From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Fri Apr  9 08:08:12 1999
Received: from ntsvexch.albmolecular.com (mail.albmolecular.com [205.247.153.6])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id IAA19012
        Fri, 9 Apr 1999 08:08:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by Ntsvexch with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1457.3)
	id <1WP5HDR7>; Fri, 9 Apr 1999 08:10:35 -0400
Message-ID: <80F79FF3ECD6D1119D9000805FCC602A309C5C@Ntsvexch>
From: "Andruski, Stephen W." <StephenA@albmolecular.com>
To: "'CCL'" <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: MIF summary
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 08:10:33 -0400
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1457.3)
Content-Type: text/plain


About a month ago I posted a question regarding the MIF format and its
status.  I only received one response from David E. Bernholdt suggesting
CML as a better way to achieve the same goal.  See the CML Web site at
http://www.xml-cml.org/ for more information.  For an example of the use
of the MIF format for computational chemistry see Mark Favas' posting to
CCL on 91/10/15 titled "Comput. chemistry archive/data exchange file
format" in the CCL archives. I am not convinced that CML is a better
solution.  In my mind MIF and CML each have advantages and
disadvantages, and may both be appropriate for different applications.
In either case, it seems there is little active interest in developing
standards.  Software support is also needed in order to clearly show the
utility of these formats and to work out the problems and limitations. 

My original question and the response are listed below.

***************************************************
Original post:
Does anyone out there know the status of the MIF (Molecular Information
File) format.  Searching the CCL archives, the most recent message on
this topic I found was ~1993.  I have searched the Internet and cannot
find any information out there, though a number of years ago the format
specification and preliminary data dictionary were available (I have
copies, but no longer remember whose Web site they were on).  This file
format seems like such a good idea for the archiving and transmittal of
molecular data (MO calculations, MM calculations, multiple
conformations, X-ray data, etc.) in a single file.  Much like the CIF
format now widely used for crystallographic data, the content is
extensible using data dictionaries and could accommodate a large amount
of different data for different uses.

My gut feeling is that no group or Society has taken the lead in
promoting this file format and interest has therefor waned.  Perhaps the
ACS Division of Computers in Chemistry would be an appropriate group to
do this.  

I hope that there is some interest out there.  I will gladly summarize
the responses I get.  Thank you.

Steve Andruski
 *********************************** 
 Dr. Stephen W. Andruski
 Senior Research Chemist II
 Albany Molecular Research, Inc.
 21 Corporate Circle
 Albany, New York 12203 USA
 Tel. (518) 464-0279, Ext. 3303
 Fax (518) 464-0289
 http://www.albmolecular.com
 E-mail:  stephena@albmolecular.com
  ************************************ 
*******************************************************************
Response from David E. Bernholdt:
It strikes me that the "right" way to do something like this these days
is to use XML.  Chemical Markup Language (CML) was one of the very first
XML applications (having started development before XML itself.  It is
certainly not as complete as CIF or (what I recall of) MIF, but it could
be a useful starting point or at least a source of ideas.

I think XML offers a huge potential to standardize the input and output
of many comp. chem. applications -- if people think it is useful enough
to agree to/help develop the standards.
--
David E. Bernholdt                      | Email:  bernhold@npac.syr.edu
Northeast Parallel Architectures Center | Phone:  +1 315 443 3857
111 College Place, Syracuse University  | Fax:    +1 315 443 1973
Syracuse, NY 13244-4100                 | URL:
http://www.npac.syr.edu

************************************************************************
*****



From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Fri Apr  9 08:21:09 1999
Received: from ntsvexch.albmolecular.com (mail.albmolecular.com [205.247.153.6])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id IAA19092
        Fri, 9 Apr 1999 08:21:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by Ntsvexch with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1457.3)
	id <1WP5HDSB>; Fri, 9 Apr 1999 08:23:32 -0400
Message-ID: <80F79FF3ECD6D1119D9000805FCC602A309C5D@Ntsvexch>
From: "Andruski, Stephen W." <StephenA@albmolecular.com>
To: "'CCL'" <chemistry@www.ccl.net>
Subject: Marching Cubes on a PC
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 08:23:31 -0400
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1457.3)
Content-Type: text/plain


Several years ago Stuart Green at the University of Leeds made available
code using the "marching cubes" algorithm to generate surfaces for the
visualization of orbitals, etc. in Rasmol and Chime (see
http:/www.chem.leeds.ac.uk/stuartg/marching/surface.html).  Has anyone
implemented this code on a PC under DOS, Windows 95/98 or NT?

Thanks in advance for any responses.  I'll summarize if there is enough
interest.

Steve Andruski
> *********************************** 
> Dr. Stephen W. Andruski
> Senior Research Chemist II
> Albany Molecular Research, Inc.
> 21 Corporate Circle
> Albany, New York 12203 USA
> Tel. (518) 464-0279, Ext. 3303
> Fax (518) 464-0289
> http://www.albmolecular.com
> E-mail:  stephena@albmolecular.com
>  ************************************ 
> 
> 

From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Fri Apr  9 09:33:45 1999
Received: from pobox.csc.fi (pobox.csc.fi [128.214.46.62])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id JAA20227
        Fri, 9 Apr 1999 09:33:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from voxopm-e.csc.fi (voxopm-e.csc.fi [128.214.46.23])
	by pobox.csc.fi (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5/CSC/Rtrs-1.22) with ESMTP id QAA25194
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Fri, 9 Apr 1999 16:33:42 +0300 (EET DST)
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 16:33:42 +0300
From: Maija Lahtela <mlahtela@csc.fi>
X-Sender: mlahtela@voxopm.minedu.fi
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: Material for teaching comp.chem
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.05.9904091622370.2143-100000@voxopm.minedu.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII


Dear CCL readers,

I have searched some material of computational chemistry (mainly
molecular modeling teaching material and self-learning material) from
internet. I have find some material, but if you know a good source, please
give me a hint, I really appreciate it. I would like which kind of
material courses, exercises, interactive exercises etc. is provided and it
would be available for everyone.

Thanks in advance.

Sincerely Yours,

Maija Lahtela-Kakkonen

***************************************
Maija Lahtela-Kakkonen
Researcher
CSC-Center for Scientific Computing
Tekniikantie 15 a D
P.O.Box 405
FIN-02101 ESPOO FINLAND
TEL 358-9-4572079
FAX 358-9-4572302
E-MAIL mlahtela@csc.fi
***************************************


From chemistry-request@www.ccl.net  Fri Apr  9 10:48:26 1999
Received: from titus.u-strasbg.fr (titus.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.79.10])
        by www.ccl.net (8.8.3/8.8.6/OSC/CCL 1.0) with ESMTP id KAA21087
        Fri, 9 Apr 1999 10:48:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from igbmc.u-strasbg.fr (zinfandel [130.79.79.230])
	by titus.u-strasbg.fr (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA22774;
	Fri, 9 Apr 1999 16:54:32 +0200 (MET DST)
Sender: calimet@titus.u-strasbg.fr
Message-ID: <370E676E.67B11905@igbmc.u-strasbg.fr>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 20:47:42 +0000
From: Nicolas Calimet <calimet@titus.u-strasbg.fr>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@www.ccl.net
Subject: What's the latest UHBD version ?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


	Hello,

	I started to use UHBD ver 6.1.exp about two months ago
to perform PB molecular dynamics. I got the distribution from
somebody in my lab, and I'm wondering whether it's the latest
release or not. Mainly, I'd like to know if the surface forces
(hydrophobic contribution) have been actually implemented, as
written in the docs but seemingly not in the source code.
Furthermore, as any experimental version, this one reveals
some problems concerning several options of the 'md' command,
sometimes leading to crash -- again in the distribution I have.
I guess I've fixed some of them, say the ones usefull for me.
But it's worthless if there is a new version available...

	Any information/help would be greatly appreciate !
	Thanks,

	Nicolas Calimet, PhD student
	IGBMC - University of Strasbourg - France
	calimet@igbmc.u-strasbg.fr

