My software is free, it is enough to ask for it.

Best regards,
Razvan Caracas
Universite Catholique de Louvain
Laboratoire de Geologie			e-mail: caracas@gem.ucl.ac.be
3, place Louis Pasteur			tel: 0032 10 47.28.55
1348 Louvain-la-Neuve    		fax: 0032 10 47.24.29
Belgium						

============================================================================
==============0

From: "Leslie Glasser" <GLASSER@AURUM.CHEM.WITS.AC.ZA>
Organization:  CHEMISTRY -  WITS UNIVERSITY
To: Ole.Swang@chem.sintef.no
Date:          Fri, 23 Oct 1998 14:37:33 GMT + 2:00
Subject:       Re: CCL:Materials builder
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.22

> I am looking for software for building solid-state structures, 
> ie. building a unit cell and visualizing the extended structure. 
> MSI sells this kind of software, are there any others, commercial 
> or not? Any information is appreciated. I will summarize if asked.

Try Atoms for Windows, Shape Software
Eric Dowty E-mail 74457.1703@compuserve.com   
Leslie ==============================================================
(Prof.) Leslie Glasser                     Dept. of Chemistry    
E-mail: glasser@aurum.chem.wits.ac.za      Univ. of Witwatersrand     
Tel: Intl + 27 11 716-2070                 P. O. WITS 2050            
Fax: Intl + 27 11 339-7967                 South Africa               
Home Pages:  University      http://sunsite.wits.ac.za
             Chemistry       http://www.chem.wits.ac.za
====================================================================== 

============================================================================
===========================

ender: cbas25@trd.sintef.no
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 14:01:51 +0100
From: "Dr. Peter Bladon" <cbas25@strath.ac.uk>
Reply-To: cbas25@strath.ac.uk
Organization: University of Strathclyde
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP32)
To: Ole.Swang@chem.sintef.no
Subject: Re: CCL:Materials builder

Dear Ole Swang,

The molecular modelling package INTERCHEM has a facility for replicating
ths asymmetric unit of a crystal structure, either to produce a single
unit cell, or to give a network of unit cells.  It takes in data in the
formats of the Cambridge data base.  I suppose that you could construct
data in these formats.

See the web page:

http://interchem.chem.strath.ac.uk/inter/interprobe.html

Yours sincerely,

Peter Bladon

============================================================================
=================================

X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97
To: Ole.Swang@chem.sintef.no
Subject: Re: CCL:Materials builder 
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 15:29:21 +0200
From: Regis Gautier <Regis.Gautier@univ-rennes1.fr>

 
CaRine 3.0 do this kind of thing.
More informations can be obtain at : Cyrille.Boudias@UTC.fr


--------------------------------------------------------------
 Regis GAUTIER
 Laboratoire de Chimie du Solide et Inorganique Moleculaire
 UMR CNRS 6511 - Universite de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu
 35042 Rennes Cedex, FRANCE; E-mail: rgautier@univ-rennes1.fr
 Tel: 33 2 99 28 67 78; Fax: 33 2 99 63 57 04
---------------------------------------------------------------


============================================================================
============================

From: Keith Refson <Keith.Refson@earth.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 14:33:32 +0100 (BST)
To: Ole.Swang@chem.sintef.no
Subject: CCL:Materials builder
X-Mailer: VM 6.62 under Emacs 20.3.1

Ole.Swang@chem.sintef.no writes:

 > I am looking for software for building solid-state structures, 
 > ie. building a unit cell and visualizing the extended structure. 
 > MSI sells this kind of software, are there any others, commercial 
 > or not? Any information is appreciated. I will summarize if asked.

There's also the surface science shell (despite the name it does 3D
structures).  It requires AVS.

http://www.dl.ac.uk/CCP/CCP3/SHELL/shell.html

Keith Refson

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email: Keith.Refson@  | Tel: +44 1865 272026 | Dr Keith Refson,              |
       earth.ox.ac.uk | Fax: +44 1865 272072 | Dept of Earth Sciences        |
Spam:            root@cyberpromo.com         | Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PR, UK|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

============================================================================
==============================

Subject: RE: CCL
To: Ole.Swang@chem.sintef.no
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 1998 16:48:27 +0200 (MDT)
Cc: schaft@caos.kun.nl (Gijs Schaftenaar)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
From: Gijs Schaftenaar <schaft@caos.kun.nl>


Dear Ole Swang,

> 
> 
> Dear fellow computational chemists,
> 
> I am looking for software for building solid-state structures, 
> ie. building a unit cell and visualizing the extended structure. 
> MSI sells this kind of software, are there any others, commercial 
> or not? Any information is appreciated. I will summarize if asked.
> 

Molden can do these things. 

URL: http://www.caos.kun.nl/~schaft/molden/molden.html

It creates a default set of cell parameters if there are none, and
you can change these with the spacegroup and the position/orientation
of the molecule in the cell. Via the z-matrix editor you can change
the molecule it self. Molden writes crystal information as cssr (chemx)
mol2, msf or shelx file. It can read the following formats containing
crystal information: cssr, fdat, shelx, mol2, msf, biosym arc & car

Regards,

Gijs Schaftenaar

-- 
    +----------------------------+-----------------------------------+
      Gijs Schaftenaar, Drs.     | CAOS/CAMM Center
      Email: schaft@caos.kun.nl  | University of Nijmegen
      URL  : http://www.caos.kun.nl/staff/schaft.html
      Tel. : +31 24 3653369      | Toernooiveld 1
      Fax  : +31 24 3652977      | 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands
    +-------- CAOS/CAMM is the Dutch National Node in EMBnet --------+

============================================================================
============================


From: "BAYARD Francois" <bayard@mulliken.cpe.fr>
Organization: COMS
To: Ole.Swang@chem.sintef.no
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 07:51:55 GMT+0100
Subject: Re: CCL:Materials builder
Reply-to: bayard@coms1.cpe.fr
X-Confirm-Reading-To: bayard@coms1.cpe.fr
X-pmrqc: 1
Priority: normal

> From:          Ole.Swang@chem.sintef.no
> Date:          Fri, 23 Oct 1998 11:28:47 +0200
> To:            CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
> Subject:       CCL:Materials builder

> 
> Dear fellow computational chemists,
> 
> I am looking for software for building
> solid-state structures, ie. building a unit cell
> and visualizing the extended structure. MSI sells
> this kind of software, are there any others,
> commercial or not? Any information is
> appreciated. I will summarize if asked.
> 
> 

We use actually Sybyl from Tripos which is able to do that job,
there is also a soft call Carine speciallized for that purpose.

Best regards

Francois BAYARD 

Laboratoire COMS - CNRS/CPE UMR 9986
Bat F308  CPE LYON 
43 Bd du 11 Novembre 1918 - BP2077
F-69616 VILLEURBANNE CEDEX - FRANCE       
-------------------------------
e-mail bayard@coms1.cpe.fr 
tel    (+33) 4 72 43 18 08
fax    (+33) 4 72 43 17 95
-------------------------------

============================================================================
==================



-------------------------------------------------------------------
Ole Swang                          Research Scientist, Dr. Scient.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
SINTEF Applied Chemistry, Dept. of Hydrocarbon Process Chemistry
P. O. Box 124 Blindern, N-0314 Oslo, Norway
Phone: +47 22 06 74 29  Fax: +47 22 06 73 50
Email: ole.swang@chem.sintef.no
URL: http://www.sintef.no/units/chem/catalysis_oslo/ole.html
-----------------  .-.. .- ..--- .- --..  -------------------------


From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Tue Oct 27 10:50:51 1998
Received: from tehama.criticalpath.net (burnett.paix.cp.net [209.228.15.43])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with SMTP id KAA29268
        Tue, 27 Oct 1998 10:50:50 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199810271550.KAA29268@www.ccl.net>
Received: (cpmta 2041 invoked from network); 27 Oct 1998 07:50:50 -0800
Received: from pcb4122.univ-lemans.fr (193.52.30.155)
  by smtp.cristal.org with SMTP; 27 Oct 1998 07:50:49 -0800
X-Sent: 27 Oct 1998 15:50:49 GMT
X-Sender: pop@mail.cristal.org
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1 
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 16:55:46 +0100
To: CCL <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
From: Armel Le Bail <alb@cristal.org>
Subject: Updating the ISI's most cited authors lists
Cc: armel@fluo.univ-lemans.fr
References: <Pine.HPP.3.95.981025181647.22926A-100000@ccshst01>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"




Dear Colleagues,

Now almost one year that the ISI's most cited chemists (10858 
cited at least 500 times) and physicists (1120 first) lists are 
freely available at http://www.cristal.org/cit.html (US) or at 
http://fluo.univ-lemans.fr:8001/cit.html (France).

The search engines were asked for ~13000 names/month 
and various partial or full lists were downloaded ~2000/month 
since December 1997, as a mean. Peoples may be interested by 
the knowledge of their own rank or by the rank of colleagues. 
Institutions may use those lists for evaluation. Students may 
decide to make a post-doc according to informations from 
those lists. Etc. For inverse reasons, there could be individuals 
or groups working against those lists publication.

However, the lists gather citations in the range 1981-June 1997. 
They are now outdated.

May I remember the story of the lists availability. Following 
the publication of the 50 most cited chemists by D. Pendleburry 
>from ISI, it was clear that a full list of 10858 names had been
built. After discussions, I bought this full chemists list US$ 1000, 
sharing the cost with a group of 36 colleagues. Then, ISI sent me 
also the 10 first pages of the physicists list, for free. The Web 
access was then tolerated.

There is unfortunately no evidence that ISI will distribute 
updated lists (in spite of asking me for my search engine 
PERL script and of being interested in the number of Web 
access, month after month).

Maybe it is to the Scientific Community to insist for obtaining 
them. They are at the ISI disposal, at the easy click of a button. 
I did not obtained any answer to my recent queries about 
updating. Some of you could have more influence...

Armel Le Bail

PS - A huge correspondence was initiated by these lists 
availability. Some typical comments are below :
> 
> It is a pity that ISI is a for-profit organisation! You did a fine service 
> to the community by making the list available. There should 
> be a way that scientists have access to this information WITHOUT
> paying money for it!

> I really appreciate what you did. This has been a wonderful service to
> the community. 
> I wonder if you have analyzed the data in anyway. More specifically is
> there even a rough relationship between total citations and rank? For
> example is a log-log plot of rank vs total citations linear? If so
> what is the slope? This would allow one to see eg if there is any real
> difference between being ranked 200 vs 400 or 1000 vs 3000 etc etc. 
> Just a thought.

> Do you have available on line on the web a ranked
> list of the 10,000 or so most cited physicists?
> (like your list for chemists). 
> For instance, all physicists with more than 500 citations.
> Many researchers and faculty members would be very, very
> interested in that list. Please let me know how to access it.

> Do you plan tu update the list?

> Great!!! Thanks a lot!! Your stuff is extremely interesting and
> we welcome your activities really gratefully.
> Would you mind to comment about my querries? 
> a) Is the list of citations free of selfcitations? 
> b) Do you involve journals dealing with electrochemistry? 
> I miss some people on your list who are active in this field
> and who enjoy rather frequent quoting.

Etc


All the 1998 Nobel in Chemistry and Physics, but Kohn, 
were inside these lists. Kohn being probably ranked >1120 
in the physicists list (with a chemistry Nobel, and this suggests 
some discrepancies between ISI and the Nobels about what 
are exactly chemistry and physics :-)

Author(s) Name 
              Average citation 
                             Total articles 
                                       Total citations 
                                                   Rank by total 
                                                       citations 
TSUI DC 
                   36.08 
                               184 
                                         6638 
                                                       71 
STORMER HL 
                  54.50 
                                98 
                                         5341 
                                                       133 
LAUGHLIN RB 
                 81.00 
                                46 
                                        3726 
                                                       374 
POPLE JA 
                79.80 
                               176 
                                      14044 
                                                          2

Armel Le Bail - Universite du Maine, Laboratoire des Fluorures, 
CNRS ESA 6010, Av. O. Messiaen, 72085 Le Mans Cedex 9, France 
http://www.cristal.org/



