From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Thu Jul  1 04:01:10 1999
Received: from gwdu12.gwdg.de (gwdu42.gwdg.de [134.76.10.26])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id EAA31304
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 04:01:09 -0400
Received: from taurus.uni-oc.gwdg.de ([134.76.66.164] helo=gwdg.de)
	by gwdu12.gwdg.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 10zbiY-0006zR-00
	for chemistry@ccl.net; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 09:57:10 +0200
Sender: crinders@gwdg.de
Message-ID: <377B3B5E.56C049B1@gwdg.de>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 09:56:46 +0000
From: Christopher Rinderspacher <crinder1@gwdg.de>
Organization: Institut der Org. Chemie der 
	=?iso-8859-1?Q?Universit=E4t=20G=F6ttingen?=
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.6 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Imaginary Components of wavefunctions
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 
 Hi,
 
  I would like to get the imaginary component of a solution to the
 Schroedinger equation. I am working with Gaussian(98) and can't find
any
 references anywhere. I would appreciate any help on how to obtain them
 (G98 or any other program). Thanks,
 
         Christopher

-- 
Christopher Rinderspacher
Institut fuer Organische Chemie
Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen
Tammannstr. 2
37077 Goettingen
crinder1@gwdg.de
From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Thu Jul  1 06:09:18 1999
Received: from mserv.rug.ac.be (mserv.rug.ac.be [157.193.40.37])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA32654
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 06:09:18 -0400
Received: from elptrs3.rug.ac.be (elptrs3.rug.ac.be [157.193.113.1])
	by mserv.rug.ac.be (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id MAA16353
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 12:05:30 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from lptpc66.rug.ac.be by elptrs3.rug.ac.be (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA15094; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 12:08:32 +0100
Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 12:08:20 +0200
Message-Id: <01BEC3BA.693AFF00.mark.saeys@rug.ac.be>
From: Mark Saeys <mark.saeys@rug.ac.be>
To: "'chemistry@ccl.net'" <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Hindered-rotor option and transition states in g98
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 12:08:19 +0200
Organization: Universiteit Gent
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet-e-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dear all,

When I tried using the Freq=HinderedRot keyword in Gaussian 98 for a 
transition state geometry, which I read from a checkpoint-file, g98 stopped 
and gave the following error:

 Low frequencies --- -374.5162  -20.3673  -12.8460   -0.0009   -0.0008 
  -0.0002
 Low frequencies ---    4.0589   91.5939  216.9199
 ******    1 imaginary frequencies (negative Signs) ******
           Hindered Internal Rotation Analysis
 Internal coordinate list checked
 Check for planar centers
    1         2         4         5      359.873
 Check reduced barrier height. Cut-off : V/RT =    33.7559
 Check for ring deformation
 Number of internal rotation degrees of freedom =   1
 NNew=   20 NTest=    1 NB=    5 IFrz=    0 IBar=    0 ICyc=    0
  Problem with the number of degrees of freedom
 Error termination via Lnk1e in /usr/people/soft/g98/l716.exe.

When I do a Freq calculation without HinderedRot the calculation terminates 
normally. Is it not possible to use Freq=HinderedRot for a transition 
state?

  Thanks,

Mark Saeys
Universiteit Gent



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Thu Jul  1 10:53:38 1999
Received: from mail.chemie.fu-berlin.de (root@mail.chemie.fu-berlin.de [160.45.24.23])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA03927
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 10:53:35 -0400
Received: from ki1.chemie.fu-berlin.de([160.45.24.21]) (2028 bytes) by mail.chemie.fu-berlin.de
	via sendmail with P:smtp/R:bind_hosts/T:inet_zone_bind_smtp
	(sender: <rabe@chemie.fu-berlin.de>) 
	id <m10zi9o-000CFGC@mail.chemie.fu-berlin.de>
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 16:49:44 +0200 (CEST)
	(Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #18 built 1999-Feb-17)
Received: by ki1.chemie.fu-berlin.de (Smail3.2.0.98)
	  from chemie.fu-berlin.de (160.45.24.178) with esmtp
	  id <m10zi9j-0000XuC>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 16:49:39 +0200 (MEST)
Sender: rabe@ccl.net
Message-ID: <377B8002.4E4BEF39@chemie.fu-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 16:49:38 +0200
From: Bjoern Rabenstein <rabe@chemie.fu-berlin.de>
Organization: Freie Universitaet Berlin, Germany
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.9 i686)
X-Accept-Language: de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Computational Chemistry Mailing List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Compiling Rasmol for Linux
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi!

Has anybody managed to compile rasmol on Linux 2.2.x with egcs?

We have just tried to compile Rasmol26b2 (and also Rasmol26b1) and got
the following error message:
rasmol.c:46: sys/termio.h: No such file or directory

We simply tried to link /usr/include/sys/termio.h to
/usr/include/termio.h.
Then we got the following error messages:

rasmol.c: In function `OpenConnection':
rasmol.c:329: invalid use of undefined type `struct fd_set'
rasmol.c: In function `CloseConnection':
rasmol.c:345: invalid use of undefined type `struct fd_set'
rasmol.c: In function `InitTerminal':
rasmol.c:392: invalid use of undefined type `struct fd_set'
rasmol.c:392: invalid use of undefined type `struct fd_set'
rasmol.c:393: invalid use of undefined type `struct fd_set'
rasmol.c:399: invalid use of undefined type `struct fd_set'
rasmol.c:409: invalid use of undefined type `struct fd_set'
[...]

What's the trick here?

Thanks for any help!
-- 
__ \__\__ \ Bjoern Rabenstein * PhD student * Freie Universitaet Berlin
__\___\__\_\ Inst. f. Kristallographie * Takustrasse 6 * D-14195 Berlin
  \   \  \ \\ [email] rabe@chemie.fu-berlin.de  [phone] +49-30-838-3484
[WWW] http://userpage.chemie.fu-berlin.de/~rabe/  [fax] +49-30-838-3464
From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Thu Jul  1 11:08:18 1999
Received: from phare.univ-lille2.fr (root@phare.univ-lille2.fr [193.51.138.40])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA04102
	for <chemistry@server.ccl.net>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 11:08:17 -0400
Received: from icpl6 (icpl6.univ-lille2.fr [193.51.138.127])
	by phare.univ-lille2.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA14800
	for <chemistry@www.ccl.net>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 16:01:35 +0200
Message-ID: <002301bec3d2$99d25740$7f8a33c1@icpl6.univ-lille2.fr>
Reply-To: "Philippe CHAVATTE" <pchavatt@phare.univ-lille2.fr>
From: "Philippe CHAVATTE" <pchavatt@phare.univ-lille2.fr>
To: "CCL" <chemistry@server.ccl.net>
Subject: Proteins comparison
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 17:01:29 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4

Dear CCLers,

What is the best methodology to compare two protein 3D structures (pdb
format) ?
What criteria permit to affirm their similarity ?
Many thanks for your help.

Philippe
-----------------

Philippe CHAVATTE
Institut de Chimie Pharmaceutique Albert Lespagnol
BP 83
59006 LILLE CEDEX
FRANCE

E-Mail : pchavatt@phare.univ-lille2.fr



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Thu Jul  1 12:27:45 1999
Received: from illinois.ncifcrf.gov (illinois.NCIFCRF.GOV [129.43.6.38])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA04738
	for <chemistry@server.ccl.net>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 12:27:45 -0400
Received: from localhost (huzj@localhost) by illinois.ncifcrf.gov (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id MAA83987; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 12:23:43 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 12:23:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Zeng-Jian Hu <huzj@illinois.ncifcrf.gov>
To: Philippe CHAVATTE <pchavatt@phare.univ-lille2.fr>
cc: CCL <chemistry@server.ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:Proteins comparison
In-Reply-To: <002301bec3d2$99d25740$7f8a33c1@icpl6.univ-lille2.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.96.990701122124.76152a-100000@illinois.ncifcrf.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hi, Philippe,

Just see:

http://protein3d.ncifcrf.gov/tsai/

Hope it helpful to you.

-----------------------------------------------------
Zengjian Hu
Laboratory of Experimental and Computational Biology   
NCI-FCRDC, Building 469, Room 151
Frederick, MD 21702-1201, USA          
Ph#  301-846-5580
Fax# 301-846-5598
E-mail: huzj@illinois.ncifcrf.GOV
-----------------------------------------------------

On Thu, 1 Jul 1999, Philippe CHAVATTE wrote:

> Dear CCLers,
> 
> What is the best methodology to compare two protein 3D structures (pdb
> format) ?
> What criteria permit to affirm their similarity ?
> Many thanks for your help.
> 
> Philippe
> -----------------
> 
> Philippe CHAVATTE
> Institut de Chimie Pharmaceutique Albert Lespagnol
> BP 83
> 59006 LILLE CEDEX
> FRANCE
> 
> E-Mail : pchavatt@phare.univ-lille2.fr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody    |   CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Thu Jul  1 13:42:33 1999
Received: from lucia.u.arizona.edu (mcafiero@lucia.U.Arizona.EDU [128.196.137.26])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA05731
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 13:42:31 -0400
Received: from localhost (mcafiero@localhost)
	by lucia.u.arizona.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA48148;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 10:38:30 -0700
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 10:38:30 -0700 (MST)
From: Mauricio L Cafiero <mcafiero@U.Arizona.EDU>
To: Christopher Rinderspacher <crinder1@gwdg.de>
cc: chemistry@ccl.net
Subject: Re: CCL:Imaginary Components of wavefunctions
In-Reply-To: <377B3B5E.56C049B1@gwdg.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.10.9907011032350.37930-100000@lucia.u.arizona.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hello:
	Exactly what do you mean by the imaginary component? The
wavefunctions given by Gaussian (approximate solutions of the Shrodinger
equation) are defined in terms of real functions (that is, real basis
sets). The angular dependence is given by powers of x, y and z in front of
the cartesian gaussian basis functions. 

========================================================================
Mauricio Cafiero
University of Arizona
Department of Chemistry


On Thu, 1 Jul 1999, Christopher Rinderspacher wrote:

>  
>  Hi,
>  
>   I would like to get the imaginary component of a solution to the
>  Schroedinger equation. I am working with Gaussian(98) and can't find
> any
>  references anywhere. I would appreciate any help on how to obtain them
>  (G98 or any other program). Thanks,
>  
>          Christopher
> 
> -- 
> Christopher Rinderspacher
> Institut fuer Organische Chemie
> Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen
> Tammannstr. 2
> 37077 Goettingen
> crinder1@gwdg.de
> 
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody    |   CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Thu Jul  1 14:27:03 1999
Received: from mailbox.syr.edu (root@mailbox.syr.edu [128.230.18.5])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA06122
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 14:27:03 -0400
Received: from syr.edu (curie.syr.edu [128.230.187.116])
	by mailbox.syr.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA24374
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 14:23:11 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: desingh@mailbox.syr.edu
Message-ID: <377BB340.9633597A@syr.edu>
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 14:28:17 -0400
From: Deepak Singh <desingh@syr.edu>
Organization: Dept. of Chem & Biochem, Syracuse University
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.07C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX64 6.5 IP30)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Heat of formation and stationary points
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello again,

I have been running MOPAC calculations on systems with 2 or more
molecules (not bonded to each other).  I have noticed something
interesting.  When I do not constrain anything, the SCF calculation goes
along fine.  However when I constrain 2 or more  atoms, I almost always
have my Heats of Formation eventually becoming self consistent, but not
my gradiets and the arc file reports that although the SCF has been
achieved, the geometry is not at a stationary point.  What does this
mean, especially in a physical sense?

Regards

Deepak.



--
**********************************************************************
Deepak Singh                        Tel : (315)443 1739 (w)
Graduate Student                          (315)472 9659 (h)
Dept. of Chemistry                Fax : (315)443 4070
Syracuse University               email : desingh@syr.edu
1-014 CST, Syracuse               URL : http://web.syr.edu/~desingh
NY 13244

"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." --- Salvor Hardin
**********************************************************************



From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Thu Jul  1 14:44:50 1999
Received: from lucia.u.arizona.edu (mcafiero@lucia.U.Arizona.EDU [128.196.137.26])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA06289
	for <chemistry@ccl.net>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 14:44:50 -0400
Received: from localhost (mcafiero@localhost)
	by lucia.u.arizona.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA37124;
	Thu, 1 Jul 1999 11:40:57 -0700
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 11:40:56 -0700 (MST)
From: Mauricio L Cafiero <mcafiero@U.Arizona.EDU>
To: Deepak Singh <desingh@syr.edu>
cc: Computational Chemistry List <chemistry@ccl.net>
Subject: Re: CCL:Heat of formation and stationary points
In-Reply-To: <377BB340.9633597A@syr.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.10.9907011135220.43120-100000@lucia.u.arizona.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hello:
	A geometry optimization finds a minimum based on the gradients
with respect to atomic coordinates. When you constrain any atoms, the
optimization cannnot find a true minimum, and hence your total gradient
will not become very small. 
	So your gradients do not converge because you do not reach the
minimum and you do not reach the minimum because you have constrained
atoms. The SCF will work at any geometry, so you can find an energy at
that non-optimum geometry.

========================================================================
Mauricio Cafiero
University of Arizona
Department of Chemistry 




On Thu, 1 Jul 1999, Deepak Singh wrote:

> Hello again,
> 
> I have been running MOPAC calculations on systems with 2 or more
> molecules (not bonded to each other).  I have noticed something
> interesting.  When I do not constrain anything, the SCF calculation goes
> along fine.  However when I constrain 2 or more  atoms, I almost always
> have my Heats of Formation eventually becoming self consistent, but not
> my gradiets and the arc file reports that although the SCF has been
> achieved, the geometry is not at a stationary point.  What does this
> mean, especially in a physical sense?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Deepak.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> **********************************************************************
> Deepak Singh                        Tel : (315)443 1739 (w)
> Graduate Student                          (315)472 9659 (h)
> Dept. of Chemistry                Fax : (315)443 4070
> Syracuse University               email : desingh@syr.edu
> 1-014 CST, Syracuse               URL : http://web.syr.edu/~desingh
> NY 13244
> 
> "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." --- Salvor Hardin
> **********************************************************************
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -= This is automatically added to each message by mailing script =-
> CHEMISTRY@ccl.net -- To Everybody    |   CHEMISTRY-REQUEST@ccl.net -- To Admins
> MAILSERV@ccl.net -- HELP CHEMISTRY or HELP SEARCH
> CHEMISTRY-SEARCH@ccl.net -- archive search    |    Gopher: gopher.ccl.net 70
> Ftp: ftp.ccl.net  |  WWW: http://www.ccl.net/chemistry/   | Jan: jkl@ccl.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

From chemistry-request@server.ccl.net  Thu Jul  1 18:38:32 1999
Received: from scriptgen.com (smtp.scriptgen.com [216.47.36.98])
	by server.ccl.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA08280
	for <CHEMISTRY@ccl.net>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 18:38:31 -0400
Received: from scriptgen.com ([192.168.12.6]) by gateway.scriptgen.com with ESMTP id <115202>; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 18:36:04 -0400
Received: from diversity (192.168.12.152) by scriptgen.com with SMTP (Eudora
 Internet Mail Server 2.2.2); Thu, 1 Jul 1999 18:37:08 -0400
Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990701183712.009b6d10@pop.scriptgen.com>
X-Sender: aarvanites@pop.scriptgen.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32)
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 18:37:12 -0400
To: CHEMISTRY@ccl.net
From: Anthony Arvanites <aarvanites@scriptgen.com>
Subject: CCL: Natural Product Databases
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hello CCL:

I am very interested in finding out if there are any databases of natural
products in an electronic format (SD file, etc.) that I could examine.  I
realize that some dictionaries of natural products do not exist as an SD
file. I would like to perform advanced searches on a natural product
database using for example MDL technology. Any information regarding this
issue is greatly appreciated.  I will summarize the answers received.

Thank you

Anthony Arvanites

Anthony Arvanites
Compound Distribution Manager
Assistant Scientist
SCRIPTGEN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
610 Lincon St.
Waltham, MA 02451
(781) 522-5082
fax: (781) 768-0040
e-mail: aarvanites@scriptgen.com
