From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Tue Dec  1 09:03:49 1998
Received: from camd1.kkpcr.re.kr (camd1.kkpcr.re.kr [134.75.174.101])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id JAA01238
        Tue, 1 Dec 1998 09:03:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from jeonghy@localhost)
	by camd1.kkpcr.re.kr (8.8.6H1/8.8.6) id XAA08815
	for chemistry@www.ccl.net; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 23:04:26 -0900 (PST)
From: Ho Young Jeong <jeonghy@camd1.kkpcr.re.kr>
Message-Id: <199812020804.XAA08815@camd1.kkpcr.re.kr>
Subject: cohesive energy density from MD
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 23:04:26 -0900 (PST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Dear CCL user:

I'm looking for the references to calculate cohesive energy density (CED)
from MD. CED value computed by my own code is so far from the experimental
one. There are several problem in the code, but I suspect the equation to
obtain it from the radial distribution function of MD trajectory. Please
let me know the introductory books, reviews or papers in this field. 

Thank you in advance,

Ho Young Jeong
Kumho Chemical Lab., Korea.

From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Tue Dec  1 12:07:16 1998
Received: from hercules.telenet-ops.be (hercules.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.33])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id MAA03267
        Tue, 1 Dec 1998 12:07:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a.pandora.be ([195.130.139.203]) by hercules.telenet-ops.be
          (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6)  with SMTP id AAA1B45
          for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 18:07:08 +0100
Message-ID: <36642343.480E@pandora.be>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 18:11:31 +0100
From: Violon Daniel <comed@pandora.be>
Reply-To: comed@pandora.be
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 [nl]C-PAN1  (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: mopac7/cosmo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


From Daniel VIOLON
     Belgium    
     comed@pandora.be

Subject: COSMO in MOPAC7 (DOS)

Hello!
I would like to use COSMO on molecules containing approximatively 65
atoms ("heavy" and "light" together). Apparently, the COSMO routine
(available in the free downloadable MOPAC7 for DOS) does not work for
molecules containing more than 50 atoms (producing an error message and
returning to the C prompt), although AM1 and MNDO work normally for my
larger molecules, without the COSMO keywords. This COSMO properly
handles smaller molecules (Klamt's glycine testrun is OK). Am I missing
something important?
Is there any place where a MOPAC7 version could be found with a COSMO
module able to work with the required number of atoms (approximatively
maximum 65) for DOS or even WIN95, without having to recompile the code,
not being a native programmer?
Thank you very much for helping!

Daniel
comed@pandora.be

From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Tue Dec  1 12:33:39 1998
Received: from nenuphar.saclay.cea.fr (nenuphar.saclay.cea.fr [132.166.192.7])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id MAA03742
        Tue, 1 Dec 1998 12:33:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from muguet.saclay.cea.fr (muguet.saclay.cea.fr [132.166.192.6])
	by nenuphar.saclay.cea.fr (8.9.1a/8.9.1/CEAnet-relay-5.0.0.1) with ESMTP id SAA14979
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 18:33:49 +0100 (MET)
Received: from styx.bruyeres.cea.fr (styx-e76.bruyeres.cea.fr [132.165.76.3])
	by muguet.saclay.cea.fr (8.9.1a/8.9.1/CEAnet-relay-5.0.0.1) with SMTP id SAA26714;
	Tue, 1 Dec 1998 18:31:03 +0100 (MET)
Received: by styx.bruyeres.cea.fr (CEANET-1.1+)
	id AA24856; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 18:33:20 +0100
Received: from indre.ripault.cea.fr(132.165.32.1) by styx via smap 
	id sma024824; Tue Dec  1 18:32:50 1998
Received: from ripault.cea.fr (manse.ripault.cea.fr [132.165.32.9]) by ripault.cea.fr. (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA02242; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 18:32:44 +0100
Received: from manse.ripault.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ripault.cea.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA05522;
	Tue, 1 Dec 1998 18:33:06 +0100
Sender: mathieu@ripault.cea.fr
Message-Id: <36642852.19691851@ripault.cea.fr>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 17:33:06 +0000
From: Didier MATHIEU <mathieu@ripault.cea.fr>
Organization: CEA - Le Ripault
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.32 i586)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Elmar Gerwalin <gerwalin@rhrk.uni-kl.de>
Cc: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:G:Calculate Heat of formation ?
References: <m0zkWyL-0000XOC@aixd1.rhrk.uni-kl.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Elmar Gerwalin wrote:
> 
> Hi
> I want to use Gaussian94 to calculate the heat of
> formation for organic compounds.
> 
> Do I have to perform a frequency calculation to get the
> Zero point vinbration energy to get correct results ?

Concerning calculation of Heats of formation and other thermochemical
quantities, there is a very useful (to me) recent book, in which a wide
variety of methods, from purely empirical to very high level ab initio,
are discussed:

   Computational Thermochemistry
   ACS Symposium Series No 677
   K. Irikura and D.J. Frurip (eds).

This book is available from the Amazon bookshop:

   http://www.amazon.com

> Or is there a better way to get the values ?

It depends on a number of factors such as the target accuracy, the size
of the molecules considered... If you can afford high-level ab initio
techniques of course calculation of zero-point energy is recommended,
and also others less significant contributions (thermal vib+rot+trans
and delta(PV)...) easy to obtain. My version of Gaussian is G92 but I
think in Gaussian94 calculation of formation enthalpies is implemented
in an automated way (G2 or CBS models).

If more efficient techniques are required, you need "atom equivalents":
see S.J. Mole et al. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 14665 (1996) and ref. therein.

A set of atom equivalents for C,H,N,O,F,Cl compounds has been derived by
Habibollahzadeh et al. J. Comp. Chem. 16, 654 (1995).

To come back to the original question, I believe than explicit
calculation of frequencies is useful only at the highest levels, because
using HF or popular DFT functional the errors stem mostly from the
equilibrium energies (even after correction through atom equivalents)
rather than from the neglect of ZPE and thermal contributions.  Maybe
with B3LYP and large basis set (Mole et al.) introducing explicit
calculation of the frequencies might be useful, but it is doubtful to
me. 

For instance, in JCC 16, 654 (1995) all contributions are calculated
explicitly. However, it yields no improvement over the more usual method
were everything is dumped into atom equivalents exepted the DFT energy.
We tried both schemes and obtained very similar results.

To save CPU time, you can simply perform single point energy
calculations on geometries optimized with accurate molecular mechanics
force field such as MMFF. We developed a set of atom equivalents
suitable for BP/DN**//MMFF calculations. There were obtained from a
calibration set of 84 molecules and tested on the panel of JCC 16, 654
(1995): we obtained the same accuracy of the original method at a much
reduced cost. I can send the group equivalents.

However, one must be careful with the environments of the atoms. For
instance we found out that the atom equivalents for F bonded to C CANNOT
be used for F bonded to N, at least at the BP/DN**//MMFF level.
Moreover, MMFF wrongly predicts nitro groups to be perpendicular to the
ring plane for nitroaromatics!

In JCC 16, 654 (1996) it is obvious that uncorrected theoretical
enthalpies are very poor. For fast calculations we use the PIMM model
available from the university of Darmstadt:

   http://tutor.oc.chemie.th-darmstadt.de/TZ/AKLindner/pimm_e.html

To my experience, the PIMM method is faster and more reliable than both
AM1 (significantly) and PM3 for energetic  materials, although it was
not designed for this specific application.

Here is a comparaison of performance for ~100 molecules, most of them
staken from JCC 16, 654 (1995):
values reported = average absolute deviation and max. abs. dev.
(kJ/mol):

   PIMM method           19.5    13.3
   BP/DN**//MMFF (*)     12.5    59.6
   BP/DN**//MMFF (**)    12.3    64.8
   BP/6-31G(d,p)         13.3    43.8

(*) freq. calculated explicitly, hence VIB+ROT+TRANS+D(PV)
(**) no explicit calculation of the above contributions

Regards

Didier

-- 
Didier MATHIEU
CEA - Le Ripault, BP 16
37260 Monts (France)
Tel. 33(0)2.47.34.41.85

From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Tue Dec  1 10:15:44 1998
Received: from reddeer.fisica.ufpr.br (reddeer.fisica.ufpr.br [200.17.214.184])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id KAA02033
        Tue, 1 Dec 1998 10:15:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (edulsa@localhost)
	by reddeer.fisica.ufpr.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA19997
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 13:15:25 -0200 (EDT)
	(envelope-from edulsa@reddeer.fisica.ufpr.br)
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 13:15:25 -0200 (EDT)
From: Eduardo <edulsa@reddeer.fisica.ufpr.br>
To: "ccl.osc" <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: sources to ampac2.1
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.01.9812011310140.19946-100000@reddeer.fisica.ufpr.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by www.ccl.net id KAA02036




Dear netters


  Does somebody know where I can find a ampac2.1 (or higher) sources
to compiling at UNIX (FreeBSD or Linux) enviroment? I've tried to use
these from ccl.osc, but I can't to solve the problem from SIZES/NOLIST
file (isn't have any file with this name in the package)


				thanks a lot
				
				Eduardo

			edulsa@quimica.ufpr.br
			Univ. Feder. Paraná - Curitiba - Brazil



From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Tue Dec  1 15:08:25 1998
Received: from ns01.sbphrd.com (firewall-user@ns01.sbphrd.com [208.198.64.1])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with SMTP id PAA19728
        Tue, 1 Dec 1998 15:08:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: by ns01.sbphrd.com; id PAA09481; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 15:08:26 -0500
Received: from phinet.sbphrd.com(139.136.64.5) by ns01.sbphrd.com via smap (3.2)
	id xma009405; Tue, 1 Dec 98 15:08:17 -0500
Received: from phufs2.um.us.sbphrd.com by phinet.sbphrd.com; (/)
	id AA06065; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 15:08:17 -0500
Received: from phu198.um.us.sbphrd.com (phu198.um.us.sbphrd.com [139.136.98.47]) by phufs2.um.us.sbphrd.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/sbphrd/mh/19971204) with ESMTP
	id PAA26803 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 15:08:17 -0500 (EST)
From: M Dominic Ryan <ryanmd@mh.us.sbphrd.com>
Received: (from ryanmd@localhost) by phu198.um.us.sbphrd.com (8.8.8/8.8.8)
	id PAA96044 for chemistry@www.ccl.net; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 15:10:37 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 15:10:37 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199812012010.PAA96044@phu198.um.us.sbphrd.com>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Travel Grants Available, addendum





As posted last week, the Computers in Chemistry Division is making available
a limited number of grants of up to $500.  Two addenda should be added:

The deadline for submission is January 28, 1999.  This will permit
sufficient time to process the submissions and make the awards for the
candidate to still adjust travel plans. 

Only authors presenting a paper in the Division of Computers in Chemistry
are eligible.

The original notice is included below:


---------------
The Computers in Chemistry Division of American Chemical Society invites
students presenting a paper at the spring meeting in Anaheim to apply for
a travel grant.

A limited number of grants of up to $500 will be awarded to selected
students.

1.  Candidates must be graduate students OR undergraduate students in good
    standing as confirmed by their department.

2.  Students must have a supporting letter from their (primary) 
    thesis advisor or the department chair if the latter is not possible
    (with an explanatory note).  

3.  No more than one award will be given to a research group.

4.  Funds must be used to attend the Spring 1999 National meeting of the 
    American Chemical Society.

5.  Candidates must be presenting either an oral paper or a poster.

6.  To apply, send letter of request, C.V. and supporting documents to the
    address below.  Supporting Letters must be sent by mail (i.e. hard-copy).

        M. Dominic Ryan, UW2412
        SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals
        709 Swedeland Rd
        King of Prussia, PA 19406
        USA

There is still limited time to submit a paper to either the General oral
section or to the Posters.  If you have already been accepted, forward
your application for consideration.  If you would like to present a
paper, please forward both the grant application and the abstract form.
----------------


Dominic Ryan

Program Chair

Division of Computers in Chemistry
American Chemical Society.
__
M. Dominic Ryan   (610)-270-6529     SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals 
Internet:  ryanmd@mms.sbphrd.com     King of Prussia, PA  


From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Tue Dec  1 15:57:55 1998
Received: from gate-sl1.mdli.com (ns2.mdli.com [208.200.221.3])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id PAA23484
        Tue, 1 Dec 1998 15:57:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
	by gate-sl1.mdli.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA15380;
	Tue, 1 Dec 1998 12:51:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from puffin.mdli.com(191.254.19.10) by gate-sl1.mdli.com via smap (V2.1)
	id xma015378; Tue, 1 Dec 98 12:51:04 -0800
Received: from shepherd.mdli.com by puffin.mdli.com (8.8.5/BCH1.0)
	id MAA18817; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 12:57:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by shepherd.mdli.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
	id <W269KV9X>; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 12:57:54 -0800
Message-ID: <8E13FBBA26A9DA119ED400A0C9AB2CE55A7806@shepherd.mdli.com>
From: Guenter Grethe <Guenter@mdli.com>
To: CHMINF-L <CHMINF-L@LISTSERV.INDIANA.EDU>,
        Computational Chemistry List
	 <chemistry@www.ccl.net>,
        Diversity LIst
	 <mol-diversity@listserv.arizona.edu>,
        isisforum <isisforum-l@mdli.com>,
        Medicinal Chemistry List <acsmedi@lists.wayne.edu>
Cc: "'Guenter Grethe'" <Guenter@mdli.com>, "'Wendy Warr'" <wendy@warr.com>
Subject: Fifth International Conference on Chemical Structures - Call for 
	Papers
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 12:57:51 -0800 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9)
Content-Type: text/plain





You will find information about the conference and for submitting abstracts
at the following URL. 

http://ChemWeb.com/conference/5iccs/5iccs.html

The site will be updated continously as new information becomes available.
Hardcopy announcements will not be mailed out.  If you plan to present a
paper it is recommended to send in your abstracts as soon as possible as
this conference fills up early.

Guenter Grethe
Conference Chairman


From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Tue Dec  1 20:50:40 1998
Received: from teapot06.domain1.bigpond.com (teapot06.bigpond.com [139.134.5.237])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with SMTP id UAA27176
        Tue, 1 Dec 1998 20:50:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by teapot06.domain1.bigpond.com (NTMail 3.02.13) with ESMTP id ra820343 for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 11:45:30 +1000
Received: from BDIP-T-009-p-235-34.tmns.net.au ([139.134.235.34]) by mail1.bigpond.com (Claudes-Predictive-MailRouter V2.1); 02 Dec 1998 11:45:30
Message-ID: <003e01be1d96$1f1d8200$09007a81@hnlsyd8>
Reply-To: "Dr Huang" <showing@bigfoot.com>
From: "Dr Huang" <showing@bigfoot.com>
To: <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Cc: <jkl@ccl.net>
Subject: I uploaded my software polar31p.zip to ftp.ccl.net/incoming
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 12:50:20 +1100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3




  Polar 3.1 for Windows: electrochemical simulation and data analysis

  Dr Weiguang HUANG
124 Eastern Avenue, Kingsford, Sydney, NSW 2032, Australia
Phone: 61 2 96620516, 0413 008 019
mailto:polarography@bigfoot.com, showing@bigfoot.com
http://www.bigfoot.com/~polarography/
http://showing.home.ml.org

 It analytically and digitally simulates voltammograms and stripping
voltammograms with charge current, resistance and noise on about 20
mechanisms
at 8 electrode geometries (planar, spherical, semi-spherical, cylindrical,
semi-cylindrical, microdisc, thin film, and rotating electrodes) in 5
techniques
(linear sweep and CV, DC, normal pulse, differential pulse, and squre wave
voltammetries), and outputs current, resitance, conductivity and surface
concentration.

 Its data analysis include detecting peak area, current and
potential, semi-derivative, derivative, intergral, semi-intergral,
curve fitting, and separating overlapped peaks.

 It shows tip when the user put mouse cursor over a lable.
The progrom can separate overlapped voltammograms into individuals,
and extract real peak from voltammogram with noise and baseline.
It outputs the theoretical peak values, the peak current and potential, and
current-potential data, which can be imported into other program (e.g.
MS Excel). User can copy-and-paste the voltammogram into his document.

 It has been successfully applied to fit experimental
polarograms (voltammograms) of In(III), Cd(II), Pb(II), Tl(I), Cr(III).
Zn(II), and binuclear copper complex in aqueous and non-aqueous media
at mercury, solid metal and non-metal electrodes (specifically the
dropping mercury, hanging mercury drop, gold, platinum and glassy
carbon electrodes) by various electrochemical techniques (differential
pulse, sqware wave, and pseudo-derivative normal pulse polargraphies)
[1].

 It runs on IBM PC under Windows 95/98/NT, available from the
author or download from my Web site.

 REFERENCES
[1] W. Huang, T. Henderson, A.M. Bond and K.B. Oldham, Curve fitting
    to resolve overlapping voltammetric peaks: model and examples,
    Anal. Chim. Acta, 1995, 304, 1-15.




