From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Jan 13 04:55:51 1999
Received: from hartree.chem.kuleuven.ac.be (hartree.quantchem.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.49.1])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id EAA15245
        Wed, 13 Jan 1999 04:55:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (steven@localhost)
	by hartree.chem.kuleuven.ac.be (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id KAA24164
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:55:08 +0100
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:55:07 +0100 (NFT)
From: Steven Creve <Steven.Creve@chem.kuleuven.ac.be>
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: CCL:Metal Complex Optimization
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.9901131053450.26712-100000@hartree.quantchem.kuleuven.ac.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII




Hi all,


what would be the method of choice for structure optimizations of fairly
large transition metal systems (say 50 atoms) of Ti or Zr? I would like to
get some feeling of timings and quality.

Thanks,

Steven


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven Creve                       steven.creve@chem.kuleuven.ac.be
Labo Quantumchemie
Celestijnenlaan 200F
3001-HEVERLEE                      tel: (32) (16) 32 73 93
BELGIUM                            fax: (32) (16) 32 79 92


From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Jan 13 10:11:49 1999
Received: from sirio.cineca.it (sirio.cineca.it [193.204.121.3])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id KAA17125
        Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:11:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from incci000@localhost) by sirio.cineca.it (8.8.5/8.7) id QAA25095; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 16:02:59 +0100 (MET)
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 16:02:58 +0100 (MET)
From: Sigismondo Boschi <incci000@sirio.cineca.it>
To: Fenglou Mao <mao@csb0.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN>
cc: CCL <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:ANSI C++ question?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.3.91.990112211656.9539A-100000@csb0.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.91.990113153258.20329A-100000@sirio.cineca.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Yes, C++ has been standardized by a committee of standardization ISO/ANSI.

the most important name is "Bjarne Stroustrup" (the c++ "creator"), that has 
recently published a book about the ANSI C++, very nice indeed:

"The C++ Programming Language", third edition.

I strongly suggest it.

STL is now part of the ansi/iso standard of c++. The press release of 
C++ ISO standard can be found here:

http://www.research.att.com/~bs/iso_release.html
Here you can find either some interesting links.


The ANSI drafts of the standard are not at disposal in any electronic 
form: they have to be requested directly to "ANSI":

From a FAQ:
You can get a paper copy of the standard from ANSI. Either send email to 
Lynn Barra (lbarra@itic.nw.dc.us) or send a letter to the address below, and 
ask for the latest version  of "Draft Proposed American National 
Standard for Information  Systems - Programming Language C++" which is 
document number CD14882. 
It is typically shipped 2-day FedEx within the continental US. If you 
want to order via snail mail, send a letter to X3 Secretariat / 1250 Eye 
Street NW / Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20005 / 202-626-5738.  

Finally, reporting from a FAQ:

C++ has been standardized by ANSI (The American National Standards 
Organization), BSI (The British Standards Institute), DIN (The German 
National
Standards Organization), several other national standards bodies, and ISO 
(The International Standards Organization). The ISO standard has been
finalized and adopted by unanimous vote Nov 14, 1997. 
The ANSI-C++ committee is called "X3J16". The ISO C++ standards group is 
called "WG21". The major players in the ANSI/ISO C++ standards
process includes just about everyone: representatives from Australia, 
Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, Japan, the Netherlands, New
Zealand, Sweden, the UK, and the USA, along with representatives from 
about a hundred companies and many interested individuals. Major players
include AT&T, Ericsson, Digital, Borland, Hewlett Packard, IBM, Mentor 
Graphics, Microsoft, Silicon Graphics, Sun Microsystems, and Siemens. After
about 8 years of work, this standard is now complete. On November 14, 
1997, the standard was approved by a unanimous vote of the countries that had
representatives present in Morristown. Final ratification by two dozen 
countries is expected by March 1998. 

 --------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
|Sigismondo Boschi                      |tel: +39 51 6171559              |
|CINECA (Gruppo Supercalcolo) - INSTM   |fax: +39 51 6132198              |
|via Magnanelli, 6/3                    |e-mail: s.boschi@cineca.it       |
|40033 Casalecchio di Reno (Bologna)    |                                 |
|ITALY                                  |                                 |
 --------------------------------------- ---------------------------------

On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Fenglou Mao wrote:

> Dear all,
>      I am wondering if there is a ANSI C++ standard, and if have one,
> where I can find an introduction about it. And how about STL(standard
> template library) defined in ANSI C++, and how to find some introduction 
> about it?
> 
> Sincerely Yours,
> 
> FengLou Mao
> *******************************
> ADD:Mr. FengLou Mao
>     Peking University
>     BeiJing
>     P.R.China
> Tel:86-10-62751490
> Fax:86-10-62751725
> 
> 
> 
> -------This is added Automatically by the Software--------
> -- Original Sender Envelope Address: chemistry-request@www.ccl.net
> -- Original Sender From: Address: mao@csb0.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN
> CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@www.ccl.net: Coordinator
> MAILSERV@www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher: www.ccl.net 73
> Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@www.ccl.net -- archive search
>              Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html 
> 

From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Jan 13 10:44:25 1999
Received: from bacchus.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de (root@bacchus.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de [134.99.152.11])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id KAA17676
        Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:44:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from bacchus.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de (jochen@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bacchus.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA12596;
	Wed, 13 Jan 1999 16:43:33 +0100
From: Jochen Kuepper <jochen@uni-duesseldorf.de>
Organization: Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet
To: Ferenc Csizmadia <fcsiz@chemaxon.com>, chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:New ideas for chemistry software
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2135 23:03:00 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.11]
Content-Type: text/plain
References: <3697B311.E8D65392@chemaxon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <99011316433300.10662@bacchus.pc1.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by www.ccl.net id KAA17677



Regarding the summary of new ideas:

Dear All,
please keep in mind that PC does not mean Microsoft !
There have been several statements that want to get programs ported to Windows
to be able to run them on "cheap" PC-hardware.
Since there are many OSs that run these programs on exactly that cheap
hardware, I would not see this urgent need for porting but would like the
programs to be enhanced in functionality !

PS: I know at least 10 OSs of very different flavour running on exactly this PC
hardware, of which MS_DOS(+Win3.1+Win9x) and Windows NT are only two, and will
be only one really soon, since the DOS branch is declared death already by
Microsoft.
Moreover basically all of this can be installed in parallel on the same machine.

So I would strongly suggest to work on the science part of the programs, not
the operating system topics.

Greetings,
Jochen
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jochen K"upper

  Heinrich-Heine-Universit"at D"usseldorf   jochen@uni-duesseldorf.de
  Institut f"ur Physikalische Chemie I
  Universit"atsstr. 1, Geb 26.43 Raum 02.29    phone ++49-211-8113681
  40225 D"usseldorf                            fax   ++49-211-8115195
  Germany             http://www-public.rz.uni-duesseldorf.de/~jochen
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Jan 13 11:01:53 1999
Received: from sg2.csrsrc.mi.cnr.it (sg2.csrsrc.mi.cnr.it [155.253.3.253])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with SMTP id LAA18057
        Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:01:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost by sg2.csrsrc.mi.cnr.it via SMTP (951211.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH1042/951211.SGI.AUTO)
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net> id RAA13130; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 17:05:14 -0800
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 17:05:12 -0800
From: Alessandra Villa <ale@sg2.csrsrc.mi.cnr.it>
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: ab initio calculation: NMR shielding tensor 
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.02.9901131646460.13058-100000@sg2.csrsrc.mi.cnr.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII



Dear All, 
       
        I wonder if someone have performed ab initio NMR
shielding tensor calculations on paramagnetic compounds by means of GIAO
or CSGT methods. 
       Could you point me some paper concerning the argument? or could you
write me your knowledge about the reliability of GIAO and CSGT NMR
shielding tensor calculations on paramagnetic molecules? 
       I will summary all the answers.
       Thank you 

 Alessandra  
 

*******************************************************************************
  Alessandra Villa                            ale@sg2.csrsrc.mi.cnr.it
  PhD-Student 
  Dipartimento di Chimica Fisica ed Elettrochimica
  Universtita' degli Studi di Milano
  via Golgi 19
  20133 Milano-Italy
*******************************************************************************



From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Jan 13 12:12:07 1999
Received: from wavefun.com (wave-fw.wavefun.com [209.125.133.2])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with SMTP id MAA20235
        Wed, 13 Jan 1999 12:12:06 -0500 (EST)
From: <yu@wavefun.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 09:11:24 -0800
Message-Id: <9901130911.ZM28405@wavefun.com
 >
In-Reply-To: Steven Creve <Steven.Creve@chem.kuleuven.ac.be>
        "CCL:Metal Complex Optimization" (Jan 13, 10:55am)
References: <Pine.A41.4.05.9901131053450.26712-100000@hartree.quantchem.kuleuven.ac.be>
X-Mailer: Z-Mail-SGI (3.2S.3 08feb96 MediaMail)
To: Steven Creve <Steven.Creve@chem.kuleuven.ac.be>
Subject: Re: CCL:Metal Complex Optimization
Cc: CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


On Jan 13, 10:55am, Steven Creve wrote:
> Subject: CCL:Metal Complex Optimization
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> what would be the method of choice for structure optimizations of fairly
> large transition metal systems (say 50 atoms) of Ti or Zr? I would like to
> get some feeling of timings and quality.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steven
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Steven Creve                       steven.creve@chem.kuleuven.ac.be
> Labo Quantumchemie
> Celestijnenlaan 200F
> 3001-HEVERLEE                      tel: (32) (16) 32 73 93
> BELGIUM                            fax: (32) (16) 32 79 92
>
>
> -------This is added Automatically by the Software--------
> -- Original Sender Envelope Address: chemistry-request@www.ccl.net
> -- Original Sender From: Address: Steven.Creve@chem.kuleuven.ac.be
> CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net: Everybody | CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@www.ccl.net: Coordinator
> MAILSERV@www.ccl.net: HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH | Gopher: www.ccl.net 73
> Anon. ftp: www.ccl.net   | CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@www.ccl.net -- archive search
>              Web: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry.html
>-- End of excerpt from Steven Creve

PM3(TM) in our SPARTAN can calculate Ti and Zr compounds. The method is a
semi-emperical one, and have no problem to optimize 50 atom systems by today's
computer. The results of geometry optimizations with PM3(TM) are pretty good.

Jianguo Yu

-- 
+-----------------------+------------------+-------------------------+
|Jianguo Yu, Ph.D.      |  ______________  | E-Mail: yu@wavefun.com  |
|Computational Chemist  |  \  _________ /  | Phone:  (949)955-2120   |
|Wavefunction Inc.      |   \ \\\\\\\\/    | Fax:    (949)955-2118   |
|18401 Von Karman       |    \ \\\\\/      | "The doctrines observe  |
|Suite 370              |     \ \\/        |  nature"                |
|Irvine, CA 92612       |      \/          |   Lao-tzu (604-531 B.C.)| 
+----------------------http://www.wavefun.com------------------------+

From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Jan 13 19:54:47 1999
Received: from sungod.ccs.yorku.ca (zK9EYroKA9hZYuK4LlDFTP8sBV+RopV1@sungod.ccs.yorku.ca [130.63.236.104])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id TAA22078
        Wed, 13 Jan 1999 19:54:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from curl.gkcl.yorku.ca (curl.gkcl.yorku.ca [130.63.232.224]) by sungod.ccs.yorku.ca (8.8.7/8.6.11) with SMTP id TAA08621 for <@mailrelay.yorku.ca:chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 19:54:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: by curl.gkcl.yorku.ca (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
	for chemistry@www.ccl.net id TAA03709; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 19:56:34 -0500
From: chan@curl.gkcl.yorku.ca (Wai-To-Chan)
Message-Id: <199901140056.TAA03709@curl.gkcl.yorku.ca>
Subject: Re: CCL:G:SUMMARY OF RATE/ACTIVATION ENERGY
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 19:56:33 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit



     Having read Dr Topper's information about POLYRATE
I realize I should take back my remarks about the program
being inappropriate for isomerisation reaction rate calculation.

   In writing my previous message I had in mind that 
it is not always neccessary to apply unimolecular rate theory 
rigorously using a package as sophiscated as POLYRATE. 
One can estimate rate constants using a calculator merely by 
substitution of thermodynamic quantities readily obtained from
ab initio MO calculations into the Arrhenius rate 
equation, K = A * exp(-E/RT). Evaluation of the rate constant 
this way is not strictly valid as E is the high-pressure- 
-activation-energy which is not equivalent to the barrier height
obtained from ab initio calculation. Nonetheless the ab initio
barrier height should approximate E reasonably well and I would 
not recommend one going through the trouble of calculating it 
using RRKM method. My opinion is that applying RRKM method
safely requires a better than casual understanding 
of the background theory which happened to be a difficult 
learning experience to me. However I should have presented 
my thoughts on using POLYRATE, which I never used, more carefully. 

   Finally I should point out I mistakenly referred to 
Q the "partition function" from the Arrhenius rate equation as 
the "entropy" in my early comments. My apology for the blunder.

Wai-To Chan
Research Associate
Department of Chemistry 
York University
Toronto, Canada

From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Jan 13 21:43:04 1999
Received: from mail-03.telis.org (mail-03.telis.org [204.71.76.231])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id VAA22635
        Wed, 13 Jan 1999 21:43:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [207.49.123.49] (s06-pm42.snaustel.campuscwix.net [207.49.123.49])
	by mail-03.telis.org (8.9.0/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA15007
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 18:37:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender: gammadas@mail.telis.org
Message-Id: <l03130300b2c3083cdbe9@[207.49.122.181]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 20:38:36 -0600
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
From: Goutam Das <gammadas@telis.org>
Subject: complex geom calc protocol


Here are two more responses to my originial questions which goes as follows:
A very big thank you to everyone who responded.


"I wonder whether there are protocols (besides MD sim) for calculating
geometries (ab initio/semiempiric/molmech) of  minima's and finally glob
minimas  for pairs of simple molecules. If there are, I would deeply
appreciate if anyone could kindly point me to good references.  Normally I
optimize geom's of both mol's, then freeze the crd's of each and then move
one relative to another and then relax all constraints, guessing inital
geoms by intuition--I am sure I  miss a lot of conf's and maybe certainly
the glob min (although I understand that there is no guarantee that any
particular method could give the global min).  However, there should be a
much better & efficient subroutine."

Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 09:13:07 -0600
From: "Mark A. Zottola" <asnmaz01@asc.edu>
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Goutam Das <gammadas@telis.org>
Subject: Global Minima

Dear Dr. Das,

I do not have the reference on hand, but I do know that in the late 80's
Dr. Scheraga published a paper on an algorithm for finding the global
minimum for a geometry by manipulating the dimensionality of the
problem. I believe instead of working in n-space and doing a geometry
minimization (which is almost guaranteed to NOT find the global
minimum), Scheraga's approach (I believe, check the paper) works on
starting with a low dimensionality then adding complexity, the idea
being that if you approach the problem from the downside, the first
point you should hit would be the global minimum...

Good luck finding the reference. If I manage to run across it I will
send it to you.

Best of luck in your research!
--
*********
Mark A. Zottola                       Alabama Research and Education
Network
119 Rust Research Center              Nichols Research Corporation
University of Alabama-Birmingham      VOICE:  (205) 934-3893
Birmingham, AL  35294                 EMAIL:  asnmaz01@csimail.asc.edu

From: ross@cgl.ucsf.EDU
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1999 20:57:55 -0800 (PST)
To: gammadas@telis.org
Subject: Re:  CCL:complex geom calcn protocol

You might find 'molecular silverware' by people at Rohm-Haas (Hass?)
of interest. It was written up in J. Comp. Chem. a few years ago.

Bill Ross

GOUTAM  DAS, Ph.D
BETZDEARBORN (A division of Hercules)
PO BOX 4300, 9669 GROGANS MILL ROAD
THE WOODLANDS, TX 77387-4300
# 281.367.6201 xt 425///email:gammadas@telis.org



From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Wed Jan 13 22:17:34 1999
Received: from csb0.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN (csb0.ipc.pku.edu.cn [162.105.177.12])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with SMTP id WAA22740
        Wed, 13 Jan 1999 22:17:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: by csb0.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN (920330.SGI/940406.SGI.AUTO)
	for CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net id AA24526; Thu, 14 Jan 99 11:15:50 -0800
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 11:15:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Fenglou Mao <mao@csb0.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN>
To: "CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net" <CHEMISTRY@www.ccl.net>
Subject: fasta3 build question.
Message-Id: <Pine.SGI.3.91.990114111355.19966D-100000@csb0.IPC.PKU.EDU.CN>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear all,
   Did anyone build fasta3 in linux(egcs)?
   When I built it, it had some problem in thread? Did anyone have\
experience about it?

Sincerely Yours,

FengLou Mao
*******************************
ADD:Mr. FengLou Mao
    Peking University
    BeiJing
    P.R.China
Tel:86-10-62751490
Fax:86-10-62751725



